Answer me these questions three: Using online training to improve students’ oral source citations

References

• Angélil-Carter, S. (2000). Stolen language?: Plagiarism in writing. Harlow, UK: Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Angus, S. D., & Watson, J. (2009). Does regular online testing enhance student learning in the numerical sciences? Robust evidence from a large data set. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40(2), 255–272. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2008.00916.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Artino, A. R. (2008). Motivational beliefs and perceptions of instructional quality: Predicting satisfaction with online training. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 24(3), 260–270. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2007.00258.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashworth, P., Bannister, P., Thorne, P., & Students on the Qualitative Research Method Course Unit. (1997). Guilty in whose eyes? University students’ perceptions of cheating and plagiarism in academic work and assessment. Studies in Higher Education, 22(2), 187–203. doi:10.1080/03075079712331381034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avanzino, S. (2010). Starting from scratch and getting somewhere: Assessment of oral communication proficiency in general education across lower and upper division courses. Communication Teacher, 24, 91–110. doi:10.1080/17404621003680898
   Google Scholar
• Barry, E. S. (2006). Can paraphrasing practice help students define plagiarism? College Student Journal, 40, 377–384.
   Google Scholar
• Behnke, R. R., & King, P. E. (1984). Computerized speech criticism. Communication Education, 33(2), 173–177. doi:10.1080/03634528409384735
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beidler, K., & Panton, L. (2013). Incorporating the virtual into the physical classroom: Online mastery quizzes as a blended assessment strategy. The Journal of Interactive Technology & Pedagogy, 3. Retrieved from http://jitp.commons.gc.cuny.edu/incorporating-the-virtual-into-the-physical-classroom-online-mastery-quizzes-as-a-blended-assessment-strategy/
   Google Scholar
• Belter, R. W., & du Pré, A. (2009). A strategy to reduce plagiarism in an undergraduate course. Teaching of Psychology, 36, 257–261. doi:10.1080/00986280903173165
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Block, J. H., & Anderson, L. W. (1975). Mastery learning in classroom instruction. New York: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Bloom, B. S. (1968). Learning for mastery. Evaluation Comment, 1(2), 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, V. J., & Howell, M. E. (2001). The efficacy of policy statements on plagiarism: Do they change students’ views? Research in Higher Education, 42(1), 103–118. doi:10.1023/A:1018720728840
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buerkle, C. W., Gearhart, C. C., & Oliveira, C. M. (in press). According to, student motivations…: A theory of planned behavior investigation of students' intention to orally cite sources. Communication Reports.
   Google Scholar
• Buerkel-Rothfuss, N. L., Gray, P. L., & Yerby, J. (1993). The structured model of competency-based instruction. Communication Education, 42(1), 22–36. doi:10.1080/03634529309378910
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buranen, L. (2009). A safe place: The role of librarians and writing centers in addressing citation practices and plagiarism. Knowledge Quest, 37(3), 24–33.
   Google Scholar
• Caldwell, E. C., Bissonnettee, K., Klishis, M. J., Ripley, M., Farudi, P. P., Hochstetter, G. T., & Radiker, J. E. (1978). Mastery: The essential essential in PSI. Teaching of Psychology, 5(2), 59–65. doi:10.1207/s15328023top0502_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curtis, G. J., Gouldthorp, B., Thomas, E. F., O'Brien, G. M., & Correia, H. M. (2013). Online academic-integrity mastery training may improve students’ awareness of, and attitudes toward, plagiarism. Psychology Learning & Teaching, 12(3), 282–289. doi:10.2304/plat.2013.12.3.282
   Google Scholar
• Dodou, D., & de Winter, J. C. (2011). Why students’ plagiarism is such a persistent phenomenon: A literature review and empirical study. In J. Bernardino & J. C. Quadrado (Eds.), Proceedings from the 1st world engineering education flash week, SEFI annual conference, Lisbon 2011: Global engineering recognition, sustainability, mobility (pp. 776–783). Retrieved from http://www.sefi.be/wp-content/papers2011/T14/192.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Dubner, F. S., & Mills, F. O. (1984). Triplespeak: A teaching technique to multiply successful speech performance. Communication Education, 33, 168–172. doi:10.1080/03634528409384734
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellery, K. (2008). Undergraduate plagiarism: A pedagogical perspective. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 33, 507–516. doi:10.1080/02602930701562981
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eyre, H. L. (2007). Keller's personalized system of instruction: Was it a fleeting fancy or is there a revival on the horizon? The Behavior Analyst Today, 8(3), 317–324. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0100623
   Google Scholar
• Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A. G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. doi:10.3758/bf03193146
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franklyn-Stokes, A., & Newstead, S. E. (1995). Undergraduate cheating: Who does what and why? Studies in Higher Education, 20, 159–172. doi:10.1080/03075079512331381673
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Genereux, R. L., & McLeod, B. A. (1995). Circumstances surrounding cheating: A questionnaire study of college students. Research in Higher Education, 36(6), 687–704. doi:10.1007/BF02208251
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grant, L. K., & Spencer, R. E. (2003). The personalized system of instruction: Review and applications to distance education. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 4(2), 1–12. doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v4i2.152
   Google Scholar
• Gray, P. L., Buerkel-Rothfuss, N. L., & Yerby, J. (1986). A comparison between PSI-based and lecture-recitation formats of instruction in the introductory speech communication course. Communication Education, 35(2), 111–125. doi:10.1080/03634528609388329
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guertin, L. (2005). Using virtual lectures to educate students on plagiarism. First Monday, 10(9). Retrieved from http://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/1277/1197 doi: 10.5210/fm.v10i9.1277
   Google Scholar
• Hagerty, G., Smith, S., & Goodwin, D. (2010). Redesigning college algebra: Combining educational theory and web-based learning to improve student attitudes and performance. Primus, 20(5), 418–437. doi:10.1080/10511970802354527
   Google Scholar
• Hale, J. L. (1987). Plagiarism in classroom settings. Communication Research Reports, 4(2), 66–70.
   Google Scholar
• Howard, R. M. (1992). A plagiarism pentimento. Journal of Teaching Writing, 11(3), 233–246.
   Google Scholar
• Howard, R. M. (1995). Plagiarisms, authorships, and the academic death penalty. College English, 57(7), 788–806. doi:10.2307/378403
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keller, F. S. (1968). Good-bye, teacher … . Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1(1), 79–89. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1968.1-79
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, P. E., Young, M. J., & Behnke, R. R. (2000). Public speaking performance improvement as a function of information processing in immediate and delayed feedback interventions. Communication Education, 49(4), 365–374. doi:10.1080/03634520009379224
   Google Scholar
• Kinsner, W., & Pear, J. J. (1988). Computer-aided personalized system of instruction for the virtual classroom. Canadian Journal of Educational Communication, 17, 21–36.
   Google Scholar
• Kreiner, D. S. (2006). A mastery-based approach to teaching statistics online. International Journal of Instructional Media, 33(1), 73. doi:10.1037/e413812005-735
   Google Scholar
• Kulik, C. L. C., Kulik, J. A., & Bangert-Drowns, R. L. (1990). Effectiveness of mastery learning programs: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 60(2), 265–299. doi:10.3102/00346543060002265
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kulik, J. A., Kulik, C. L. C., & Cohen, P. A. (1979). A meta-analysis of outcome studies of Keller's personalized system of instruction. American Psychologist, 34(4), 307–318. doi:10.1037/0003-066x.34.4.307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landau, J. D., Druen, P. B., & Arcuri, J. A. (2002). Methods for helping students avoid plagiarism. Teaching of Psychology, 29, 112–115. doi:10.1207/S15328023TOP2902_06
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, L. M., Nagel, R. W., & Gould, D. J. (2012). The educational value of online mastery quizzes in a human anatomy course for first-year dental students. Journal of Dental Education, 76(9), 1195–1199.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leinhardt, G., & Young, K. M. (1998). Writing from primary documents: A way of knowing in history. Written Communication, 15(1), 25–68. doi:10.1177/0741088398015001002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liefeld, J. P., & Herrmann, T. F. (1990). Learning consequences for university students using computerized mastery testing. Educational Technology Research and Development, 38(2), 19–25. doi:10.1007/bf02298266
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maki, W. S., & Maki, R. H. (2001). Mastery quizzes on the web: Results from a web-based introductory psychology course. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 33(2), 212–216. doi:10.3758/bf03195367
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McCroskey, J. C. (1969). A summary of experimental research on the effects of evidence in persuasive communication. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 55(2), 169–176. doi:10.1080/00335636909382942
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGregor, J. H. (1994). Cognitive processes and the use of information: A qualitative study of higher order thinking skills used in the research process by students. School Library Media Annual, 12, 124–133.
   Google Scholar
• McGregor, J. H., & Streitenberger, D. C. (1998). Do scribes learn? Copying and information use. School Library Media Quarterly, 40. Retrieved from http://www.ala.org/aasl/sites/ala.org.aasl/files/content/aaslpubsandjournals/slr/vol1/SLMR_DoScribesLearn_V1.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Menzel, K. E., & Carrell, L. J. (1994). The relationship between preparation and performance in public speaking. Communication Education, 43, 17–26. doi:10.1080/03634529409378958
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Communication Association. (1999). NCA credo for ethical communication. Retrieved from http://www.natcom.org/uploadedFiles/About_NCA/Leadership_and_Governance/Public_Policy_Platform/PDF-PolicyPlatform-NCA_Credo_for_Ethical_Communication.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Overbey, G. A. U., & Guiling, S. F. (1999). Student perceptions of plagiarism and the evaluation of assignments. Journal on Excellence in College Teaching, 10(3), 3–22.
   Google Scholar
• Owens, C., & White, F. A. (2013). A 5-year systematic strategy to reduce plagiarism among first-year psychology university students. Australian Journal of Psychology, 65(1), 14–21. doi:10.1111/ajpy.12005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pear, J. J., Schnerch, G. J., Silva, K. M., Svenningsen, L., & Lambert, J. (2011). Web-based computer-aided personalized system of instruction. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2011, 85–94. doi:10.1002/tl.471
   Google Scholar
• Pearson, J. C., Child, J. T., & Kahl, D. H. Jr. (2006). Preparation meeting opportunity: How do college students prepare for public speeches? Communication Quarterly, 54, 351–366. doi:10.1080/01463370600878321
   Google Scholar
• Pearson, J. C., Child, J. T., Mattern, J. L., & Kahl, D. H. Jr. (2006). What are students being taught about ethics in public speaking textbooks? Communication Quarterly, 54, 507–521. doi:10.1080/01463370601036689
   Google Scholar
• Quigley, B. L., & Nyquist, J. D. (1992). Using video technology to provide feedback to students in performance courses. Communication Education, 41, 324–334. doi:10.1080/03634529209378892
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reinard, J. C. (1988). The empirical study of the persuasive effects of evidence: The status after fifty years of research. Human Communication Research, 15(1), 3–59. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.1988.tb00170.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Risquez, A., O'Dwyer, M., & Ledwith, A. (2011). Technology enhanced learning and plagiarism in entrepreneurship education. Education + Training, 53(8/9), 750–761. doi:10.1108/00400911111185062
   Google Scholar
• Roig, M. (1997). Can undergraduate students determine whether text has been plagiarized? The Psychological Record, 47, 133–122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuetze, P. (2004). Evaluation of a brief homework assignment designed to reduce citation problems. Teaching of Psychology, 31, 257–262. doi:10.1207/s15328023top3104_6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seiler, W. J. (1983). PSI: An attractive alternative for the basic speech communication course. Communication Education, 32(1), 15–25. doi:10.1080/03634528309378510
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seiler, W. J., & Fuss-Reineck, M. (1986). Developing the personalized system of instruction for the basic speech communication course. Communication Education, 35(2), 126–133. doi:10.1080/03634528609388330
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi, L. (2008). Textual appropriation and citing behaviors of university undergraduates. Applied Linguistics, 31, 1–24. doi:10.1093/applin/amn045
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, C. D., & King, P. E. (2004). Student feedback sensitivity and the efficacy of feedback interventions in public speaking performance improvement. Communication Education, 53, 203–216. doi:10.1080/0363452042000265152
   Google Scholar
• Smith, T. E., & Frymier, A. B. (2006). Get ‘real’: Does practicing speeches before an audience improve performance? Communication Quarterly, 54, 111–125. doi:10.1080/01463370500270538
   Google Scholar
• Spitzberg, B. H., & Cupach, W. R. (1984). Interpersonal communication competence (Vol. 4). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Staton-Spicer, A. Q., & Bassett, R. E. (1980). A mastery learning approach to competency-based education for public speaking instruction. Communication Education, 29(2), 171–182. doi:10.1080/03634528009378408
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone, T. H., Jawahar, I., & Kisamore, J. L. (2009). Using the theory of planned behavior and cheating justifications to predict academic misconduct. Career Development International, 14(3), 221–241. doi:10.1108/13620430910966415
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taveggia, T. C. (1976). Personalized instruction: A summary of comparative research, 1967–1974. American Journal of Physics, 44(11), 1028–1033. http://dx.doi.org/10.1119/1.10579
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, C. (2005). ‘Authority is everything’: A study of the politics of textual ownership and knowledge in the formation of student writer identities. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 1(1). Retrieved from http://www.ojs.unisa.edu.au/index.php/IJEI/article/viewFile/18/8
   Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, J. (2009). Staff and student perceptions of plagiarism and cheating. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 20(2), 98–105.
   Google Scholar