https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7824-3788
References and suggested readings
- Collier, M. J. (2005). Theorizing cultural identification: Critical updates and continuing evolution. In W. B. Gudykunst (Ed.), Theorizing about intercultural communication (pp. 235–256). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- Evans, N. J., & Broido, E. M. (2002). The experiences of lesbian and bisexual women in college residence halls: Implications for addressing homophobia and heterosexism. In E. P. Cramer (Ed.), Addressing homophobia and heterosexism on college campuses (pp. 29–42). Binghamton, NY: Harrington Park Press.
- Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
- Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224–253. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.98.2.224
- Martin, J. N., & Nakayama, T. K. (2018). Intercultural communication in contexts (7th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw Hill.
- Sue, D. W. (2010). Microaggressions in everyday life: Race, gender, and sexual orientation. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
- Sue, D. W., Capodilupo, C. M., Torino, G. C., Bucceri, J. M., Holder, A. M. B., Nadal, K. L., & Esquilin, M. (2007). Racial microaggressions in everyday life: Implications for clinical practice. American Psychologist, 62, 271–286. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.62.4.271
- Tajfel, H., & Turner, C. J. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In L. Worchel & W. Austin (Eds.), The psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7–24). Chicago, IL: Nelson Hall.
- Ting-Toomey, S. (2005). Identity negotiation theory: Crossing cultural boundaries. In W. B. Gudykunst (Ed.), Theorizing about intercultural communication (pp. 211–233). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- Ting-Toomey, S. (2010). Applying dimensional values in understanding intercultural communication. Communication Monographs, 77, 169–180. doi: 10.1080/03637751003790428
- Young, K., Anderson, M., & Stewart, S. (2015). Hierarchical microaggressions in higher education. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 8, 61–71. doi: 10.1037/a0038464