Stories and voices: Engaging community differences by designing a deliberative public dialogue

References and suggested readings

• Aakus, M. (2007). Communication as design. Communication Monographs, 74(1), 112–117. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637750701196383
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abdullah, C., Karpowitz, C. F., & Raphael, C. (2016). Equality and equity in deliberation: Introduction to the special issue. Journal of Public Deliberation, 12(2), Article 1. https://www.publicdeliberation.net/jpd/vol12/iss2/art1 DOI: http://doi.org/10.16997/jdd.253/
   Google Scholar
• Black, L. W. (2008). Deliberation, storytelling, and dialogic moments. Communication Theory, 18(1), 93–116. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2007.00315.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blithe, S. J. (2016). Teaching intercultural communication through service-learning. Communication Teacher, 30(3), 165–171. https://doi.org/10.1080/17404622.2016.1192666
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Botticelli, M. P., & Koh, H. K. (2016). Changing the language of addiction. Journal of American Medical Association, 316(13), 1361–1362. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2016.11874
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carcasson, M. (2017). Deliberative pedagogy as critical connective: Building democratic mind-sets and skill sets for addressing wicked problems. In T. J. Shaffer, N. V. Longo, I. D., & M. M. St. Thomas (Eds.), Deliberative pedagogy: Teaching and learning for democratic engagement (pp. 3–20). East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cooperrider, D., & Whitney, D. (2005). Appreciative inquiry, a positive revolution in change. Berrett-Koehler Publishers, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Dillard, K. N. (2013). Envisioning the role of facilitation in public deliberation. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 41(3), 217–235. https://doi.org/10.1080/00909882.2013.826813
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Driskill, G. W. (2007). Internationalizing the campus through an intercultural assignment. Communication Teacher, 21(1), 6–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/17404620701211485
   Google Scholar
• Escobar, O. (2011). Public dialogue and deliberation: A communication perspective for public engagement practitioners. UK Beacons for Public Engagement. https://www.ed.ac.uk/files/imports/fileManager/eResearch_Oliver%20Escobar.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Gastil, J., Knobloch, K., & Kelly, M. (2012). Evaluating deliberative public event, and projects. In T. Nabatchi, J. Gastil, G. M. Wiksner, & M. Leighninger (Eds.), Democracy in motion: Evaluating the practice and impact of deliberative civic engagement (pp. 205–232). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hanasono, L. K. (2017). Making a difference: A community-based campaign that promotes diversity and inclusion. Communication Teacher, 31(1), 27–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/17404622.2016.1244348
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heath, R. G. (2010). The community collaboration stakeholder project. Communication Teacher, 24(4), 215–220. https://doi.org/10.1080/17404622.2010.513001
   Google Scholar
• Heath, R. G., & Isbell, M. (2015). Broadening organizational communication curricula: Collaboration as key to 21st century organizing. Management Communication Quarterly, 29(2), 309–314. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318915571351
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jack, A. A. (2019 The privileged poor. Harvard Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lahman, M. (2012). Appreciative inquiry: Guided reflection to generate change in service-learning courses. Communication Teacher, 26(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1080/17404622.2011.625362
   Google Scholar
• Linvill, D. L., & Pyle, A. S. (2017). Inquiry-based civil discourse education. Communication Teacher, 31(4), 214–219. https://doi.org/10.1080/17404622.2017.1358382
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lukensmeyer, C., & Brigham, S. (2005). Taking democracy to scale: Large scale interventions—or citizens. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 41(1), 47–60. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886304272656
   Google Scholar
• Martinez, S. P. (2004). Informative connections: Enhancing public speaking assignments with service learning. Communication Teacher, 18(1), 23–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/1740462032000142158
   Google Scholar
• Nagda, B. (2006). Breaking barriers, crossing borders, building bridges: Communication processes in intergroup dialogues. Journal of Social Issues, 62(3), 553–576. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.2006.00473.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramasubramanian, S., & Wolfe, A. (2020, Nov 2). The promise and perils of interracial dialogue. Spectra. https://www.natcom.org/spectra/promise-and-perilsinterracial-dialogue
   Google Scholar
• Reinig, L., & Sprain, L. (2019). Note-taking as communication design: Promoting democratic processes. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 47(6), 648–666. https://doi.org/10.1080/00909882.2019.1690667
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryfe, D. M., & Stalsburg, B. (2012). The participation and recruitment challenge. In T. Nabatchi, J. Gastil, G. M. Weiksner, & M. Leighninger (Eds.), Democracy in motion: Evaluating the practice and impact of deliberative civic engagement (pp. 43–58). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Salazar, L. R. (2015). The challenge of allowing everyone’s voice to be heard: Introducing civil dialogue in public speaking courses. Communication Teacher, 29(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1080/17404622.2014.985594
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smithberger, L. K. (2016). Framing the public discourse across time: National issues forums guides on immigration in the U.S. (1986–2013). Journal of Public Deliberation, 12(1).
   Google Scholar
• Spada, P., & Vreeland, J. R. (2013). Who moderates the moderators? The effect of non-neutral moderators in deliberative decision making. Journal of Public Deliberation, 9(2), Article 3, 1–31. http://www.publicdeliberation.net/jpd/vol9/iss2/art3S DOI: http://doi.org/10.16997/jdd.165
   Google Scholar
• Sprain, L., Carcasson, M., & Merolla, A. (2014). Utilizing “on tap” experts in deliberative forums: Implications for design. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 42(2), 150–167. https://doi.org/10.1080/00909882.2013.859292
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steimel, S. J. (2013). Community partners’ assessment of service learning in an interpersonal and small group communication course. Communication Teacher, 27(4), 241–255. https://doi.org/10.1080/17404622.2013.798017
   Google Scholar
• Swenson-Lepper, T. (2012). ‘Community’ as a guiding theme for the public speaking course. Communication Teacher, 26(3), 170–177. https://doi.org/10.1080/17404622.2011.650701
   Google Scholar
• Vogt, E. E., Brown, J., & Isaacs, D. (2003). The art of powerful questions: Catalyzing, insight, innovation, and action, 1–14. https://umanitoba.ca/admin/human_resources/change/media/the-art-of-powerful-questions.pdf
   Google Scholar