Autoethnography as assessment: Communication pedagogies as social justice activism

References

• Agar, M. (1990). Text and fieldwork: Exploring the excluded middle. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 19(1), 73–88. https://doi.org/10.1177/089124190019001004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexander, B. K. (2000). Skin flint (or, the garbage man’s kid): A generative autobiographical performance based on Tami Spry’s tattoo stories. Text and Performance Quarterly, 20(1), 97–114. https://doi.org/10.1080/10462930009366286
   Google Scholar
• Anzaldúa, G. E. (2002). (Un)natural bridges, (un)safe spaces. In G. E. Anzaldúa (Ed.), This bridge we call home: Radical visions for transformation (pp. 1–5). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Blinne, K. C. (2020). Grading justice: Teacher-activist approaches to assessment. Lexington Books.
   Google Scholar
• Calafell, B. M., & Gutierrez-Perez, R. (2018). (Critical) love is a battlefield: Implications for a critical intercultural pedagogical approach. In A. Atay & S. Toyosaki (Eds.), Critical intercultural communication pedagogy (pp. 49–63). Lexington Books.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, Y. W., & Lawless, B. (2018). Rethinking “difficult” conversations in communication instruction from an intercultural lens: Pedagogical strategies for “SWAP-ping” the communication classroom. Communication Studies, 69(4), 372–388. https://doi.org/10.1080/10510974.2018.1472117
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clifford, J. (1986). Writing culture: The poetics and politics of ethnography. In J. Clifford & G. E. Marcus (Eds.), Introduction: Partial truths (pp. 1–27). University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• De Los Santos Upton, S., & Hernández, L. H. (2021). Teaching Anzaldúa: Strategies in the physical and psychological borderlands in civilian and military classrooms. In M. Cantú-Sánchez, C. de León-Zepeda, & N. E. Cantú (Eds.), Teaching Gloria E. Anzaldúa: Pedagogy and practice for our classrooms and communities (pp. 152–164). The University of Arizona Press.
   Google Scholar
• Denzin, N. K. (1996). The facts and fictions of qualitative inquiry. Qualitative Inquiry, 2(2), 230–241. https://doi.org/10.1177/107780049600200207
   Google Scholar
• “Executive Order on Combating Race and Sex Stereotyping.” (2020, September 22). https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/executive-order-combating-race-sex-stereotyping/
   Google Scholar
• Griffin, R. A. (2012). Navigating the politics of identity/identities and exploring the promise of critical love. In N. Bardham & M. Orbe (Eds.), Identity research and intercultural communication: Reflections and future direction (pp. 207–221). Lexington Books.
   Google Scholar
• Gutierrez-Perez, R. (2018). Theories in the flesh and flights of the imagination: Embracing the soul and spirit of critical performative writing in communication research. Women’s Studies in Communication, 41(4), 404–415. https://doi.org/10.1080/07491409.2018.1551695
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gutierrez-Perez, R., & Hernández, L. H. (2019). Introduction: How to read this book: An introduction for everyone and no one. In L. H. Hernández & R. Gutierrez-Perez (Eds.), This bridge we call communication: Anzaldúan approaches to theory, method, and praxis (pp. xiii–xxv). Lexington Books.
   Google Scholar
• Hernández, L. H. (2019). “We get it done because we have to:” Military spouses with advanced degrees, career and educational experiences, and grit amongst uncertainty. In L. H. Hernández & J. Belding (Eds.), Military spouses with graduate degrees: Interdisciplinary approaches to thriving amidst uncertainty (pp. 239–258). Lexington Books.
   Google Scholar
• Hernández, L. H. (2020). Identity politics in the classroom: An application of critical love to teaching difficult topics in the military classroom battlefield. In C. Rosas Webber (Ed.), Working in the margins: Domestic and international minority women in higher education (pp. 15–32). Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Hernández, L. H., & Belding, J., (Eds.). (2019). Military spouses with graduate degrees: Interdisciplinary approaches to thriving amidst uncertainty. Lexington Books.
   Google Scholar
• Hernández, L. H., De Los Santos Upton, S., & Aguirre, A. (2020). Nepantla, liminality, and teaching and learning in the space between: A borderlands approach to military-affiliated learner pedagogy. In V. McDermott, L. H. Hernández, & A. May (Eds.), Supporting the military-affiliated learner: Communication approaches to military pedagogy and education (pp. 133–157). Lexington Books.
   Google Scholar
• Hernández, L. H., & De Los Santos Upton, S. (2021). Honoring vivencias: A borderlands approach to higher education pedagogy justice. In K. Blinne (Ed.), Grading justice: Teacher-activist approaches to assessment (pp. 91–107). Lexington Books.
   Google Scholar
• hooks, b. (1990). Yearning: Race, gender, and cultural politics. South End Press.
   Google Scholar
• hooks, b. (1994). Teaching to transgress: Education as the practice of freedom. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kahl, D. H., Jr. (2020). Resisting the detrimental effects of grade inflation on university faculty and students through critical communication pedagogy. In K. Blinne (Ed.), Grading justice: Teacher-activist approaches to assessment (pp. 297–308). Lexington Books.
   Google Scholar
• Langellier, K. (1999). Personal narrative, performance, performativity: Two or three things I know for sure. Text and Performance Quarterly, 19(2), 125–124. https://doi.org/10.1080/10462939909366255
   Google Scholar
• Lawless, B., & Chen, Y. W. (2020). Still a “sensitive” subject? Unpacking strengths and struggles of intercultural communication pedagogies. Howard Journal of Communications, 31(2), 171–186. https://doi.org/10.1080/10646175.2019.1707135
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Love, B. L. (2019). We want to do more than survive: Abolitionist teaching and the pursuit of educational freedom. Beacon Press.
   Google Scholar
• McDermott, V., Hernández, L. H., & May, A. (Eds.). (2021). Supporting the military-affiliated learner: Communication approaches to military pedagogy and education. Lexington Books.
   Google Scholar
• Moraga, C., & Anzaldúa, G. (1981). Theory in the flesh. In C. Moraga & G. Anzaldúa (Eds.), This bridge called my back: Writings by radical women of color (p. 23). Kitchen Table: Women of Color Press.
   Google Scholar
• Munz, S. M., & Colvin, J. (2018). Communication apprehension: Understanding communication skills and cultural identity in the basic communication course. Basic Communication Course Annual, 30(10), 172–199. https://ecommons.udayton.edu/bcca/vol30/iss1/10
   Google Scholar
• Oliver, K. (2001). Witnessing: Beyond recognition. University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Palmer, D. L. (2021). Student-activist mentor letters as a form of social movement-building in communication activism pedagogy. In K. Blinne (Ed.), Grading justice: Teacher-activist approaches to assessment (pp. 133–162). Lexington Books.
   Google Scholar
• Poulos, C. N. (2012). Life, interrupted. Qualitative Inquiry, 18(4), 323–332. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800411431565
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosas Webber, C. (2020). Introduction: Working in the margins of our difference. In C. Rosas Webber (Ed.), Working in the margins: Domestic and international minority women in higher education (pp. 1–14). Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Spry, T. (2006). A “performative-I” copresence: Embodying the ethnographic turn in performance and the performative turn in ethnography. Text and Performance Quarterly, 26(4), 339–346. https://doi.org/10.1080/10462930600828790
   Google Scholar
• Yep, G. A. (2019). Becoming a bridge in/through critical communication scholarship: Meditations on the affective afterlife of cultural normativities. In L. H. Hernández & R. Gutierrez-Perez (Eds.), This bridge we call communication: Anzaldúan approaches to theory, method, and praxis (pp. 335–355). Lexington Books.
   Google Scholar