Micro, meso, and macro: A multilevel approach to civic engagement in the communication classroom

References

• Applegate, J. L., & Morreale, S. P. (1999). Service-learning in communication: A natural partnership. In D. Droge & B. O. Murphy (Eds.), Voices of strong democracy: Concepts and models for service-learning in communication studies (pp. ix–xiv). American Association for Higher Education.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, T. C., Procopio, C. H., Goering, B., Dong, Q., & Bodary, D. L. (2016). Civic engagement and a communication research agenda. Communication Education, 65(4), 490–492. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634523.2016.1206658
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boylorn, R. M. (2020). Teaching at the end of the world. Communication Education, 69(4), 525–529. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634523.2020.1803381
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Britt, L. L. (2012). Why we use service-learning: A report outlining a typology of three approaches to this form of communication pedagogy. Communication Education, 61(1), 80–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634523.2011.632017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Britt, L. L. (2014). Service-learning in the service of social justice: Situating communication activism pedagogy within a typology of service-learning approaches. In L. R. Frey, & D. L. Palmer (Eds.), Teaching communication activism: Communication education for social justice (pp. 139–166). Hampton.
   Google Scholar
• Centers for Disease Control. (2013). Healthy place terminology. https://www.cdc.gov/healthyplaces/terminology.htm
   Google Scholar
• Chaskin, R. J. (1997). Perspectives on neighborhood and community: A review of the literature. Social Service Review, 71(4), 521–547. https://doi.org/10.1086/604277
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craig, D. (2006). Revising pedagogical strategies in large enrollment general education courses. Basic Communication Course Annual, 18, Article 15. https://ecommons.udayton.edu/bcca/vol18/iss1/15
   Google Scholar
• Dempsey, S. E. (2010). Critiquing community engagement. Management Communication Quarterly, 24(3), 359–390. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318909352247
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallagher, V. J., Renner, M. M., & Glover-Rijkse, R. (2020). Public address as embodied experience: Using digital technologies to enhance communicative and civic engagement in the communication classroom. Communication Education, 69(3), 281–299. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634523.2020.1735642
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herakova, L., Bonnet, J., & Congdon Jr, M. (2017). Centering information literacy (as) skills and civic engagement in the basic communication course: An integrated course library collaboration. Basic Communication Course Annual, 29(Article 12), 109–115. http://ecommons.udayton.edu/bcca/vol29/iss1/12
   Google Scholar
• Internal Revenue Service. (n.d.). The restriction of political campaign intervention by section 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. https://www.irs.gov/charities-non-profits/charitable-organizations/the-restriction-of-political-campaign-intervention-by-section-501c3-tax-exempt-organizations
   Google Scholar
• Justus, Z. S., Weber, L., & Mattor, M. (2016). Student voice in a campus civic engagement program: A description and assessment. Communication Teacher, 30(2), 106–119. https://doi.org/10.1080/17404622.2016.1139147
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahlenberg, S. G., & Shanker, A. (2020). A service-learning and integrative-learning model for media advocacy on behalf of nonprofit organizations. Communication Teacher, 35(2), 142–148. https://doi.org/10.1080/17404622.2020.1834593
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kellogg Commission. (2000). Returning to our roots: Executive summaries of the reports of the Kellogg Commission on the future of state and land-grant universities. National Association of State and Land-Grant Universities.
   Google Scholar
• Kidd, N., & Parry-Giles, T. (2013, August 8). Another view on communication scholarship. Inside Higher Ed. https://www.insidehighered.com/views/2013/08/13/essay-defends-state-communications-scholarship
   Google Scholar
• Leek, D. R. (2016). Policy debate pedagogy: A complementary strategy for civic and political engagement through service-learning. Communication Education, 65(4), 397–408. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634523.2016.1203004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, M. (2011). Fostering civic engagement in the communication research methods course. Communication Teacher, 25(3), 166–174. https://doi.org/10.1080/17404622.2011.579908
   Google Scholar
• McIntyre, K. A., & Sellnow, D. D. (2014). A little bit can go a long way: An examination of required service in the basic communication course. Communication Teacher, 28(1), 57–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/17404622.2013.843012
   Google Scholar
• Moniszko, S. M., & Reed, A. (2020, May 29). 100 resources to take action against racism, help Black organizations and learn to be anti-racist. USA Today. https://www.usatoday.com/story/life/2020/05/29/george-floyd-death-donations-resources-justice-petitions/5282539002/
   Google Scholar
• Morreale, S. P., Myers, S. A., Backlund, P. M., & Simonds, C. J. (2015). Study IX of the basic communication course at two- and four-year U.S. Colleges and Universities: A re-examination of our discipline’s “front porch”. Communication Education, 65(3), 338–355. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634523.2015.1073339
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Communication Association. (2015). What should a graduate with a communication degree know, understand, and be able to do. https://www.natcom.org/sites/default/files/publications/LOC_1_What_Should_a_Graduate_with_a_Communication_Degree.pdf
   Google Scholar
• National Task Force on Civic Learning and Democratic Engagement. (2012). A crucible moment: College learning and democracy’s future. Association of American Colleges and Universities.
   Google Scholar
• Roidt, J., DeNicolo, M., Kittle, A., Osborne, K., & Saindon, B. (2016). First year symposium: One college’s response to the perceived “deficit” in civic education. Communication Education, 65(4), 409–419. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634523.2016.1203003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruiz-Mesa, K., & Hunter, K. M. (2019). Best practices for facilitating difficult dialogues in the basic communication course. Journal of Communication Pedagogy, 2, 134–141. https://doi.org/10.31446/JCP.2019.23
   Google Scholar
• Sellnow, D. D. (2014). The rhetorical power of popular culture: Considering mediated texts (2nd ed.). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Simmons, N., & Tenzek, K. E. (2016). “Listening is an act of love”: Learning listening through StoryCorps. Communication Teacher, 30(1), 17–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/17404622.2015.1102307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stake, R. (2003). Application of a case study methodology. In N. Denizen, & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Strategies of qualitative inquiry (pp. 161–164). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Styer, M. I., Anderson, L. B., & Nichols, A. L. (2018). Ally, advocate, activist: Semester-long civic engagement in the basic communication course. Communication Teacher, 32(4), 231–235. https://doi.org/10.1080/17404622.2017.1372604
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suarz, J. (2017). Promoting civic engagement in a required general education course. In E. C. Matto, A. R. M. McCartney, E. A. Bennion, & D. Simpson (Eds.), Teaching civic engagement across disciplines (pp. 169–182). American Political Science Association.
   Google Scholar
• Tellis, W. M. (1997). The application of a case study methodology. The Qualitative Report, 3(3), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/1997.2015
   Google Scholar
• United Nations: Department of Economic and Social Affairs. (n.d.). The 17 goals. https://sdgs.un.org/goals
   Google Scholar
• Wells, C. C., & DeLeon, D. (2015). Slam and the citizen orator: Teaching civic oration and engagement through spoken word. Communication Teacher, 29(4), 201–205. https://doi.org/10.1080/17404622.2015.1058405
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (4th ed.). Sage.
   Google Scholar