0
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Invited Articles

Culture-centered reflexivity as critical assessment

, , , &
Received 17 Jan 2024, Accepted 11 Jun 2024, Published online: 08 Jul 2024

References

  • Andrade, H. L. (2019). A critical review of research on student self-assessment. Frontiers in Education, 4(87). https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2019.00087
  • Ashlee, A. A., Zamora, B., & Karikari, S. N. (2017). We are woke: A collaborative critical autoethnography of three “womxn” of color graduate students in higher education. International Journal of Multicultural Education, 19(1), 89. https://doi.org/10.18251/ijme.v19i1.1259
  • Belkin Martinez, D., & Fleck-Henderson, A. (Eds.). (2014). Social justice in clinical practice: A liberation health framework for social work (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315813073
  • Blum, S. D. (2020). Why ungrade? Why grade? In S. D. Blum & A. Kohn (Eds.), Ungrading: Why rating students undermines learning (and what to do instead) (pp. 1–21). West Virginia University Press.
  • Bourke, R., & Mentis, M. (2013). Self-assessment as a process for inclusion. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 17(8), 854–867. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2011.602288
  • Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. National Academy Press.
  • Denial, C. (2019). A pedagogy of kindness. In J. Stommel, C. Friend, & S. M. Morris (Eds.), Critical digital pedagogy: A collection. PressBooks. https://pressbooks.pub/cdpcollection/chapter/a-pedagogy-of-kindness/
  • Dutta, M. J. (2008) Communicating health: A culture-centered approach. Polity.
  • Dutta, M. J., Moana-Johnson, G., & Elers, C. (2020). COVID 19 and the pedagogy of culture-centered community radical democracy: A response from aotearoa New Zealand. Journal of Communication Pedagogy, 3, 11–19. https://doi.org/10.31446/JCP.2020.03
  • Fassett, D. L., & Warren, J. T. (2007). Critical communication pedagogy (1st ed.). SAGE Publ. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452225883
  • Hoffmann-Longtin, K., Brann, M., Ridley-Merriweather, K. E., & Bach, B. W. (2021). Rethinking graduate student socialization and identification: How the communication discipline can help. Communication Education, 70(1), 120–122. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634523.2020.1811361
  • Jones, R. G., & Calafell, B. M. (2012). Contesting neoliberalism through critical pedagogy, intersectional reflexivity, and personal narrative: Queer tales of academia. Journal of Homosexuality, 59(7), 957–981. https://doi.org/10.1080/00918369.2012.699835
  • Lacy, N. B., & Chen, Y. (2022). “‘It takes a village’: Proposing critically reflexive (co-)mentoring with underrepresented students as racialized, gendered, and othered. Communication Education, 71(4), 370–373. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634523.2022.2105922
  • Munshi, D., Kurian, P., Cretney, R., Morrison, S. L., & Kathlene, L. (2020). Centering culture in public engagement on climate change. Environmental Communication, 14(5), 573–581. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2020.1746680
  • Segura Castillo, Y. F. (2023). Reflexivity as a pedagogical act: Unveiling the self in the shadows of complicity and coloniality in teaching and academia. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681366.2023.2283176
  • Stommel, J. (2023). Undoing the grade: Why we grade, and how to stop. Hybrid Pedagogy Inc.
  • Tanner, K.D. (2021) Promoting student metacognition. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 11(2), 113–120. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.12-03-0033
  • Thiem, K. C., & Dasgupta, N. (2022). From precollege to career: Barriers facing historically marginalized students and evidence-based solutions. Social Issues and Policy Review, 16(1), 212–251. https://doi.org/10.1111/sipr.12085
  • United States Department of Education. (2022). 2022 Agency equity plan related to executive order 13985. https://www2.ed.gov/documents/equity/2022-equity-plan.pdf
  • Whitcomb, K. M., Cwik, S., & Singh, C. (2021). Not all disadvantages are equal: Racial/Ethnic minority students have largest disadvantage among demographic groups in both STEM and non-STEM GPA. AERA Open, 7, 233285842110598. https://doi.org/10.1177/23328584211059823

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.