Response-compatibility effects in children

REFERENCES

• Albrecht, B., Heinrich, H., Brandeis, D., Uebel, H., Yordanova, J., Kolev, V., Rothenberger, A., & Banaschewski, T. (2009). Flanker-Task in Children. Journal of Psychophysiology, 23, 183–190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brodeur, D. A. (2004). Age changes in attention control: Assessing the role of stimulus contingencies. Cognitive Development, 19, 241–252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryce, D., Szűcs, D., Soltész, F., & Whitebread, D. (2011). The development of inhibitory control: An averaged and single-trial Lateralized Readiness Potential study. NeuroImage, 57, 671–685.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bunge, S. A., Dudukovic, N. M., Thomason, M. E., Vaidya, C. J., & Gabrieli, J. D. E. (2002). Immature frontal lobe contributions to cognitive control in children: Evidence from fMRI. Neuron, 33, 301–311.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casey, B. J., Tottenham, N., & Fossella, J. (2002). Clinical, imaging, lesion, and genetic approaches toward a model of cognitive control. Developmental Psychobiology, 40, 237–254.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craig, J. C., & Evans, P. M. (1995). Tactile selective attention and temporal masking. Perception & Psychophysics, 57, 511–518.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dempster, F. N. (1993). Resistance to interference: Developmental changes in a basic processing mechanism. In M. L.Howe & R.Pasnak (Eds.), Emerging themes in cognitive development: Vol. 1. Foundations (pp. 3–27). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• E-prime (2.0) [Computer software]. http://www.pstnet.com/eprime.cfm.
   Google Scholar
• Eriksen, B. A., & Eriksen, C. W. (1974). Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task. Perception &Psychophysics, 16, 143–149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eriksen, C. W. (1995). The flankers task and response competition: A useful tool for investigating a variety of cognitive problems. Visual Cognition, 2, 101–118.
   Google Scholar
• Fox, E. (1995). Negative priming from ignored distractors on visual selection: A review. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2, 145–173.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frings, C., Feix, S., Röthig, U., Brüser, C., & Junge, M. (2007). Children do show negative priming: Further evidence for early development of an intact selective control mechanism. Developmental Psychology, 43, 1269–1273.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuentes, L. J., Vivas, A. B., & Humphreys, G. W. (1999). Inhibitory mechanisms of attentional networks: Spatial and semantic inhibitory processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 1114–1126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halford, G. S. (1993). Children's understanding: The development of mental models. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Hillman, C. H., Buck, S. M., Themanson, J. R., Pontifex, M. B., & Castelli, D. M. (2009). Aerobic fitness and cognitive development: Event-related brain potential and task performance indices of executive control in preadolescent children. Developmental Psychology, 45, 114–129.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houghton, G., & Tipper, S. P. (1994). A model of inhibitory mechanisms in selective attention. In D.Dagenbach & T. H.Carr (Eds.), Inhibitory processes in attention and language (pp. 53–112). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Johnstone, S. J., Barry, R. J., Markovska, V., Dimoska, A., & Clarke, A. R. (2009). Response inhibition and interference control in children with AD/HD: A visual ERP investigation. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 72, 145–153.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jongen, E., & Jonkman, L. (2008). The developmental pattern of stimulus and response interference in a color-object Stroop task: An ERP study. BMC Neuroscience, 9(82)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Logan, G. D. (1988). Toward an instance theory of automatization. Psychological Review, 95, 492–527.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacLeod, C. M. (1991). Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: An integrative review. Psychological Bulletin, 109, 163–203.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDermott, J. M., Pérez-Edgar, K., & Fox, N. A. (2007). Variations of the flanker paradigm: Assessing selective attention in young children. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 62–70.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michel, E., Kauer, M., & Roebers, C. M. (2011). Motorische Koordinationsdefizite im Kindesalter [Motor coordination deficits in children]. Kindheit und Entwicklung, 20, 49–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pritchard, V. E., & Neumann, E. (2004). Negative priming effects in children engaged in nonspatial tasks: Evidence for early development of an intact inhibitory mechanism. Developmental Psychology, 2, 191–203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pritchard, V. E., & Neumann, E. (2011). Classic Stroop negative priming effects for children and adults diverge with less-conflicting and nonconflicting conditions. The American Journal of Psychology, 124, 405–419.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ridderinkhof, K. R., & van der Molen, M. W. (1995). A psychophysiological analysis of developmental differences in the ability to resist interference. Child Development, 66, 1040–1056.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rueda, M. R., Fan, J., McCandliss, B. D., Halparin, J. D., Gruber, D. B., Lercari, L. P., & Posner, M. I. (2004). Development of attentional networks in childhood. Neuropsychologia, 42, 1029–1040.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simone, P. M., & McCormick, E. B. (1999). Effect of a defining feature on negative priming across the life span. Visual Cognition, 6, 587–606.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stins, J. F., Polderman, T. J. C., Boomsma, D. I., & de Geus, E. J. C. (2005). Response interference and working memory in 12-year-old children. Child Neuropsychology, 11, 191–201.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szűcs, D., Soltész, F., Bryce, D., & Whitebread, D. (2009). Real-time tracking of motor response activation and response competition in a Stroop task in young children: A lateralized readiness potential study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 21, 2195–2206.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tipper, S. P. (1992). Selection for action: The role of inhibitory mechanisms. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 1, 105–109.
   Google Scholar
• Tipper, S. P., & Cranston, M. (1985). Selective attention and priming: Inhibitory and facilitatory effects of ignored primes. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 37A, 591–611.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tipper, S. P., Bourque, T. A., Anderson, S. H., & Brehaut, J. C. (1989). Mechanisms of attention: A developmental study. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 48, 353–378.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Molen, M. W. (2000). Developmental changes in inhibitory processing: Evidence from psychophysiological measures. Biological Psychology, 54, 207–239.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Leeuwen, M., van den Berg, S. M., Hoekstra, R. A., & Boomsma, D. I. (2007). Endophenotypes for intelligence in children and adolescents. Intelligence, 35, 369–380.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waszak, F., Li, S. -C., & Hommel, B. (2010). The development of attentional networks: Cross-sectional findings from a life span sample. Developmental Psychology, 46, 337–349.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar