Why do some students want to be actively involved as peer educators, while others do not? Findings from NoTrap! anti-bullying and anti-cyberbullying program

References

• Abdi, F., & Simbar, M. (2013). The peer education approach in adolescents-narrative review article. Iranian Journal of Public Health, 42(11), 1200–1206.
   Google Scholar
• Achenbach, T. M. (1991). Manual for the youth self-report and 1991 profile. Burlington, VT: University of Vermont, Department of Psychiatry.
   Google Scholar
• Adler-Constantinescu, C., Beşu, E.-C., & Negovan, V. (2013). Perceived social support and perceived self-efficacy during adolescence. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 78, 275–279. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.04.294
   Google Scholar
• Bastiaensens, S., Vandebosch, H., Poels, K., Van Cleemput, K., DeSmet, A., & De Bourdeaudhuij, I. (2014). Cyberbullying on social network sites. An experimental study into bystanders’ behavioural intentions to help the victim or reinforce the bully. Computers in Human Behavior, 31(1), 259–271. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2013.10.036
   Google Scholar
• Birnbaum, M., Crohn, K., Maticka-Tyndale, E., & Barnett, J. P. (2010). Peer-led interventions to reduce HIVrisk of youth: A review. Evaluation and Program Planning, 33(2), 98–112.
   Google Scholar
• Borgia, P., Marinacci, C., Schifano, P., & Perucci, C. a (2005). Is peer education the best approach for HIV prevention in schools? Findings from a randomized controlled trial. Journal of Adolescent Health, 36(6), 508–516. doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2004.03.005
   Google Scholar
• Brack, A. B., Millard, M., & Shah, K. (2008). Are peer educators really peers? Journal of American College Health, 56(5), 566–568. doi:10.3200/JACH.56.5.566-568
   Google Scholar
• Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136–162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, J. M., & Marino, C. a (2009). Brief report: Sociometric status and behavioral characteristics of peer nominated buddies for a child with autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 39(9), 1359–1363. doi:10.1007/s10803-009-0738-z
   Google Scholar
• Canty-Mitchell, J., & Zimet, G. D. (2000). Psychometric properties of the multidimensional scale of perceived social support in urban adolescents. American Journal of Community Psychology, 28(3), 391–400. doi:10.1023/A:1005109522457
   Google Scholar
• Caravita, S. C. S., Di Blasio, P., & Salmivalli, C. (2009). Unique and interactive effects of empathy and social status on involvement in bullying. Social Development, 18(1), 140–163. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9507.2008.00465.x
   Google Scholar
• Cowie, H., & Wallace, P. (2001). Peer support in action – From bystanding to standing by. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 673–674.
   Google Scholar
• Demaray, K., & Malecki, C. K. (2003). Perceptions of the frequency and importance of social support by students classified as victims, bullies, and bully/victims in an urban middle school. School Psychology Review, 32(3), 471–489.
   Google Scholar
• Di Fabio, A., & Busoni, L. (2008). Misurare il supporto sociale percepito: Proprietà psicometriche della Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS) in un campione di studenti universitari. Risorsa Uomo: Rivista di Psicologia del Lavoro e dell’ Organizzazione, 14(3), 339–350.
   Google Scholar
• Furman, W. (1998). The measurement of friendship perceptions: Conceptual and methodological issues. In W. M. Bukowski, A. F. Newcomb, & W. W. Hartup (Eds.), The company they keep: Friendship in childhood and adolescence (pp. 41–65). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gini, G., Albiero, P., Benelli, B., & Altoe, G. (2007). Does empathy predict adolescents ‘ Bullying and defending behavior ? Aggressive behavior, 33(December 2005), 467–476. doi:10.1002/ab
   Google Scholar
• Greene, M. B. (2003). Counseling and climate change as treatment modalities for bullying in school. International Journal for the Advancement of Counselling, 25(4), 293–302. doi:10.1023/B:ADCO.0000005528.59128.32
   Google Scholar
• Houlston, C., & Smith, P. K. (2009). The impact of a peer counselling scheme to address bullying in an all-girl London secondary school: A short-term longitudinal study. The British Journal of Educational Psychology, 79(Pt 1), 69–86. doi:10.1348/000709908X293878
   Google Scholar
• Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55. doi:10.1080/10705519909540118
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, J. N., & Campbell, J. M. (2009). Teachers’ peer buddy selections for children with autism: Social characteristics and relationship with peer nominations. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 39(2), 269–277. doi:10.1007/s10803-008-0623-1
   Google Scholar
• Li, Q. (2007). New bottle but old wine: A research of cyberbullying in schools. Computers in Human Behavior, 23(4), 1777–1791.10.1016/j.chb.2005.10.005
   Google Scholar
• Malecki, C. K., & Demaray, M. K. (2002). Measuring perceived social support: Development of the child and adolescent social support scale (CASSS). Psychology in the Schools, 39(1), 1–18. doi:10.1002/pits.10004
   Google Scholar
• Malecki, C. K., & Elliott, S. N. (1999). Adolescents’ ratings of perceived social support and its importance: Validation of the student social support scale. Psychology in the Schools, 36(6), 473–483.
   Google Scholar
• Menesini, E., & Gini, G. (2000). Il bullismo come processo di gruppo: Adattamento e validazione del questionario “Ruoli dei partecipanti” alla popolazione italiana. Eta’ Evolutiva, 66, 18–32.
   Google Scholar
• Menesini, E., Nocentini, A., & Palladino, B. E. (2012). Empowering students against bullying and cyberbullying: Evaluation of an Italian peer-led model. International Journal of Conflict and Violence, 6(2), 314–321.
   Google Scholar
• Menesini, E., Palladino, B. E., & Nocentini, A. (2015). Online and school based intervention to prevent cyberbullying among adolescents. In T. Völlink, F. Dehue, & C. Mc Guckin (Eds.),Cyberbullying: From theory to intervention (p. 240). London, UK: Taylor & Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Nordgren, L. F., Banas, K., & MacDonald, G. (2011). Empathy gaps for social pain: Why people underestimate the pain of social suffering. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100(1), 120–128. doi:10.1037/a0020938
   Google Scholar
• Palladino, B. E., Nocentini, A., & Menesini, E. (2015). Psychometric properties of the florence cyberbullying-cybervictimization scales. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, 18(2), 112–119. doi:10.1089/cyber.2014.0366
   Google Scholar
• Palladino, B. E., Nocentini, A., & Menesini, E. (2016). Evidence-based intervention against bullying and cyberbullying: Evaluation of the Noncadiamointrappola! program through two independent trials. Aggressive Behavior, 42(2), 194–206. doi:10.1002/ab.21636
   Google Scholar
• Porter, J. R., & Smith-Adcock, S. (2011). Children who help victims of bullying: Implications for practice. International Journal for the Advancement of Counselling, 33(3), 196–205. doi:10.1007/s10447-011-9121-9
   Google Scholar
• Salmivalli, C. (1999). Participant role approach to school bullying: Implications for interventions. Journal of Adolescence, 22(4), 453–459. doi:10.1006/jado.1999.0239
   Google Scholar
• Salmivalli, C. (2001). Peer-led intervention campaign against school bullying: Who considered it useful, who benefited? Educational Research, 43, 263–278. doi:10.1080/00131880110081035
   Google Scholar
• Salmivalli, C., Lagerspetz, K., Björkqvist, K., Österman, K., & Kaukiainen, A. (1996). Bullying as a group process: Participant roles and their relations to social status within the group. Aggressive Behavior, 22, 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Shiner, M. (1999). Defining peer education. Journal of Adolescence, 22, 555–566.10.1006/jado.1999.0248
   Google Scholar
• Smith, P. K., Salmivalli, C., & Cowie, H. (2012). Effectiveness of school-based programs to reduce bullying: A commentary. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 8(4), 433–441. doi:10.1007/s11292-012-9142-3
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, F., & Smith, P. k. (2011). The use and effectiveness of anti-bullying strategies in schools. Research Brief DFE-RR098, 1–220.
   Google Scholar
• Ttofi, M. M., & Farrington, D. P. (2011). Effectiveness of school-based programs to reduce bullying: A systematic and meta-analytic review. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 7, 27–56.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, G., & Shepherd, J. (1999). A method in search of a theory: Peer education and health promotion, 14(2), 235–247.
   Google Scholar
• Van Cleemput, K., Vandebosch, H., & Pabian, S. (2014). Personal characteristics and contextual factors that determine “helping”, “joining in”, and “doing nothing” when witnessing cyberbullying. Aggressive Behavior, 40(5), 383–396. doi:10.1002/ab.21534
   Google Scholar
• Wye, S. Q., & AIVL Hepatitis C Peer Education & Prevention Program. (2006). A framework for peer education by drug-user organisations. Canberra: Australian Injecting & Illicit Drug Users League.
   Google Scholar
• Zimet, G. D., Dahlem, N. W., Zimet, S. G., & Farley, G. K. (1988). The multidimensional scale of perceived social support. Journal of Personality Assessment, 52(1), 30–41. doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa5201
   Google Scholar
• Zimet, G. D., Powell, S. S., Farley, G. K., Werkman, S., & Berkoff, K. A. (1990). Psychometric characteristics of the multidimensional scale of perceived social support. Journal of Personality Assessment, 55, 610–617.
   Google Scholar