Evaluations of pro-environmental behaviours in preschool age

References

• Batson, C. D., & Powell, A. A. (2003). Altruism and prosocial behavior. In T. Millon & M. J. Lerner (Eds.), Handbook of psychology: Personality and social psychology (Vol. 5, pp. 463–484). John Wiley & Sons, Inc. https://doi.org/10.1002/0471264385.wei0519
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, N. J., Whitty, T. S., Finkbeiner, E., Pittman, J., Bassett, H., Gelcich, S., & Allison, E. H. (2018). Environmental stewardship: A conceptual review and analytical framework. Environmental Management, 61(4), 597–614. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-017-0993-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourdeau, P. (2004). The man−nature relationship and environmental ethics. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity, 72(1–2), 9–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0265-931X(03)00180-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burns, M. P., & Sommerville, J. (2014). “I pick you”: The impact of fairness and race on infants’ selection of social partners. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, Article 93. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00093
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buyukozer Dawkins, M., Ting, F., Stavans, M., & Baillargeon, R. (2020). Early moral cognition: A principle-based approach. In D. Poeppel, G. R. Mangun, & M. S. Gazzaniga (Eds.), The cognitive neurosciences (6th ed. pp. 7–16). MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). L. Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, S., & Horm-Wingerd, D. (1993). Children and the environment: Ecological awareness among preschool children. Environment and Behavior, 25(1), 103–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916593251005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coley, J. D. (2012). Where the wild things are: Informal experience and ecological reasoning. Child Development, 83(3), 992–1006. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2012.01751.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collado, S., & Sorrel, M. (2019). Children’s environmental moral judgments: Variations according to type of victim and exposure to nature. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 62, 42–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2019.02.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahl, A. (2019). The science of early moral development: On defining, constructing, and studying morality from birth. Advances in Child Development and Behavior, 56, 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.acdb.2018.11.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Waal, F. B. (2008). Putting the altruism back into altruism: The evolution of empathy. Annual Review of Psychology, 59(1), 279–300. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093625
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ding, X. P., Tay, C., Chua, Y. J., & Cheng, J. K. T. (2023). Can classic moral stories with anthropomorphized animal characters promote children’s honesty? Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 85, 101498. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2022.101498
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunfield, K. A. (2014). A construct divided: Prosocial behavior as helping, sharing, and comforting subtypes. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 958. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00958
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenberg, N., & Shell, R. (1986). Prosocial moral judgment and behavior in children: The mediating role of cost. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 12(4), 426–433. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167286124005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenberg, N., VanSchyndel, S. K., & Spinrad, T. L. (2016). Prosocial motivation: Inferences from an opaque body of work. Child Development, 87(6), 1668–1678. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12638
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Essler, S., & Paulus, M. (2021). When do caregivers begin to view their child as a moral agent? Comparing moral and non-moral reactions to young children’s moral transgressions. Journal of Moral Education, 50(3), 330–342. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057240.2020.1722622
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gelman, S. A. (2003). The essential child: Origins of essentialism in everyday thought. Oxford Cognitive Development.
   Google Scholar
• Gelman, S. A. (2009). Essentialist reasoning about the biological world. In A. Berthoz & Y. Christen (Eds.), Neurobiology of “Umwelt” (pp. 7–16). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Gelman, S. A., & Noles, N. S. (2011). Domains and naïve theories. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 2(5), 490–502. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.124
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geraci, A. (2020). How do toddlers evaluate defensive actions toward third parties? Infancy, 25(6), 910–926. https://doi.org/10.1111/infa.12367
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geraci, A., & Franchin, L. (2021). Is defensive behavior a subtype of prosocial behaviors? Frontiers in Psychology, 12, Article 678370. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.678370
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geraci, A., Franchin, L., & Benavides-Varela, S. (2023). Evaluations of pro-environmental behaviors by 7-month-old infants. Infant Behavior and Development, 72, 101865. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infbeh.2023.101865
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geraci, A., Santos Barbosa, A. R. D. C., Augello, R., Perucchini, P., & Surian, L. (2023). Education to justice and infants’ sense of fairness. Frontiers in Developmental Psychology, 1, 1282533. https://doi.org/10.3389/fdpys.2023.1282533
   Google Scholar
• Geraci, A., & Surian, L. (2011). The developmental roots of fairness: Infants’ reactions to equal and unequal distributions of resources. Developmental Science, 14(5), 1012–1020. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2011.01048.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geraci, A., & Surian, L. (2023). Intention-based evaluations of distributive actions by 4-month-olds. Infant Behavior and Development, 70, 101797. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infbeh.2022.101797
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hahn, E. R., & Garrett, M. K. (2017). Preschoolers’ moral judgments of environmental harm and the influence of perspective taking. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 53, 11–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2017.05.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haidt, J. (2001). The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychological Review, 108(4), 814–834. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.108.4.814
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamlin, J. K. (2013a). Failed attempts to help and harm: Intention versus outcome in preverbal infants’ social evaluations. Cognition, 128(3), 451–474. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2013.04.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamlin, J. K. (2013b). Moral judgment and action in preverbal infants and toddlers: Evidence for an innate moral core. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 22(3), 186–193. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721412470687
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamlin, J. K., & Wynn, K. (2011). Young infants prefer prosocial to antisocial others. Cognitive Development, 26(1), 30–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2010.09.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamlin, J. K., Wynn, K., & Bloom, P. (2007). Social evaluation by preverbal infants. Nature, 450(7169), 557–559. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature06288
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamlin, J. K., Wynn, K., & Bloom, P. (2010). Three‐month‐olds show a negativity bias in their social evaluations. Developmental Science, 13(6), 923–929. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2010.00951.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamlin, J. K., Wynn, K., Bloom, P., & Mahajan, N. (2011). How infants and toddlers react to antisocial others. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(50), 19931–19936. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1110306108
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hertz, S. G., & Krettenauer, T. (2016). Does moral identity effectively predict moral behavior?: A meta-analysis. Review of General Psychology, 20(2), 129–140. https://doi.org/10.1037/gpr0000062
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holvoet, C., Scola, C., Arciszewski, T., & Picard, D. (2016). Infants’ preference for prosocial behaviors: A literature review. Infant Behavior and Development, 45, 125–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infbeh.2016.10.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoover, K. S. (2021). Children in nature: Exploring the relationship between childhood outdoor experience and environmental stewardship. Environmental Education Research, 27(6), 894–910. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2020.1856790
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howe, D. C., Kahn, P. H., & Friedman, B. (1996). Along the Rio Negro: Brazilian children’s environmental views and values. Developmental Psychology, 32(6), 979. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.32.6.979
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hussar, K. M., & Horvath, J. C. (2011). Do children play fair with mother nature? Understanding children’s judgments of environmentally harmful actions. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 31(4), 309–313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2011.05.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, C., & Wu, Z. (2022). They can and will: Preschoolers encourage pro-environmental behavior with rewards and punishments. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 82, 101842. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2022.101842
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inagaki, K., & Hatano, G. (2006). Young children’s conception of the biological world. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 15(4), 177–181. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2006.00431.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaime, M., Salazar, C., Alpizar, F., & Carlsson, F. (2022). Can school environmental education programs make children and parents more pro-environmental? Journal of Development Economics, 161, 103032. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2022.103032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen, B. B. (2002). Knowledge, action and pro-environmental behaviour. Environmental Education Research, 8(3), 325–334. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504620220145474
   Google Scholar
• Kahn, P. H. (1997). Children’s moral and ecological reasoning about the Prince William Sound oil spill. Developmental Psychology, 33(6), 1091. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.33.6.1091
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahn, P. H. (1999). The human relationship with nature: Development and culture. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kahn, P. H. (2002). Children’s affiliations with nature: Structure, development, and the problem of environmental generational amnesia. In P. H. Kahn & S. R. Kellert (Eds.), Children and nature: Psychological, sociocultural, and evolutionary investigations (pp. 93–116). MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kahn, P. H., & Friedman, B. (1995). Environmental views and values of children in an inner-city black community. Child Development, 66(5), 1403–1417. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.1995.tb00942.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahn, P. H., Friedman, B., Perez-Granados, D. R., & Freier, N. G. (2006). Robotic pets in the lives of preschool children. Interaction Studies: Social Behavior and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systems, 7(3), 405–436. https://doi.org/10.1075/is.7.3.13kah
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahn, P. H., Severson, R. L., & Ruckert, J. H. (2009). The human relation with nature and technological nature. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18(1), 37–42. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2009.01602.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaiser, F. G., & Wilson, M. (2000). Assessing people’s general ecological behavior: A cross‐cultural measure 1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 30(5), 952–978. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2000.tb02505.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanakogi, Y., Inoue, Y., Matsuda, G., Butler, D., Hiraki, K., & Myowa-Yamakoshi, M. (2017). Preverbal infants affirm third-party interventions that protect victims from aggressors. Nature Human Behaviour, 1(2), Article 0037. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-016-0037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanakogi, Y., Okumura, Y., Inoue, Y., Kitazaki, M., Itakura, S., & Bremner, A. (2013). Rudimentary sympathy in preverbal infants: Preference for others in distress. Public Library of Science ONE, 8(6), e65292. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0065292
   Google Scholar
• Keil, F. C. (2007). Biology and beyond: Domain specificity in a broader developmental context. Human Development, 50(1), 31–38. https://doi.org/10.1159/000097682
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kellert, S. R., & Wilson, E. O. (Eds.). (1993). The biophilia hypothesis. Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Killen, M. (2018). The origins of morality: Social equality, fairness, and justice. Philosophical Psychology, 31(5), 767–803. https://doi.org/10.1080/09515089.2018.1486612
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Killen, M., & Smetana, J. G. (2015). Origins and development of morality. In M. E. Lamb (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology and developmental science (7th ed. Vol. III, pp. 701–749). Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Kozachenko, H. H., & Piazza, J. (2021). How children and adults value different animal lives. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 210, 105204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2021.105204
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krebs, D. L. (2008). Morality: An evolutionary account. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3(3), 149–172. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6924.2008.00072.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krettenauer, T. (2021). Moral sciences and the role of education. Journal of Moral Education, 50(1), 77–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057240.2020.1784713
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewin, D. (2020). Between horror and boredom: Fairy tales and moral education. Ethics and Education, 15(2), 213–231. https://doi.org/10.1080/17449642.2020.1731107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malle, B. F. (2021). Moral judgments. Annual Review of Psychology, 72(1), 293–318. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-072220-104358
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mareschal, D., & Quinn, P. C. (2001). Categorization in infancy. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 5(10), 443–450. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01752-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall, J., Wynn, K., & Bloom, P. (2020). Do children and adults take social relationship into account when evaluating people’s actions? Child Development, 91(5), e1082–e1100. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13390
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neaman, A., Otto, S., & Vinokur, E. (2018). Toward an integrated approach to environmental and prosocial education. Sustainability, 10(3), 583. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10030583
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nucci, L. (2019). Character: A developmental system. Child Development Perspectives, 13(2), 73–78. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12313
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nucci, L., Creane, M. W., & Powers, D. W. (2015). Integrating moral and social development within middle school social studies: A social cognitive domain approach. Journal of Moral Education, 44(4), 479–496. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057240.2015.1087391
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Opfer, J. E., & Gelman, S. A. (2011). Development of the animate–inanimate distinction. In U. Goswami (Ed.), The Wiley-Blackwell handbook of childhood cognitive development (2nd ed. pp. 213–238). Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Otto, S., Evans, G. W., Moon, M. J., & Kaiser, F. G. (2019). The development of children’s environmental attitude and behavior. Global Environmental Change, 58, 101947. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2019.101947
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Otto, S., Pensini, P., Zabel, S., Diaz-Siefer, P., Burnham, E., Navarro-Villarroel, C., & Neaman, A. (2021). The prosocial origin of sustainable behavior: A case study in the ecological domain. Global Environmental Change, 69, Article102312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102312
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paulus, M., Wörle, M., & Christner, N. (2020). The emergence of human altruism: Preschool children develop a norm for empathy-based comforting. Journal of Cognition and Development, 21(1), 104–124. https://doi.org/10.1080/15248372.2019.1693375
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quinn, P. C., & Eimas, P. D. (1996). Perceptual cues that permit categorical differentiation of animal species by infants. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 63(1), 189–211. https://doi.org/10.1006/jecp.1996.0047
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quinn, P. C., & Eimas, P. D. (1998). Evidence for a global categorical representation of humans by young infants. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 69(3), 151–174. https://doi.org/10.1006/jecp.1998.2443
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rakoczy, H., & Schmidt, M. F. H. (2013). The early ontogeny of social norms. Child Development Perspectives, 7(1), 17–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reynolds, S. J., & Ceranic, T. L. (2007). The effects of moral judgment and moral identity on moral behavior: An empirical examination of the moral individual. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(6), 1610–1624. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.6.1610
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruault, J. F., La Tour, A. D., Evette, A., Allain, S., & Callois, J. M. (2022). A biodiversity-employment framework to protect biodiversity. Ecological Economics, 191, 107238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.107238
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schüßler, D., Richter, T., & Mantilla-Contreras, J. (2019). Educational approaches to encourage pro-environmental behaviors in Madagascar. Sustainability, 11(11), 3148. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11113148
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Setoh, P., Wu, D., Baillargeon, R., & Gelman, R. (2013). Young infants have biological expectations about animals. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110(40), 15937–15942. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1314075110
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soga, M., & Gaston, K. J. (2024). Do people who experience more nature act more to protect it? A meta-analysis. Biological Conservation, 289, 110417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2023.110417
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spannring, R. (2017). Animals in environmental education research. Environmental Education Research, 23(1), 63–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2016.1188058
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spriet, C., Abassi, E., Hochmann, J. R., & Papeo, L. (2022). Visual object categorization in infancy. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 119(8), Article e2105866119. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2105866119
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stern, P. (2000). New environmental theories: Toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 407–424. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00175
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stern, J. A., Yucel, M., Grossmann, T., & Vaish, A. (2021). Childhood roots of being green: Environmental morality and behavior in children and adults. https://psyarxiv.com/2ywuk/download?format=pdf
   Google Scholar
• Strid, K., & Meristo, M. (2020). Infants consider the distributor’s intentions in resource allocation. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, Article 2806. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.596213
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Surian, L., & Franchin, L. (2017a). Infants reason about deserving agents: A test with distributive actions. Cognitive Development, 44, 49–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2017.08.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Surian, L., & Franchin, L. (2017b). Toddlers selectively help fair agents. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, Article 944. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00944
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Świątkowski, W., Surret, F. L., Henry, J., Buchs, C., Visintin, E. P., & Butera, F. (2024). Interventions promoting pro-environmental behaviors in children: A meta-analysis and a research agenda. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 102295, 102295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2024.102295
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, C. C., & Markus, H. R. (2023). Enculturating the science of international development: Beyond the WEIRD independent paradigm. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 54(2), 195–214. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220221221128211
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomasello, M. (2016). A natural history of human morality. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tomasello, M. (2019). Becoming human: A theory of ontogeny. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Trivers, R. L. (1971). The evolution of reciprocal altruism. The Quarterly Review of Biology, 46(1), 35–57. https://doi.org/10.1086/406755
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turiel, E. (1983). The development of social knowledge: Morality and convention. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Turiel, E. (2014). Morality: Epistemology, development, and social opposition. In M. Killen & J. G. Smetana (Eds.), Handbook of moral development (2nd ed. pp. 3–22). Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vaish, A., Grossmann, T., & Woodward, A. (2008). Not all emotions are created equal: The negativity bias in social-emotional development. Psychological Bulletin, 134(3), 383. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.134.3.383
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van de Vondervoort, J. W., & Hamlin, J. K. (2016). Evidence for intuitive morality: Preverbal infants make sociomoral evaluations. Child Development Perspectives, 10(3), 143–148. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12175
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van de Vondervoort, J. W., & Hamlin, J. K. (2018). The early emergence of sociomoral evaluation: Infants prefer prosocial others. Current Opinion in Psychology, 20, 77–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.08.014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woo, B. M., Tan, E., & Hamlin, J. K. (2022). Human morality is based on an early-emerging moral core. Annual Review of Developmental Psychology, 4(1), 41–61. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-devpsych-121020-023312
   Google Scholar
• Woo, B. M., Tan, E., Yuen, F. L., & Hamlin, J. K. (2022). Socially evaluative contexts facilitate mentalizing. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 27(1), 17–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2022.10.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wynn, K., Bloom, P., Jordan, A., Marshall, J., & Sheskin, M. (2018). Not noble savages after all: Limits to early altruism. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 27(1), 3–8. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721417734875
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, A., Khalil, K. A., & Wharton, J. (2018). Empathy for animals: A review of the existing literature. Curator: The Museum Journal, 61(2), 327–343. https://doi.org/10.1111/cura.12257
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar