THE MULTIMODAL CONSTRUCTION OF THE IDENTITY OF POLITICIANS

References

• Ainsworth, S., & Hardy, C. (2004). Critical discourse analysis and identity: Why bother? Critical Discourse Studies, 1(2), 225–259. doi: 10.1080/1740590042000302085
   Google Scholar
• Bakhtin, M. M. (1981). The dialogic imagination: Four essays. ( M. Holquist and C. Emerson, Trans.). London: University of Texas Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bednarek, M., & Caple, H. (2010). Playing with environmental stories in the news-good or bad practice. Discourse & Communication, 4(1), 5–31. doi: 10.1177/1750481309351206
   Google Scholar
• Bezemer, J., & Kress, G. (2008). Writing in multimodal texts: A social semiotic account of designs for learning. Written Communication, 25(2), 166–195. doi: 10.1177/0741088307313177
   Google Scholar
• Bloome, D., & Egan-Robertson, A. (1993). The social construction of intertextuality in classroom reading and writing lessons. Reading Research Quarterly, 28, 304–333. doi: 10.2307/747928
   Google Scholar
• Caple, H. (2010). Doubling-up: Allusion and bonding in multisemiotic news stories. In M. Bednarek & J. R. Martin (Eds.), New discourse on language (pp. 111–133). London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Caple, H., & Bednarek, M. (2010). Double take: Unpacking the play in the image-nuclear news story. Visual Communication, 9(2), 211–229. doi: 10.1177/1470357210369863
   Google Scholar
• Culler, J. (1976). Presupposition and intertextuality. Comparative Literature, 91(6), 1380–1396. Retrieved March 31, 2010 from http://www.jstor.org/stable/2907142
   Google Scholar
• De Cillia, R., Reisigl, M., & Wodak, R. (1999). The discursive construction of national identities. Discourse and Society, 10, 149–173. doi: 10.1177/0957926599010002002
   Google Scholar
• Duff, P. A. (2003). Intertextuality and hybrid discourses: The infusion of pop culture in educational discourse. Linguistics and Education, 14, 231–276. doi: 10.1016/j.linged.2004.02.005
   Google Scholar
• Dunmire, P. L. (2009). ‘9/11 changed everything’: An intertextual analysis of the bush doctrine. Discourse & Society, 20(2), 195–222. doi: 10.1177/0957926508099002
   Google Scholar
• El Refaie, E. (2009). Multiliteracies: How readers interpret political cartoons. Visual Communication, 8(2), 181–205. doi: 10.1177/1470357209102113
   Google Scholar
• Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and text: Linguistic intertextual analysis within discourse analysis. Discourse and Society, 3(2), 193–217. doi: 10.1177/0957926592003002004
   Google Scholar
• Fairclough, N. (2003). Analysing discourse: Textual analysis for social research. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Feng, D., & Wignell, P. (2011). Intertextual voices and engagement in TV advertisements. Visual Communication, 10, 565–588. doi: 10.1177/1470357211415788
   Google Scholar
• Galtung, J., & Ruge, M. H. (1965). The structure of foreign news. The presentation of the Congo, Cuba and Cyprus crises in four Norwegian newspapers. Journal of Peace Research, 2, 64–91. doi: 10.1177/002234336500200104
   Google Scholar
• Hall, S. (2000). “Who needs ‘identity’”? In P. du Gay, J. Evans & P. Redman (Eds.), Identity: A reader (pp. 15–30). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Harcup, T., & O'Neill, D. (2001). What is news? Galtung and Ruge revisited. Journalism Studies, 2(2), 261–280. doi: 10.1080/14616700118449
   Google Scholar
• Hartley, J. (1982). Understanding News. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hickman, S. E., & Muehlenhard, C. L. (1999). ‘By the semi-mystical appearance of a condom’: How young women and men communicate sexual consent in heterosexual situations. Journal of Sex Research, 36(3), 258–272. doi: 10.1080/00224499909551996
   Google Scholar
• Hiramoto, M. (Ed.). (2012). Media intertextualities. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Hodge, R., & Kress, G. R. (1988). Social semiotics. New York: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Iedema, R. (2001). Resemiotization. Semiotica, 1(4), 23–39.
   Google Scholar
• Iedema, R. (2003). Multimodality, resemiotization: Extending the analysis of discourse as multi-semiotic practice. Visual Communication, 2(1), 29–57. doi: 10.1177/1470357203002001751
   Google Scholar
• Irwin, W. (2004). Against intertextuality. Philosophy and Literature, 28(2), 227–242. doi: 10.1353/phl.2004.0030
   Google Scholar
• Ivanic, R. (2004). Intertextual practices in the construction of multimodal texts in inquiry-based learning. In N. Shuart-Faris & D. Bloome (Eds.), Uses of intertextuality in classroom and educational research (pp. 279–316). Greenwich: Information Age Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Jaworski, A., & Thurlow, C. (2010). Semiotic landscapes. London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Jewitt, C. (2005). Classrooms and the design of pedagogic discourse: A multimodal approach. Culture Psychology, 11(3), 309–320. doi: 10.1177/1354067X05055519
   Google Scholar
• Jewitt, C., & Oyama, R. (2001). Visual meaning: A social semiotic approach. In T. Van Leeuwen & C. Jewitt (Eds.), A handbook of visual analysis (pp. 134–156). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Johnstone, B. (2008). Discourse analysis (2nd ed.). Malden: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Knox, J. (2007). Visual-verbal communication on online newspaper home pages. Visual Communication, 6(1), 19–53. doi: 10.1177/1470357207071464
   Google Scholar
• Kress, G. R. (2005). Gains and losses: New forms of texts, knowledge, and learning. Computers and Composition, 22, 5–22. doi: 10.1016/j.compcom.2004.12.004
   Google Scholar
• Kress, G. R. (2009). Multimodality: A social semiotic approach to contemporary communication. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kress, G. R., & Van Leeuwen, T. (1996). Reading images: The grammar of visual design. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kress, G. R., & Van Leeuwen, T. (1998). Front pages: The (critical) analysis of newspaper layout. In A. Bell & P. Garrett (Eds.), Approaches to media discourse (pp. 186–219). Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Kristeva, J. (1986). The Kristeva reader. T. Moi (Ed.). Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Lemke, J. L. (1992). Intertextuality and educational research. Linguistics and Education, 4(3), 257–267. doi: 10.1016/0898-5898(92)90003-F
   Google Scholar
• Lennon, P. (2004). Allusions in the press. An applied linguistic study. Berlin: De Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• McCloud, S. (1993). Understanding comics. The invisible art. New York: Harper Perennial.
   Google Scholar
• Orr, M. (2003). Intertextuality. Debates and contexts. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pietikäinen, S., & Dufva, H. (2006). Voices in discourses: Dialogism, critical discourse analysis and ethnic identity. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 10(2), 205–224. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-6441.2006.00325.x
   Google Scholar
• Scollon, R. (1998). Mediated discourse as social interaction: A study of news discourse. London: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Solin, A. (2004). Intertextuality as mediation: On the analysis of intertextual relations in public discourse. Text, 24(2), 267–296.
   Google Scholar
• Stenglin, M. (2009). Space and communication in exhibitions. Unravelling the nexus. In C. Jewitt (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of multimodal analysis (pp. 272–283). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wahl-jorgensen, K. (2004). Playground of the pundits or voice of the people? Comparing British and Danish opinion pages1. Journalism Studies, 5(1), 59–70. doi: 10.1080/1461670032000174747
   Google Scholar