The politics of fear vs. the politics of hope: analysing the 2015 Greek election and referendum campaigns

References

• Allen, M., & Burell, N. (2002). The negativity effect in political advertising. A meta-analysis. In J. Dillard & M. Pfau (Eds.), The persuasion handbook: Developments in theory and practice (pp. 83–98). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, B. (1983/2006). Imagined communities. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Ansolabehere, S., & Iyengar, S. (1995). Going negative: How political advertisements shrink and polarize the electorate. New York: The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Aristotle. (1992). Topics. Athens: Kaktos (in Greek).
   Google Scholar
• Aristotle. (2004). Rhetoric. Thessaloniki: Zitros (in Greek).
   Google Scholar
• Billig, M. (1995). Banal nationalism. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Charteris-Black, J. (2014). Analysing political speeches: Rhetoric, discourse and metaphor. London: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Fairclough, I., & Fairclough, N. (2012). Political discourse analysis. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fairclough, N. (2006). Language and globalisation. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Featherstone, K. (2011). The Greek Sovereign Debt Crisis and EMU: A failing state in a skewed regime. JCMS, 49(2), 193–217.
   Google Scholar
• Finlayson, A. (2012). Rhetoric and the political theory of ideologies. Political Studies, 60(4), 751–767. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9248.2012.00948.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garramone, G. Μ., Atkin, C. K., Pinkleton, B. E., & Cole, R. T. (1990). Effects of negative political advertising on political process. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 34, 299–311. doi: 10.1080/08838159009386744
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gropas, R., & Triandafyllidou, A. (2009). The state of the art: Various paths to modernity. In ELIAMEP, Greek case report. Athens: ELIAMEP.
   Google Scholar
• Hobsbawm, E. (1992). Introduction. In E. Hobsbawm & T. Ranger (Eds.), The invention of tradition (pp. 1–14). Cambridge: CUP.
   Google Scholar
• Howarth, D., Norval, A., & Stavrakakis, Y. (2000). Discourse theory and political analysis. Manchester: MUP.
   Google Scholar
• Ihnen, C., & Richardson, J. (2011). On combining pragma-dialectics with critical discourse analysis. In E. Feteris, B. Garssen, & F. Snoeck Henkemans (Eds.), Keeping in touch with Pragma-dialectics: In honour of Frans H. Van Eemeren (pp. 231–244). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Kahn, K. F., & Kenney, P. J. (1999). Do negative campaigns mobilize or suppress turnout? Clarifying the relationship between negativity and participation. The American Political Science Review, 93(4), 877–889. doi: 10.2307/2586118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplanis, Y. (2011). An economy that excludes the many and an accidental revolt. In A. Vradis & D. Dalakoglou (Eds.), Revolt and crisis in Greece: Between a present yet to pass and a future still to come (pp. 215–28). London: A.K. Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kienpointner, M. (2001). Modern revivals of Aristotle’s and Cicero’s Topics: Toulmin, Parelman, Anscombre/Ducrot. In A. Bertocchi, M. Maraldi, & A. Orlandini (Eds.), Papers on Grammar VII argumentation and Latin (pp. 17–34). Bologna: CLUEB.
   Google Scholar
• Kontogiorgis, G. (2012). Partitocracy and dynastic state. Athens: Savvalas (in Greek).
   Google Scholar
• Laclau, E. (2000). Identity and hegemony: The role of universality in the construction of the political logics. In J. Butler, E. Laclau, & S. Zizek (Eds.), Contingency, hegemony, universality; contemporary dialogues on the left (pp. 44–90). London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (2003). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mancini, P. (1999). New frontiers in political professionalism. Political Communication, 16(3), 231–245. doi: 10.1080/105846099198604
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNair, B. (2003). An introduction to political communication. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Musolff, A. (2006). Metaphor scenarios in public discourse. Metaphor and Symbol, 21(1), 23–38. doi: 10.1207/s15327868ms2101_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pappas, T. (2013). Why Greece failed. Journal of Democracy, 24(2), 31–45. doi: 10.1353/jod.2013.0035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reisigl, M. (2014). Argumentation analysis and the discourse-historical approach: A methodological framework. In C. Hart & P. Cap (Eds.), Contemporary critical discourse studies (pp. 67–96). London: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Reisigl, M., & Wodak, R. (2001). Discourse and discrimination: Rhetorics of racism and antisemitism. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Reisigl, M., & Wodak, R. (2009). The discourse historical approach. In R. Wodak & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods of critical discourse analysis (pp. 87–121). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Richardson, J., & Wodak, R. (2013). Analysing fascist discourse: European fascism in talk and text. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rubinelli, S. (2009). ArsTopica: The classical technique of constructing arguments from Aristotle to Cicero. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Schulz, W. (1997). Changes of the mass media and the public sphere. Javnost – The Public, 4, 57–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spinoza, B. (2001). Ethics. London: Wordsworth Classics.
   Google Scholar
• Swanson, D. L., & Mancini, P. (1996). Patterns of modern electoral campaigning and their consequences. In D. L. Swanson & P. Mancini (Eds.), Politics, media and modern democracy. An international study of innovations in electoral campaigning and their consequences (pp. 247–276). London: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Tajfel, H. (1981). Human groups and social categories. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of inter-group behavior. In S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7–24). Chicago, IL: Nelson Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Toulmin, S. (1958/2003). The uses of argument. Cambridge: CUP.
   Google Scholar
• Tsoukalas, C. (2013). Forms of continuity and discontinuity. Athens: Themelio (in Greek).
   Google Scholar
• Van Dijk, T. (1998). What is political discourse analysis? In J. Blommaert & Ch. Bulcaen (Eds.), Political linguistics (pp. 11–52). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Vasilopoulou, S., & Halikiopoulou, D. (2013). In the shadow of Grexit: The Greek election of 17 June 2012. South European Society and Politics, 18(4), 523–542. doi: 10.1080/13608746.2013.779784
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vasilopoulou, S., Halikiopoulou, D., & Exadaktylos, T. (2014). Greece in Crisis: Austerity, populism and the politics of blame. Journal of Common Market Studies, 52(2), 388–402. doi: 10.1111/jcms.12093
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vernardakis, C. (2011). Political parties, elections and party system: The transformations of political representation 1990–2010. Athens: Sakkoulas (in Greek).
   Google Scholar
• Vernardakis, C. (2012). From Mass Parties to Cartel Parties: The evolution of the structure of political parties in Greece through changes in their statutes and systems of financing. Working paper series in the legal regulation of political parties, No. 27.
   Google Scholar
• Verney, S. (2014). Broken and can’t be fixed’: The impact of the economic crisis on the Greek party system. The International Spectator: Italian Journal of International Affairs, 49(1), 18–35. doi: 10.1080/03932729.2014.877222
   Google Scholar
• Verney, S. (2015). Waking the ‘sleeping giant’ or expressing domestic dissent? Mainstreaming Euroscepticism in crisis-stricken Greece. International Political Science Review, 36(3), 279–295. doi: 10.1177/0192512115577146
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voltmer, K. (2006). The mass media and the dynamics of political communication in processes of democratization. An introduction. In K. Voltmer (Ed.), Mass media and political communication in new democracies (pp. 1–17). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Voulgaris, Y., & Nikoloakopoulos, I. (2014). The 2102 election earthquake. In Y. Voulgaris & I. Nikolakopoulos (Eds.), The 2012 double election earthquake (pp. 9–31). Athens: Themelio (in Greek).
   Google Scholar
• Wattenberg, M. P., & Brians, C. L. (1999). Negative campaign advertising: Demobilizer or mobilizer? The American Political Science Review, 93, 891–899. doi: 10.2307/2586119
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wodak, R. (2001). The discourse historical approach. In R. Wodak & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods of critical discourse analysis (pp. 63–95). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Wodak, R. (2011). The discourse of politics in action: Politics as usual. London: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Wodak, R. (2015). The politics of fear: What right wing populist discourses mean. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Wodak, R., & Boukala, S. (2015). European identities and the revival of nationalism in the European Union: A discourse historical approach. Journal of Language and Politics, 14(1), 87–109. doi: 10.1075/jlp.14.1.05wod
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wodak, R., de Cillia, R., Reisigl, M., & Liebhart, K. (2009). The discursive construction of national identity. Edinburgh: EUP.
   Google Scholar
• Wodak, R., & Fairclough, N. (2010). Recontextualizing European higher education policies: The cases of Austria and Romania. Critical Discourse Studies, 7(1), 19–40. doi: 10.1080/17405900903453922
   Google Scholar