The field-specific representation of climate change in factual television: a multimodal critical discourse analysis

References

• Albertson, B., & Busby, J. W. (2015). Hearts or minds? Identifying persuasive messages on climate change. Research and Politics, 2(1), 1–9. doi: 10.1177/2053168015577712
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bacon, W., & Nash, C. (2012). Playing the media game. The relative (in)visibility of coal industry interests in media reporting of coal as a climate change issue in Australia. Journalism Studies, 13(2), 243–258. doi: 10.1080/1461670X.2011.646401
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bain, P. G., Milfont, T. L., Kashima, Y., Bilewicz, M., Doron, G., Garðarsdóttir, R. B., … Saviolidis, N. M. (2016). Co-benefits of addressing climate change can motivate action around the world. Nature Climate Change, 6, 154–159. doi:10.1038/NCLIMATE2814
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berglez, P. (2011). Inside, outside, and beyond media logic: Journalistic creativity in climate reporting. Media, Culture & Society, 33(3), 449–465. doi: 10.1177/0163443710394903
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berglez, P., Höijer, B., & Olausson, U. (2009). Individualisation and nationalisation of the climate issue: Two ideological horizons in Swedish news media. In T. Boyce & J. Lewis (Eds.), Climate change and the media (pp. 211–223). New York, NY: Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Bernauer, T., & McGrath, L. F. (2016). Simple reframing unlikely to boost public support for climate policy. Nature Climate Change, 6, 680–683. doi: 10.1038/nclimate2948
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bevitori, C. (2011). The meanings of responsibility in the British and American press on climate change: A corpus-assisted discourse analysis perspective. In S. Goźdź-Roszkowski (Ed.), Explorations across languages and corpora: PALC 2009 (pp. 243–259). Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Bland, D. (2014). Environmental discourse: Power, agency, and the ‘green consumer’. Language & Ecology. Retrieved from http://www.ecoling.net/articles
   Google Scholar
• Boykoff, M. T. (2011). Who speaks for the climate? Making sense of media reporting on climate change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carvalho, A. (2005). Representing the politics of the greenhouse effect: Discursive strategies in the British media. Critical Discourse Studies, 2(1), 1–29. doi: 10.1080/17405900500052143
   Google Scholar
• Crome, K. (2012). Nachhaltigkeitsberichterstattung zwischen Programm und Produktion: Über die doppelte Verantwortung von Medienunternehmen [ Sustainability reporting between programming and production: About the double responsibility of media corporations]. uwf – UmweltWirtschaftsForum, 19(3–4), 257–261. doi: 10.1007/s00550-011-0214-z
   Google Scholar
• Debrett, M. (2015). Representing climate change on public service television: A case study. Public Understanding of Science. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1177/0963662515597187
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doyle, J. (2011). Mediating climate change. Farnham: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Esbjörn-Hargens, S. (2010). An ontology of climate change: Integral pluralism and the enactment of multiple objects. Journal of Integral Theory and Practice, 5(1), 143–174.
   Google Scholar
• Forchtner, B., & Schneickert, C. (2016). Collective learning in social fields: Bourdieu, Habermas and Critical Discourse Analysis. Discourse & Society, 27(3), 293–307. doi: 10.1177/0957926516630892
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grundmann, R., & Krishnamurthy, R. (2010). The discourse of climate change: A corpus-based approach. Critical Approaches to Discourse Analysis across Disciplines, 4(2), 125–146.
   Google Scholar
• Hulme, M. (2009). Why we disagree about climate change: Understanding controversy, inaction and opportunity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Iedema, R. (2001). Analysing film and television: A social semiotic account of hospital: An unhealthy business. In T. van Leeuwen & C. Jewitt (Eds.), Handbook of visual analysis (pp. 183–204). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Ihlen, Ø., & Nitz, M. (2008). Framing contests in environmental disputes: Paying attention to media and cultural master frames. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 2(1), 1–18. doi: 10.1080/15531180701623478
   Google Scholar
• IPCC. (2014). Climate change 2014: Synthesis report. Contribution of working groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Geneva: IPCC. Retrieved from IPCC: http://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar5/syr/
   Google Scholar
• León, B., & Erviti, M. C. (2015). Science in pictures: Visual representation of climate change in Spain’s television news. Public Understanding of Science, 24(2), 183–199. doi: 10.1177/0963662513500196
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lester, L., & Cottle, S. (2009). Visualizing climate change: Television news and ecological citizenship. International Journal of Communication, 3, 920–936.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marschalek, M. (Writer), & Taufer, T. (Director). (2012, February 5). ‘Grüne’ Kirche. In N. Steidl (Producer), Orientierung. Wien: Österreichischer Rundfunk (ORF).
   Google Scholar
• Moser, S. C. (2010). Communicating climate change: History, challenges, process and future directions. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 1(1), 31–53. doi: 10.1002/wcc.11
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nisbet, M. C. (2009). Communicating climate change: Why frames matter for public engagement. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, 51(2), 12–23. doi: 10.3200/ENVT.51.2.12-23
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olausson, U. (2009). Global warming – global responsibility? Media frames of collective action and scientific certainty. Public Understanding of Science, 18(4), 421–436. doi: 10.1177/0963662507081242
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Neill, S., Boykoff, M. T., Niemeyer, S., & Day, S. A. (2013). On the use of imagery for climate change engagement. Global Environmental Change, 23, 413–421. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.11.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ORF. (2012). Vom 4. bis 10. Februar 2012: ORF-Programmschwerpunkt ‘Unser Klima: Es liegt in unserer Hand!’ [Internet Archive]. Retrieved from https://web.archive.org/web/20130512230533/http://klima.orf.at/klima_schwerpunkt.html
   Google Scholar
• Peirce, C. S. (1931–1958). Collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reisigl, M. (2011). Grundzüge der Wiener Kritischen Diskursanalyse. In R. Keller, A. Hirseland, W. Schneider, & W. Viehöver (Eds.), Handbuch Sozialwissenschaftliche Diskursanalyse. Band 1: Theorien und Methoden (3rd ed., pp. 459–497). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
   Google Scholar
• Reisigl, M. (2014). Argumentation analysis and the Discourse-Historical Approach. A methodological framework. In C. Hart & P. Cap (Eds.), Contemporary critical discourse studies (pp. 67–96). London: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Reisigl, M., & Wodak, R. (2016). The discourse-historical approach (DHA). In R. Wodak & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods of critical discourse studies (3rd ed., pp. 23–61). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Sabet, M. (2014). ‘MORAL OFFSET’. Competing framings of pro-environmental lifestyle choices. Critical Discourse Studies, 11(1), 95–116. doi: 10.1080/17405904.2013.829115
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlichting, I. (2013). Strategic framing of climate change by industry actors: A meta-analysis. Environmental Communication, 7(4), 493–511. doi: 10.1080/17524032.2013.812974
   Google Scholar
• Schwarz, E. (Writer), & Ronnie, M. (Director). (2012, February 6). Energie-Ausweis. In E. Möser (Producer), Konkret – Das Servicemagazin. Wien: Österreichischer Rundfunk (ORF).
   Google Scholar
• Sedlaczek, A. S. (2014). Multimodale Repräsentation von Klimawandel und Klimaschutz. Eine theoretische und methodologische Annäherung am Beispiel des Österreichischen Rundfunks [ Multimodal representation of climate change and climate protection: A theoretic and methodological approach using the example of Austrian public service broadcasting]. Wiener Linguistische Gazette, 78A, 14–33.
   Google Scholar
• Sedlaczek, A. S. (2016). Representations of climate change in documentary television. Integrating an ecolinguistic and ecosemiotic perspective into a multimodal critical discourse analysis. Language & Ecology. Retrieved from http://www.ecoling.net/articles
   Google Scholar
• Sikka, T. (2012). A critical discourse analysis of geoengineering advocacy. Critical Discourse Studies, 9(2), 163–175. doi: 10.1080/17405904.2012.656377
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slocum, R. (2004). Polar bears and energy-efficient lightbulbs: Strategies to bring climate change home. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 22(3), 413–438. doi: 10.1068/d378
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sonnett, J. (2010). Climates of risk: A field analysis of global climate change in US media discourse, 1997–2004. Public Understanding of Science, 19(6), 698–716. doi: 10.1177/0963662509346368
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Leeuwen, T. (2005). Introducing social semiotics. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wardekker, J. A., Petersen, A. C., & van der Sluijs, J. P. (2008). Religious positions on climate change and climate policy in the United States. In A. Carvalho (Ed.), Communicating climate change: Discourses, mediations and perceptions (pp. 53–72). Braga: Centro de Estudos de Comunicação e Sociedade, Universidade do Minho. Retrieved from http://www.lasics.uminho.pt/ojs/index.php/climate_change/article/view/414
   Google Scholar
• Ytterstad, A. (2015). Framing global warming: Is that really the question? A realist, Gramscian critique of the framing paradigm in media and communication research. Environmental Communication, 9(1), 1–19. doi: 10.1080/17524032.2014.919332
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar