Resisting dehumanization: citizen voices and acts of solidarity

References

• Abramsky, S. (2016). If Sweden and Denmark are so progressive, why did they close their doors to refugees? The Nation, September 27. Retrieved from https://www.thenation.com/article/if-sweden-and-denmark-are-so-progressive-why-did-they-close-their-doors-to-refugees/
   Google Scholar
• Agustin, O. G., & Jørgensen, M. B. (eds.). (2016). Solidarity without Borders: Gramscian perspectives on migration and civil society alliances (pp. 3–19). London: Pluto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bech, E. C., Borevi, K., & Mouritsen, P. (2017). CMS 5: 7. doi: 10.1186/s40878-016-0046-7
   Google Scholar
• Billig, M. (2006). Political rhetorics of discrimination. In K. Brown (Ed.), Encyclopaedia for language and linguistics (pp. 697–699). Oxford: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Boréus, K. (2013). Nationalism and discursive discriminiation against immigrants in Austria, Denmark and Sweden. In R. Wodak, M. KhosraviNik, & B. Mral (Eds.), Right-wing populism in Europe: Politics and discourse (pp. 293–308). London: Bloomsbury Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Death, C. (2010). Counter-conducts. A Foucauldian analytics of protest. Social Movement Studies: Journal of Social, Cultural and Political Protest, 9(3), 235–251. doi: 10.1080/14742837.2010.493655
   Google Scholar
• Fairclough, N. (2003). Analysing discourse. Textual analysis for social research. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1983). The subject and power. In H. Dreyfus & P. Rabinow (Eds.), Michel Foucault: Beyond structuralism and hermeneutics (pp. 208–226). Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (2007). Security, territory, population: Lectures at the Collège de France 1977–78. (G. Burchell, Trans.). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Fryklund, B. (2013). Populism – Changes over time and space: A comparative and retrospective analysis of populist parties in the Nordic Countries from 1965 to 2012. In R. Wodak, M. KhosraviNik, & B. Mral (Eds.), Right-wing populism in Europe: Politics and discourse (pp. 267–276). London: Bloomsbury Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Holloway, J. (2005). Change the world without taking the power. The meaning of revolution today. London: Pluto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jørgensen, M. B., & Agustin, O. G. (Eds.). (2015). Politics of dissent. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Jørgensen, M. B., & Thomsen, T. L. (2013). Crises Now and then – Comparing integration policy frameworks and immigrant target groups in Denmark in the 1970s and 2000s. Journal of International Migration and Integration, 14, 245–262.
   Google Scholar
• Lindegaard, L. B. (2016). The discursive intersection of the government of others and the government of self in the face of climate change. In P. McIlvenny, J. Z. Klausen, & L. B. Lindegaard (Eds.), Studies of discourse and governmentality (pp. 95–118). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• The Local. (2016). Why do refugees prefer Sweden to Denmark? 4 January 2017. Retrieved from https://www.thelocal.se/20160104/why-do-refugees-prefer-sweden-to-denmark
   Google Scholar
• Martin, J. R., & White, P. R. R. (2005). The language of evaluation. Appraisal in English. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• McIlvenny, P., Klausen, J. Z., & Lindegaard, L. B. (2016). Studies of discourse and governmentality. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Milchman, A., & Rosenberg, A. (2009). The final Foucault: Government of others and government of the self. In S. Binkley & J. Capetillo (Eds.), A Foucault for the 21st century: Governmentality, biopolitics and discipline in the new millennium (pp. 62–71). Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Press.
   Google Scholar
• Myers, G. (2004). Matters of opinion: Talking about public issues. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen, N. R. (2016). El-politikere skal for retten tirsdag. Århus Stiftstidende. Retrieved from http://stiften.dk/aarhus/EL-politikere-skal-for-retten-tirsdag/artikel/353730
   Google Scholar
• Pyrhönen, N., Leinonen, J., & Martikainen, T. (2017). Nordic migration and integration research. Overview and future prospects. Policy Paper 3/2017. Oslo: Nordforsk.
   Google Scholar
• Rancière, J. (1999). Disagreement: Politics and philosophy. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rancière, J. (2010). Dissensus. On politics and aesthetics. London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Ritzau. (2016). Mange lønmodtagere frygter at flygtninge vil tage job. Politiken. Retrieved from https://politiken.dk/oekonomi/arbejdsmarked/art5610659/Mange-l%C3%B8nmodtagere-frygter-atflygtninge-vil-tage-job (verified 150218)
   Google Scholar
• Rydgren, J. (2010). Radical right-wing populism in Denmark and Sweden: Explaining party system change and stability. SAIS Review, 30(1), 57–71. doi: 10.1353/sais.0.0070
   Google Scholar
• Siim, B., & Meret, S. (2016). Right wing populism in Denmark – People, nation and welfare in the construction of the ‘other’. In G. Lazaridis, A. Benveniste, & G. Campani (Eds.), The rise of the Far right in a Europe under crisis (pp. 1–31). London: Palgrave/Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Suszycki, A. M. (Ed.). (2011). Welfare citizenship and welfare nationalism. NordWel studies in historical welfare state research 2. Helsinki: Nordic Centre of Excellence NordWel.
   Google Scholar
• Vallgårda, S., Diderichsen, F., & Jørgensen, T. (2014). Sygdomsforebyggelse. København: Munksgaard.
   Google Scholar
• Walters, W. (2012). Governmentality. Critical encounters. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wodak, R. (2015). The politics of fear. London and New York: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Wodak, R., & Meyer, M. (Eds.). (2010). Methods of critical discourse analysis. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (2012). Case-study research. Design and methods (5th ed). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar