Accumulating discursive capital, valuating subject positions. From Marx to Foucault

References

• Althusser, L. (2003). Three notes on the theory of discourses. In The humanist controversy and other writings (1966–67) (pp. 33–84). London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Angermuller, J. (2009). Citer les autorités du discours intellectuel. Tel Quel et la création de la Théorie. Regards sociologiques, 37/38, 175–183.
   Google Scholar
• Angermuller, J. (2013a). Discours académique et gouvernementalité entrepreneuriale. Des textes aux chiffres. In M. Temmar, J. Angermuller, & F. Lebaron (Eds.), Les discours sur l'économie (pp. 7184). Paris: PUF.
   Google Scholar
• Angermuller, J. (2013b). How to become an academic philosopher. Academic discourse as a multileveled positioning practice. Sociología histórica, 3, 263–289.
   Google Scholar
• Angermuller, J. (2014). Poststructuralist discourse analysis. Subjectivity in enunciative pragmatics. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Angermuller, J. (2015). Why there is no poststructuralism in France. The making of an intellectual generation. London: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Angermuller, J. (2017). Academic careers and the valuation of academics. A discursive perspective on status categories and academic salaries in France as compared to the U.S., Germany and Great Britain. Higher Education, 73, 963–980. doi: 10.1007/s10734-017-0117-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Angermuller, J. (2018). Truth after post-truth: For a Strong Programme in Discourse Studies. Palgrave Communications, 4(30), 1–8. doi: 10.1057/s41599-018-0080-1
   Google Scholar
• Angermuller, J., & Maeße, J. (2015). Regieren durch Leistung. Zur Verschulung des Sozialen in der Numerokratie. In A. Schaefer & C. Thompson (Eds.), Leistung (pp. 61–108). Paderborn: Schöningh.
   Google Scholar
• Baudrillard, J. (1972). Pour une critique de l’économie politique du signe. Paris: Gallimard. [transl. For a critique of the political economy of the sign. St. Louis: Telos Press, 1981].
   Google Scholar
• Beetz, J., & Schwab, V. (2017). Material discourse-materialist analysis: Approaches in discourse studies. London: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Berger, P., & Luckmann, T. (1966). The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. New York: Anchor Books.
   Google Scholar
• Boltanski, L., & Esquerre, A. (2017). Enrichissement: Une critique de la marchandise. Paris: Gallimard.
   Google Scholar
• Borrelli, G. (2018). Marx, a ‘semiotician’? On the (possible) relevance of a materialistic-semiotic approach to discourse studies. Critical Discourse Studies. doi: 10.1080/17405904.2018.1456947
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (1982). Ce que parler veut dire. L’économie des échanges linguistiques. Paris: Fayard.
   Google Scholar
• Boutang, Y. (2012). Cognitive capitalism. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Chilton, P. (2014). Language, space and mind: The conceptual geometry of linguistic meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ducrot, O. (1984). Le Dire et le dit. Paris: Minuit.
   Google Scholar
• Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and power. London: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (2004). Territoire, population, sécurité. Paris: Gallimard, Seuil. [transl. Security, Territory, Population. Lectures at the College De France. Basingstoke: Palgrave, Macmillan, 2007].
   Google Scholar
• Franck, G. (2007). Mentaler Kapitalismus. Eine politische Ökonomie des Geistes. Wien: Hanser.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. (1992). Faktizität und Geltung: Beiträge zur Diskurstheorie des Rechts und des demokratischen Rechtsstaats. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
   Google Scholar
• Hamann, J. (2016). “Let us salute one of our kind.” How academic obituaries consecrate research biographies. Poetics, 56, 1–14. doi: 10.1016/j.poetic.2016.02.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haroche, C., Henry, P., & Pêcheux, M. (1971). La sémantique et la coupure saussurienne: Langue, langage, discours. Langages, 24, 93–106. doi: 10.3406/lgge.1971.2608
   Google Scholar
• Harré, R., & Davies, B. (1990). Positioning: The discursive production of selves. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 20(1), 43–63. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-5914.1990.tb00174.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herzog, B. (2016). Discourse analysis as social critique. Discursive and non-discursive realities in critical social research. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Hyland, K. (1999). Academic attribution: Citation and the construction of disciplinary knowledge. Applied Linguistics, 20(3), 341–367. doi: 10.1093/applin/20.3.341
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jameson, F. (1991). Postmodernism, or the cultural logic of late capitalism. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Laclau, E., & Mouffe, C. (1985). Hegemony and socialist strategy. Towards a radical democratic politics. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Lamont, M. (2012). Toward a comparative sociology of valuation and evaluation. Annual Review of Sociology, 38(21), 201–221. doi: 10.1146/annurev-soc-070308-120022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maeße, J. (2013). Das Feld und der Diskurs der Ökonomie. In J. Maeße (Ed.), Ökonomie, Diskurs, Regierung. Interdisziplinäre Perspektiven (pp. 241–275). Wiesbaden: VS.
   Google Scholar
• Marazzi, C. (1994). Il posto dei calzini: la svolta linguistica dell'economia e i suoi effetti nella politica. Bellinzona: Casagrande.
   Google Scholar
• Marx, K. (1990). Capital: Critique of political economy. New York: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Marx, K. (2002). The eighteenth Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte. Marx's eighteenth Brumaire: (Post)modern interpretations, London, Sterling (pp. 19–109). London: Pluto.
   Google Scholar
• Marx, K. (2010). Theses on Feuerbach. Karl Marx and Frederick Engels works, vol. 5, April 1845–April 1847 (pp. 3–5). London: Lawrence & Wishart Electric Book.
   Google Scholar
• Marx, K., & Engels, F. (1963). The German ideology, parts I & III. New York: International Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Marx, K., & Engels, F. (1988). Economic and philosophic manuscripts of 1844 and the communist manifesto. Amherst: Prometheus.
   Google Scholar
• Merton, R. K. (1968). The Matthew effect in science. Science, 159(3810), 56–63. doi: 10.1126/science.159.3810.56
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker, I. (2014). Psychotherapy under capitalism: The production, circulation and management of value and subjectivity. Psychotherapy and Politics International, 12(3), 166–175. doi: 10.1002/ppi.1333
   Google Scholar
• Rancière, J. (1995). La Mésentente: politique et philosophie. Paris: Galilée. [transl. Disagreement. Politics and Philosophy. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1999].
   Google Scholar
• Reitz, T. (2017). Academic hierarchies in neo-feudal capitalism: How status competition processes trust and facilitates the appropriation of knowledge. Higher Education, 73(6), 871–886. doi: 10.1007/s10734-017-0115-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson, J. E. (2004). (Mis)Representing Islam. The racism and rhetoric of British broadsheet newspapers. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Slaughter, S., & Leslie, L. L. (1997). Academic capitalism. Politics, policies, and the entrepreneurial university. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Spivak, G. (1988). Can the subaltern speak? In C. Nelson & L. Grossberg (Eds.), Marxism and the interpretation of culture (pp. 271–313). Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stavrakakis, Y., Katsambekis, G., Nikisianis, N., Kioupkiolis, A., & Siomos, T. (2017). Extreme right-wing populism in Europe: Revisiting a reified association. Critical Discourse Studies, 17(4), 420–439. doi: 10.1080/17405904.2017.1309325
   Google Scholar
• Sum, N.-L., & Jessop, B. (2013). Towards a cultural political economy. Putting culture in its place in political economy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Wodak, R. (2014). The strategy of discursive provocation: A discourse-historical analysis of the FPÖ’s discriminatory rhetoric. In P. Jackson & M. Feldman (Eds.), Doublespeak: The rhetoric of the far right since 1945 (pp. 101–122). Stuttgart: ibidem.
   Google Scholar