Religious solidarity, historical mission and moral superiority: construction of external and internal ‘others’ in AKP’s discourses on Syrian refugees in Turkey

References

• Aras, B., & Polat, R. K. (2007). Turkey and the Middle East: Frontiers of the new geographic imagination. Australian Journal of International Affairs, 61(4), 471–488. doi: 10.1080/10357710701684930
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Çağaptay, S. (2009, October 26). Is turkey leaving the west? Foreign Affairs. Retrieved from http://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/65661/soner-cagaptay/is-turkey-leaving-the-west
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, A. (2010). Washington concerned as Turkey leaving the west. Turkish Policy Quarterly, 9(3), 25–35.
   Google Scholar
• Davutoğlu, A. (2015, September 9). Turkey cannot deal with the refugee crisis alone. EU nations need to help, The Guardian. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2015/sep/09/turkey-refugee-crisis-christian-fortress-europe
   Google Scholar
• Dryzek, J. S. (2003). Discursive democracy vs. liberal constitutionalism. In M. Saward (Ed.), Democratic innovation: Deliberation, representation and association (pp. 78–89). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Efe, I. (2015). Turk basınında Suriyeli sığınmacılar [Syrian asylum-seekers in the Turkish media], SETA Report, Ankara.
   Google Scholar
• Erdoğan, M. (2014). Syrians in Turkey: Social acceptance and integration research. Ankara: Hacettepe University.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, F. (2003). Reframing public policy: Discursive politics and deliberative practices. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gümüş, B., & Eroğlu, D. (2015). Partial integration of Syrian ‘escapees’ under the rule of Turkey’s justice and development party (JDP). Contemporary Arab Affairs, 8(4), 469–487. doi: 10.1080/17550912.2015.1080965
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, L. (2006). Security as practice: Discourse analysis and the Bosnian war. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Howarth, D., & Stavrakakis, Y. (2000). Introducing discourse theory and political analysis. In D. Howarth, A. Norval, & Y. Stavrakakis (Eds.), Discourse theory and political analysis: Identities, hegemonies and social change (pp. 1–23). Manchester and New York: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Huysmans, J. (2000). The European Union and the securitization of migration. Journal of Common Market Studies, 38(5), 751–777. doi: 10.1111/1468-5965.00263
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huysmans, J., & Buonfino, A. (2008). Politics of exception and unease: Immigration, asylum and terrorism in parliamentary debates in the UK. Political Studies, 56(4), 766–788. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9248.2008.00721.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalaycıoğlu, E. (2015). Turkish popular presidential elections: Deepening legitimacy issues and looming regime change. South European Society and Politics, 20(2), 157–179. doi: 10.1080/13608746.2015.1046264
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karyotis, G., & Patrikios, S. (2010). Religion, securitization and anti-immigration attitudes: The case of Greece. Journal of Peace Research, 47(1), 43–57. doi: 10.1177/0022343309350021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keyman, F. (2014). The AK party: Dominant party, New Turkey and polarization. Insight Turkey, 16(2), 19–31.
   Google Scholar
• Keyman, F., & Gümüşcü, Ş. (2014). Democracy, identity and foreign policy in Turkey: Hegemony through transformation. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Korkut, U. (2016). Pragmatism, moral responsibility or policy change: The Syrian refugee crisis and selective humanitarianism in the Turkish refugee regime. Comparative Migration Studies, 4(2), 1–20. doi: 10.1093/migration/mnv029
   Google Scholar
• Maessen, E. (2014). Reassessing Turkish national memory: An analysis of the representation of turkish national memory by the AKP. Middle Eastern Studies, 50(2), 309–324. doi: 10.1080/00263206.2013.870895
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, M. (2001). Between theory, method, and politics: Positioning of the approaches to CDA. In R. Wodak, & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods of critical discourse analysis (pp. 14–32). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Öniş, Z. (2013). Sharing power: Turkey’s democratization challenge in the age of the AKP hegemony. Insight Turkey, 15(2), 103–122.
   Google Scholar
• Özden, S. (2013). Syrian refugees in Turkey. Florence: Migration Policy Centre, European University Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Özkan, B. (2014). Turkey, Davutoglu and the idea of Pan-Islamism. Survival, 56(4), 119–140. doi: 10.1080/00396338.2014.941570
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Said, E. (1978). Orientalism. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Saraçoğlu, C., & Demirkol, Ö. (2015). Nationalism and foreign policy discourse in Turkey under the AKP rule: Geography, history and national identity. British Journal of Middle Eastern Studies, 42(3), 301–319. doi: 10.1080/13530194.2014.947152
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Squire, V. (2009). The exclusionary politics of Asylum. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• van Dijk, T. (2001). Multidisciplinary CDA: A plea for diversity. In R. Wodak, & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods of critical discourse analysis (pp. 95–120). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Wodak, R. (2001). The discourse-historical approach. In R. Wodak, & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods of critical discourse analysis (pp. 63–95). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Wodak, R. (2009). The discourse historical approach. In R. Wodak, & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods of critical discourse analysis (2nd revised edition, pp. 63–94). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Wodak, R. (2011). Suppression of the Nazi past, coded languages, and discourses of silence: Applying the discourse-historical approach to post-War anti-semitism in Austria. In W. Steinmetz (Ed.), Political languages in the age of extremes (pp. 351–379). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yanow, D. (1996). How does a policy mean? Interpreting policy and organizational actions. Washington: Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar