Rehabilitation, language, and power: interdiscursive relationships between policy strategies and professional practices in Norway

References

• Barnes, C., Mercer, G., & Shakespeare, T. (1999). Exploring disability: A sociological introduction. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bhatia, V. K. (2010). Interdiscursivity in professional communication. Discourse & Communication, 4(1), 32–50. doi: 10.1177/1750481309351208
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blaxter, M. (2010). Health. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bowling, A. (2009). Research methods in health. Investigating health and health services. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Bury, M. (1997). Health and illness in a changing society. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bury, M. (2005). Health and illness. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (1991). Comeback: The process of overcoming disability. In G. L. Albrecht & J. A. Levy (Eds.), Advances in medical sociology (pp. 137–159). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
   Google Scholar
• Corker, M., & Shakespeare, T. (2002). Disability/postmodernism. Embodying disability theory. New York: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Dijkers, M. P., Hart, T., Tsaousides, T., Whyte, J., & Zanca, J. M. (2014). Treatment taxonomy for rehabilitation: Past, present, and prospects. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 95(1), S6–S16. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2013.03.032
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fairclough, N. (1992a). Discourse and social change. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fairclough, N. (1992b). Discourse and text: Linguistic and intertextual analysis within discourse analysis. Discourse and Society, 3(2), 193–217. doi: 10.1177/0957926592003002004
   Google Scholar
• Fairclough, N. (2003). Analysing discourse: Textual analysis for social research. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fairclough, N. (2005a). Discourse in processes of social change: ‘Transition’ in Central and Eastern Europe. British and American Studies, 11, 9–35.
   Google Scholar
• Fairclough, N. (2005b). Discourse analysis in organization studies: The case for critical realism. Organization Studies, 26(6), 915–939. doi: 10.1177/0170840605054610
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fairclough, N. (2009). A dialectical-relational approach to critical discourse analysis in social research. In R. Wodak & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods of critical discourse analysis (pp. 162–186). Los Angeles: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Fairclough, N. (2012). Critical discourse analysis. In J. P. Gee & M. Handford (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of discourse analysis (pp. 9–20). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fairclough, N. (2013). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Feiring, M. (2012). Rehabilitation—between management and knowledge practices: An historical overview of public action in Norwegian welfare reforms. Policy and Society, 31(2), 119–129. doi: 10.1016/j.polsoc.2012.04.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flynn, R. (2002). Clinical governance and governmentality. Health, Risk & Society, 4(2), 155–173. doi: 10.1080/13698570220137042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garåsen, H., Magnussen, J., Windspoll, R., & Johnsen, R. (2008). Eldre Pasienter I Sykehus eller i Intermediæravdeling i Sykehjem—en Kostnadsanalyse [Elderly patients in hospitals or intermediary units in nursing homes—A cost analysis]. Tidsskriftet for Norsk Lægeforening, 3(128), 283–285.
   Google Scholar
• Hagen, R., & Johnsen, E. (2013). Styring Gjennom Samhandling: Samhandlingsreformen Som Kasus [Management through coordination: The coordination reform as case]. In A. Tjora & L. Melby (Eds.), Samhandling for helse (pp. 31–52). Oslo: Gyldendal Akademisk.
   Google Scholar
• Hammell, K. W. (2006). Perspectives on disability and rehabilitation. Philadelphia: Churchill Livingstone Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Hanssen, J.-I., & Sandvin, J. T. (2003). Conceptualising rehabilitation in late modern society. Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research, 5(1), 24–41. doi: 10.1080/15017410309512610
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, D. (2006). Neo-liberalism as creative destruction. Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography, 88(2), 145–158. doi: 10.1111/j.0435-3684.2006.00211.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hibbard, J., & Greene, J. (2013). What the evidence shows about patient activation: Better health outcomes and care experiences; fewer data on costs. Health Affairs, 32(2), 207–214. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2012.1061
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holstein, J. A., & Gubrium, J. F. (2000). Constructing the life course. New York: General Hall, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Howarth, D. (2005). Applying discourse theory: The method of articulation. In D. Howarth & J. Torfing (Eds.), Discourse theory in European politics: Identity, policy and governance (pp. 316–349). London: Palgrave Macmillan UK.
   Google Scholar
• Jørgensen, M. W., & Phillips, L. J. (2002). Discourse analysis as theory and method. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Kvale, S., & Brinkmann, S. (2009). Interviews: Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Kvist, J. (2015). A framework for social investment strategies: Integrating generational, life course and gender perspectives in the EU social investment strategy. Comparative European Politics, 13(1), 131–149. doi: 10.1057/cep.2014.45
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kvist, J. (2016). Fighting poverty and exclusion through social investment: A European research perspective—A policy review. Edited by the Directorate General for Research and Innovation of the European Commission, Unit Open and Inclusive Societies. Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Laine, P., & Vaara, E. (2007). Struggling over subjectivity: A discursive analysis of strategic development in an engineering group. Human Relations, 60, 29–58. doi: 10.1177/0018726707075279
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levitt, J. (2017). Exploring how the social model of disability can be re-invigorated: In response to Mike Oliver. Disability and Society, 32(4), 589–594. doi: 10.1080/09687599.2017.1300390
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marini, I. (2011). Theories of adjustment and adaptation to disability. In I. Marini, N. M. Glover-Graf, & M. J. Millington (Eds.), Psychosocial aspects of disability: Insider perspectives and strategies for counselors (pp. 133–168). New York: Springer Publishing Company, LLC.
   Google Scholar
• McLaughlin, H. (2009). What’s in a name: ‘client’, ‘patient’, ‘customer’, ‘consumer’, ‘expert by experience’, ‘service user’—what’s next? British Journal of Social Work, 39(6), 1101–1117. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/bcm155
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monkerud, L. C., & Tjerbo, T. (2016). The effects of the Norwegian coordination reform on the use of rehabilitation services: Panel data analyses of service use, 2010 to 2013. BMS Health Services Research, 16(353), 2–13.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Oliver, M. (1996). Understanding disability: From theory to practice. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
   Google Scholar
• Oliver, M. (2013). The social model of disability: Thirty years on. Disability and Society, 28(7), 1024–1026. doi: 10.1080/09687599.2013.818773
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Priestley, M. (1998). Constructions and creations: Idealism, materialism and disability theory. Disability and Society, 13(1), 75–94. doi: 10.1080/09687599826920
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rabinow, P., & Rose, N. (2006). Biopower today. BioSocieties, 1(2), 195–217. doi: 10.1017/S1745855206040014
   Google Scholar
• Røberg, A. S. B., Feiring, M., & Romsland, G. I. (2017a). Norwegian rehabilitation policies and the coordination reform’s effect: A critical discourse analysis. Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research, 19(1), 56–68. doi: 10.1080/15017419.2016.1196242
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Røberg, A. S. B., Hansen, H. P., Feiring, M., & Romsland, G. I. (2017b). Rehabilitation in momentum of Norwegian coordination reform: From practices of discipline to disciplinary practices. Alter-European Journal of Disability Research, 11(3), 193–207. doi: 10.1016/j.alter.2017.05.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romøren, T. I., Torjesen, D. O., & Landmark, B. (2011). Promoting coordination in Norwegian health care. International Journal of Integrated Care [Special 10th Anniversary Edition], 11, 1–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose, N. (1999). Powers of freedom: Reframing political thought. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, N. (2006). Governing “advanced” liberal democracies. In A. Sharma & A. Gupta (Eds.), The anthropology of the state. A reader (pp. 144–162). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, N., & Miller, P. (1992). Political power beyond the state: Problematics of government. The British Journal of Sociology, 43(2), 173–205. doi: 10.2307/591464
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose, N., O’Malley, P., & Valverde, M. (2009). Governmentality. Sydney Law School Research Paper No. 09/94 2, 83–104. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Mariana_Valverde/publication/277832646_GUBERNAMENTALIDAD/links/559d2fc108ae76bed0bae514.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Sandvin, J. (2012). Rehabilitering som Koordinering og Samhandling [Rehabilitation as coordination and cooperation]. In P. K. Solvang & Å Slettebø (Eds.), Rehabilitering. Individuelle prosesser, fagutvikling og samordning av tjenester (pp. 52–64). Oslo: Gyldendal Norsk Forlag AS.
   Google Scholar
• Shakespeare, T. (2014). Disability rights and wrongs revised. Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Stucki, G., Cieza, A., & Melvin, J. (2007). The international classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF): A unifying model for the conceptual description of the rehabilitation strategy. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine: Official Journal of the UEMS European Board of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, 39(4), 279–285. doi: 10.2340/16501977-0041
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, S. (2003). Locating and conducting discourse analytic research. In M. Wetherell, S. Taylor, & S. J. Yates (Eds.), Discourse as data. A guide for analysis (pp. 5–48). London: The Open University.
   Google Scholar
• Van Dijk, T. A. (2002). Discourse, knowledge and ideology: Reformulating old questions and proposing some new solutions. Paper for the International LAUD Symposium on Language and Ideology, Landau, pp. 5–38. Retrieved from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download;jsessionid=E3BCC3327CA4097EF9F99BF9F8388766?doi=10.1.1.653.3771&rep=rep1&type=pdf
   Google Scholar
• Van Dijk, T. A. (2004). Macro contexts. In U. S. Lottgen & J. S. Sanchez (Eds.), Discourse and international relations (pp. 3–26). Bern: Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Vike, H., Bakken, R., Brinchmann, A., Haukelien, H., & Kroken, R. (2009). Maktens samvittighet [The conscience of power]. Oslo: Gyldendal Akademisk.
   Google Scholar
• White Paper No. 21. (1998–99). St.meld. nr. 21 (1998–99) Ansvar og meistring. Mot ein heilskapleg rehabiliteringspolitikk [ Responsibility and coping. Towards a holistic rehabilitation policy. Not available in English]. Oslo: Sosial- og helsedepatermentet.
   Google Scholar
• White Paper No. 47. (2008–2009). St.Meld. nr 47 (2008–09) Samhandlingsreformen. Rett Behandling - på Rett Sted - til Rett Tid [ The Coordination Reform. Proper treatment—At the right place and right time. Summary in English]. Oslo: Helse- og omsorgsdepartementet.
   Google Scholar
• Wodak, R., & Meyer, M. (2002). Critical discourse analysis: History, agenda, theory, and methodology. In R. Wodak & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods of critical discourse analysis (pp. 1–32). Los Angeles: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar