Green conflicts in environmental discourse. A topos based integrative analysis of critical voices

References

• Aristotle. (2007). On rhetoric. A theory of civic discourse [ Translated by G.A. Kennedy]. (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Arler, F. (2000). Aspects of landscape or nature quality. Landscape Ecology, 15, 291–302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bäckstrand, K., & Lövbrand, E. (2007). Climate governance beyond 2012: Competing discourses of green governmentality, ecological modernization and civic environmentalism. In M. E. Pettenger (Ed.), Red.) The social construction of climate change: Power, knowledge, norms, discourses (pp. 123–147). Farnham/ Burlington: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Billig, M. (1995). Banal nationalism. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Billig, M. (1996). Arguing and thinking: A rhetorical approach to social psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boon, T. E., & Reimer, T. (2015). Blæst om demokratiet. Momentum, 4, 28–31.
   Google Scholar
• Bornscheuer, L. (1976). Topik. Zur Struktur der gesellschaftlichen Einbildungskraft. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp.
   Google Scholar
• Boukala, S. (2016). Rethinking topos in the discourse historical approach: Endoxon seeking and argumentation in Greek media discourses on ‘Islamist terrorism’. Discourse Studies, 18(3), 249–268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carbaugh, D., & Cerulli, T. (2013). Cultural discourses of dwelling: Investigating environmental communication as a place-based Practice. Environmental Communication, 7(1), 4–23.
   Google Scholar
• Carvalho, A. (2007). Ideological cultures and media discourses on scientific knowledge: Re-reading news on climate change. Public Understanding of Science, 16, 223–243.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carvalho, A., Pinto-Coelho, Z., & Seixas, E. (2016). Listening to the public – enacting power: Citizen access, standing and influence in public participation discourses. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, doi: 10.1080/1523908X.2016.1149772
   Google Scholar
• Cottle, S. (2009). Global crisis reporting: Journalism in the global age. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cox, R. (2009). Environmental communication and the public sphere. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Derrien, M. M., & Stokowski, P. A. (2016). Discourses of place: Environmental interpretation about Vermont forests. Environmental Communication, doi: 10.1080/17524032.2016.1211160
   Google Scholar
• Devine-Wright, P. (2009). Rethinking NIMBYism: The role of place attachment and place identity in explaining place-protective action. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 19, 426–441.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dryzek, J. S. (2005). The politics of the earth: Environmental discourses. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eide, E., Kunelius, R., & Kumpu, V. (2010). Global climate – local journalisms: A Translational study of how the media makes sense of climate summits. Bochum/Freiburg: Projektverlag.
   Google Scholar
• Eskjær, M. (2013). The regional dimension: How regional media systems condition global climate-change communication. Journal of International and Intercultural Communication, 6(1), 61–81.
   Google Scholar
• Fairclough, N. (2010). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language (2nd Edition). London: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Fairclough, I., & Fairclough, N. (2012). Political discourse analysis. A method for advanced students. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Forchtner, B., & Kølvraa, C. (2015). The nature of nationalism: Populist radical right parties on countryside and climate. Nature and Culture, 10(2), 199–224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1969). L’archéologie du savoir. Paris: Gallimard.
   Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. (2009). The politics of climate change. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hajer, M. A. (1995). The politics of environmental discourse: Ecological modernization and the policy process. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, A., & Machin, D. (2015). Visual environmental communication. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, D. (1996). Justice, nature, and the geography of difference. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Horsbøl, A. (2011). Responding to expert arguments. Emerging lay topoi in focus group interviews on GM crops. In T. van Haaften, H. Jansen, J. de Jong, & W. Koetsenruijter (Eds.), Bending Opinion. Essays on Persuasion in the Public Domain (pp. 395–406). Leiden: Leiden University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Horsbøl, A. (2013). Energy transition in and by the local media. Nordicom Review, 34(2), 19–34.
   Google Scholar
• Hulme, M. (2010). Why we disagree about climate change: Understanding controversy, inaction and opportunity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Keller, R. (2011). The sociology of knowledge approach to discourse (SKAD). Human Studies, 34(1), 43–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kienpointner, M. (1997). On the art of finding arguments. What ancient and modern masters of invention have to tell us about the ‘Ars Inveniendi’. Argumentation, 11(2), 225–236.
   Google Scholar
• Ko, Y., Schubert, D. K., & Hester, R. T. (2011). A conflict of greens: Green development versus habitat preservation – the case og Incheon, South Korea. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, 53(3), 3–17.
   Google Scholar
• Kopperschmidt, J. (1991). Formale Topik. Anmerkungen zu ihrer heuristischen Funktionalisierung innerhalb einer Argumentationsanalytik. In G. Ueding (Ed.), Rhetorik zwischen den Wissenschaften. Geschichte, System, Praxis als Probleme des “Historischen Wörterbuch der Rhetorik” (pp. 53–62). Tübingen: Niemeyer.
   Google Scholar
• Laclau, E., & Mouffe, C. (1985). Hegemony and socialist strategy: Towards a radical democratic politics. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Lassen, I. (2018). Resisting dehumanization: Citizen voices and acts of solidarity. Critical Discourse Studies, doi: 10.1080/17405904.2018.1441038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malpas, J. (1999). Place and experience: A philosophical topography. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Murton, B. (2010). Place. In B. Warf (Ed.), Encyclopedia of geography (pp. 2187–2188). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Nicolini, D. (2012). Practice theory, work, & organization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Painter, J., et al. (2016). Something old, something new: Digital media and the coverage of climate change. Oxford: Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism.
   Google Scholar
• Potter, J. (2003). Discursive psychology: Between method and paradigm. Discourse & Society, 14(6), 783–794.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reisigl, M. (2014). Argumentation analysis and the discourse-historical approach: A methodological framework. In C. Hart & P. Cap (Eds.), Contemporary critical discourse studies (pp. 67–96). London: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Reisigl, M., & Wodak, R. (2009). The discourse-historical approach. In R. Wodak & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods of critical discourse analysis (pp. 87–121). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Rudolph, D. (2014). The resurgent conflict between offshore wind farms and tourism: Underlying storylines. Scottish Geographical Journal, 130(3), 168–187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schweizer, S., Davis, S., & Thompson, J. L. (2013). Changing the conversation about climate change: A theoretical framework for place-based climate change engagement. Environmental Communication, 7(1), 42–62.
   Google Scholar
• Scollon, R. (2001). Mediated discourse: The nexus of practice. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Stevenson, H., & Dryzek, J. S. (2014). Democratizing global climate governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Toulmin, S. (1958). The uses of argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tuan, Y.-F. (1974). Topophilia. A study of environmental perception, attitudes, and values. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• van Dijk, T. (2009). Society and discourse: How social contexts influence text and talk. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wengeler, M. (2013). Historische Diskurssemantik als Analyse von Argumentationstopoi. In D. Busse & W. Teubert (Eds.), Linguistische Diskursanalyse: Neue Perspektiven (pp. 189–215). Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
   Google Scholar
• Wodak, R. (2009). The discourse of politics in action. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Wynne, B. (1992). Misunderstood misunderstanding: Social identities and public uptake of science. Public Understanding of Science, 1(3), 281–304.
   Google Scholar
• Žagar, IŽ. (2010). Topoi in critical discourse analysis. Lodz Papers in Pragmatics, 6(1), 3–27.
   Google Scholar
• Zompetti, J. P. (2006). The value of topoi. Argumentation, 20(1), 15–28.
   Google Scholar