References
- Fairclough, N. (2016). Evaluating policy as argument: The public debate over the First UK austerity budget. Critical Discourse Studies, 13(1), 57–77. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2015.1074595
- Grisold, A., & Silke, H. (2019). Denying, downplaying, debating: Defensive discourses of inequality in the debate on Piketty. Critical Discourse Studies, 16(3), 264–281. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2019.1570289
- Jeffries, L., & Walker, B. (2019). Austerity in the commons: A corpus critical analysis of austerity and its surrounding grammatical context in Hansard (1803–2015). In K. Power, T. Ali, & E. Lebdušková (Eds.), Discourse analysis and austerity: Critical studies from economics and linguistics (pp. 53–79). Routledge.
- Machin, D., & Richardson, J. E. (2008). Renewing an academic interest in structural inequalities. Critical Discourse Studies, 5(4), 281–287. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/17405900802405148
- Partington, A., Duguid, A., & Taylor, C. (2013). Patterns and meanings in discourse: Theory and practice in corpus-assisted discourse studies (CADS). Amsterdam.
- Silke, H., Quinn, F., & Rieder, M. (2019). Telling the truth about power? Journalism discourses and the facilitation of inequality. Critical Discourse Studies, 16(3), 241–247. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2019.1568897
- Toolan, M. (2016). Peter Black, Christopher Stevens, class and inequality in the daily mail. Discourse & Society, 27(6), 642–660. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926516664655
- Toolan, M. (2018). The language of inequality in the news: A discourse analytic approach. Cambridge University Press.