The argumentative function of rescue narratives: Trump’s national security rhetoric as a case study

References

• Bex, F., & Bench-Capon, T. (2017). Arguing with stories. In P. Olmas (Ed.), Narration as argument (pp. 31–46). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Boukala, S. (2016). Rethinking Topos in the discourse historical approach: Endoxon seeking and argumentation in Greek media discourse on ‘Islamist terrorism’. Discourse Studies, 8(3), 249–268. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445616634550
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, K., & Jamieson, K. (1990). Presidents creating presidency: Deeds done in words. UCP.
   Google Scholar
• Clément, M., Lindemann, T., & Sangar, E. (2017). The ‘Hero-protector narrative’: Manufacturing emotional consent for the use of force. Political Psychology, 38(6), 991–1008. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12385
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Graaf, B., Dimitriu, G., & Ringsmose, J. (2015). Strategic narratives, public opinion, and war. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, D. (2014). Narrative as deliberative argument. Dynamics of Asymmetric Conflict, 7(1), 95–108. https://doi.org/10.1080/17467586.2014.915337
   Google Scholar
• Fairclough, I., & Fairclough, N. (2012). Political discourse analysis: A method for advanced students. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, W. (1987). Technical logic, rhetorical logic, and narrative rationality. Argumentation, 1(1), 3–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00127116
   Google Scholar
• Fludernik, M. (2009). An introduction to narratology. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Forchtner, B. (2014). Historia Magistra Vitae: The Topos of history as a teacher in public struggles of self and other representation. In C. Hart & P. Cap (Eds.), Contemporary critical discourse studies (pp. 19–43). Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Forchtner, B. (2020). Critique, Habermas and narrative (genre): The discourse-historical approach in critical discourse studies. Critical Discourse Studies, 18(3), 314–331. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2020.1803093
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Georgakopoulou, A., & Goutsos, D. (1997). Discourse analysis. An introduction. EUP.
   Google Scholar
• Gounari, P. (2018). Authoritarianism, discourse and social media: Trump as the ‘American Agitator’. In M. Jeremiah (Ed.), Critical theory and authoritarian populism (pp. 207–227). UWP.
   Google Scholar
• Govier, T., & Ayers, L. (2012). Logic, parables, and argument. Informal Logic, 32(2), 161–189. https://doi.org/10.22329/il.v32i2.3457
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herman, D. (2009). Basic elements of narrative. Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Homolar, A. (2021). A call to arms: Hero-villain narratives in US security discourse. Security Dialogue, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/09670106211005897
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Homolar, A., & Scholz, R. (2019). The power of Trump-speak: Populist crisis narratives and ontological security. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 32(3), 344–364. https://doi.org/10.1080/09557571.2019.1575796
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoven, P. (2017). Narratives and pragmatic arguments: Ivens’ The 400 million. In P. Olmas (Ed.), Narration as argument (pp. 103–122). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Jakobsen, P., & Ringsmose, J. (2015). For our own security and for the sake of the Afghans: How the Danish public was persuaded to support an unprecedented costly military endeavour in Afghanistan. In D. G. Beatrice, G. Dimitriu, & J. Ringsmose (Eds.), Strategic narratives, public opinion, and War (pp. 138–156). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jasper, J., Young, M., & Zuern, E. (2018). Character work in social movements. Theory and Society, 47(1), 113–131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-018-9310-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jentleson, B., & Britton, R. (1998). Still pretty prudent. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 42(4), 395–417. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002798042004001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kafalenos, E. (2006). Narrative causalities. Ohio State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kienpointner, M. (2009). Plausible and fallacious strategies to silence one’s opponent. In F. van Eemeren (Ed.), Examining argumentation in context: Fifteen studies on strategic maneuvering (pp. 61–76). John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Kissas, A. (2020). Performative and ideological populism: The case of charismatic leaders in Twitter. Discourse & Society, 31(3), 26–284. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926519889127
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krzyżanowski, M. (2020). Discursive shifts and the normalisation of racism: Imaginaries of immigration, moral panics and the discourse of contemporary right-wing populism. Social Semiotics, 30(4), 503–527. https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2020.1766199
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krzyżanowski, M., & Ledin, P. (2017). Uncivility on the web populism in/and the borderline discourses of exclusion. Journal of Language and Politics, 16(4), 566–581. https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.17028.krz
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kvernbekk, T. (2003). On The argumentative quality of explanatory narrative. In F. van Eemeren, A. Blair, & C. Willard (Eds.), Anyone who has a view: Theoretical contributions to the study of argumentation (pp. 269–282). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Kvernbekk, T., & Bøe-Hansen, O. (2017). How to win wars: The role of the war narrative. In P. Olmas (Ed.), Narration as argument (pp. 216–234). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Lacey, N. (2000). Narrative and genre: Key concepts in media studies. Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Lakoff, G. (1991). Metaphor and war: The metaphor system used to justify war in the Gulf. The Canadian Journal of Peace and Conflict Studies, 23(2/3), 25–32. http://www.jstor.org/stable/23609916
   Google Scholar
• Lakoff, G. (2009). The political mind: A cognitive scientist’s guide to your brain and its politics. Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• McDonough, M. (2018). The evolution of demagogic rhetoric as interactive and ongoing. Communication Quarterly, 66(2), 138–156. https://doi.org/10.1080/014663373.2018.1438486
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGee, M., & Nelson, J. (1985). Narrative reason in public argument. Journal of Communication, 35(4), 139–155. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1985.tb02978.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mudde, C., & Kaltwasser, R. (2017). Populism: A very short introduction. OUP.
   Google Scholar
• Olmos, P. (2014). Classical fables as arguments: Narration and analogy. In H. Ribeiro (Ed.), Systematic approaches to argument by analogy (pp. 189–208). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Olmos, P. (2015). Story credibility in narrative arguments. In F. van Eemeren & B. Garssen (Eds.), Reflections on theoretical issues in argumentation theory (pp. 155–167). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Reisigl, M. (2020). “Narrative!” I can’t hear that anymore. A linguistic critique of an overstretched umbrella term in cultural and social science studies, discussed with the example of the discourse on climate change. Critical Discourse Studies, 18(3), 368–386. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2020.1822897
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reisigl, M., & Wodak, R. (2001). Discourse and discrimination: Rhetorics of racism and antisemitism. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Reisigl, M., & Wodak, R. (2009). The discourse historical approach. In R. Wodak & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods of critical discourse analysis (pp. 87–121). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Richardson, J. E. (2018). Sharing values to safeguard the future: British Holocaust Memorial Day commemoration as epideictic rhetoric. Discourse & Communication, 12(2), 171–191. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481317745743
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ricoeur, P. (1991). Life in quest of narrative. In D. Wood (Ed.), On Paul Ricoeur: Narrative and interpretation (pp. 20–33). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ringmar, E. (2006). Inter-textual relations: The quarrel over the Iraq war as a conflict between narrative types. Cooperation and Conflict: Journal of the Nordic International Studies Association, 41(4), 403–421. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010836706069611
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowland, R. (2019). The populist and nationalist roots of Trump’s rhetoric. Rhetoric & Public Affairs, 22(3), 343–388. https://doi.org/10.14321/rhetpublaffa.22.3.0343
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schauer, F. (1987). Precedent. Stanford Law Review, 39(3), 571–605. https://doi.org/10.2307/1228760
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneiker, A. (2020). Populist leadership: The superhero Donald Trump as savior in times of crisis. Political Studies, 68(4), 857–874. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032321720916604
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Somers, R. (1994). The narrative constitution of identity: A relational and network approach. Theory and Society, 23(5), 605–649. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00992905
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Dijk, T. (1993). Stories and racism. In D. Mumby (Ed.), Narrative and social control: Critical perspectives (pp. 121–142). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• van Eemeren, F., Garssen, B., & Erik, K. (2014). Handbook of argumentation theory. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• van Eemeren, F., & Grootendorst, R. (1992). Argumentation, communication, and fallacies: A pragma-dialectical perspective. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• van Eemeren, F., & Grootendorst, R. (2004). A systematic theory of argumentation: The pragma-dialectical approach. CUP.
   Google Scholar
• van Eemeren, F., & Houtlosser, P. (1999). Strategic manoeuvring in argumentative discourse. Discourse Studies, 1(4), 479–497. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445699001004005
   Google Scholar
• Walton, D. (1997). Appeal to pity: Argumentum ad misericordiam. SUNYP.
   Google Scholar
• Walton, D. (2012). Story similarity in arguments from analogy. Informal Logic, 32(2), 190–221. https://doi.org/10.22329/il.v32i2.3159
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walton, D., Reed, C., & Macagno, F. (2008). Argumentation schemes. CUP.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, M. (1978). Economy and society: An outline of interpretive sociology. UCP.
   Google Scholar
• Weyland, K. (2001). Clarifying a contested concept: Populism in the study of Latin American politics. Comparative Politics, 34(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.2307/422412
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wodak, R. (2015). The politics of fear: What right-wing populist discourses mean. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Wodak, R. (2020). The trajectory of far-right populism: A discourse-analytical perspective. In B. Forchtner (Ed.), The far right and the environment: Politics, discourse and communication (pp. 29–42). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Žagar, I. (2009). Topoi in critical discourse analysis. Lodz Papers in Pragmatics, 6(1), 3–27. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10016-010-0002-1
   Google Scholar