The law and critical discourse studies

References

• Allan, T. R. S. (2001). Constitutional justice: A liberal theory of the rule of law. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Assimakopoulos, S., Baider, F. H., & Miller, S. (2017). Online hate speech in the European union: A critical discourse perspective. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Aston, S., & Aydos, E. (2019). Environmental discourses and water Law: A case study of the regulation of the Murray-darling basin. Sequencia, 83, 47–86. https://doi.org/10.5007/2177-7055.2019v41n83p47
   Google Scholar
• Banks, J. (2010). Regulating hate speech online, international review of Law. International Review of Law, Computers & Technology, 24(3), 233–239. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600869.2010.522323
   Google Scholar
• Bhatia, V. K. (1993). Analysing genre: Language Use in professional settings. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bulkeley, H. (2000). Discourse coalitions and the Australian climate change policy network. Environment and Planning C:Government and Policy, 18, 727.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouvier, G. (2020). Racist call-outs and cancel culture on twitter: The limitations of the platform’s ability to define issues of social justice. Discourse, Context & Media, 38), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2020.100431
   Google Scholar
• Cannie, H., & Voorhoof, D. (2011). The abuse clause and freedom of expression in the European human rights convention: An added value for democracy and human rights protection? Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights, 29(1), 54–83. https://doi.org/10.1177/016934411102900105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, L., & Cheng, W. (2012). Legal interpretation: Meaning as social construction. Semiotica, 192, 427–448. https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2012-0086
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cotal San Martin, V., & Machin, D. (2020). The legitimization of the use of sweat shops by H&M in the Swedish press. Journal of Language and Politics, 20(2), 254–276. https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2012-0086
   Google Scholar
• Cotterrell, R. (1984). The sociology of Law. Butterworths.
   Google Scholar
• Coulthard, M., Grant, T., & Kredens, K. (2010). Forensic linguistics. In B. Johnstone, R. Wodak, & P. Kerswill (Eds.), The sage handbook of sociolinguistics (pp. 529–544). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• de Morree, P. (2017). Rights and wrongs under the ECHR: The prohibition of abuse of rights in article 17 of the European convention on human rights. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dobkiewicz, P. (2017). Instagram narratives in Trump’s America, Multimodal social media and mitigation of right-wing populism. Journal of Language and Politics, 18(6), 826–847. https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.19039.dob
   Google Scholar
• Donoghue, J. (2009). Reflections on the sociology of law: A rejection of law as ‘socially marginal’. International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice, 37(1-2), 51–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlcj.2009.03.001
   Google Scholar
• Dryzek, J. (2007). Paradigms and discourses. In D. Bodansky, J. Brunée, & E. Hey (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of international environmental Law (pp. 1–15). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and power. Longmans.
   Google Scholar
• Farsi, D. (2021). Social media and health care, part I: Literature review of social media Use by health care providers. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 23(4), https://doi.org/10.2196/23205
   Google Scholar
• Flowerdew, J., & Richardson, J. (2017). Introduction, routledge handbook of critical discourse studies. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1978). The history of sexuality Volume 1: An Introduction (R. Hurley, Trans.). New York: Pantheon Books.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1980). Power/knowledge, selected interviews and other writings, 1972-1977. Pantheon Books.
   Google Scholar
• Galanter, M. (1974). Why the haves come out ahead: Speculations on the limits of legal change. Law & Society Review, 9(1), 95–160. https://doi.org/10.2307/3053023
   Google Scholar
• Golder, B., & Fitzpatrick, P. (2013). Foucault’s Law. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Goodrich, P. (1990). Languages of Law: From logics of memory to nomadic masks. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hajer, M. (1993). Discourse coalitions and the institutionalization of practice: The case of acid rain in britain. In F. Fischer, & J. Forester (Eds.), The argumentative turn in policy analysis and planning (pp. 43–45). Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hamilton, S. (2018). Supermarket USA: Food and power in the cold War farms race. Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hartwick, E., & Peet, R. (2003). Neoliberalism and nature: The case of the WTO. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 590(1), 188–121. https://www.jstor.org/stable/i370679 https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716203256721
   Google Scholar
• Hayek, F. A. (2012). Law, legislation and liberty A new statement of the liberal principles of justice and political economy. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hinton, E. K. (2016). From the war on poverty to the war on crime: The making of mass incarceration in America. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Holdren, N., & Tucker, E. (2020). Marxist theories of Law past and present: A meditation occasioned by the 25th anniversary of Law, labor, and ideology. Law & Social Inquiry, 45(4), 1142–1169. https://doi.org/10.1017/lsi.2020.23
   Google Scholar
• Holt Giménez, E., & Shattuck, A. (2011). Food crises, food regimes and food movements: Rumblings of reform or tides of transformation? The Journal of Peasant Studies, 38(1), 109–144. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2010.538578
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunt, A. (1993). Explorations in Law and society: Toward a constitutive theory of Law. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Huo, J., & Turner, K. (2019). Social media in health communication. In J. Bian, Y. Guo, Z. He, & X. Hu (Eds.), Social Web and health research (pp. 53–82). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Jessup, B. (2010). Plural and hybrid environmental values: a discourse analysis of the wind energy conflict in Australia and the United Kingdom. Environmental Politics, 19(1), 21–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jessup, B., & Rubenstein, K. (2012). Environmental discourses in public and international Law. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Keane, D. (2007). Attacking hate speech under article 17 of the European convention on human rights. Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights, 25(4), 641–663. https://doi.org/10.1177/016934410702500404
   Google Scholar
• Kress, G. (1979). Language as ideology. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kress, G. (1985). Linguistic Processes in Sociocultural Practice, Deakin University. School of Education. Open Campus Program.
   Google Scholar
• Ledin, P., & Krzyanowski, M. (2019). Uncivility on the web populism in/and the borderline discourses of exclusion. Journal of Language and Politics, 16(4), 566–581.
   Google Scholar
• Litfin, K. (1994). Ozone discourses: Science and politics in global environmental cooperation. Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lorr, B. (2020). The secret life of groceries: The dark miracle of the American supermarket. Avery.
   Google Scholar
• MacKinnon, C. A. (2010). The liberal state. In M. Krook, & S. Childs (Eds.), Women, gender, and politics: A reader (pp. 293–298). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marshall, A.-M. (2005). Confronting sexual harassment: The Law and politics of everyday life. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, W. E. (1998). Brown v. Board of education: A brief history with documents. Bedford/St. Martin's.
   Google Scholar
• Matamoros-Fernández, A., & Farkas, J. (2021). Racism, hate speech, and social media: A systematic review and critique. Television & New Media, 22(2), 205–224. https://doi.org/10.1177/1527476420982230
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mather, L. (2013). Law and society. In R. E. Goodin (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of political science (pp. 681–697). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mayr, A., & Machin, D. (2012). The language of crime and deviance. Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Melinkoff, D. (1963). The language of Law. Little, Brown & Co.
   Google Scholar
• Rabuy, B., & Kopf, D. (2016). Detaining the Poor: How money bail perpetuates an endless cycle of poverty and jail time. https://www.prisonpolicy.org/reports/incomejails.html
   Google Scholar
• Rayner, G., Barling, D., & Lang, T. (2008). Sustainable food systems in Europe: Policies, realities and futures. Journal of Hunger & Environmental Nutrition, 3(2/3), 145–168. https://doi.org/10.1080/19320240802243209
   Google Scholar
• Sandefur, R. L. (2008). Access to civil justice and race, class, and gender inequality. Annual Review of Sociology, 34(1), 339–358. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.34.040507.134534
   Google Scholar
• Seron, C., & Munger, F. (1996). Law and inequality: Race, gender … and, of course, class. Annual Review of Sociology, 22(1), 187–212. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.22.1.187
   Google Scholar
• Siapera, E., & Viejo-Otero, P. (2021). Governing hate: Facebook and digital racism. Television & New Media, 22(2), 112–130. https://doi.org/10.1177/1527476420982232
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slaughter, A. (2000). A liberal theory of international law. Proceedings of the ASIL Annual Meeting, 94, 240–249. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272503700055919
   Google Scholar
• Solan, L., & Tiersma, P. (2004). Author identification in American courts. Applied Linguistics, 25(4), 448–465. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/25.4.448
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turkel, G. (1990). Michel Foucault: Law, Power, and Knowledge. Journal of Law and Society 17(2): 170–193.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Dijk, T. (1998). Ideology. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Van Eijk, G. (2017). Socioeconomic marginality in sentencing: The built-in bias in risk assessment tools and the reproduction of social inequality. Punishment & Society, 19(4), 463–481. https://doi.org/10.1177/1462474516666282
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Oelreich, J., & Milestad, R. (2017). Sustainability transformations in the balance: Exploring Swedish initiatives challenging the corporate food regime. European Planning Studies, 25(7), 1129–1114. https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/eurpls/v25y2017i7p1129-1146.html. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2016.1270908
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Western, B., & Muller, C. (2013). Mass incarceration, macrosociology, and the poor. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 647(1), 166–189. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716213475421
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar