Ambiguity, responsibility and political action in the UK daily COVID-19 briefings

References

• Alyeksyeyeva, I., Kaptiurova, O., & Orlova, V. (2021). World War Flu: War rhetoric of the Australian Prime Minister on coronavirus. 3L: Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies, 27(1), 90–101. https://doi.org/10.17576/3L-2021-2701-07
   Google Scholar
• Andreouli, E., & Brice, E. (2022). Citizenship under COVID-19: An analysis of UK political rhetoric during the first wave of the 2020 pandemic. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 32(3), 555–572. https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.2526
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berrocal, M., Kranert, M., Attolino, P., Bonatti Santos, J. A., Garcia Santamaria, S., Henaku, N., Koffi, A. D. L., Marziani, C., Mažeikienė, V., Olivera Pérez, D., Rajandran, K., & Salamurović, A. (2021). Constructing collective identities and solidarity in premiers’ early speeches on COVID-19: A global perspective. Humanities & Social Sciences Communications, 8, 8(128). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-021-00805-x
   Google Scholar
• Billig, M. (2021). Rhetorical uses of precise numbers and semi-magical round numbers in political discourse about COVID-19: Examples from the government of the United Kingdom. Discourse & Society, 32(5), 542–558. https://doi.org/10.1177/09579265211013115
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
   Google Scholar
• Bull, P., & Fetzer, A. (2006). Who are we and who are you? The strategic use of forms of address in political interviews. Text & Talk, 26(1), 3–37. https://doi.org/10.1515/TEXT.2006.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cowper, A. (2020). Ambitious rhetoric and appalling reality: The UK government’s response to COVID-19. BMJ, 369(m2321), 1–2. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m2321
   Google Scholar
• De Fina, A. (1995). Pronominal choice, identity and solidarity in political discourse. Text & Talk, 15(3), 379–410. https://doi.org/10.1515/text.1.1995.15.3.379
   Google Scholar
• Eggins, S. (2004). An introduction to systemic functional linguistics (2nd ed.). Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Fetzer, A., & Bull, P. (2008). Well, I answer it by simply inviting you to look at the evidence’ The strategic use of pronouns in political interviews. Journal of Language and Politics, 7(2), 271–289. https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.7.2.05fet
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fontaine, L. (2013). Analysing English grammar: A systemic functional introduction. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ge, N., Hale, J., & Charniak, E. (1998). A statistical approach to anaphora resolution. In Proceedings of Sixth workshop on very large corpora (pp. 161–170). Association for Computational Linguistics.
   Google Scholar
• Grosz, B. J., Joshi, A. K., & Weinstein, S. (1983). Providing a unified account of definite noun phrases in discourse. Proceedings of the 21st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 44–50. https://doi.org/10.3115/981311.981320
   Google Scholar
• Grosz, B. J., Joshi, A. K., & Weinstein, S. (1995). Centering: A framework for modelling the local coherence of discourse. Computational Linguistics, 21(2), 203–225. https://repository.upenn.edu/ircs_reports/116?utm_source=repository.upenn.edu%2Fircs_reports%2F116&utm_medium=PDF&utm_campaign=PDFCoverPages
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gwilliams, L., & Fontaine, L. (2015). Indeterminacy in process type classification. Functional Linguistics, 2(1), 8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40554-015-0021-x
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, M. A. K., & Hasan, R. (1976). Cohesion in English. Harlow.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (1999). Construing experience through meaning: A language based approach to cognition. Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (2014). Halliday’s introduction to functional grammar (4th ed.). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hobbs, J. R. (1979). Coherence and coreference. Cognitive Science, 3(1), 67–90. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog0301_4
   Google Scholar
• Hunt, S. (2021). COVID and the South African family: Cyril Ramaphosa, president or father? Discourse, Context & Media, 44, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2021.100541
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Íñigo-Mora, I. (2017). Who’s responsible for what? Mitigation in Spanish and British parliamentary speeches. Revista Canaria de Estudios Ingleses, 75, 191–214.
   Google Scholar
• Jarvis, L. (2021). Constructing the coronavirus crisis: Narratives of time in British political discourse on COVID-19. British Politics, https://doi.org/10.1057/s41293-021-00180-w
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaworska, S. (2021). Competence and collectivity: The discourse of Angela Merkel’s media communications during the first wave of the pandemic. Discourse, Context & Media, 42, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2021.100506
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kehler, A., & Rohde, H. (2013). A probabilistic reconciliation of coherence-driven and centering-driven theories of pronoun interpretation. Theoretical Linguistics, 39(1–2), 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1515/tl-2013-0001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mulderrig, J. (2012). The hegemony of inclusion: A corpus-based critical discourse analysis of deixis in education policy. Discourse & Society, 23(6), 701–728. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926512455377
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Donnell, M. J., Zappavigna, M., & Whitelaw, C. (2008). A survey of process type classification over difficult cases. In C. Jones, & E. Ventola (Eds.), From language to multimodality: New developments in the study of ideational meaning (pp. 47–64). Equinox.
   Google Scholar
• Olimat, S. N. (2020). Words as powerful weapons: Dysphemism in trump's COVID-19 speeches. 3L: Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies, 26(3), 17–29. https://doi.org/10.17576/3L-2020-2603-02
   Google Scholar
• Oliver, D. (2020). COVID-19 highlights the need for effective government communications. BMJ, 369(m1863), 1–2. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m1863
   Google Scholar
• O'Malley, P., Rainford, J., & Thompson, A. (2009). Transparency during public health emergencies: From rhetoric to reality. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 87(8), 614–618. https://doi.org/10.2471/BLT.08.056689
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SAGE. 2020. UK government messaging and its association with public understanding and adherence to COVID-19 mitigations: Five principles and recommendations for a COVID communication reset. https://www.independentsage.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/Messaging-paper-FINAL-1-1.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Sanders, K. B. (2020). British government communication during the 2020 COVID-19 pandemic: Learning from high reliability organizations. Church, Communication and Culture, 5(3), 356–377. https://doi.org/10.1080/23753234.2020.1824582
   Google Scholar
• Sjölander-Lindqvist, A., Larsson, S., Fava, N., Gillberg, N., Marciano, C., & Cinque, S. (2020). Communicating about COVID-19 in four European countries: Similarities and differences in national discourses in Germany, Italy, Spain, and Sweden. Frontiers in Communication – Media Governance and the Public Sphere, 5, 593325. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2020.593325
   Google Scholar
• Teo, P. (2004). Clean and green — that’s the way we like it’: Greening a country, building a nation. Journal of Language and Politics, 3(3), 485–505. https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.3.3.07teo
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, J. (1990). Politically speaking. Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Zupnik, Y.-J. (1994). A pragmatic analysis of the use of person deixis in political discourse. Journal of Pragmatics, 21(4), 339–383. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(94)90010-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar