What is spatial planning saying? A conceptual and methodological framework to assess the institutionalization of nature using critical discourse analysis

References

• Arts, B., & Buizer, M. (2009). Forests, discourses, institutions. A discursive-institutional analysis of global forest governance. Forest Policy and Economics, 11(5–6), 340–347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2008.10.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arts, B., Leroy, P., & van Tatenhove, J. (2006). Political modernisation and policy arrangements: A framework for understanding environmental policy change. Public Organization Review, 6(2), 93–106. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-006-0001-4
   Google Scholar
• Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1966). The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Buckingham-Hatfield, S., & Evans, B. (1996). Environmental planning and sustainability. John Wiley and Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Buttel, F. H. (1997). The politics of environmental discourse: Ecological modernization and the policy process. By Maarten A. Hajer. Oxford University Press, 1995. Social Forces, 75(3), 1138–1140. https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/75.3.1138
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coscieme, L., Hyldmo, S., Fernández-llamazares, Á, Palomo, I., Mwampamba, T. H., Selomane, O., Sitas, N., Jaureguiberry, P., Takahashi, Y., Lim, M., Barral, M. P., Farinaci, J. S., Diaz-josé, J., Ghosh, S., Ojino, J., Alassaf, A., Baatuuwie, B. N., Balint, L., Basher, Z., … Valle, M. (2020). Multiple conceptualizations of nature are key to inclusivity and legitimacy in global environmental governance. Environmental Science and Policy, 104, 36–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2019.10.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglass, M. (2015). The urban transition of disaster governance in Asia some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects: Global householding view project globalization and urbanization in Asia view project (pp. 13–43). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Duvall, P., Lennon, M., Scott, M., Duvall, P., Lennon, M., & Scott, M. (2017). The ‘natures’ of planning : Evolving conceptualizations of nature as expressed in urban planning theory and practice nature as expressed in urban planning theory and practice. European Planning Studies, 26(3), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2017.1404556
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2011). The EU Biodiversity Strategy to 2020. https://doi.org/10.2779/39229
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2013). Green Infrastructure (GI) — Enhancing Europe’s Natural Capital. In Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the European Economic Council, The European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2015). Towards an EU Research and Innovation Policy Agenda for Nature-based Solutions & Re-naturing Cities. Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2777/765301
   Google Scholar
• Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and social change. Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fairclough, N. (2005). Discourse analysis in organization studies: The case for critical realism. Organization Studies, 26(6), 915–939. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840605054610
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fairclough, N. (2013). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Farrelly, M. (2020). Rethinking intertextuality in CDA. Critical Discourse Studies, 17(4), 359–376. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2019.1609538
   Google Scholar
• Feindt, P. H., & Oels, A. (2005). Does discourse matter? Discourse analysis in environmental policy making. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, 7(3), 161–173. https://doi.org/10.1080/15239080500339638
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1980). In C. Gordon (Ed.), Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings. Phanteon B.
   Google Scholar
• Gellers, J. C. (2015). Greening critical discourse analysis: Applications to the study of environmental law. Critical Discourse Studies, 12(4), 482–493. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2015.1023326
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grant, D., & Iedema, R. (2005). Discourse analysis and the study of organizations. Text – Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse, 25(1), 37–66. https://doi.org/10.1515/text.2005.25.1.37
   Google Scholar
• Gray, R. (2010). Accounting, organizations and society is accounting for sustainability actually accounting for sustainability … and how would we know ? An exploration of narratives of organisations and the planet. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 35(1), 47–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2009.04.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haase, D., Kabisch, S., Haase, A., Andersson, E., Banzhaf, E., Baró, F., Brenck, M., Fischer, L. K., Frantzeskaki, N., Kabisch, N., Krellenberg, K., Kremer, P., Kronenberg, J., Larondelle, N., Mathey, J., Pauleit, S., Ring, I., Rink, D., Schwarz, N., & Wolff, M. (2017). Greening cities – To be socially inclusive? About the alleged paradox of society and ecology in cities. Habitat International, 64, 41–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2017.04.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hajer, M., & Versteeg, W. (2005). A decade of discourse analysis of environmental politics: Achievements, challenges, perspectives. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, 7(3), 175–184. https://doi.org/10.1080/15239080500339646
   Google Scholar
• Hajer, M. A. (1995). The politics of environmental discourse: Ecological modernization and the policy process. Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Head, B. W. (2014). Managing urban water crises : Adaptive policy responses to drought and flood in southeast Queensland, Australia. Ecology and Society, 19(2), 33. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-06414-190233
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huge, J., Waas, T., Dahdouh-guebas, F., Koedam, N., & Block, T. (2012). A discourse-analytical perspective on sustainability assessment : Interpreting sustainable development in practice a discourse-analytical perspective on sustainability assessment : Interpreting sustainable development in practice. Sustainability Science, 8(2), 187–198. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-012-0184-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IPCC. (2014). Climate Change 2014. In The intergovernmental panel on climate change. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs, K. (2006). Discourse analysis and its utility for urban policy research. Urban Policy and Research, 24(1), 39–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/08111140600590817
   Google Scholar
• Jorgensen, M., & Phillips, L. J. (2002). Discourse analysis as theory and method. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Keller, R. (2012). Doing discourse research: An introduction for social scientists. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Lees, L. (2004). Urban geography: Discourse analysis and urban research. Progress in Human Geography, 28(1), 101–107. https://doi.org/10.1191/0309132504ph473pr
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leipold, S. (2014). Creating forests with words – A review of forest-related discourse studies. Forest Policy and Economics, 40, 12–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2013.12.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leipold, S., Feindt, P. H., Winkel, G., & Keller, R. (2019). Discourse analysis of environmental policy revisited: Traditions, trends, perspectives. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, 21(5), 445–463. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2019.1660462
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, D., & Stoker, G. (2002). Theories and methods in political science (2nd edition). Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Mendes, R., Fidélis, T., Roebeling, P., & Teles, F. (2020). The institutionalization of nature-based solutions – A discourse analysis of emergent literature. Resources, 9(1), 6. https://doi.org/10.3390/resources9010006
   Google Scholar
• Mulderrig, J. (2019). Analysing orders of discourse of neoliberal rule: Health “nudges” and the rise of psychological governance. In Critical Policy Discourse Analysis (pp. 48–72). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788974967.00008.
   Google Scholar
• Mumby, D. K., & Clair, R. (1997). Organizational discourse. In T. A. Van Dijk (Ed.), Discourse as social interaction (pp. 181–205). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Myerson, G., & Rydin, Y. (1996). The language of environment: A new rhetoric. Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Owens, S. (1994). Land, limits and sustainability: A conceptual framework and some dilemmas for the planning system. Transactions – Institute of British Geographers, 19(4), 439. https://doi.org/10.2307/622834
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pecurul-Botines, M., Di Gregorio, M., & Paavola, J. (2019). Multi-level processes and the institutionalization of forest conservation discourses: Insights from Natura 2000. Forest Policy and Economics, 105, 136–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2019.05.027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips, N., Lawrence, T. B., & Hardy, C. (2004). Discourse and institutions. Academy of Management Review, 29(4), 636–652. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2004.14497617
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pontee, N., Beck, M. W., & Hosking, A. H. (2016). Nature based solutions: Lessons from around the world. Maritime Engineering Journal, 169(3), 651–661. https://doi.org/10.1680/cm.61149.651
   Google Scholar
• Porter, T. B. (2005). Identity subtexts in the discursive construction of sustainability. Electronic Journal of Radical Organisation Theory, 9(1), 102–115.
   Google Scholar
• Randrup, T. B., Buijs, A., Konijnendijk, C. C., Wild, T., & Wild, T. (2020). Moving beyond the nature-based solutions discourse : Introducing nature-based thinking. Urban Ecosystems, 23, 919–926.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rydin, Y. (1999). Can we talk ourselves into sustainability? The role of discourse in the environmental policy process. Environmental Values, 8(4), 467–484. https://doi.org/10.3197/096327199129341923
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saldert, H. (2017). From ecocycle to sustainable growth : Governing sustainability in Stockholm and växjö. Urban Research & Practice, 10(4), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/17535069.2016.1232434
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, V. A. (2007). Bringing the State Back Into Varieties of Capital and Discourse Back into Explanations of Change. Program for the Study of Germany and Europe Working Paper Series 07.3, 3.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, V. A. (2008). Discursive institutionalism: The explanatory power of ideas and discourse. Annual Review of Political Science, 11(1), 303–326. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.11.060606.135342
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, V. A. (2010). Taking ideas and discourse seriously: Explaining change through discursive institutionalism as the fourth ‘new institutionalism’. European Political Science Review, 2(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1017/S175577390999021X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, V. A. (2011). Speaking of change: Why discourse is key to the dynamics of policy transformation. Critical Policy Studies, 5(2), 106–126. https://doi.org/10.1080/19460171.2011.576520
   Google Scholar
• Seghezzo, L. (2009). The five dimensions of sustainability the five dimensions of sustainability. Environmental Politics, 18(4), 539–556. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644010903063669
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sumares, D., & Fidélis, T. (2011). Natura 2000 and the narrative nature of nature: A case for critical discourse analysis. Journal of Integrative Environmental Sciences, 8(1), 53–68. https://doi.org/10.1080/1943815X.2011.556649
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tahvilzadeh, N., Montin, S., & Cullberg, M. (2017). Functions of sustainability : Exploring what urban sustainability policy discourse “does” in the Gothenburg Metropolitan Area. Local Environment, 22(sup1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/13549839.2017.1320538
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, J. R., & Van Every, E. J. (1993). The vulnerable fortress: Bureaucratic organization and management in the information age. University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tsoukas, H., & Chia, R. (2002). On organizational becoming: Rethinking organizational change. Organization Science, 13(5), 567–582. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.13.5.567.7810
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Dijk, T. A. (1993). Principles of critical discourse analysis. Discourse & Society, 4(2), 249–283. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926593004002006
   Google Scholar
• Wagenaar, H. (2011). Meaning in action: Interpretation and dialogue in policy analysis. ME Sharpe.
   Google Scholar
• Westman, L., Patterson, J., Macrorie, R., Orr, C. J., Ashcraft, C. M., Castán Broto, V., Dolan, D., Gupta, M., van der Heijden, J., Hickmann, T., Hobbins, R., Papin, M., Robin, E., Rosan, C., Torrens, J., & Webb, R. (2022). Compound urban crises. Ambio, 51(6), 1402–1415. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-021-01697-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yanow, D. (2007). Interpretation in policy analysis: On methods and practice. Critical Policy Studies, 1(1), 110–122. https://doi.org/10.1080/19460171.2007.9518511
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, M., Gable, G., & Rai, A. (2016). A systematic approach to conceptualization. Information Systems Foundations Workshop.
   Google Scholar