The hybrid discourse of the ‘European Green Deal’: road-mapping economic transition to environmental sustainability (almost) seamlessly

References

• Alexander, R. J. (2009). Framing discourse on the environment: A critical discourse approach. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bloomfield, J., & Steward, F. (2020). The politics of the green new deal. The Political Quarterly, 91(4), 770–779. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-923X.12917
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowen, F. (2014). After greenwashing: Symbolic corporate environmentalism and society. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carvalho, A. (2020). Discourses for transformation? Climate change, power and pathways to the future. In K. Krippendorff, & N. Halabi (Eds.), Discourses in action: What language enables US to do (pp. 104–119). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Chilton, P., & Schaefner, C. (2002). Introduction: Themes and principles in political discourse analysis. In P. Chilton, & C. Schaefner (Eds.), Politics as text and talk: Analytic approaches to political discourse (pp. 1–44).
   Google Scholar
• Dardot, P., & Laval, C. (2014). The new way of the world. On neoliberal society. Verso.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2019, 11 December). The European Green Deal, Communication from the Commission, COM 640, https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/info/files/european-green-deal-communication_en.pdf (accessed 15 February 2021).
   Google Scholar
• Fairclough, N. (2000). New labour, New language. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fairclough, N. (2003). Analysing discourse: Text analysis for social research. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fletcher, R. (2010). Neoliberal environmentality: Towards a poststructuralist political ecology of the conservation debate. Conservation and Society, 8(3), 171–181. http://www.conservationandsociety.org/text.asp?2010/8/3/171/73806 https://doi.org/10.4103/0972-4923.73806
   Google Scholar
• Hampton, P. (2015). Workers and trade unions for climate solidarity. Tackling climate change in neoliberal World. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kenis, A., & Lievens, M. (2014). The limits of the green economy. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Klein, N. (2019). On fire: The (burning) case for a Green New Deal. Simon & Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Lemke, T. (2001). 'The birth of bio-politics': Michel Foucault's lecture at the Collège de France on neo-liberal governmentality. Economy and Society, 30(2), 190–207. https://doi.org/10.1080/03085140120042271
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maeseele, P. (2015). The risk conflicts perspective. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 35(1-2), 44–53. https://doi.org/10.1177/0270467615594938
   Google Scholar
• Mann, M. E. (2019). Radical reform and the green New deal. Nature, 573(7774), 340–341. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-019-02738-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molek-Kozakowska, K. (2021). Environmental activism as counter-hegemony? A comparative Critical Discourse Analysis of self-representations of radical environmental organisations. Language and Intercultural Communication, 21(6), 717–733. https://doi.org/10.1080/14708477.2021.1979570
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, J. (2016). Anthropocene or Capitalocene? Nature, history and the crisis of capitalism. In J. Moore (Ed.), Anthropocene or Capitalocene (pp. 1–13). PM Press.
   Google Scholar
• O’Regan, J. P., & Gray, J. (2018). The bureaucratic distortion of academic work: A transdisciplinary analysis of the UK Research Excellence Framework in the age of neoliberalism. Language and Intercultural Communication, 18(5), 533–548. https://doi.org/10.1080/14708477.2018.1501847
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oreskes, N., & Conway, E. M. (2010). Merchants of doubt: How a handful of scientists obscured the truth on issues from tobacco smoke to global warming. Bloomsbury Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pollin, R. (2019). The Green New Deal as an anti-neoliberalism program. Dollars & Sense: The Real World Economics. http://www.dollarsandsense.org/archives/2019/1119pollin.html.
   Google Scholar
• Reisigl, M. (2017). The discourse-historical approach. In J. Flowerdew, & J. Richardson (Eds.), The routledge handbook of critical discourse studies (pp. 44–59). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, M. (2007). WordSmith Tools 4.0. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stehr, N., & Ruser, A. (2018). Climate change, governance and knowledge. In T. Scavenius, & S. Rayner (Eds.), Institutional capacity for climate change response: A new approach to climate politics (pp. 15–30). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Stibbe, A. (2014). Ecolinguistics and erasure: Restoring the natural world to consciousness. In P. Cap, & C. Hart (Eds.), Contemporary critical discourse studies (pp. 585–604). Bloomsbury Press.
   Google Scholar
• Swyngedouw, E. (2013). The non-political politics of climate change. ACME: An International E-Journal for Critical Geographies, 12(1), 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Thunberg, G. (2019). No one is too small to make a difference. Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Tian, H. (2020). One case, two verdicts: The vertical interplay of authoritative discourses in China. In K. Krippendorff, & N. Halabi (Eds.), Discourses in action: What language enables US to do (pp. 158–172). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Toke, D. (2000). Green politics and neoliberalism. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Wallerstein, I. (2006). European universalism: The rhetoric of power. The New Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wetts, R. (2019). Models and morals: Elite-oriented and value-neutral discourse dominates American organizations’ framings of climate change. Social Forces, 98(3), 1339–1369. https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/soz027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wodak, R. (2020). Analysing the politics of denial: Critical discourse studies and the discourse-historical approach. In K. Krippendorff, & N. Halabi (Eds.), Discourses in action: What language enables US to do (pp. 19–36). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wodak, R., & Krzyżanowski, M.2008). Qualitative discourse analysis in the social sciences. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Young, J. (2021). Environmental colonialism, digital indigeneity, and the politicization of resilience. Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space, 4(2), 230–251. https://doi.org/10.1177/2514848619898098
   Google Scholar