Negotiating climate change in public discourse: insights from critical discourse studies

References

• Antilla, L. (2005). Climate of scepticism: US newspaper coverage of the science of climate change. Global Environmental Change, 15(4), 338–352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2005.08.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asayama, S., & Ishii, A. (2014). Reconstruction of the boundary between climate science and politics: The IPCC in the Japanese mass media, 1988–2007. Public Understanding of Science, 23(2), 189–203. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662512450989
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atanasova, D., & Koteyko, N. (2017). Metaphors in guardian online and mail online opinion-page content on climate change: War, religion, and politics. Environmental Communication, 11(4), 452–469. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2015.1024705
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Billett, S. (2010). Dividing climate change: Global warming in the Indian mass media. Climatic Change, 99(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-009-9605-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowley, A. (2022). COP27 – achievements and outcomes. https://www.nomuraconnects.com/focused-thinking-posts/cop27-achievements-and-outcomes/
   Google Scholar
• Boyce. T., & Lewis, J. (Eds.) (2009). Climate change and the media. Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Boykoff, M. T. (2007). Flogging a dead norm? Newspaper coverage of anthropogenic climate change in the United States and United Kingdom from 2003 to 2006. Area, 39(4), 470–481. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4762.2007.00769.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boykoff, M. T., & Boykoff, J. M. (2004). Balance as bias: Global warming and the US prestige press. Global Environmental Change-Human and Policy Dimensions, 14(2), 125–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2003.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brossard, D., Shanahan, J., & McComas, K. (2004). Are issue-cycles culturally constructed? A comparison of French and American coverage of global climate change. Mass Communication and Society, 7(3), 359–377. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327825mcs0703_6
   Google Scholar
• Brüggemanna, M., & Engesser, S. (2017). Beyond false balance: How interpretive journalism shapes media coverage of climate change. Global Environmental Change, 42, 58–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.11.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carvalho, A. (2005). Representing the politics of the greenhouse effect. Critical Discourse Studies, 2(1), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405900500052143
   Google Scholar
• Carvalho, A. (2007). Ideological cultures and media discourses on scientific knowledge: Re-reading news on climate change. Public Understanding of Science, 16(2), 223–243. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662506066775
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carvalho, A., & Burgess, J. (1985). Cultural circuits of climate change in UK broadsheet newspapers. Risk Analysis: An International Journal, 25(6), 1457–1469.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, L., & Nerlich, B. (2015). Examining user comments for deliberative democracy: A corpus-driven analysis of the climate change debate online. Environmental Communication, 9(2), 189–207. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2014.981560
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahl, T. (2022). Global villain, but local hero? A linguistic analysis of climate narratives from the fossil fuel sector. Applied Linguistics, 43(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amab003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dayrell, C. (2019). Discourses around climate change in Brazilian newspapers: 2003–2013. Discourse & Communication, 13(2), 149–171. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481318817620
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DiFrancesco, D. A., & Young, N. (2011). Seeing climate change: The visual construction of global warming in Canadian national print media. Cultural Geographies, 18(4), 517–536. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474474010382072
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doulton, H., & Brown, K. (2009). Ten years to prevent catastrophe?: Discourses of climate change and international development in the UK press. Global Environmental Change, 19(2), 191–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2008.10.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esser, F., & Umbricht, A. (2014). The evolution of objective and interpretative journalism in the western press: Comparing six news systems since the 1960s. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 91(2), 229–249. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699014527459
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fu, X., & Wang, G. (2022). Confrontation, competition, or cooperation? The China–US relations represented in China Daily’s coverage of climate change (2010–2019). Critical Arts, 36(1–2), 95–109. https://doi.org/10.1080/02560046.2022.2116466
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gavin, N. T., & Marshall, T. (2011). Mediated climate change in Britain: Scepticism on the web and on television around Copenhagen. Global Environmental Change, 21(3), 1035–1044. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.03.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gellers, J. C. (2015). Greening critical discourse analysis. Critical Discourse Studies, 12(4), 482–493. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2015.1023326
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grundmann, R., & Krishnamurthy, R. (2010). The discourse of climate change: A corpus-based approach. Critical Approaches to Discourse Analysis Across Disciplines, 4, 125–146. https://www.lancaster.ac.uk/fass/journals/cadaad/volume-4-2/
   Google Scholar
• Grundmann, R., & Scott, M. (2014). Disputed climate science in the media: Do countries matter? Public Understanding of Science, 23(2), 220–235. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662512467732
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hajer, M., & Versteeg, W. (2005). A decade of discourse analysis of environmental politics: Achievements, challenges, perspectives. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 7(3), 175–184. https://doi.org/10.1080/15239080500339646
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, A. (2010). Environment, media and communication (2nd ed.). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, A. (2015). The routledge handbook of environment and communication. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, A., & Machin, D. (2008). Visually branding the environment: Climate change as a marketing opportunity. Discourse Studies, 10(6), 777–794. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445608098200
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilton, I., & Kerr, O. (2017). The Paris agreement: China’s ‘new normal’ role in international climate negotiations. Climate Policy, 17(1), 48–58. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2016.1228521
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horsbøl, A. (2020). Green conflicts in environmental discourse. A topos based integrative analysis of critical voices. Critical Discourse Studies, 17(4), 429–446. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2019.1617757
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hovi, J., Sprinz, D. F., & Bang, G. (2012). Why the United States did not become a party to the Kyoto protocol: German, Norwegian, and US perspectives. European Journal of International Relations, 18(1), 129–150. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066110380964
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huan, C. (2023). Politicized or popularized? News values and news voices in China’s and Australia’s media discourse of climate change. Critical Discourse Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2023.2200194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huan, C., & Guan, X. (2020). Sketching landscapes in discourse analysis (1978–2018): A bibliometric study. Discourse Studies, 22(6), 697–719. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445620928814
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacob, J. (2010). Copenhagen and the ‘BASIC’ countries: Some basic differences between the Indian and Chinese emissions. Current Science, 99, 439–443. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24109566
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaspal, R., Nerlich, B., & Koteyko, N. (2013). Contesting science by appealing to its norms: Readers discuss climate science in The Daily Mail. Science Communication, 35(3), 383–410. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547012459274
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanerva, J., & Krizsán, A. (2021). Discouraging climate action through implicit argumentation: An analysis of linguistic polyphonic in the summary for policymakers by the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Discourse and Communication, 15(6), 609–628. https://doi.org/10.1177/17504813211026512
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koteyko, N. (2010). Mining the internet for linguistic and social data: An analysis of ‘carbon compounds’ in web feeds. Discourse & Society, 21(6), 655–674. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926510381220
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koteyko, N. (2012). Managing carbon emissions: A discursive presentation of ‘market-driven sustainability’ in the British media. Language & Communication, 32(1), 24–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2011.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krzyżanowski, M. (2013). Policy, policy communication and discursive shifts: Analyzing EU policy discourses on climate change. In P. Cap, & U. Okulska (Eds.), Analyzing new genres in political communication: Theory and practice (pp. 101–133). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Leipold, S., Feindt, P. H., Winkel, G., & Keller, R. (2019). Discourse analysis of environmental policy revisited: Traditions, trends, perspectives. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 21(5), 445–463. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.10801523908X.2019.1660462 https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2019.1660462
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mccomas, K., & Shanahan, J. (1999). Telling stories about global climate change: Measuring the impact of narratives on issue cycles. Communication Research, 26(1), 30–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mooney, C., & Nisbet, M. (2006). The next big storm: Can scientists and journalists work together to improve coverage of the hurricane-global warming controversy? Sceptical Inquirer, August 3rd. Retrieved December 10, 2021. https://skepticalinquirer.org/exclusive/next-big-storm/
   Google Scholar
• Mormont, M., & Dasnoy, C. (1995). Source strategies and the mediatization of climate change. Media, Culture & Society, 17(1), 49–64. https://doi.org/10.1177/016344395017001004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nerlich, B., Forsyth, R., & Clarke, D. (2012). Climate in the news: How differences in media discourse between the US and UK reflect national priorities. Environmental Communication: A Journal of Nature and Culture, 6(1), 44–63. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2011.644633
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nerlich, B., Koteyko, N., & Brown, B. (2010). Theory and language of climate change communication. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 1(1), 97–110. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielsen, K. H., & Schmidt Kjærgaard, R. (2011). News coverage of climate change in nature news and science now during 2007. Environmental Communication, 5(1), 25–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2010.520722
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olausson, U. (2009). Global warming-global responsibility? Media frames of collective action and scientific certainty. Public Understanding of Science, 18(4), 421–436. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662507081242
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Neill, S. J. (2013). Image matters: Climate change imagery in US, UK and Australian newspapers. Geoforum; Journal of Physical, Human, and Regional Geosciences, 49, 10–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2013.04.030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pounds, G. (2021). The values of trees and woodland: A discourse-based cross-disciplinary perspective on integrating ‘revealed’ evaluations of nature into environmental agendas-disciplinary perspective on integrating ‘revealed’ evaluations of nature into environmental agendas. Critical Discourse Studies, 18(4), 461–480. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2020.1752757
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schäfer, M. S., & Schlichting, I. (2014). Media representations of climate change: A meta-analysis of the research field. Environmental Communication, 8(2), 142–160. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2014.914050
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sedlaczek, A. S. (2017). The field-specific representation of climate change in factual television: A multimodal critical discourse analysis. Critical Discourse Studies, 14(5), 480–496. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2017.1352003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trumbo, C. (1996). Constructing climate change: Claims and frames in US news coverage of an environmental issue. Public Understanding of Science, 5(3), 269–283. https://doi.org/10.1088/0963-6625/5/3/006
   Google Scholar
• Van Dijk, T. A. (2001). Multidisciplinary CDA: A plea for diversity. In R. Wodak, & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods of critical discourse analysis (pp. 95–120). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Wang. (2009). A corpus-based discourse analysis of global warming in American, British and Chinese Newspapers. https://www.academia.edu/es/35166007/A_Corpus_based_Discourse_Analysis_of_Global_Warming_in_American_British_and_Chinese_Newspapers_doc
   Google Scholar
• Wang, G., Liu, M., & Xin, Y. (2022). Categorisations of developed and developing countries in UN news on climate change. Social Semiotics, https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2022.2052275
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, G., Wu, X., & Li, Q. (2022). A bibliometric study of news discourse analysis (1988–2020). Discourse & Communication, 16(1), 110–128. https://doi.org/10.1177/17504813211043725
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, T., & Gao, X. (2018). Reflection and operationalization of the common but differentiated responsibilities and respective capabilities principle in the transparency framework under the international climate change regime. Advances in Climate Change Research, 9(4), 253–263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accre.2018.12.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wessler, H., Wozniak, A., Hofer, L., & Lück, J. (2016). Global multimodal news frames on climate change: A comparison of five democracies around the world. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 21(4), 423–445. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161216661848
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, N. (2013). Working the fringes: The role of letters to the editor in advancing non-standard media narratives about climate change. Public Understanding of Science, 22(4), 443–459. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662511414983
   PubMedGoogle Scholar