Discourse, intersectionality, critique: theory, methods and practice

References

• Angouri, J., & Baxter, J. (eds.). (2021). The Routledge handbook of language, gender, and sexuality. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, P. (2004). Public discourses of Gay Men. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, P. (2008). Sexed texts: Language, gender and sexuality. Equinox.
   Google Scholar
• Bell, V. (1999). Feminist political imagination. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Borba, R. (2022). Enregistering “gender ideology”: The emergence and circulation of a transnational anti-gender language. Journal of Language and Sexuality, 11(1), 57–79. https://doi.org/10.1075/jls.21003.bor
   Google Scholar
• Butler, J. (2004). Undoing gender. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Catalano, T., & Waugh, L. R. (2020). Critical discourse analysis, critical discourse studies and beyond. Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Christoffersen, A., & Emejulu, A. (2022). ‘Diversity within’: The problems with ‘intersectional’ white feminism in practice. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society, 30(2), 630–653. https://doi.org/10.1093/sp/jxac044
   Google Scholar
• Collins, P. H. (2015). Intersectionality's definitional dilemmas. Annual Review of Sociology, 41, 1–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conaghan, J. (2009). Intersectionality and the feminist project in Law. In E. Grabham, D. Cooper, J. Krishnadas, & D. Herman (Eds.), Intersectionality and beyond: Law, power and the politics of location (pp. 21–48). Routledge – Cavendish.
   Google Scholar
• Crenshaw, K. (1989). Demarginalizing the Intersection of Race and Sex: A Black Feminist Critique of Antidiscrimination Doctrine, Feminist Theory and Antiracist Politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum, Iss.1 Art.8, 139–167.
   Google Scholar
• Crenshaw, K. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 1241–1299. https://doi.org/10.2307/1229039
   Google Scholar
• Davis, K. (2008). Intersectionality as a buzzword: A sociology of science perspective on what makes a feminist theory successful. Feminist Theory, 9(1), 67–85. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464700108086364
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, K. (2020). Who owns intersectionality? Some reflections on feminist debates on how theories travel. European Journal of Women's Studies, 27(2), 113–127. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350506819892659
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Melo Resende, V. (2021). Decolonizing critical discourse studies: For a Latin American perspective. Critical Discourse Studies, 18(1), 26–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2018.1490654
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donaldson, I., & Jedwab, J. (2003). Intersections of diversity. Canadian Ethnic Studies, 35(3), 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Eckert, P., & McConnell-Ginet, S. (2003). Language and gender. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Esposito, E. (2022). The visual semiotics of misogyny: Female leaders in the viewfinder. Feminist Media Studies, https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2022.2139279
   Google Scholar
• French, S., & Swain, J. (2006). Telling stories for a politics of hope. Disability & Society, 21(5), 383–396. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687590600785654
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghaffari, S. (2022). Discourses of celebrities on Instagram: Digital femininity, self-representation and hate speech. Critical Discourse Studies, 19(2), 161–178. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2020.1839923
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. (1979). Gender advertisements. Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Grabham, E., Cooper, D., Krishnadas, J., & Herman, D. (2009). Introduction. In E. Grabham, D. Cooper, J. Krishnadas, & D. Herman (Eds.), Intersectionality and beyond: Law, power and the politics of location (pp. 1–17). Routledge - Cavendish.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, K., Levon, E., & Milani, T. (2019). Navigating normativities: Gender and sexuality in text and talk. Language in Society, 48(4), 481–489. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404519000447
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill Collins, P. (1995). Symposium on west and Fensternmaker’s ‘doing difference’. Gender & Society, 9(4), 491–494. https://doi.org/10.1177/089124395009004006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill Collins, P. (2018). Intersectionality as critical social theory. Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hull, A. G., Bell-Scott, P., & Smith, B. (eds.). (1982). All the women Are white, All the blacks are men, but some of us are brave: Black women’s studies. Feminist Press.
   Google Scholar
• Koller, V. (2004). Metaphor and gender in business media discourse: A critical cognitive study. Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Labov, W. (1966). The social stratification of English in New York city. Centre for Applied Linguistics (CAL).
   Google Scholar
• Labov, W. (1972). Language in the inner city: Studies in the black English vernacular. University of Pennsylvania Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lakoff, R. (1975). Language and woman’s place. Harper and Row.
   Google Scholar
• Lazar, M. (2005). Politicizing gender in discourse: Feminist critical discourse analysis as political perspective and praxis. In M. Lazar (Ed.), Feminist critical discourse analysis: Gender, power and ideology in discourse (pp. 1–28). Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Lazar, M. (2007). Feminist critical discourse analysis: Articulating a feminist discourse praxis. Critical Discourse Studies, 4(2), 141–164. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405900701464816
   Google Scholar
• Lazar, M. (2014). Feminist critical discourse analysis. In S. Ehrlich, M. Meyerhoff, & J. Holmes (Eds.), The handbook of language, gender, and sexuality (2nd ed., pp. 180–199). Wiley Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Leap, W. L. (2015). Queer linguistics as critical discourse analysis. In H. E. Hamilton, D. Tannen, & D. Schiffrin (Eds.), The handbook of discourse analysis (2nd ed., pp. 661–680). John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Levon, E. (2015). Integrating intersectionality in language, gender, and sexuality research. Language and Linguistics Compass, 9(7), 295–308. https://doi.org/10.1111/lnc3.12147
   Google Scholar
• Litosseliti, L. (2006). Constructing gender in public arguments: The female voice as emotional voice. In J. Baxter (Ed.), Speaking out: The female voice in public contexts (pp. 40–58). Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Love, R., & Baker, P. (2015). The hate that dare not speak its name? Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict, 3(1), 57–86. https://doi.org/10.1075/jlac.3.1.03lov
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lykke, N. (2010). Feminist studies. A guide to intersectional theory, methodology and writing. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Machin, D., Caldas-Coulthard, C. R., & Milani, T. M. (2016). Doing critical multimodality in research on gender, language and discourse. Gender and Language, 10(3), 301–308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manuel, T. (2006). Envisioning the Possibilities for a Good Life: Exploring the Public Policy Implications of Intersectionality Theory. Journal of Women, Politics & Policy, 28(3-4), 173–203. https://doi.org/10.1300/J501v28n03_08
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matsuda, M. (1991). Beside my sister, facing the enemy: Legal theory out of coalition. Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 1183–1192. https://doi.org/10.2307/1229035
   Google Scholar
• McCall, L. (2005). The complexity of intersectionality. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 30(3), 1771–1800. https://doi.org/10.1086/426800
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milani, T. M. (2013). Are ‘queers’ really ‘queer’? Language, identity and same-sex desire in a South African online community. Discourse & Society, 24(5), 615–633. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926513486168
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milani, T. M., & Lazar, M. (2017). Seeing from the south: Discourse, gender and sexuality from southern perspectives. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 21(3), 307–319. https://doi.org/10.1111/josl.12241
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milani, T. M., & Levon, E. (2019). Israel as homotopia: Language, space, and vicious belonging. Language in Society, 48(4), 607–628. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404519000356
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mills, S., & Mullany, L. (2011). Language, gender and feminism: Theory, methodology and practice. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Reisigl, M. (2018). The discourse–historical approach. In J. Flowerdew, & J. E. Richardson (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of critical discourse analysis (pp. 44–59). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ringrow, H. (2016). The language of cosmetics advertising. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Rodríguez, J. J., & Piedrahita-Bustamante, P. (2022). ‘Discursos populistas y negacionistas de la violencia de género y la diversidad sexual en la pospandemia: Análisis del caso VOX en España’. VISUAL REVIEW. International Visual Culture Review/Revista Internacional de Cultura Visual, 12(1), 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Roig, E. (2018, March 6). Intersectionality in Europe: a depoliticized concept? Völkerrechtsblog. doi: 10.17176/20180306-142929.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, G. (2014). On the relation between visual research methods and contemporary visual culture. The Sociological Review, 62(1), 24–46. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-954X.12109
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma, S. (2018). Language, gender and ideology: Constructions of femininity for marriage. Routledge India.
   Google Scholar
• Shi-Xu. (2014). Chinese discourse studies. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Speer, S. A. (2005). Introduction: Feminism, discourse and conversation analysis. In S. A. Speer (Ed.), Gender talk: Feminism, discourse and conversation analysis (pp. 1–19). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Tannen, D. (1990). You just don't understand: Women and men in conversation. Virago.
   Google Scholar
• Tomlinson, B. (2013). To tell the truth and not get trapped: Desire, distance, and intersectionality at the scene of argument. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 38(4), 993–1017. https://doi.org/10.1086/669571
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trudgill, P. (1972). Sex, covert prestige and linguistic change in the urban. British English of Norwich. Language in Society, 1(2), 179–195.
   Google Scholar
• Vertovec, S. (2007). Super-diversity and its implications. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 30(6), 1024–1054. https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870701599465
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vertovec, S. (2023). Superdiversity: Migration and social complexity. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Weatherall, A. (2002). Gender, language and discourse (1st ed.). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Webster, L. (2019). I am I: Self-constructed transgender identities in internet-mediated forum communication. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 2019(256), 129–146. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijsl-2018-2015
   Google Scholar
• Weiss, G., & Wodak, R. (2003). Critical discourse analysis. Theory and interdisciplinarity. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Wodak, R. (1997). Some important issues in the research of gender and discourse. In R. Wodak (Ed.), Gender and discourse (pp. 1–20). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Yuval-Davis, N. (2006). Intersectionality and feminist politics. European Journal of Women’s Studies, 13(3), 193–209. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350506806065752
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Żuk, P., & Żuk, P. (2019). Dangerous liaisons between the Catholic church and state: The religious and political alliance of the nationalist right with the conservative church in Poland. Journal of Contemporary Central and Eastern Europe, 27(2–3), 191–212. https://doi.org/10.1080/25739638.2019.1692519
   Google Scholar