Rethinking ethics in AI policy: a method for synthesising Graham’s critical discourse analysis approaches and the philosophical study of valuation

References

• AI HLEG (High-Level Expert Group on Artificial Intelligence). (2019a, 8 April). Ethics guidelines for trustworthy AI. https://www.aepd.es/sites/default/files/2019-12/ai-ethics-guidelines.pdf
   Google Scholar
• AI HLEG (High-Level Expert Group on Artificial Intelligence). (2019b, 26 June). Policy and investment recommendations for trustworthy AI. https://cyberpolicy.nask.pl/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/Policy-and-investment-recommendations-for-trustworthy-Artificial-Intelligence.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Bohm, D. (2005). Wholeness and the implicate order. Routledge & Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Dafoe, A. (2018). AI governance: A research agenda. Centre for the Governance of AI. Future of Humanity Institute. University of Oxford. https://www.fhi.ox.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/GovAI-Agenda.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and social change. Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fairclough, N. (2000). New labour, new language? Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fairclough, N., & Graham, P. (2002). Marx as a critical discourse analyst: The genesis of a critical method and its relevance to the critique of global capital. Sociolinguistics Studies, 3(1), 1–56.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1984). Foucault. http://foucault.info/foucault/biography.html
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M., & Rabinow, P. (1977). Ethics: Subjectivity and truth. New Press.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, P. (1999). Critical systems theory. Communication Research, 26(4), 482–507. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365099026004006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, P. (2000). Hypercapitalism. New Media & Society, 2(2), 131–156. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614440022225742
   Google Scholar
• Graham, P. (2001). Space: Irrealis objects in technology policy and their role in a new political economy. Discourse & Society, 12(6), 761–788. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926501012006003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, P. (2002). Predication and propagation: A method for analysing evaluative meanings in technology policy. Text, 22(2), 227–268.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, P. (2005). Analysing policy values in a knowledge economy. In D. Rooney, G. Hearn, & A. Ninan (Eds.), Handmonograph on the knowledge economy (pp. 118–128). Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, P. (2007). Critical discourse analysis and evaluative meaning: Interdisciplinary as a critical turn. In R. Wodak, & W. Gilbert (Eds.), Critical discourse analysis: Theory and interdisciplinarity (pp. 110–129). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, P., & Luke, A. (2011). Critical discourse analysis and political economy of communication: Understanding the new corporate order. Cultural Politics, 7(1), 103–132. https://doi.org/10.2752/175174311X12861940861824
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, M. A. K. (1994). An introduction to functional grammar (2nd edn). Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• Hallward-Driemeier, M., Nayyar, G., Fengler, W., Aridi, A., & Gill, I. (2020). Europe 4.0: Addressing the digital dilemma. World Bank. © World Bank. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/34746 License: CC BY 3.0 IGO
   Google Scholar
• Krishnamurti, J. (1984). The Krishnamurti Podcast-Ep.26-Interview by Eric Robson. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v = iU8JUH3m4eU
   Google Scholar
• Lemke, J. L. (1995). Textual politics: Discourse and social dynamics. Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Lemke, J. L. (1998). Resources for attitudinal meaning. Functions of Language, 5(1), 33–56. https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.5.1.03lem
   Google Scholar
• Martin, J. T. (2000). Beyond exchange: Appraisal systems in English. In S. Hunston, & G. Thompson (Eds.), Evaluation in text: Authorial stance and the construction of discourse (pp. 142–175). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mulderrig, J. (2008). Using keywords analysis in CDA: Evolving discourses of the knowledge economy in education. In B. Jessop, N. Fairclough, & R. Wodak (Eds.), Education and the knowledge-based economy in Europe (pp. 149–170). Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Mulderrig, J. (2009). The language of education policy: From Thatcher to Blair. VDM Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Mulderrig, J. (2012). The hegemony of inclusion: A corpus-based critical discourse analysis of deixis in education policy. Discourse & Society, 23(6), 701–728. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926512455377
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nietzsche, F. W., Kaufmann, W., & Hollingdale, R. J. (1967). The will to power. Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Sandel, M. J. (2020). The tyranny of merit: What’s become of the common good? Penguin UK.
   Google Scholar
• Stiglitz, J. E. (2004). The roaring nineties: a new history of the world’s most prosperous decade. WW Norton & Company.
   Google Scholar
• Talib, N. (2021a). How is structural inequality made fair in a meritocratic education system? Journal of Language and Politics, 20(3), 383–406. https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.20012.tal
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Talib, N. (2021b). Is it time to let meritocracy go? Examining the case of Singapore. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Talib, N., & Fitzgerald, R. (2016). Micro–meso–macro movements; A multi-level critical discourse analysis framework to examine metaphors and the value of truth in policy texts. Critical Discourse Studies, 13(5), 531–547. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2016.1182932
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Talib, N., & Fitzgerald, R. (2022). The art of illusion as government policy. Analysing political economies of surrealism. Critical Discourse Studies, 19(1), 19–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2020.1848891
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar