Of Bricks and Glass: Learning to Accommodate the Everyday Rhythms of Home

References

• Anderson, B. and J. Wylie. 2009. “On geography and materiality” Environment and Planning A 41: 318–335.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartram, R. 2016. “Housing and social and material vulnerabilities.” Housing, Theory & Society 33(4): 469–483.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, J. 2010. Vibrant Matter: A political ecology of things.Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blunt, A. 2005. “Cultural geography: Cultural geographies of home.” Progress in Human Geography 29(4): 505–515.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blunt, A. and R. Dowling. 2006. Home.London; Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Blunt, A. and A. Varley, 2004. “Geographies of home.” Cultural Geographies 11:3–6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brand, S. 1995. How Buildings Learn. New York: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Brickell, K. 2012. “‘Mapping’ and ‘doing’ critical geographies of home.” Progress in Human Geography 36(2): 225–244.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox, R. 2016. “What are homes made of? Building materials, DIY and the homeyness of homes.” Home Cultures 13(1): 63–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Datta, A. 2008. “Building differences: Material geographies of home(s) among Polish builders in London.” Transactions, Institute of British Geographers 33: 518–531.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Vet, E. 2014. “Weather-ways: experiencing and responding to everyday weather.” Ph.D thesis, University of Wollongong.
   Google Scholar
• Dowling, R. 2008. “Accommodating open plan: children, clutter, and containment in suburban houses in Sydney, Australia.” Environment and Planning A 40: 536–549.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dowling, R., and K. Mee. 2007. “Home and homemaking in Australia.” Housing, Theory & Society 24(3): 161–165.
   Google Scholar
• Dowling, R., and E. Power. 2012. “Sizing home, doing family in Sydney, Australia.” Housing Studies 27(5): 605–619.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edensor, T. 2010. Geographies of Rhythm: Nature, Place, Mobilities and Bodies.Farnham: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Edensor, T. 2011. “Entangled agencies, material networks and repair in a building assemblage: the mutable stone of St Ann’s Church, Manchester.” Transactions, Institute of British Geographers 36: 238–252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fincher, R., J. Barnett, S. Graham, and A. Hurlimann. 2014. “Time stories: making sense of futures in anticipation of sea-level rise.” Geoforum 56: 201–210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabriel, M., and P. Watson. 2013. “From modern housing to sustainable suburbia: How occupants and their dwellings are adapting to reducing home energy consumption.” Housing, Theory & Society 30(3): 219–236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallan, B., and C. Gibson. 2011. “New dawn or new dusk? Beyond the binary of day and night.” Environment and Planning A 43: 2509–2515.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gill, N., P. Osman, P. L. Head, M. Moyer, T. Harada, G. Waitt, and C. Gibson. 2015. ‘Looking beyond installation: why households struggle to make the most of solar hot water systems.’ Energy Policy, 87: 83–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorman-Murray, A. 2008. “Reconciling self: gay men and lesbians using domestic materiality for identity management.” Social & Cultural Geography 9(3): 283–301.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gregson, N. 2007. Living With Things: Ridding, Accommodation, Dwelling.Wantage; Sean Kingston.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, S.M. 2016. “Everyday family experiences of the financial crisis: Getting by in the recent economic recession.” Journal of Economic Geography 16: 305–330.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hand, M., E., Shove, and D. Southerton. 2007. “Home extensions in the United Kingdom: Space, time and practice.” Environment and Planning D 25: 668–681.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison, P. 2007. “The space between us: Opening remarks on the concept of dwelling.” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 25: 625–647.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Head, L., C. Farbotko, C. Gibson, N. Gill, and G. Waitt. 2013. “Zones of friction, zones of traction: the connected household in climate change and sustainability policy.” Australasian Journal of Environmental Management 20: 351–362.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heidegger, M. 1971. “Building, Dwelling, Thinking.” translated by A. Hofstadter. Poetry, Language, Thought.New York; Harper Row.
   Google Scholar
• Hitchings, R. 2006. “Expertise and inability: Cultured materials and the reason for some retreating lawns in London.” Journal of Material Culture 11(3): 364–381.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hitchings, R., G. Waitt, K. Roggeveen, and C. Chisholm. 2015. “Winter cold in a summer place: perceived norms of seasonal adaptation and cultures of home heating in Australia.” Energy Research & Social Science 8: 162–172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ingold, T. 2012. “Toward an ecology of materials.” Annual Review of Anthropology 41: 427–442.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ingold, T. 2007. “Materials against materiality.” Archaeological Dialogues 14(1): 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Ingold, T. 2005. “Epilogue: Towards a politics of dwelling.” Conservation and Society 3(2): 501–508.
   Google Scholar
• Ingold, T. 2000. “Building, dwelling, living: how animals and people make themselves at home in the world” in The Perception of the Environment: Essays on Livelihood, Dwelling and Skill. London and New York; Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs, J. 2003. “Editorial: Home rules” Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 28: 259–263.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobs, J. and S. Cairns. 2011. “Ecologies of dwelling: Maintaining high-rise housing in Singapore” in S. Watson & G. Bridge (eds) The New Companion to the City. Oxford: Blackwell. pp 79–95.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs, J., and S. Smith. 2008. “Living room: rematerializing home” Environment and Planning A 40: 515–519.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobs, J., and P. Merriman. 2011. “Practising architectures” Social and Cultural Geography 12(3): 211–222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobs, K., and M. Gabriel. 2013. “Homes, objects and things.” Housing, Theory and Society 30(3): 213–218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaika, M. 2004. “Interrogating the geographies of the familiar: domesticating nature and constructing the autonomy of the modern home.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 28(2): 265–286.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klocker, N., P. Mbenna. and C. Gibson. 2017. “From troublesome materials to fluid technologies: Making and playing with plastic-bag footballs.” Cultural Geographies 25(2): 301–318. DOI: 10.1177/1474474017732979
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lane, R., and A. Gorman-Murray. 2011. Material Geographies of Household Sustainability. Aldershot: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Lane, R., R. Horne. and J. Bicknell. 2009. “Routes of reuse of second-hand goods in Melbourne households.” Australian Geographer 40(2): 151–168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lane, R. and M. Watson. 2012. “Stewardship of things: The radical potential of product stewardship for re-framing responsibilities and relationships to products and materials” Geoforum 43(6): 1254.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Llewellyn, M. 2004. “‘Urban village’ or ‘white house’: envisioned spaces, experienced places, and everyday life at Kensal House, London in the 1930s.” Environment and Planning D 22: 229–249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maller, C., and R. Horne. 2011. “Living lightly: How does climate change feature in residential home improvements and what are the implications for policy?” Urban Policy and Research 29(1): 59–72
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maller, C., R. Horne, and T. Dalton. 2012. “Green renovations: Intersections of daily routines, housing aspirations and narratives of environmental sustainability.” Housing, Theory and Society 29(3): 255–275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Massey, D. 1994. Space, Place and Gender. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Massey, D. 1992. “A place called home.” New Formations 17: 3–15.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, D. 2008. The Comfort of Things. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nansen, B., M. Arnold, M. Gibbs, and H. Davis. 2011. “Dwelling with media stuff: latencies and logics of materiality in four Australian homes.” Environment and Planning D 29: 693–715.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pink, S. and K. Leder Mackley. 2016. “Moving, making and atmosphere: Routines of home as sites for mundane improvisation.” Mobilities 11(2): 171–187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Power, E. 2009. “Border processes and home-making: encounters with possums in suburban Australian homes.” Cultural Geographies 16: 29–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose, G., M. Degen, and B. Basdus. 2010. “More on ‘big things’: building events and feelings.” Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 35: 334–349.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shove, E. 2003. Comfort, Cleanliness and Convenience: The Social Organisation of Normality.Oxford: Berg.
   Google Scholar
• Simonsen, K. 2007. “Practice, spatiality and embodied emotions: An outline of a geography of practice.” Human Affairs 17: 168–181.
   Google Scholar
• Strebel, I. 2011. “The living building: Towards a geography of maintenance work” Social and Cultural Geography 12: 243–262.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toole, S., N. Klocker, and L. Head. 2015. “Re-thinking climate change adaptation and capacities at the household scale.” Climatic Change 135(2): 203–209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vannini, P. and J. Taggart. 2014. “Do-it-yourself or do-it-with? The regenerative life skills of off-grid home builders.” Cultural Geographies 21(2): 267–285.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson, M. and E. Shove. 2008. “Product, competence, project and practice.” Journal of Consumer Culture 8: 69–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiesel, I., S. Pinnegar, and R. Freestone. 2013 “Supersized Australian dream: Investment, lifestyle and neighbourhood perceptions among ‘Knockdown-Rebuild’ owners in Sydney” Housing, Theory & Society 30(3): 312–329.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar