The role of E-Mentoring in distinguishing pedagogic experiences of gifted and talented pupils in physical education

References

• Abbott, A., and D. Collins 2002. “A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis of a ‘State of the Art’ Talent Identification Model.” High Ability Studies, 13 (2): 157–178. doi: 10.1080/1359813022000048798
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aldous, D., and D. Brown 2010. “Framing Bodies of Knowledge within the Acoustics of the School: Exploring Pedagogical Transition Through Newly Qualified Physical Education Teacher Experiences.” Sport, Education and Society, 15 (4): 411–429. doi: 10.1080/13573322.2010.514737
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alleman, E., J. Cochran, J. Doverspike, and I. Newman 1984. “Enriching Mentoring Relationships.” The Personal Guidance Journal, 62 (6): 329–333. doi: 10.1111/j.2164-4918.1984.tb00217.x
   Google Scholar
• Annerstedt, C 2008. “Physical Education in Scandinavia with a Focus on Sweden: A Comparative Perspective.” Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 13 (4): 303–318. doi: 10.1080/17408980802353347
   Google Scholar
• Arnot, M., and D. Reay 2004. “Power, Pedagogic Voices and Pupil Talk.” In Knowledge, Power and Educational Reform, edited by R. Moore, M. Arnot, J. Beck, and H. Daniels, 75–94. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bailey, R.P., and D. Morley 2006. “Towards a Model of Talent Development in Physical Education.” Sport, Education and Society, 11 (3): 211–230. doi: 10.1080/13573320600813366
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailey, R.P., and D. Morley 2010. “Supporting Talented Students in Physical Education.” In Physical Education for Learning. A Guide for Secondary Schools, edited by R. Bailey, 208–227. London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Bailey, R., D. Morley, and H. Dismore 2009. “Talent Development in Physical Education: A National Survey of Policy and Practice in England.” Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 14 (1): 59–72. doi: 10.1080/17408980701712007
   Google Scholar
• Baker, J., and J. Côté 2003. “Resources and Commitment as Critical Factors in the Development of ‘Gifted’ Athletes.” High Ability Studies, 14 (2): 139–140. doi: 10.1080/1359813032000163816
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernstein, B 1990. Class, Codes and Control, Volume IV: The structuring of pedagogic discourse, London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bernstein, B 2000. Pedagogy, Symbolic Control and Identity: Theory, Research and Critique. Revised ed, Oxford: Taylor and Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Bierema, L., and S.B. Merriam 2002. “E-Mentoring: Using Computer Mediated Communication to Enhance the Mentoring Process.” Innovative Higher Education, 26 (3): 211–227. doi: 10.1023/A:1017921023103
   Google Scholar
• Castells, M 2000. The Rise of the Network Society. (2nd ed.) Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Colley, H 2003. Mentoring for Social Inclusion: A Critical Approach to Nurturing Mentor-Relationships, London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cotton, A 2004. “Ensnaring Webs and Nets: Ethical Issues in Internet-Based Research.” Contemporary Nurse, 16 (1–2): 114–123. doi: 10.5172/conu.16.1-2.114
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J.W. 2009. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Csikszentmihalyi, M., S. Whalen, M. Wong, and K. Rathunde 1993. Talented Teenagers: The Routes of Success and Failure, New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Curtner-Smith, M 2002. “Methodological Issues in Research.” In The Sociology of Sport and Physical Education. An Introductory Reader, edited by A. Laker, 36–57. London: Routledge/: Falmer.
   Google Scholar
• Denzin, N., and Y. Lincoln 2000. Handbook of Qualitative Research. 2nd ed, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Department for Children, Schools and Families (DCSF). 2009. Your Child, Your Schools, Our Future: Building a 21st-Century Schools System. Norwich: TSO
   Google Scholar
• Durand-Bush, N., and J.H. Salmela 2002. “The Development and Maintenance of Expert Athletic Performance: Perceptions of World and Olympic Champions.” Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 14 (3): 154–171. doi: 10.1080/10413200290103473
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durkin, S., and D. Neils. 1996. The HP Email Mentor Programme. Accessed September 5, 2012. http://mentor.external.hp.com/
   Google Scholar
• Elliott, J 1988. “Educational Research and Outsider-insider Relations.” Qualitative Studies in Education, 1 (2): 155–166. doi: 10.1080/0951839880010204
   Google Scholar
• Ennis, C., and S. Chen 2012. “Interviews and Focus Groups.” In Research Methods in Physical Education and Youth Sport, edited by K. Armour, and D. Macdonald, 217–237. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Enright, E., and M. O'Sullivan 2012. “Listening to Young People's Voices in Physical Education and Youth Sport Research.” Research Methods in Physical Education and Youth Sport, edited by K. Armour, and D. Macdonald,120–133. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ericsson, K.A., R.W. Roring, and K. Nandagopal 2007. “Giftedness and Evidence for Reproducibly Superior Performance: An Account Based on the Expert Performance Framework.” High Ability Studies, 18 (1): 3–56. doi: 10.1080/13598130701350593
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, J., and B. Davies 2004. “Pedagogy, Symbolic Control, Identity and Health.” In Body Knowledge and Control: Studies in the Sociology of Physical Education and Health, edited by J. Evans, B. Davies, and J. Wright, 3–19. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fagenson-Eland, E., S. Baugh, and M. Lankau 2005. “Seeing Eye to Eye: A Dyadic Investigation of the Effect of Relational Demography on Perceptions of Mentoring Activities.” Career Development International, 10 (67): 460–477. doi: 10.1108/13620430510620557
   Google Scholar
• Fitz, J., B. Davies, and J. Evans 2006. Educational Policy and Social Reproduction: Class Inscription and Symbolic Control, London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg, B 2006. “Five Misunderstandings about Case-Study Research.” Qualitative Inquiry, 12 (2): 219–245. doi: 10.1177/1077800405284363
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gagné, F 2005. “From Gifts to Talents: The DMGT as a Developmental Model.” In Conceptions of Giftedness. 2nd ed, edited by R. J. Sternberg, J. E. Davidson, 98–119. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Galvin, B 2004. A Guide to Mentoring Sports Coaches, Leeds: Sports Coach UK.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, S.K. 2004. “Mentoring in Business and Industry: The Need for a Phenomenological Perspective.” Mentoring and Tutoring, 12 (2): 259–275. doi: 10.1080/1361126042000239974
   Google Scholar
• Goldman, M. 1997. Perspectives on Telementoring and Mentor Center. National School Network Telementoring and Mentor Center. Accessed September 5, 2012. http://nsn.bbn.com/telementor wrkshp/goldman.html
   Google Scholar
• Gould, D., K. Dieffenbach, and A. Moffett 2002. “Psychological Characteristics and their Development in Olympic Champions.” The Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 14 (3): 172–204. doi: 10.1080/10413200290103482
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grassinger, R., M. Porath, and A. Ziegler 2010. “Mentoring the Gifted: A Conceptual Analysis.” High Ability Studies, 21 (1): 27–46. doi: 10.1080/13598139.2010.488087
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grybek, D 1997. “Mentoring the Gifted and Talented, Preventing School Failure.” Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 41 (3): 115–118.
   Google Scholar
• Hastie, P., and O. Glotova 2012. “Analysing Qualitative Data.” In Research Methods in Physical Education and Youth Sport, edited by K. Armour, and D. Macdonald, 309–321. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Huang, C., and J. Lynch 1995. Mentoring, New York: Harper Collins.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, R.L., R. Harris, and A. Miles 2009. “Mentoring in Sports Coaching: A Review of the Literature.” Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 14 (3): 267–284. doi: 10.1080/17408980801976569
   Google Scholar
• Jonker, L., M. Elferink-Gemser, and C. Visscher 2009. “Talented Athletes and Academic Achievements: A Comparison over 14 Years.” High Ability Studies, 20 (1): 55–64. doi: 10.1080/13598130902863691
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kårhus, S 2010. “Physical Education Teacher Education on the Education Market - Who's Defining what Physical Education Teachers Need to Know?.” Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 15 (3): 227–241. doi: 10.1080/17408980903150139
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klasen, N., and D. Clutterbuck 2002. Implementing Mentoring Schemes: A Practical Guide to Successful Programmes, Oxford, UK: Butterworth-Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Knowles, C., and C. Parsons 2009. “Evaluating a Formalised Peer Mentoring Programme: Student Voice and Impact Audit.” Pastoral Care in Education, 27 (3): 205–218. doi: 10.1080/02643940903133888
   Google Scholar
• Kozel, J 1996. “Talent Identification and Development in Germany.” Coaching Focus, 31: 5–6.
   Google Scholar
• Kralik, D., K. Price, K. Warren, and T. Koch 2006. “Issues in Data Generation Using Email Group Conversations for Nursing Research.” Journal of Advanced Nursing, 53 (2): 213–220. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2006.03717.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kress, G., C. Jewitt, and C. Tsatarelis 2000. “Knowledge, Identity, Pedagogy: Pedagogic Discourse and the Representational Environments of Education in Late Modernity.” Linguistics in Education, 11: 7–30. doi: 10.1016/S0898-5898(99)00015-7
   Google Scholar
• Kvale, S., and S. Brinkman 2009. InterViews: Learning the Craft of Qualitative Research Interviewing 2, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Lamb, P., and K. Lane. In press. “Pupil Voice on Being Gifted and Talented in Physical Education ‘They Think It's Just, Like, a Weekend Sort of Thing’.” Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy doi: 10.1080/17408989.2011.649722
   Google Scholar
• Lamnias, C 2002. “The Contemporary Pedagogic Device: Functional Imposition and Limitations.” Pedagogy, Culture and Society, 10 (1): 21–38. doi: 10.1080/14681360200200131
   Google Scholar
• Le Cornu, R 2005. “Peer Mentoring: Engaging Pre-Service Teachers in Mentoring One Another.” Mentoring and Tutoring, 13 (3): 355–366. doi: 10.1080/13611260500105592
   Google Scholar
• Light, R. L., S. Harvey, and D. Memmert. In press. “Why Children Join and Stay in Sports Clubs: Case Studies in Australian, French and German Swimming Clubs.” Sport, Education and Society doi: 10.1080/13573322.2011.594431
   Google Scholar
• MacPhail, A., T. Gorley, and D. Kirk 2003. “Young People's Socialisation into Sport: A Case Study of an Athletics Club.” Sport, Education and Society, 8 (2): 251–267. doi: 10.1080/13573320309251
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall, D 2001. “Mentoring as a Developmental Tool for Women Coaches.” Canadian Journal for Women in Coaching, 2 (2): 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Martindale, R., D. Collins, and J. Daubney 2005. “Talent Development: A Guide for Practice and Research within Sport.” Quest, 57: 353–375. doi: 10.1080/00336297.2005.10491862
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McFadden, M., and G. Munns 2002. “Student Engagement and the Social Relations of Pedagogy.” British Journal of Sociology of Education, 23 (3): 357–366. doi: 10.1080/0142569022000015409
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Neill, K., R. Wagner, and L.M. Gomez 1996. “Online Mentors: Experimenting in Science Class.” Educational Leadership, 54 (3): 39–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parsloe, E., and M. Wray 2000. Coaching and Mentoring: Practical Methods to Improve Learning, London: Kogan-Page.
   Google Scholar
• Patton, M 2002. Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods, London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Regnier, G., J. Salmela, and S.J. Russell 1993. “Talent Detection and Development in Sport.” In Handbook on Research on Sport Psychology, edited by R. N. Singer, M. Murphy, L. K. Tennant, 290–313. New York: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Rickard, K 2004. “E-Mentoring and Pedagogy: A Useful Nexus for Evaluating Online Mentoring Programs for Small Business?..” Mentoring and Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 12 (3): 383–401. doi: 10.1080/030910042000275972
   Google Scholar
• Rowley, S 1992. Training of Young Athletes Study (TOYA): TOYA and Lifestyle, London: The Sports Council.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, W 2000. “Giftedness, Expertise, and (Exceptional) Performance: A Developmental Perspective.” In International Handbook of Research and Development of Giftedness and Talent, edited by K. Heller, F. Monks, R. Sternberg, and R. Subotnik, 165–177. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sękowski, A., and M. Siekańska 2008. “National Academic Award Winners over Time: Their Family Situation, Education and Interpersonal Relations.” High Ability Studies, 19 (2): 155–171. doi: 10.1080/13598130802504270
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh, P 2002. “Pedagogising Knowledge: Bernstein's Theory of the Pedagogic Device.” British Journal of Sociology of Education, 23 (4): 571–582. doi: 10.1080/0142569022000038422
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spencer, R 2006. “Understanding the Mentoring Process between Adolescents and Adults.” Youth Society, 37 (3): 287–315. doi: 10.1177/0743558405278263
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sriprakash, A 2011. “The Contributions of Bernstein's Sociology to Education Development Research.” British Journal of Sociology of Education, 32 (4): 521–539. doi: 10.1080/01425692.2011.578436
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stake, R 2000. “Case Studies.” In Handbook of Qualitative Research. 2nd ed, edited by N. K. Denzin, Y. S. Lincoln, 435–454. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• The Office for Standards in Education. 2004. Provision for Gifted and Talented Pupils in Physical Education, 2003–2004. HMI 2149. Accessed June 23, 2010. www.ofsted.gov.uk
   Google Scholar
• The Office for Standards in Education, Children's Services and Skills 2009. Physical Education in Schools 2005/08. Working Towards 2012 and Beyond, London: HMI 080249.
   Google Scholar
• Vaeyens, R., M. Lenoir, A.M. Williams, and R.M. Philippaerts 2008. “Talent Identification and Development Programmes in Sport. Current Models and Future Directions.” Sports Medicine, 39 (9): 703–714. doi: 10.2165/00007256-200838090-00001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, G 2008. “Gifted and Talented in Physical Education… or is it Sport?..” Physical Education Matters, 3 (3): 19–22.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, A.M., and T. Reilly 2000. “Talent Identification and Development in Soccer.” Journal of Sport Sciences, 18 (9): 657–667. doi: 10.1080/02640410050120041
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, R.K 2009. Case Study Research Design and Methods. 4th ed, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Youth Sport Trust 2009. Junior Athlete Education: Recognising Talent, Guiding Talent, Supporting Talent, Inspiring Talent, Loughborough: Youth Sport Trust.
   Google Scholar
• Youth Sport Trust. 2010. Accessed January 14, 2013. http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20100813174213/http://gifted.youthsporttrust.org/downloads/cms/Talent-ladder/JAEf_Information_sheet_Feb_09.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Youth Sport Trust. 2011a. Accessed January 14, 2013. http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20110118182308/http://gifted.youthsporttrust.org/page/pe-sport/index.html
   Google Scholar
• Youth Sport Trust. 2011b. Accessed January 14, 2013. http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20110118182308/http://gifted.youthsporttrust.org/subpage/mentoring/index.html
   Google Scholar
• Zey, M.G. 1984. The Mentor Connection, Homewood, IL: Dow Jones-Irwin.
   Google Scholar