Student voice as risky praxis: democratising physical education teacher education

References

• Apple, M. W., and J. A. Beane. 1995. Democratic Schools. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, 1250 North Pitt Street.
   Google Scholar
• Barber, B. R. 1992. An Aristocracy of Everyone: The Politics of Education and the Future of Democracy. New York: Ballatine.
   Google Scholar
• Boler, M. 2004. Democratic Dialogue in Education: Troubling Speech, Disturbing Silence. New York: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Bovill, C. 2013. “Students and Staff co-Creating Curricula: an Example of Good Practice in Higher Education?” In The Student Engagement Handbook: Practice in Higher Education, edited by E. Dunne and D. Owen, 461–476. Bingley: Emerald.
   Google Scholar
• Bragg, S. 2007. “‘Student Voice’ and Governmentality: The Production of Enterprising Subjects?” Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education 28 (3): 343–358.
   Google Scholar
• Brooker, R., and D. McDonald. 1999. “Did We Hear You? Issues of Student Voice in Curriculum Innovation.” Journal of Curriculum Studies 31 (1): 83–97. doi: 10.1080/002202799183313
   Google Scholar
• Brookfield, S. 1998. “Critically Reflective Practice.” Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions 18 (4): 197–205. doi: 10.1002/chp.1340180402
   Google Scholar
• Cochran-Smith, M. 2004. Walking the Road: Race, Diversity, and Social Justice in Teacher Education. New York: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cochran-Smith, M., and S. L. Lytle. 2009. Inquiry as Stance: Practitioner Research for the Next Generation. New York: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cook-Sather, A. 2002. “Authorizing Students’ Perspectives: Toward Trust, Dialogue, and Change in Education.” Educational Researcher 31 (4): 3–14. doi: 10.3102/0013189X031004003
   Google Scholar
• Cook-Sather, A. 2006. “‘Change Based on What Students Say’: Preparing Teachers for a Paradoxical Model of Leadership.” International Journal of Leadership in Education 9 (4): 345–358. doi: 10.1080/13603120600895437
   Google Scholar
• Cook-Sather, A. 2007. “Translating Researchers: Re-imagining the Work of Investigating Students’ Experiences in School.” In International Handbook of Student Experience in Elementary and Secondary School, edited by D. Thiessen and A. Cook-Sather, 829–873. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Cook-Sather, A. 2008. “What You Get is Looking in a Mirror, Only Better’: Inviting Students to Reflect (on) College Teaching.” Reflective Practice 9 (4): 473–483. doi: 10.1080/14623940802431465
   Google Scholar
• Cook-Sather, A. 2010. “Students as Learners and Teachers: Taking Responsibility, Transforming Education, and Redefining Accountability.” Curriculum Inquiry 40 (4): 555–575. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-873X.2010.00501.x
   Google Scholar
• Cox, M. D., and D. L. Sorenson. 2000. “Student Collaboration in Faculty Development.” In To Improve the Academy, edited by M. Kaplan, 97–106. Bolton, MA: Anker.
   Google Scholar
• Curtner-Smith, M. D. 2007. “The Impact of a Critically Oriented Physical Education Teacher Education Course on Preservice Classroom Teachers.” Journal of Teaching in Physical Education 26 (1): 1–27. doi: 10.1123/jtpe.26.1.35
   Google Scholar
• Delpish, A., A. Holmes, M. Knight-McKenna, R. Mihans, A. Darby, K. King, and P. Felten. 2010. “Equalizing Voices: Student-Faculty Partnership in Course Design.” In Engaging Student Voices in the Study of Teaching and Learning, edited by C. Werder and M. M. Otis, 96–114. Sterling, VA: Stylus.
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. 1963. Experience and Education. New York: Collier.
   Google Scholar
• Diamond, M. R. 2004. “The Usefulness of Structured mid-Term Feedback as a Catalyst for Change in Higher Education Classes.” Active Learning in Education 5 (3): 217–231. doi: 10.1177/1469787404046845
   Google Scholar
• Dunne, E., and R. Zandstra. 2011. Students as Change Agents. New Ways of Engaging with Learning and Teaching in Higher Education. Bristol: ESCalate Higher Education Academy Subject Centre for Education/University of Exeter.
   Google Scholar
• Emery, C. R., T. R. Kramer, and R. G. Tian. 2003. “Return to Academic Standards: A Critique of Student Evaluations of Teaching Effectiveness.” Quality Assurance in Education 11 (1): 37–46. doi: 10.1108/09684880310462074
   Google Scholar
• Enright, E., and M. O’Sullivan. 2010. “‘Can I do it in my Pyjamas?’: Negotiating a Physical Education Curriculum with Teenage Girls.” European Physical Education Review 16 (3): 203–222. doi: 10.1177/1356336X10382967
   Google Scholar
• Enright, E., and M. O’Sullivan. 2012. “Physical Education ‘in All Sorts of Corners’ Student Activists Transgressing Formal Physical Education Curricular Boundaries.” Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport 83 (2): 255–267.
   Google Scholar
• Fals Borda, O. 1979. “Investigating the Reality in Order to Transform It: The Coloumbian Experience.” Dialectical Anthropology 4: 33–55. doi: 10.1007/BF00417683
   Google Scholar
• Fernandez-Balboa, J. M., ed. 1997. Critical Postmodernism in Human Movement, Physical Education, and Sport. New York: Suny Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fielding, M. 1999. “Radical Collegiality: Affirming Teaching as an Inclusive Professional Practice.” Australian Educational Researcher 26 (2): 1–34. doi: 10.1007/BF03219692
   Google Scholar
• Fielding, M. 2004. “‘New Wave’ Student Voice and the Renewal of Civic Society.” London Review of Education 2 (3): 197–217. doi: 10.1080/1474846042000302834
   Google Scholar
• Fine, M., M. E. Torre, A. Burns, and Y. A. Payne. 2007. “Youth Research/Participatory Methods for Reform.” In International Handbook of Student Experience in Elementary and Secondary School, edited by D. Thiessen and A. Cook-Sather, 805–828. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Fisette, J. 2011. “Exploring how Girls Navigate Their Embodied Identities in Physical Education.” Physical Education and Sports Pedagogy 16 (2): 179–196. doi: 10.1080/17408989.2010.535199
   Google Scholar
• Freire, P. 1982. “Creating Alternative Research Methods. Learning to Do It by Doing It.” In Creating Knowledge: A Monopoly, edited by B. Hall, A. Gillette, and R. Tandon, 29–37. New Delhi: Society for Participatory Research in Asia.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, B. G. 1965. “The Constant Comparative Method of Qualitative Analysis.” Social Problems 12 (4): 436–445. doi: 10.2307/798843
   Google Scholar
• Greene, M. 1988. The Dialectic of Freedom. New York: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hickey, C. 2001. “‘I Feel Enlightened Now, but  …  ’: The Limits to the Pedagogic Translation of Critical Social Discourses in Physical Education.” Journal of Teaching in Physical Education 20 (3): 227–246. doi: 10.1123/jtpe.20.3.227
   Google Scholar
• Hil, R. 2015. Selling Students Short. Crows Nest: Allen and Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, A. Y., and L. A. Mazzei. 2013. “Plugging One Text into Another Thinking with Theory in Qualitative Research.” Qualitative Inquiry 19 (4): 261–271. doi: 10.1177/1077800412471510
   Google Scholar
• Lesnick, A. 2005. “The Mirror in Motion: Redefining Reflective Practice in an Undergraduate Field Work Seminar.” Reflective Practice 6 (1): 33–48. doi: 10.1080/1462394042000326798
   Google Scholar
• Lloyd, M. M. 2013. Troubled Times in Australian Teacher Education: 2012–2013. Sydney: Office for Learning and Teaching.
   Google Scholar
• Lorente, E., and D. Kirk. 2013. “Alternative Democratic Assessment in PETE: An Action-Research Study Exploring Risks, Challenges and Solutions.” Sport, Education and Society 18 (1): 77–96. doi: 10.1080/13573322.2012.713859
   Google Scholar
• Michelli, N., and D. L. Keiser. 2005. Teacher Education for Democracy and Education. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mihans, R., D. Long, and P. Felten. 2008. “Power and Expertise: Student-Faculty Collaboration in Course Design and the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning.” International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning 2 (2): 1–9. doi: 10.20429/ijsotl.2008.020216
   Google Scholar
• Mitra, D. 2004. “The Significance of Students: Can Increasing ‘Student Voice’ in Schools Lead to Gains in Youth Development?” The Teachers College Record 106 (4): 651–688. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9620.2004.00354.x
   Google Scholar
• Novak, J. M., ed. 1994. Democratic Teacher Education: Programs, Processes, Problems, and Prospects. New York: SUNY Press.
   Google Scholar
• Oliver, K. L., and H. A. Oesterreich. 2013. “Student-centred Inquiry as Curriculum as a Model for Field-Based Teacher Education.” Journal of Curriculum Studies 45 (3): 394–417. doi: 10.1080/00220272.2012.719550
   Google Scholar
• Oliver, K. L., H. A. Oesterreich, R. Aranda, J. Archeleta, C. Blazer, K. de la Cruz, D. Martinez, et al. 2015. “‘The Sweetness of Struggle’: Innovation in Physical Education Teacher Education Through Student-Centered Inquiry as Curriculum in a Physical Education Methods Course.” Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy 20 (1): 97–115. doi: 10.1080/17408989.2013.803527
   Google Scholar
• Ovens, A., and T. Fletcher. 2014. Self-study in Physical Education Teacher Education. New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Palmer, S. 2012. “Student Evaluation of Teaching: Keeping in Touch with Reality.” Quality in Higher Education 18 (3): 297–311. doi: 10.1080/13538322.2012.730336
   Google Scholar
• Penney, D. 2006. “Curriculum Construction and Change.” In Handbook of Physical Education, edited by D. Kirk, D. MacDonald, and M. O’Sullivan, 565–579. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, R. S. 1970. Ethics and Education. London: Allen and Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Rubin, H. J., and I. S. Rubin. 1995. Qualitative Interviewing. The Art of Hearing Data. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Russell, B. 1939. “Education for Democracy.” NASSP Bulletin 23 (81): 6–16. doi: 10.1177/019263653902308101
   Google Scholar
• Shor, I. 1996. When Students Have Power: Negotiating Authority in a Critical Pedagogy. New York: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thomson, P. 2011. “Coming to Terms with ‘Voice’.” In The Student Voice Handbook: Bridging the Academic/Practitioner Divide, edited by W. Kidd and G. Czerniawski, 19–30. Bingley: Emerald.
   Google Scholar
• Werder, C., and M. M. Otis, eds. 2010. Engaging Student Voices in the Study of Teaching and Learning. Sterling, VA: Stylus.
   Google Scholar
• Werder, C., L. Ware, C. Thomas, and E. Skogsberg. 2010. Students in Parlor Talk on Teaching and Learning: Conversational Scholarship. Engaging student voices in the study of teaching and learning. Sterling, VA: Stylus.
   Google Scholar
• Wisby, E. 2011. “Student Voice and New Models of Teacher Professionalism.” In The Student Voice Handbook: Bridging the Academic/Practitioner Divide, edited by W. Kidd and G. Czerniawski, 31–44. Bingley: Emerald.
   Google Scholar
• Zeichner, K. 2003. “The Adequacies and Inadequacies of Three Current Strategies to Recruit, Prepare, and Retain the Best Teachers for All Students.” The Teachers College Record 105 (3): 490–519. doi: 10.1111/1467-9620.00248
   Google Scholar