Different versions of assessment for learning in the subject of physical education

References

• Alexander, B. K., G. L. Anderson, and B. P. Gallegos, eds. 2005. Performance Theories in Education. Power, Pedagogy, and the Politics of Identity. London: LEA.
   Google Scholar
• Annerstedt, C., and S. Larsson. 2010. “‘I Have My Own Picture of What the Demands are … ’: Grading in Swedish PEH—Problems of Validity, Comparability and Fairness.” European Physical Education Review 16 (2): 97–115.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, S. J. 2000. “Performativities and Fabrications in the Education Economy: Towards the Performative Society?” The Australian Educational Researcher 27 (2): 1–23.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, S. J. 2003. “The Teacher's Soul and the Terrors of Performativity.” Journal of Education Policy 18 (2): 215–228.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, S. J., M. Maguire, A. Braun, J. Perryman, and K. Hoskins. 2012. “Assessment Technologies in Schools: ‘Deliverology’ and the ‘Play of Dominations’.” Research Papers in Education 27 (5): 513–533.
   Google Scholar
• Beach, D., and M. Dovemark. 2009. “Making ‘Right’ Choices? An Ethnographic Account of Creativity, Performativity and Personalised Learning Policy, Concepts and Practices.” Oxford Review of Education 35 (6): 689–704.
   Google Scholar
• Black, P., C. Harrison, C. Lee, B. Marshall, and D. Wiliam. 2002. Working Inside the Black Box. Assessment for Learning in the Classroom. London: GL Assessment.
   Google Scholar
• Black, P., and D. Wiliam. 2009. “Developing the Theory of Formative Assessment.” Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability (Formerly: Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education) 21 (1): 5–31.
   Google Scholar
• Borghouts, L. B., M. Slingerland, and L. Haerens. 2016. Assessment Quality and Practices in Secondary PE in the Netherlands. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy. doi:10.1080/17408989.2016.1241226.
   Google Scholar
• Broadfoot, Patricia. 2002. “Beware the Consequences of Assessment!.” Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice 3 (9): 285–288.
   Google Scholar
• Chan, K., P. J. Hay, and R. Tinning. 2011. “Understanding the Pedagogic Discourse of Assessment in Physical Education.” Asia-Pacific Journal of Health, Sport and Physical Education 2 (1): 3–18.
   Google Scholar
• Charteris, J. 2016. “Dialogic Feedback as Divergent Assessment for Learning: An Ecological Approach to Teacher Professional Development.” Critical Studies in Education 57 (3): 277–295.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, B., and R. Harré. 2001. “Positioning: The Discursive Production of Selves.” In Discourse Theory and Practice, edited by M. Wetherell, S. Taylor, and S. J. Yates, 198–209. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• DinanThompson, M., and D. Penney. 2015. “Assessment Literacy in Primary Physical Education.” European Physical Education Review 21 (4): 485–503.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, J., E. Rich, B. Davies, and R. Allwood. 2008. Education, Disordered Eating and Obesity Discourse: Fat Fabrications. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. 1982/1994. “The Subject and Power.” In Power, edited by J. D. Fabion and P. Rabinow, 326–348. New York: The New Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hattie, J., and H. Timperley. 2007. “The Power of Feedback.” Review of Educational Research 77 (1): 81–112.
   Google Scholar
• Hay, P. J. 2006. “Assessment for Learning in Physical Education.” In The Handbook of Physical Education, edited by D. Kirk, D. Mcdonald, and M. O’Sullivan, 312–325. London: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Hay, P. J., and D. Penney. 2013. Assessment in Physical Education. A Sociocultural Perspective. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hudson, B. 2002. “Holding Complexity and Searching for Meaning: Teaching as Reflective Practice.” Journal of Curriculum Studies 34 (1): 43–57.
   Google Scholar
• Hudson, B., and M. A. Meyer, eds. 2011. Beyond Fragmentation: Didactics, Learning and Teaching in Europe. Opladen and Farmington Hills: Barbara Budrich Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Jönsson, A. 2016. Bedömningsreformen som kom av sig. Skola och Samhälle. The assessment reform that failed. School and Society. Digital journal. www.skolaochsamhalle.se.
   Google Scholar
• Larsson, H., B. Fagrell, and K. Redelius. 2009. “Queering Physical Education.” Between Benevolence Towards Girls and a Tribute to Masculinity. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy 14 (1): 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Leirhaug, P. E., and C. Annerstedt. 2015. “Assessing with New Eyes? Assessment for Learning in Norwegian Physical Education.” Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy 21 (6): 616–631.
   Google Scholar
• Leirhaug, P. E., and A. MacPhail. 2015. “‘It’s the Other Assessment that is the Key’: Three Norwegian Physical Education Teachers’ Engagement (or not) with Assessment for Learning.” Sport, Education and Society 20 (5): 624–640. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Leirhaug, P. E., A. MacPhail, and C. Annerstedt. 2016. “‘The Grade Alone Provides no Learning’: Investigating Assessment Literacy Among Norwegian Physical Education Teachers.” Asia-Pacific Journal of Health, Sport and Physical Education 7 (1): 21–36.
   Google Scholar
• López-Pastor, V. M., D. Kirk, E. Lorente-Catalán, A. MacPhail, and D. Macdonald. 2013. “Alternative Assessment in Physical Education: A Review of International Literature.” Sport, Education and Society 18 (1): 57–76. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• MacPhail, A., and J. Halbert. 2010. “‘We Had to Do Intelligent Thinking During Recent PE’: Students’ and Teachers’ Experiences of Assessment for Learning in Post-primary Physical Education.” Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice 17 (1): 23–39.
   Google Scholar
• Ní Chróinín, D., and C. Cosgrave. 2013. “Implementing Formative Assessment in Primary Physical Education: Teacher Perspectives and Experiences.” Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy 18 (2): 219–233.s
   Google Scholar
• Öhman, J. 2014. “Om didaktikens möjligheter: ett pragmatiskt perspektiv.” Utbildning och Demokrati 23 (3): 33–52. [On the possibilities of didactics: a pragmatic perspective. Education and Democracy.].
   Google Scholar
• Patton, M. Q. 2002. Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Penney, D., R. Brooker, P. J. Hay, and L. Gillespie. 2009. “Curriculum, Pedagogy and Assessment: Three Message Systems of Schooling and Dimensions of Quality Physical Education.” Sport, Education and Society 14 (4): 421–442. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Price, B. 2002. “Methodological Issues in Nursing Research. Laddered Questions and Qualitative Data Research Interviews.” Journal of Advanced Nursing 37 (3): 273–281.
   Google Scholar
• Quennerstedt, M., and H. Larsson. 2015. “Learning Movement Cultures in Physical Education Practice.” Sport, Education and Society 20 (5): 565–572.
   Google Scholar
• Redelius, K., and P. J. Hay. 2012. “Student Views on Criterion-Referenced Assessment and Grading in Swedish Physical Education.” Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy 17 (2): 211–225. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Svennberg, L., J. Meckbach, and K. Redelius. 2014. “Exploring PE Teachers’‘Gut Feelings’: An Attempt to Verbalise and Discuss Teachers’ Internalised Grading Criteria.” European Physical Education Review 20 (2): 199–214.
   Google Scholar
• Taras, M. 2005. “Assessment – Summative and Formative – Some Theoretical Reflections.” British Journal of Educational Studies 53 (4): 466–478.
   Google Scholar
• Tolgfors, B., and M. Öhman. 2016. “The Implications of Assessment for Learning in Physical Education and Health.” European Physical Education Review 22 (2): 150–166.
   Google Scholar
• Torrance, H. 2007. “Assessment as Learning? How the Use of Explicit Learning Objectives, Assessment Criteria and Feedback in Post-secondary Education and Training Can Come to Dominate Learning.” Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice 14 (3): 281–294.
   Google Scholar
• Torrance, H. 2012. “Formative Assessment at the Crossroads: Conformative, Deformative and Transformative Assessment.” Oxford Review of Education 38 (3): 323–342. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Torrance, H. 2015. Blaming the Victim: Assessment, Examinations, and the Responsibilisation of Students and Teachers in Neo-liberal Governance. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education. Routledge. doi:10.1080/01596306.2015.1104854.
   Google Scholar
• Webb, P. T. 2006. “The Choreography of Accountability.” Journal of Education Policy 21 (2): 201–214.
   Google Scholar
• Wetherell, M. 1998. “Positioning and Interpretative Repertoires: Conversation Analysis and Post-Structuralism in Dialogue.” Discourse and Society 9 (3): 387–412.
   Google Scholar
• Wiliam, D. 2011. “What is Assessment for Learning?” Studies in Educational Evaluation 37: 3–14. Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Wiliam, D., and S. Leahy. 2015. Embedding formative assessment. Practical Techniques for K-12 Classrooms. West Palm Beach: Learning Sciences International.
   Google Scholar
• Wiliam, D., C. Lee, C. Harrison, and P. Black. 2004. “Teachers Developing Assessment for Learning: Impact on Student Achievement.” Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice 11 (1): 49–65. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594042000208994.
   Google Scholar