Using Flipgrid to improve reflection: a collaborative online approach to coach development

References

• Abrami, P. C., R. M. Bernard, E. M. Bures, E. Borokhovski, and R. M. Tamim. 2011. “Interaction in Distance Education and Online Learning: Using Evidence and Theory to Improve Practice.” Journal of Computing in Higher Education 23 (2-3): 82–103. doi: 10.1007/s12528-011-9043-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byington, T. 2011. “Communities of Practice: Using Blogs to Increase Collaboration.” Intervention in School and Clinic 46: 280–291. doi:10.1177/1053451210395384.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarà, M. 2015. “What Is Reflection? Looking for Clarity in an Ambiguous Notion.” Journal of Teacher Education 66 (3): 261–271. doi:10.1177/0022487114552028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, D., A. Martindale, V. Burke, and A. Cruickshank. 2015. “The Illusion of Competency Versus the Desirability of Expertise: Seeking a Common Standard for Support Professions in Sport.” Sports Medicine 45 (1): 1–7. doi:10.1007/s40279-014-0251-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Courtney, M., and S. Wilhoite-Mathews. 2015. “From Distance Education to Online Learning: Practical Approaches to Information Literacy Instruction and Collaborative Learning in Online Environments.” Journal of Library Administration 55 (4): 261–277. doi:10.1080/01930826.2015.1038924.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cushion, C., and R. C. Townsend. 2019. “Technology-Enhanced Learning in Coaching: A Review of Literature.” Educational Review 71 (5): 631–649. doi:10.1080/00131911.2018.1457010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dymoke, S., and J. Harrison. 2008. Reflective Teaching and Learning: A Guide to Professional Issues for Beginning Secondary Teachers. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Entwistle, N. J., and E. R. Peterson. 2004. “Conceptions of Learning and Knowledge in Higher Education: Relationships With Study Behaviour and Influences of Learning Environments.” International Journal of Educational Research 41: 407–428. doi: 10.1016/j.ijer.2005.08.009
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, W., and C. Brett. 2012. “Prompting Authentic Blogging Practice in an Online Graduate Course.” Computers and Education 59 (3): 1032–1041. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2012.03.019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garrett, R, and A Wrench. 2007. “Physical Experiences: Primary Student Teachers’ Conceptions of Sport and Physical Education.” Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy 12: 23–42. doi: 10.1080/17408980601060234
   Google Scholar
• Gould, D., J. Nalepa, and M. Mignano. 2019. “Coaching Generation Z Athletes.” Journal of Applied Sport Psychology. doi:10.1080/10413200.2019.1581856.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunawardena, C. N. 1995. “Social Presence Theory and Implications for Interaction and Collaborative Learning in Computer Conferences.” International Journal of Educational Telecommunications 1 (2): 147–166.
   Google Scholar
• Hatton, N., and D. Smith. 1995. “Reflection in Teacher Education: Towards Definition and Implementation.” Teaching and Teacher Education 11 (1): 33–49. doi: 10.1016/0742-051X(94)00012-U
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreijns, K., P. A. Kirschner, and W. Jochems. 2003. “Identifying the Pitfalls for Social Interaction in Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Environments: A Review of the Research.” Computers in Human Behavior 19 (3): 335–353. doi: 10.1016/S0747-5632(02)00057-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leach, L., G. Neutze, and N. Zepke. 2001. “Assessment and Empowerment: Some Critical Questions.” Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 26 (4): 293–305. doi:10.1080/02602930120063457.
   Google Scholar
• LeFebvre, L., E. L. LeFebvre, and M. Allen. 2018. “Training the Butterflies to Fly in Formation: Cataloguing Student Fears About Public Speaking.” Communication Education 67 (3): 348–362. doi:10.1080/03634523.2018.1468915.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGrath, J. E., and A. B. Hollingshead. 1993. “Putting the ‘Group’ Back in Group Support Systems: Some Theoretical Issues About Dynamic Processes in Groups with Technological Enhancements.” In Group Support Systems: New Perspectives, edited by L. M. Jessup, 78–96. New York: MacMillan Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Mennecke, B. E., J. S. Valacich, and C. B. Wheeler. 2000. “The Effects of Media and Task on User Performance: A Test of the Task-Media Fit Hypothesis.” Group Decision and Negotiation 9: 507–529. doi: 10.1023/A:1008770106779
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Northrup, P. 2001. “A Framework for Designing Interactivity Into Web-Based Instruction.” Educational Technology 41: 31–39.
   Google Scholar
• Nowell, L., J. Norris, D. White, and N. Moules. 2017. “Thematic Analysis: Striving to Meet the Trustworthiness Criteria.” International Journal of Qualitative Methods (December 2017), doi:10.1177/1609406917733847.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Piggott, D. 2015. “The Open Society and Coach Education: A Philosophical Agenda for Policy Reform and Future Sociological Research.” Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy 20 (3): 283–298. doi: 10.1080/17408989.2013.837435
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Resta, P., and T. Laferrière. 2007. “Technology in Support of Collaborative Learning.” Educational Psychology Review 19: 65–83. doi: 10.1007/s10648-007-9042-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richmond, V. P., J. S. Wrench, and J. C. McCroskey. 2013. Communication Apprehension, Avoidance, and Effectiveness. Boston, MA: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Saylor, C. R. 1990. “Reflection and Professional Education: Art, Science, and Competency.” Nurse Educator 15 (2): 8–11. doi: 10.1097/00006223-199003000-00006
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schlenker, R. B., and R. M. Leary. 1982. “Social Anxiety and Self-Presentation: A Conceptualization and Model.” Psychological Bulletin 92 (3): 641–666. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.92.3.641
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schön, D. 1991. The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think and Act. Oxford: Avebury.
   Google Scholar
• Sins, P. H. M., E. R. Savelsbergh, W. R. van Joolingen, and B. H. A. M. van Hout-Wolters. 2011. “Effects of Face-to-Face Versus Chat Communication on Performance in a Collaborative Inquiry Modeling Task.” Computers and Education 56: 379–387. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2010.08.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, B., and K. McGannon. 2018. “Developing Rigor in Qualitative Research: Problems and Opportunities Within Sport and Exercise Psychology.” International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology 11 (1): 101–121. doi:10.1080/1750984X.2017.1317357.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sports Coach UK. 2012. The UKCC Level 1–3 Support Guide. Leeds: Coachwise.
   Google Scholar
• Stoszkowski, J., and D. Collins. 2012. “Communities of Practice, Social Learning and Networks: Exploiting the Social Side of Coach Development.” Sport, Education and Society 19 (6): 773–788. doi:10.1080/13573322.2012.692671.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoszkowski, J., and D. Collins. 2014. “Blogs: A Tool to Facilitate Reflection and Community of Practice in Sports Coaching?” International Sport Coaching Journal 1 (3): 139–151. doi: 10.1123/iscj.2013-0030
   Google Scholar
• Stoszkowski, J., and D. Collins. 2016. “Sources, Topics and Use of Knowledge by Coaches.” Journal of Sports Sciences 34 (9): 794–802. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2015.1072279
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoszkowski, J., and D. Collins. 2017. “Using Shared Online Blogs to Structure and Support Informal Coach Learning. Part 1: A Tool to Promote Reflection and Communities of Practice?” Sport, Education and Society 22 (2): 247–270. doi: 10.1080/13573322.2015.1019447
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoszkowski, J., and D. Collins. 2018. “The Agony and the Ecstasy: Student-Coaches’ Perceptions of a Heutagogical Approach to Coach Development.” International Sport Coaching Journal 5 (2): 136–144. doi: 10.1123/iscj.2017-0077
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoszkowski, J., D. Collins, and C. Olsson. 2017. “Using Shared Online Blogs to Structure and Support Informal Coach Learning. Part 2: The Participants’ View and Implications for Coach Education.” Sport, Education and Society 22 (3): 407–425. doi: 10.1080/13573322.2015.1030382
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Straus, S. G. 1997. “Technology, Group Process, and Group Outcomes: Testing the Connections in Computer-Mediated and Face-to-Face Groups.” Human-Computer Interaction 12: 227–266. doi: 10.1207/s15327051hci1203_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stronach, I., D. Garratt, C. Pearce, and H. Piper. 2007. “Reflexivity, the Picturing of Selves, the Forging of Method.” Qualitative Inquiry 13 (2): 179–203. doi:10.1177/1077800406295476.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, N., and J. Pascal. 2012. “Developing Critically Reflective Practice.” Reflective Practice 13 (2): 311–325. doi:10.1080/14623943.2012.657795.
   Google Scholar
• Tsiotakis, P., and A. Jimoyiannis. 2016. “Critical Factors Towards Analysing Teachers’ Presence in On-Line Learning Communities.” The Internet and Higher Education 28: 45–58. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.09.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Linden, J., and P. Renshaw. 2001. Dialogic Learning. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, K. 2000. “It’s Difficult to Hide It: The Presentation of Self on Internet Home Pages.” Qualitative Sociology 23 (1): 99–120. doi: 10.1023/A:1005407717409
   Google Scholar
• Wass, R., T. Harland, and A. Mercer. 2011. “Scaffolding Critical Thinking in the Zone of Proximal Development.” Higher Education Research and Development 30 (3): 317–328. doi:10.1080/07294360.2010.489237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wenger, E., R. McDermott, and W. M. Snyder. 2002. Cultivating Communities of Practice. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Whipp, J. L. 2003. “Scaffolding Critical Reflection in Online Discussions: Helping Prospective Teachers Think Deeply About Field Experiences in Urban Schools.” Journal of Teacher Education 54 (4): 321–333. doi:10.1177/0022487103255010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, S. H. 2009. “Using Blogs to Enhance Critical Reflection and Community of Practice.” Educational Technology and Society 12 (2): 11–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar