‘When it’s something that you want to do.’ Exploring curriculum negotiation in Norwegian PE

References

• Aarskog, Eirik. 2020. “‘No Assessment, No Learning’ Exploring Student Participation in Assessment in Norwegian Physical Education (PE).” Sport, Education and Society, 1–14. doi:10.1080/13573322.2020.1791064.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aarskog, Eirik, Dean Barker, and Jorunn Spord Borgen. 2018. “What Were You Thinking? A Methodological Approach for Exploring Decision-Making and Learning in Physical Education.” Sport, Education and Society, 1–13. doi:10.1080/13573322.2018.1491836.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amade-Escot, Chantal. 2006. “Student Learning Within the Didactique Tradition.” In The Handbook of Physical Education, edited by David Kirk, Doune MacDonald, and Mary O’Sullivan, 347–385. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Barker, Dean, and Claes Annerstedt. 2016. “Managing Physical Education Lessons: an Interactional Approach.” Sport, Education and Society 21 (6): 924–944. doi:10.1080/13573322.2014.969229.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barker, Dean, Mikael Quennerstedt, and Claes Annerstedt. 2015. “Learning Through Group Work in Physical Education: A Symbolic Interactionist Approach.” Sport, Education and Society 20 (5): 604–623. doi:10.1080/13573322.2014.962493.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barker, Dean, Tristan Wallhead, Sheri Brock, Victoria Goodyear, and Chantal Amade-Escot. 2017. “Group Work in Physical Education: Exploring the Interconnectedness of Theoretical Approaches and Practice.” Journal of Teaching in Physical Education 36 (1): 50–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biesta, Gert, and Nicholas C. Burbules. 2003. “The Process of Inquiry.” In Pragmatism and Educational Research, edited by Gert Biesta and Nicholas C. Burbules, 55–81. Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Black, Paul, and Dylan Wiliam. 2009. “Developing the Theory of Formative Assessment.” Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability 21 (1): 5–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boekaerts, Monique, Paul Pintrich, and Moshe Zeidner. 2000. Handbook of Self-Regulation, 768. San Diego, CA: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, Virginia, and Victoria Clarke. 2006. “Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology.” Qualitative Research in Psychology 3 (2): 77–101.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, Virginia, Victoria Clarke, and Paul Weate. 2016. “Using Thematic Analysis in Sport and Exercise Research.” In Routledge Handbook of Qualitative Research in Sport and Exercise, edited by Brett Smith and Andrew C. Sparkes, 191–205. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Brock, Sheri J, Inez Rovegno, and Kimberly L Oliver. 2009. “The Influence of Student Status on Student Interactions and Experiences During a Sport Education Unit.” Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy 14 (4): 355–375.
   Google Scholar
• Cothran, D. J., and P. Kulinna. 2007. “Students’ Reports of Misbehavior in Physical Education.” Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport 78 (3): 216–224.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delamont, Sara. 2004. “Ethnography and Participant Observation.” In Qualitative Research Practice, edited by Clive Seale, Giampietro Gobo, Jaber F. Gubrium, and David Silverman, 217–229. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Dempsey, Nicholas P. 2010. “Stimulated Recall Interviews in Ethnography.” Qualitative Sociology 33 (3): 349–367.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Derry, Sharon J., Roy D. Pea, Brigid Barron, Randi A. Engle, Frederick Erickson, Ricki Goldman, Rogers Hall, et al. 2010. “Conducting Video Research in the Learning Sciences: Guidance on Selection, Analysis, Technology, and Ethics.” Journal of the Learning Sciences 19 (1): 3–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeWalt, Kathleen M, and Billie R DeWalt. 2011. Participant Observation: A Guide for Fieldworkers. 2nd ed. Plymouth: Altamira Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, John. 1902. The Child and the Curriculum. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, John. (1910) 1997. How We Think. New York: Dover.
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, John. (1916) 1980. “Democracy and Education.” In The Middle Works 1899–1924, edited by Jo Ann Boydston, 45-57, 135–177. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, John. (1938) 1997. Experience and Education. New York: Simon & Shuster.
   Google Scholar
• Enright, E., and M. O’Sullivan. 2010. “‘Can I Do It in My Pyjamas?’ Negotiating a Physical Education Curriculum with Teenage Girls.” European Physical Education Review 16 (3): 203–222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fauskanger, Janne, and Reidar Mosvold. 2014. “Innholdsanalysens Muligheter i Utdanningsforskning.” Norsk Pedagogisk Tidsskrift 98 (02): 127–139.
   Google Scholar
• Forskrift til opplæringslova. 2009. “Kap. 3. Individuell vurdering i grunnskolen og i vidaregåande opplæring.”
   Google Scholar
• Goodyear, Victoria, and Dean Dudley. 2015. “‘I’ma Facilitator of Learning!’ Understanding What Teachers and Students Do Within Student-Centered Physical Education Models.” Quest (Grand Rapids, Mich) 67 (3): 274–289.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guadalupe, Tasha, and Matthew D. Curtner-Smith. 2019a. “‘It’s Nice to Have Choices:’ Influence of Purposefully Negotiating the Curriculum on the Students in One Mixed-Gender Middle School Class and Their Teacher.” Sport, Education and Society, 1–13. doi:10.1080/13573322.2019.1674275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guadalupe, Tasha, and Matthew D. Curtner-Smith. 2019b. “‘She Was Really Good at Letting us Make Decisions:’ Influence of Purposefully Negotiating the Physical Education Curriculum on One Teacher and a Boys’ Middle School Minority Class.” Curriculum Studies in Health and Physical Education 10 (2): 109–125.
   Google Scholar
• Hastie, Peter A., Mary E. Rudisill, and Danielle D. Wadsworth. 2013. “Providing Students with Voice and Choice: Lessons from Intervention Research on Autonomy-Supportive Climates in Physical Education.” Sport, Education and Society 18 (1): 38–56. doi:10.1080/13573322.2012.701203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• How, Y. M., P. Whipp, J. Dimmock, and B. Jackson. 2013. “The Effects of Choice on Autonomous Motivation, Perceived Autonomy Support, and Physical Activity Levels in High School Physical Education.” Journal of Teaching in Physical Education 32 (2): 131–148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howley, Donal, and Deborah Tannehill. 2014. “‘Crazy Ideas’: Student Involvement in Negotiating and Implementing the Physical Education Curriculum in the Irish Senior Cycle.” Physical Educator 71 (3): 391.
   Google Scholar
• Kirk, David. 2010. Physical Education Futures. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Leirhaug, Petter Erik, and Claes Annerstedt. 2016. “Assessing with New Eyes? Assessment for Learning in Norwegian Physical Education.” Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy 21 (6): 616–631. doi:10.1080/17408989.2015.1095871.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• López-Pastor, Víctor Manuel, David Kirk, Eloisa Lorente-Catalán, Ann MacPhail, and Doune Macdonald. 2013. “Alternative Assessment in Physical Education: A Review of International Literature.” Sport, Education and Society 18 (1): 57–76. doi:10.1080/13573322.2012.713860.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, F., S. Gray, and J. Inchley. 2015. “‘This Choice Thing Really Works … ’ Changes in Experiences and Engagement of Adolescent Girls in Physical Education Classes, During a School-Based Physical Activity Programme.” Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy 20 (6): 593–611.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mordal-Moen, Kjersti, Knut Westlie, Vidar Hammer Brattli, Lars Bjørke, and Arild Vaktskjold. 2015. Kroppsøving i Elverumskolen. En Kartleggingsstudie av Elever, Lærere og Skolelederes Opplevelse av Kroppsøvingsfaget i Grunnskolen. Elverum: Høgskolen i Hedmark.
   Google Scholar
• Mosston, Muska, and Sara Ashworth. 2008. “Teaching Physical Education.” https://spectrumofteachingstyles.org/assets/files/book/Teaching_Physical_Edu_1st_Online.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• The Norwegian Directorate for Education and Training. 2020. “Core Curriculum – Values and Principles for Primary and Secondary Education.” https://www.udir.no/lk20/overordnet-del/?lang=eng.
   Google Scholar
• Quennerstedt, Mikael, Claes Annerstedt, Dean Barker, Inger Karlefors, Håkan Larsson, Karin Redelius, and Marie Öhman. 2014. “What Did They Learn in School Today? A Method for Exploring Aspects of Learning in Physical Education.” European Physical Education Review 20 (2): 282–302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quennerstedt, Mikael, Johan Öhman, and Marie Öhman. 2011. “Investigating Learning in Physical Education—A Transactional Approach.” Sport, Education and Society 16 (2): 159–177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen, Bo, Nate McCaughtry, Jeffrey Martin, and Mariane Fahlman. 2009. “Effects of Teacher Autonomy Support and Students’ Autonomous Motivation on Learning in Physical Education.” Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport 80 (1): 44–53. doi:10.1080/02701367.2009.10599528.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, A., K. Green, and M. Thurston. 2009. “'Activity Choice’ and Physical Education in England and Wales.” Sport Education and Society 14 (2): 203–222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United Nations. 1989. “The Convention on the Rights of the Child.” http://www.ohchr.org/en/professionalinterest/pages/crc.aspx.
   Google Scholar
• Wahl-Alexander, Zachary, Matthew Curtner-Smith, and Oleg Sinelnikov. 2016. “Influence of a Purposefully Negotiated Season of Sport Education on One Teacher and His Pupils.” European Physical Education Review 22 (4): 450–464. doi:10.1177/1356336(15619123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar