Merging observational and interview data to study and improve the adaptability of the products of didactic engineering to ordinary teaching in physical education

References

• Adé, D., C. Jourand, and C. Sève. 2010. “L’inscription Contextuelle de L’activité en Course en Durée.” Education et Didactique 4 (3): 7–19.
   Google Scholar
• Amade-Escot, C. 2001. “Chapitre 1. De L’usage des Théories de L’enseignant. Questions de L’étude des Contrats Didactiques en éducation Physique.” In Le Génie Didactique, edited by A. Rouchier, G. Lemoyne, and A. Mercier, 23–41. Bruxelles: De Boeck.
   Google Scholar
• Amade-Escot, C. 2005. “The Critical Didactic Incident as a Qualitative Method of Research to Analyse the Content Taught.” Journal of Teaching in Physical Education 24 (2): 127–148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amade-Escot, C. 2006. “Student Learning Within the Didactique Tradition.” In Handbook of Research in Physical Education, edited by D. Kirk, D. Macdonald, and M. O’Sullivan, 347–365. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Amade-Escot, C. 2014. “De la Nécessité D’une Observation Didactique Pour Accéder à L’épistémologie Pratique des Professeurs.” Recherches en Education 19: 18–29.
   Google Scholar
• Amade-Escot, C. 2019a. “Epistémologies Pratiques et Action Didactique Conjointe du Professeur et des Élèves.” Education et Didactique 13: 109–114.
   Google Scholar
• Amade-Escot, C. 2019b. “Poursuivre la Réflexion … à Propos du Texte de Francine Cicurel.” Education et Didactique 13: 123–125.
   Google Scholar
• Amade-Escot, C., S. Elandoulsi, and I. Verscheure. 2015. “Physical Education in Tunisia: Teachers’ Practical Epistemology, Students’ Positioning and Gender Issues.” Sport, Education and Society 20 (5): 656–675.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Artigue, M. 1986. “Etude de la Dynamique D’une Situation de Classe: Une Approche de la Reproductibilité.” Recherches en Didactique des Mathématiques 7 (1): 5–62.
   Google Scholar
• Artigue, M. 1989. “Ingénierie Didactique.” Recherches en Didactique des Mathématiques 9 (3): 281–308.
   Google Scholar
• Artigue, M. 2002. “Didactical Engineering as a Framework for the Conception of Teaching Products.” In Didactics of Mathematics as a Scientific Discipline, edited by R. Biehler, R. W. Scholz, R. Sträßer, and B. Winkelmann, 27–39. New York: Kluwer Academics Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Artigue, M., and M.-J. Perrin-Glorian. 1991. “Didactic Engineering, Research and Development Tool: Some Theoretical Problems Linked to This Duality.” For the Learning of Mathematics 11 (1): 13–18.
   Google Scholar
• Barker, D., T. Wallhead, S. Brock, V. Goodyear, and C. Amade-Escot. 2017. “Group Work in Physical Education: Exploring the Interconnectedness of Theoretical Approaches and Practices.” Journal of Teaching in Physical Education 36: 50–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boda, B., and M. Récopé. 1991. “Instrument D’analyse et de Traitement à des Fins D’enseignement de l’E.P.S.” Revue EP.S 232: 56–59.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. 1980. Le Sens Pratique. Paris: Les Editions de Minuit.
   Google Scholar
• Brousseau, G. 1997. Theory of Didactic Situations in Mathematics. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carnus, M.-F. 2012. “Comparative Linguistic Analysis Between Newly Qualified Teachers and Experienced Teachers: A Study of the Notion of Pelvic Retroversion in Physical Education.” Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy 17 (1): 37–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carnus, M.-F., J.-P. Sauvegrain, and A. Terrisse. 2002. “Intérêt et Utilité de la Méthodologie D’ingénierie Didactique Dans L’analyse du Processus Décisionnel de L’enseignant d’EPS.” Les Dossiers des Sciences de L’Education 8: 99–112.
   Google Scholar
• Chevallard, Y. 1992. “Fundamental Concepts in Didactics: Perspectives Provided by an Anthropological Approach.” In Research in Didactique of Mathematics, edited by R. Douady, and A. Mercier, 131–168. Grenoble: La pensée sauvage.
   Google Scholar
• Conférence intercantonale de l’instruction publique de Suisse romande et du Tessin (CIIP). 2010–2016. Plan d’études romand. http://www.plandetudes.ch.
   Google Scholar
• Forest, E., B. Lenzen, and M. Öhman. 2018. “Teaching Traditions in Physical Education in France, Switzerland and Sweden: A Special Focus on Official Curricula for Gymnastics and Fitness Training.” European Educational Research Journal 17 (1): 71–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harvey, S., S. Pill, P. Hastie, and T. Wallhead. 2020. “Physical Education Teachers’ Perceptions of the Successes, Constraints, and Possibilities Associated with Implementing the Sport Education Model.” Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy 25 (5): 555–566.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hmelo-Silver, C. E. 2006. “Design Principles for Scaffolding Technology-Based Inquiry.” In Collaborative Reasoning, Learning and Technology, edited by A. M. O’Donnell, C. E. Hmelo-Silver, and G. Erkens, 147–170. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Hmelo-Silver, C. E., R. Golan Duncan, and C. A. Chinn. 2007. “Scaffolding and Achievement in Problem-Based and Inquiry Learning: A Response to Kirschner, Sweller, and Clark (2006).” Educational Psychologist 42 (2): 99–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hortigüela-Alcalá, D., A. Hernando-Garijo, S. González-Villora, J. C. Pastor-Vicedo, and A. Baena-Extremera. 2020. “Cooperative Learning Does Not Work for Me: Analysis of Its Implementation in Future Physical Education Teachers.” Frontiers in Psychology 11: 1539. doi:https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01539.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juma, S., E. Lehtomäki, and A. Naukkarinen. 2017. “Scaffolding Teachers to Foster Inclusive Pedagogy and Presence Through Collaborative Action Research.” Educational Action Research 25 (5): 720–736.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirk, D. 2010. Physical Education Futures. London: Routledge, Taylor and Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Kloetzer, L., Y. Clot, and E. Quillerou-Grivot. 2015. “Stimulating Dialogue at Work: The Activity Clinic Approach to Learning and Development.” In Francophone Perspectives of Learning Through Work, edited by L. Filliettaz, and S. Billett, 49–70. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Lenzen, B., and J. Reylé. 2017. “Des Savoirs Planifiés par les Enseignants aux Connaissances Construites par les élèves en éducation Physique.” Nouveaux Cahiers de la Recherche en éducation 20 (1): 36–60.
   Google Scholar
• Leriche, J., J.-F. Desbiens, C. Amade-Escot, and R. Tinning. 2016. “Compatibility and Complementarity of Classroom Ecology and Didactique Research Perspectives in Physical Education.” Quest 68 (4): 497–520.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ligozat, F., and J. Almqvist. 2018. “Conceptual Frameworks in Didactics – Learning and Teaching: Trends, Evolutions and Comparative Challenges.” European Educational Research Journal 17 (1): 3–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• López-Pastor, V. M., D. Kirk, E. Lorente-Catalán, A. MacPhail, and D. Macdonald. 2013. “Alternative Assessment in Physical Education: A Review of International Literature.” Sport, Education and Society 18 (1): 57–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsenach, J. 1989. “Les Pratiques des Enseignants D’éducation Physique et Sportive Dans les Collèges.” Revue Française de Pédagogie 89: 7–10.
   Google Scholar
• Martinand, J.-L. 1989. “Pratiques de Référence, Transposition Didactique et Savoirs Professionnels en Sciences et Techniques.” Les Sciences de L’éducation Pour L’ère Nouvelle 1–2: 23–35.
   Google Scholar
• Moussay, S., E. Flavier, P. Zimmermann, and J. Méard. 2011. “Pre-Service Teachers’ Greater Power to Act in the Classroom: Analysis of the Circumstances for Professional Development.” European Journal of Teacher Education 34 (4): 465–482.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naess, H. S., R. Säfvenbom, and O. F. Standal. 2014. “Running with Dewey: Is It Possible to Learn to Enjoy Running in High School Physical Education?” Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health 6 (2): 301–3015.
   Google Scholar
• Perrin-Glorian, M.-J. 2011. “L’ingénierie Didactique à L’interface de la Recherche Avec L’enseignement. Développement de Ressources et Formation des Enseignants.” In En Amont et en Aval des Ingénieries Didactiques, edited by C. Margolinas, M. Abboud-Blanchard, L. Bueno-Ravel, and N. Douek, 57–78. Grenoble: La pensée sauvage.
   Google Scholar
• Pill, S., K. Swabey, and D. Penney. 2017. “Investigating Physical Education Teacher Use of Models Based Practice in Australian Secondary PE.” Revue phénEPS/PHEnex Journal 9 (1): 1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Poussin, B., H. Dénervaud, and B. Lenzen. 2014. “La Contribution de L’éducation Physique au Développement de la Démarche Réflexive des élèves: Quelles Techniques Didactiques Mises en œuvre par les Enseignants Lors D’un Cycle de Volley-Ball.” eJRIEPS 31: 53–69.
   Google Scholar
• Robert, A. 2011. “Des Recherches ‘de Type Ingénierie’.” In En Amont et en Aval des Ingénieries Didactiques, edited by C. Margolinas, M. Abboud-Blanchard, L. Bueno-Ravel, and N. Douek, 207–222. Grenoble: La pensée sauvage.
   Google Scholar
• Robert, A., and J. Robinet. 1992. “Représentations des Enseignants et des élèves.” Repère IREM 7: 93–99.
   Google Scholar
• Sensevy, G. 2007. “Des Catégories Pour Décrire et Comprendre L’action Didactique.” In Agir Ensemble. L’action Didactique Conjointe du Professeur et des élèves, edited by G. Sensevy, and A. Mercier, 13–49. Rennes: PUR.
   Google Scholar
• Sghaier, D., H. Ben Jomâa, M. Mami, G. Kapazaï, and A. Bouassida. 2019. “L’effet des Pratiques Ostensives sur le Rapport au Savoir Dans L’enseignement de la Natation: Deux études de cas.” eJRIEPS Hors Série 2: 80–97.
   Google Scholar
• Vors, O., A. Girard, N. Gal-petitfaux, B. Lenzen, N. Mascret, A. Mouchet, S. Turcotte, and F. Potdevin. 2020. “A Review of the Penetration of Francophone Research on Intervention in Physical Education and Sport in Anglophone Journals Since 2010.” Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy 25 (4): 331–345.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward, P., and S. Ayvazo. 2016. “Pedagogical Content Knowledge: Conceptions and Findings in Physical Education.” Journal of Teaching in Physical Education 35 (3): 194–207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar