References
- Arendt, H. [1963] 2006. Eichmann in Jerusalem: A report on the banality of evil. London: Penguin.
- Barrowman, K. 2011. “Collateral: A case study in ethical subjectivity.” Offscreen 15(9). https://offscreen.com/view/collateral_subjectivity.
- Barrowman, K. 2018. “Signs and meaning: Film studies and the legacy of poststructuralism.” Offscreen 22(7). https://offscreen.com/view/signs-and-meaning-film-studies-and-the-legacy-of-poststructuralism.
- Barrowman, K. 2020. “Otto Preminger and the moving camera: Feminist attunement in Whirlpool.” Mise-En-scène: The Journal of Film & Visual Narration 5: 1–13.
- Barrowman, K. 2021. “A plea for intention: Stanley Cavell and ordinary aesthetic philosophy.” Movie: A Journal of Film Criticism 9: 65–75. https://warwick.ac.uk/fac/arts/film/movie/movie_journal_issue_9._a_plea_for_intention.pdf.
- Barrowman, K. 2022a. “The availability of Jim Jarmusch’s film-philosophy: Wittgenstein, Derrida, and private language in Ghost dog: The way of the samurai.” Film-Philosophy 26, no. 3: 352–74. 10.3366/film.2022.0205
- Barrowman, K. 2022b. “How to do things with camera movement” (Review: The Lure of the Image: Epistemic Fantasies of the Moving Camera), by Daniel Morgan. Senses of Cinema 101. http://www.sensesofcinema.com/2022/book-reviews/how-to-do-things-with-camera-movement-the-lure-of-the-image-epistemic-fantasies-of-the-moving-camera-by-daniel-morgan/. 10.1525/fq.2022.76.1.101
- Barrowman, K. Forthcoming. “Alfred Hitchcock and the moving camera: Authorship, style, and declarative aesthetics.” Offscreen.
- Betz, M. 2009. Beyond the subtitle: Remapping European art cinema. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota press.
- Borde, R., and É. Chaumeton. [1955] 2002. A panorama of American film noir. San Francisco, CA: City lights books.
- Brooke, M. 2009. The weight of the world. Sight & Sound 19: 54–55.
- Çaǧlayan, E. 2018. Poetics of slow cinema: Nostalgia, absurdism, boredom. London: Palgrave.
- Camus, A. [1942] 1975. The myth of Sisyphus. In The myth of Sisyphus and other essays, ed. J. O’Brien, 9–124. London: Penguin.
- Cavell, S. [1969] 1976. Knowing and acknowledging. In Must we mean what we say?, 238–66. Cambridge: Cambridge university press.
- Cavell, S. [1971] 1979. The world viewed: Reflections on the ontology of film. Cambridge, MA: Harvard university press.
- Cavell, S. [1972] 1981. The senses of Walden. Chicago: University of Chicago press.
- Cavell, S. 1979. The claim of reason: Wittgenstein, skepticism, morality, and tragedy. Oxford: Oxford university press.
- Cavell, S. 1986. Texts of recovery (Coleridge, Wordsworth, Heidegger …). In Cavell 1988: 50–75.
- Cavell, S. 1988. In quest of the ordinary: Lines of skepticism and romanticism. Chicago: University of Chicago press.
- Cavell, S. 1990. Conditions handsome and unhandsome: The constitution of Emersonian perfectionism. Chicago: University of Chicago press.
- Cavell, S. 2003. Emerson’s transcendental etudes. Stanford, CA: Stanford University press.
- Cavell, S. 2004. Cities of words: Pedagogical letters on a register of the moral life. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
- Colvin, J.B. 2017. The other side of frontality: Dorsality in European art cinema. New Review of Film and Television Studies 15, no. 2: 191–210. doi:10.1080/17400309.2017.1312794.
- Damico, J. [1978] 1996. Film noir: A modest proposal. In Film noir reader, ed. A. Silver and J. Ursini, 95–105. New York: Limelight Editions.
- de Luca, T. 2014. Realism of the senses in world cinema: The experience of physical reality. London: I.B. Tauris.
- Dickos, A. 2002. Street with no name: A history of the classic American film noir. Lexington: University of Kentucky Press.
- Emerson, R.W. [1841] 1950. History. In The complete essays and other writings of Ralph Waldo Emerson, ed. B. Atkinson, 123–44. New York: The modern library.
- Emerson, R.W. 1860. Fate. In The conduct of life. Boston: Ticknor and Fields.
- Flanagan, M. 2012. “Slow cinema”: Temporality and style in contemporary art and experimental film. PhD thesis: University of Exeter.
- Gorfinkel, E. 2016. Exhausted drift: Austerity, dispossession, and the politics of slow in Kelly Reichardt’s Meek’s Cutoff. In Slow Cinema, ed. T. de Luca and N.B. Jorge, 123–36. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
- Gunning, T. 2000. The films of Fritz Lang: Allegories of vision and modernity. London: BFI.
- Hirsch, F. 1981. The dark side of the screen: Film noir. New York: Da Capo.
- Jaffe, I. 2014. Slow movies: Countering the cinema of action. London: Wallflower.
- Jung, C.G. [1951] 1969. The collected works of C.G. In Jung, ed., H. Read, M. Fordham, G. Adler, and W. McGuirevol. 9 part II. 71. Princeton, NJ: Princeton university press.
- Koepnick, L. 2014. On slowness: Toward an aesthetic of the contemporary. New York: Columbia University Press.
- Kovács, A.B. 2013. The cinema of Béla Tarr: The circle closes. London: Wallflower.
- Lee, N. 2008. Movie review: The Man from London. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/22/movies/22man.html.
- Morgan, D. 2016. Where are we?: Camera movements and the problem of point of view. New Review of Film and Television Studies 14, no. 2: 222–48. doi:10.1080/17400309.2015.1125702.
- Morgan, D. 2021. The lure of the image: Epistemic fantasies of the moving camera. Berkeley: University of California Press.
- Nagib, L. 2016. “The politics of slowness and the traps of modernity.” In Slow Cinema: 25–46.
- Naremore, J. [1998] 2008. More than night: Film noir in its contexts. Berkeley: University of California press.
- Pippin, R. 2012. Fatalism in American film noir: Some cinematic philosophy. Charlottesville: University of Virginia press.
- Porfirio, R. [1976] 1996. “No way out: Existential motifs in the film noir.” In Film Noir Reader: 77–93.
- Rancière, J. [1995] 1999. Disagreement: Politics and philosophy. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
- Rancière, J. [2011] 2013. Béla Tarr, the time after. Minneapolis, MN: Univocal Publishing.
- Rancière, J. 2016. “Béla Tarr: The poetics and the politics of fiction.” In Slow Cinema: 245–60.
- Samardzija, Z. 2020. Post-communist malaise: Cinematic responses to European integration. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers university press.
- Schonig, J. 2018. The chained camera: On the ethics and politics of the follow-shot aesthetic. New Review of Film and Television Studies 16, no. 3: 264–94. doi:10.1080/17400309.2018.1479184.
- Schrader, P. [1972] 2009. Notes on film noir. In Film theory & criticism, ed. L. Braudy and M. Cohen, 581–91. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Shapiro, M.J. 2020. The cinematic political: Film composition as political theory. London: Routledge.
- Tarr, B. 1987. Why I make films. https://moviechat.org/tt0249241/Werckmeister-harmoniak/58c77f7493cef4080d81ce3b/Directors-Statement-Why-I-Make-Films.
- Tarr, B. 2000. “Interview with Béla Tarr: About Werckmeister Harmonies (Cannes 2000, director’s fortnight).” Bright Lights Film Journal. https://brightlightsfilm.com/interview-bela-tarr-werckmeister-harmonies-cannes-2000-directors-fortnight/#.YPS0b0xOlPY
- Tarr, B. 2012. Interview: Béla Tarr, the complete works. Film comment. https://www.filmcomment.com/blog/interview-bela-tarr-the-complete-works/.
- Tarr, B. 2014. My master’s voice: Béla Tarr interviewed by J.R. Robinson. The quietus. https://thequietus.com/articles/16564-bela-tarr-interview-wrekmeister-harmonies.
- TIFF. 2020. https://www.tiff.net/events/damnation.
- Totaro, D. 2001. Time and the long take in The magnificent Ambersons, Ugetsu, and Stalker. PhD thesis: University of Warwick.
- Totaro, D. 2020. Temporality and the long take in Stalker. In ReFocus: The films of Andrei Tarkovsky, ed. S. Toymentsev, 102–18. Edinburgh: Edinburgh university press.
- Tuttle, H. 2010. Slower or contemplative? Unspoken cinema. https://unspokencinema.blogspot.com/2010/03/slower-or-contemplative.html.
- Tyrer, B. 2016. Out of the past: Lacan and film noir. London: Palgrave.
- Walsh, M. 2016. “The first durational cinema and the real of time.” Resources Policy: 59–70.
- Walsh, M. 2022. “Durational cinema: A short history of long films.”
- Warner, R. 2021. Notes on the slow thriller in contemporary world cinema. Studies in World Cinema 1: 104–13.
- Žižek, S. [1989] 2008. The sublime object of ideology. London: Verso.
- Žižek, S. 1993. The thing that thinks”: The Kantian background of the noir subject. In Shades of noir, ed. J. Copjec, 199–226. London: Verso.
- Žižek, S. 2021. Heaven in disorder. New York and London: OR books.