Sublime aesthetics in Philippe Grandrieux’s Un lac

References

• Armstrong, M. 2019. ‘The effects of blackness’: Gender, race and the sublime in aesthetic theories of Burke and Kant. In The sublime reader, ed. R. Clewis, 271–80. London and New York: Bloomsbury Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Baldassari, L., and N. Vigna. 2015. Interview with Philippe Grandrieux. Specchio Scuro, September 22. https://specchioscuro.it/interview-philippe-grandrieux-intervista-grandrieux/.
   Google Scholar
• Barker, J. 2009. The tactile eye: Touch and the cinematic experience. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, J. 2009. Thing-power and an ecological sublime. In The sublime now, ed. L. White and C. Pajaczkowska, 24–35. Newcastle, UK: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Beugnet, M. 2007. Cinema and sensation: French film and the art of transgression. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bordun, T. 2017. Genre trouble and extreme cinema: Film theory at the fringes of contemporary art cinema. Cham: Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Brenez, N. 2003. The body’s night: An interview with Philippe Grandrieux. Rouge 1. http://www.rouge.com.au/1/grandrieux.html.
   Google Scholar
• Brinkema, E. 2014. The forms of the affects. Durham and London: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, W., and D.H. Fleming. 2019. ‘What we do defines us’: ScarJo as war machine. In Screening Scarlett Johansson: Gender, genre, stardom, ed. J. Loreck, W. Monaghan, and K. Stevens, 183–202. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Burke, E. 1993. A philosophical enquiry. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cavell, S. 1979. The world viewed: Reflections on the ontology of film. enlarged ed. Cambridge and London: Harvard University Press
   Google Scholar
• Chamarette, J. 2011. Shadows of being in Sombre: Archetypes, wolf-men and bare life. In The new extremism: From France to Europe, ed. T.C. Horeck and T. Kendall, 69–81. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chamarette, J. 2012. Phenomenology and the future of film: Rethinking subjectivity beyond French cinema. Basingstoke, Hampshire and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Clewis, R.C. 2019. Towards a theory of the sublime and aesthetic awe. In The sublime reader, ed. R. Clewis, 341–48. London and New York: Bloomsbury Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Daigle, C., and T. McDonald, eds. 2022. From Deleuze and Guattari to posthumanism: Philosophies of immanence. New York: Bloomsbury Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Deighan, S. 2018. Great directors: Grandrieux, Philippe. Senses of Cinema 87. https://www.sensesofcinema.com/2018/great-directors/philippe-grandrieux/.
   Google Scholar
• Deren, M. 2011. Cinematography: The creative use of reality. In Critical visions in film theory: Classic and contemporary readings, ed. T. Corrigan, P. White, and M. Mazaj, 144–56. Boston and New York: Bedford/St. Martin’s.
   Google Scholar
• Doane, M.A. 1986. The voice in the cinema: The articulation of body and space. In Narrative, apparatus, ideology, ed. P. Rosen, 335–48. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ezra, E. 2017. The cinema of things: Globalization and the posthuman object. New York and London: Bloomsbury Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Forsey, J. 2019. Is a theory of the sublime possible? In The sublime reader, ed. R. Clewis, 319–28. London and New York: Bloomsbury Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Freeland, C.A. 2019. The sublime in cinema. In The sublime reader, ed. R. Clewis, 28–91. London and New York: Bloomsbury Academic.
   Google Scholar
• French, S., and Z. Shacklock. 2014. The affective sublime in Lars von Trier’s Melancholia and Terrence Malick’s The Tree of Life. New Review of Film and Television Studies 12, no. 3: 339–356. doi:10.1080/17400309.2014.942555.
   Google Scholar
• Goddard, M. 2011. Eastern extreme: The presentation of Eastern Europe as a site of monstrosity in La Vie nouvelle and Import/Export. In The new extremism: From France to Europe, ed. T.C. Horeck and T. Kendall, 82–92. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grandrieux, P. 2012. About the ‘insane horizon’ of cinema. Diagonal Thoughts, March 3. https://www.diagonalthoughts.com/?p=1423.
   Google Scholar
• Grønstad, A. 2011. On the unwatchable. In The new extremism: From France to Europe, ed. T.C. Horeck and T. Kendall, 192–207. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hainge, G. 2017. Philippe Grandrieux: Sonic cinema. New York and London: Bloomsbury Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. 1991. Simians, cyborgs and women: The reinvention of nature. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hauskeller, M., T.D. Philbeck, and C.D. Carbonell, eds. 2015. The Palgrave handbook of posthumanism in film and television. Basingstoke, UK and New York: Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Hayles, N.K. 1999. How we became posthuman: Virtual bodies in cybernetics, literature, and informatics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kant, I. 1969. Critique of judgment. Trans. James Creed Meredith. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kant, I. 2019. From critique of the power of judgment and anthropology from a pragmatic point of view. In The sublime reader, ed. R. Clewis, 122–48. London and New York: Bloomsbury Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Lübecker, N. 2015. The feel-bad film. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Masukor, S. 2013. Sublime materiality: Un lac. Screening the Past 37. http://www.screeningthepast.com/issue–37/.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, D.T., and S.L. Snyder. 2000. Narrative prosthesis: Disabilities and the dependencies of discourse. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pajaczkowska, C. 2009. Ravishing noir: The unconscious in hollywood’s B-movie sublime. In The sublime now, ed. L. White and C. Pajaczkowska, 24–68. Newcastle, UK: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Palmer, T. 2006. Style and sensation in the French cinema of the body. Journal of Film and Video 58, no. 3: 22–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosiek, J. 2009. Terror, tears, partaking: The sublime in Burke, Adorno, Stevens. In The sublime now, ed. L. White and C. Pajaczkowska, 113–24. Newcastle, UK: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, F. 2015. We wouldn’t applaud actors for blacking up, so why applaud ‘cripping up’. The Guardian, January 13. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2015/jan/13/eddie-redmayne-golden-globe-stephen-hawking-disabled-actors-characters.
   Google Scholar
• Shapiro, M.J. 2018. The political sublime. Durham and London: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sorensen, E.P. 2021. Science fiction film: Predicting the impossible in the age of neoliberalism. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sylvester, D. 1987. The brutality of fact: Interviews with Francis Bacon 1962–1979. 3rd ed. New York: Thames & Hudson
   Google Scholar
• Walisko, R. 2018. The sublime in 2001: A space odyssey. In Understanding Kubrick’s 2001: A space odyssey: Representation and interpretation, ed. J. Fenwick, 181–96. Bristol and Chicago: Intellect.
   Google Scholar
• Willis, H. 2016. Fast forward. The future(s) of the cinematic arts. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar