The motherly gaze in Aslaug Holm’s Brothers (Brødre, 2015)

References

• Aaron, M. 2014. Watching others die: spectatorship, vulnerability and the ethics of being moved. In Death and the moving image – ideology, iconography and I, edited by Michele Aaron, 155–80. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Anderst, L. 2013. ‘I’ve spent a lot of time looking at these images’: The ‘viewing I’ in contemporary autobiographical documentary. Auto Biography Studies 28, no. 2: 212–41. doi:10.1080/08989575.2013.10846828.
   Google Scholar
• Barthes, R. 2000. Camera lucida – reflections on photography. Translated by Richard Howard. London: Vintage.
   Google Scholar
• Bazin, A. 2005a. What is cinema? Volume 1. Translated by Hugh Gray. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bazin, A. 2005b. What is cinema? Volume 2. Translated by Hugh Gray. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bolaki, S. 2016. Collaborative film as terminal care. In Illness as many narratives: arts, medicine and culture, edited by S. Bolaki 125–51. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chaudhuri, S. 2014. Cinema of the dark side: atrocity and the ethics of film spectatorship. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chion, M. 1994. Audio-vision: sound on screen. Translated by Claudia Gorbman. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dowmunt, T. 2013. Autobiographical documentary – the ‘seer and the seen’. Studies in Documentary Film 7, no. 3: 263–77.
   Google Scholar
• Egan, S. 1994. Encounters in camera: autobiography as interaction. MFS Modern Fiction Studies 40, no. 3: 593–618. doi:10.1353/mfs.1994.0002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grehan, H. 2009. Performance, ethics and spectatorship in a global age. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Grierson, J. 1933. The documentary producer. Cinema Quarterly 2, no. 1: 8.
   Google Scholar
• Hampl, P. 1996. Memory’s movies. In Beyond document: essays on nonfiction film, ed. C. Warren. 51–77. Hanover: University Press of New England.
   Google Scholar
• Harbord, J. 2007. Contingency’s work: Kracauer’s theory of film and the trope of the accidental. New Formations 61, no. Summer: 90–103.
   Google Scholar
• Hestman, I.M. 2022. Aslaug Holm. Nordic Women in Film. https://nordicwomeninfilm.com/person/aslaug-holm/.
   Google Scholar
• Holm, A. 2015. Brødre. Norway: Fenris Film AS.
   Google Scholar
• Holm, A., and D. Martinez. 2016. Hot docs 2016 women directors: meet Aslaug Holm – ‘Brothers’. https://womenandhollywood.com/2016-hot-docs-women-directors-meet-aslaug-holm-brothers-3e4b9b595e02/.
   Google Scholar
• Kracauer, S. 1960. Theory of film: the redemption of physical reality. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, A. 2002. Family secrets: acts of memory and imagination. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• MacDougall, D. 1998. Transcultural cinema. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McLuhan, M. 1994. Understanding media – the extensions of man. Cambridge and London: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nichols, B. 1991. Representing reality: issues and concepts in documentary. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nichols, B. 2017. Introduction to documentary. 3rd ed. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nora, P. 1989. Between memory and history: les lieux de mémoire. Representations 26, 7–24. doi:10.2307/2928520.
   Google Scholar
• Renov, M. 1999. Domestic ethnography and the construction of the other self. In Collecting visible evidences, ed. J. M. Gaines and M. Renov, 140–55. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rosas, V, and R. Dittus. (2021). The autobiographical documentary: archive and montage to represent the self. Studies in Documentary Film 15, no. 3: 203–219. https://doi.org/10.1080/17503280.2020.1815123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruby, J. 2005. The ethics of image-making. In New challenges for documentary, ed. A. Rosenthal and J. Corner, 2nd ed. 209–19. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar