Image restoration using L₁ norm penalty function

References

• Gonzalez, RC, and Woods, RE, 2002. Digital Image Processing, . Prentice Hall: New Jersey; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Banham, MR, and Katsaggelos, AK, 1997. Digital image restoration, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine 14 (1997), pp. 24–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nashed, MZ, 1981. Operator theoretic and computational approach to ill-posed problems with application in antenna theory, IEEE Transactions on Antenna Propagation 29 (1981), pp. 220–231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tikhonov, AN, and Arsenin, VY, 1977. Solution of Ill-posed Problems. New York: John Wiley; 1977.
   Google Scholar
• Hadamard, J, 1923. Lectures on Cauchy's Problem in Linear Partial Differential Equations. New Haven: Yale University Press; 1923.
   Google Scholar
• Engl, HW, 1993. Regularization methods for the stable solution of inverse problems, Surveys on Mathematics for Industry 3 (1993), pp. 71–143.
   Google Scholar
• Engl, HW, Hanke, M, and Neubauer, A, 1996. Regularization of Inverse Problems. The Netherlands: Kluwer, Dordrecht; 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Groetsch, CW, 1993. Inverse Problems in the Mathematical Sciences. Germany: Vieweg, Wiesbaden; 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Hanke, M, and Hansen, PC, 1993. Regularization methods for large scale problems, Surveys on Mathematics for Industry 3 (1993), pp. 253–315.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, PC, 1998. Rank-deficient and Discrete Ill-posed Problems: Numerical Aspects of Linear Inversion. Philadelphia: SIAM; 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Idier, J, 1999. Regularization tools and models for image and signal reconstruction. Presented at Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Inverse Problems in Engineering: Theory and Practice.
   Google Scholar
• Rudin, L, Osher, S, and Fatemi, E, 1992. Nonlinear Total variation based noise removal algorithms, Physica D 60 (1992), pp. 259–268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koenker, R, and Mizera, I, 2004. Penalized triograms: Total variation regularization for bivariate smoothing, Journal of Royal Society of Statistics, Series B 66 (1) (2004), pp. 145–153.
   Google Scholar
• Vogel, CR, 1995. Engl, HW, Louis, AK, and Rundell, W, eds. Nonsmooth regularization, Inverse Problems in Geophysical Applications. Philadelphia: SIAM; 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Tibshirani, R, 1996. Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso, Journal of Royal Statistics Society, Series B 58 (1) (1996), pp. 267–288.
   Google Scholar
• Vogel, CR, 2002. Computational Methods for Inverse Problems. Philadelphia: SIAM; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Acar, R, and Vogel, CR, 1994. Analysis of total variation penalty methods for ill-posed problems, Inverse Problems 10 (1994), pp. 1217–1229.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vogel, CR, and Oman, ME, 1996. Iterative methods for Total variation denoising, SIAM Journal of Scientific Computing 17 (1996), pp. 227–238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan, RH, Chan, TF, and Zhou, HM, 1995. Advanced signal processing algorithms. Presented at Proceedings of the International Society of Photo-optical Instrumentation Engineers.
   Google Scholar
• Bioucas-Das, J, Figueiredo, MAT, and Oliveira, JP, 2006. Total variation–based image deconvolution: a majorization-minimization approach. Presented at Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing (ICASSP).
   Google Scholar
• Chan, TF, Golub, GH, and Mulet, P, 1999. A nonlinear primal-dual methods for Total variation based image restoration, SIAM Journal of Scientific Computing 20 (6) (1999), pp. 1964–1977.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Figueiredo, MAT, 2003. Adaptive sparseness for supervised learning, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 25 (9) (2003), pp. 1150–1159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breiman, L, 1993. Better subser selection using the non-negative garotte. Berkeley: Technical Report, University of California; 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Frank, IE, and Friedman, JH, 1993. A statistical view of some chemometrics regression tools, Technometrics 35 (1993), pp. 109–135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grandvalet, Y, 1998. Niklasson, L, Boden, M, and Ziemske, T, eds. Least Absolute Shrinkage is Equivalent to Quadratic Penalization. Skovde, Sweden: Springer-Verlag; 1998. pp. 201–206, Perspectives in neural computing.
   Google Scholar
• Grandvalet, Y, and Canu, S, 1998. Outcomes of the equivalence of adaptive ridge with least absolute shrinkage, Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS) 11 (1998), pp. 445–451.
   Google Scholar
• Guo, W, 1999. Generalized Perona–Malik equation for image restoration, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing Letters 6 (7) (1999), pp. 165–167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molina, R, Mateos, J, Katsaggelos, AK, and Vega, M, 2003. Bayesian multichannel image restoration using compound Gauss–Markov random fields, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 12 (12) (2003), pp. 1642–1654.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, Y, Galatsanos, NP, and Katsaggelos, AK, 1995. Projection-based spatially adaptive reconstruction of block-transform compressed images, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 4 (7) (1995), pp. 896–908.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar