A review on restoration of seismic wavefields based on regularization and compressive sensing

References

• Wang, YF, Yang, CC, and Cao, JJ, 2011. On Tikhonov regularization and compressive sensing for seismic signal processing, accepted, (2011), to appear in Math. Mod. Meth. Appl. Sci.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, YF, Cao, JJ, and Yang, CC, 2011. Recovery of seismic wavefields based on compressive sensing by a l1-norm constrained trust region method and the piecewise random sub-sampling, Geophys. J. Int. (2011), submitted for publication.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mostafa, N, and Sacchi, DM, 2007. Multistep autoregressive reconstruction of seismic records, Geophysics 72 (2007), pp. V111–V118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spitz, S, 1991. Seismic trace interpolation in the F-X domain, Geophysics 56 (1991), pp. 785–794.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porsani, MJ, 1999. Seismic trace interpolation using half-step prediction filters, Geophysics 64 (1999), pp. 1461–1467.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soubaras, R, 2004. Spatial interpolation of aliased seismic data, Soc. Expl. Geophys. (SEG) Expanded Abstract 16 (2004), pp. 1167–1170.
   Google Scholar
• Gulunay, N, 2003. Seismic interpolation in the Fourier transform domain, Geophysics 68 (2003), pp. 355–369.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fomel, S, 2002. Application of plane-wave destruction filters, Geophysics 67 (2002), pp. 1946–1960.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Claerbout, J, 1992. Earth Soundings Analysis: Processing Versus Inversion. Boston: Blackwell Science; 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Crawley, S, 2000. Seismic trace interpolation with non-stationary predictionary-error filters. PhD thesis. CA: Stanford University; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Ronen, J, 1987. Wave-equation trace interpolation, Geophysics 52 (1987), pp. 973–984.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stolt, RH, 2002. Seismic data mapping and reconstruction, Geophysics 67 (2002), pp. 890–908.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jakubowica, H, 1997. Seismic data acquisition, US Patent 5 (1997), p. 648.
   Google Scholar
• Larner, K, Gibson, B, and Rothman, D, 1981. Trace interpolation and the design of seismic surverys, Geophysics 46 (1981), pp. 407–409.
   Google Scholar
• Sacchi, MD, 1996. Estimation of the discrete Fourier transform, a linear inversion approach, Geophysics 61 (1996), pp. 1128–1136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sacchi, MD, Ulrych, TJ, and Walker, CJ, 1998. Interpolation and extrapolation using a high-resolution discrete Fourier transform, IEEE Trans. Signal Process. 46 (1998), pp. 31–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duijndam, AJW, Schonewille, MA, and Hindriks, COH, 1999. Reconstruction of band-limited signals, irregularly sampled along one spatial direction, Geophysics 64 (1999), pp. 524–538.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, S, Zhang, Y, Pham, D, and Lambare, G, 2005. Antileakage Fourier transform for seismic data regularization, Geophysics 70 (2005), pp. V87–V95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, B, 2004. Multi-dimensional reconstruction of seismic data. PhD thesis. Alberta, Canada: University of Alberta; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Trad, DO, Ulrych, TJ, and Sacchi, MD, 2002. Accurate interpolation with high-resolution time-variant Radon transforms, Geophysics 67 (2002), pp. 644–656.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darche, G, Spatial interpolation using fast parabolic transform, 60th Annual Internattional Society Explaing Geophysics, San Francisco, CA, Expanded Abstracts, 1990, pp. 1647–1650.
   Google Scholar
• Hennenfent, G, and Herrmann, FJ, 2008. Simply denoise: Wavefield reconstruction via jittered undersampling, Geophysics 73 (2008), pp. V19–V28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naghizadeh, M, and Sacchi, MD, 2010. Beyond alias hierarchical scale curvelet interpolation of regularly and irregularly sampled seismic data, Geophysics 75 (2010), pp. WB189–WB202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, YF, 2007. Computational Methods for Inverse Problems and Their Applications. Beijing: Higher Education Press; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Herrmann, FJ, and Hennenfent, G, 2008. Non-parametric seismic data recovery with curvelet frames, Geophys. J. Int. 173 (2008), pp. 233C–248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herrity, KK, Gilbert, AC, and Troop, JA, 2006. "Sparse approximation via iterative thresholding". In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Proceeding, Toulouse, France. 2006. pp. 624–627.
   Google Scholar
• Ewout, VB, and Michael, PF, 2008. Probing the pareto frontier for basis pursuit solutions, SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 31 (2008), pp. 890–912.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorodnitsky, IF, and Rao, BD, 1997. Sparse signal reconstruction from limited data using FOCUSS: A re-weighted minimum norm algorithm, IEEE Trans. Signal Process. 45 (1997), pp. 600–616.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lustig, M, Donoho, DL, and Pauly, JM, 2007. Sparse MRI: The application of compressed sensing for rapid MR imaging, Magnetic Reson. Med. 58 (2007), pp. 1182–1195.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Candes, E, and Tao, T, 2005. Decoding by linear programming, IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory 51 (2005), pp. 4203–4215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Candes, E, Romberg, J, and Tao, T, 2006. Robust uncertainty principles: Exact signal reconstruction from highly incomplete frequency information, IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory 52 (2006), pp. 489–509.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Candes, E, 2006. "Compressive sampling". In: Proceedings of International Congress of Mathematicians. Madrid, Spain: European Mathematical Society Publishing House; 2006. pp. 33–52.
   Google Scholar
• Candes, E, and Donoho, DL, 2000. "Curvelets: A surprisingly effective non-adaptive representation for objects with edges". In: Cohen, A., Rabut, C., and Schumaker, L.L., eds. Curves and Surfaces Fitting. Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press; 2000. pp. 105–120.
   Google Scholar
• Candes, E, Demanet, L, Donoho, D, and Ying, LX, 2006. Fast discrete curvelet transforms, Multiscale Model. Simul. 5 (2006), pp. 861–899.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Candes, E, and Donoho, D, 2004. New tight frames of curvelets and optimal representations of objects with piecewise singularities, Commun. Pure Appl. Math. 57 (2004), pp. 219–266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, YF, Ma, SQ, Yang, H, Wang, JD, and Li, XW, 2009. On the effective inversion by imposing a priori information for retrieval of land surface parameters, Sci. China D 52 (2009), pp. 540–549.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, YF, Fan, SF, and Feng, X, 2007. Retrieval of the aerosol particle size distribution function by incorporating a priori information, J. Aerosol Sci. 38 (2007), pp. 885–901.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, S, Donoho, D, and Saunders, M, 1998. Atomic decomposition by basis pursuit, SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 20 (1998), pp. 33–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osborne, MR, Presnell, B, and Turlach, BA, 2000. A new approach to variable selection in least squares problems, IMA J. Numer. Anal. 20 (2000), pp. 389–403.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donoho, D, and Tsaig, Y, 2006. Fast solution of l₁-norm minimization problems when the solution may be sparse. CA: Technical Report, Stanford University; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Malioutov, DM, Cetin, M, and Willsky, AS, 2005. Homotopy continuation for sparse signal representation, Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Acoustics Speech Signal Process. 5 (2005), pp. 733–736.
   Google Scholar
• Turlach, B, 2005. "On algorithms for solving least squares problems under an L1 penalty or an L1 constraint". In: Proceedings of the American Statistical Association. Alexandria, VA: Statistical Computing Section; 2005. pp. 2572–2577.
   Google Scholar
• Efron, B, Hastie, T, Johnstone, I, and Tibshirani, R, 2004. Least angle regression, Annal. Stat. 32 (2004), pp. 407–499.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, S, Koh, K, Lustig, M, Boyd, S, and Gorinvesky, D, 2007. A method for large-scale l₁-regularized least squares problems with applications in signal processing and statistics. Palo Alto, CA: Technical Report, Stanford University; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, YF, Li, XW, Ma, SQ, Nashed, Z, and Guan, YN, 2005. BRDF model inversion of multi-angular remote sensing: Ill-posedness and interior point solution method, Proc. 9th Int. Symp. Phys. Measurements Signature Remote Sens. XXXVI (2005), pp. 328–330.
   Google Scholar
• Figueiredo, MAT, and Nowak, RD, 2003. An EM algorithm for wavelet-based image restoration, IEEE Trans. Image Process. 12 (2003), pp. 906–916.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, YF, and Xiao, TY, 2001. Fast realization algorithms for determining regularization parameters in linear inverse problems, Inverse Probl. 17 (2001), pp. 281–291.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, G, Mallat, S, and Avellaneda, M, 1997. Greedy adaptive approximation, J. Constructive Approx. 12 (1997), pp. 57–98.
   Google Scholar
• Donoho, D, Elad, M, and Temlyakov, V, 2006. Stable recovery of sparse overcomplete representations in the presence of noise, IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory 52 (2006), pp. 6–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tropp, J, 2004. Greed is good: Algorithmic results for sparse approximation, IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory 50 (2004), pp. 2231–2242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Figueiredo, MAT, Nowak, RD, and Wright, SJ, 2007. Gradient projection for sparse reconstruction: application to compressed sensing and other inversed problems, IEEE J. Selected Topics Signal Process. 1 (2007), pp. 586–597.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rao, BD, and Kreutz-Delgado, K, 1999. An affine scaling methodology for best basis selection, IEEE Trans. Signal Process. 47 (1999), pp. 187–200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Candes, E, Wakin, MB, and Boyd, SP, 2008. Enhancing sparsity by reweighted l1 minimization, J. Fourier Anal. Appl. 14 (2008), pp. 877–905.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohimani, H, Babaie-Zadeh, M, and Jutten, C, 2009. A fast approach for overcomplete sparse decomposition based on smoothed l0 norm, IEEE Trans. Signal Process. 57 (2009), pp. 289–301.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gasso, G, Rakotomamonjy, A, and Canu, S, 2009. Recovering sparse signals with a certain family of non-convex penalties and DC programming, IEEE Trans. Signal Process. 57 (2009), pp. 4686–4698.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, YL, and Yin, WT, 2009. Sparse signal reconstruction via iterative support detection. TX: Technical Report, Rice University; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, YF, Cao, JJ, Yuan, YX, Yang, CC, and Xiu, NH, 2009. Regularizing active set method for non-negatively constrained ill-posed multi-channel image restoration problem, Appl. Optics 48 (2009), pp. 1389–1401.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zwartijes, PM, and Sacchi, MD, 2007. Fourier reconstruction of nonuniformly sampled, aliased seismic data, Geophysics 52 (2007), pp. V21–V32.
   Google Scholar
• Hennenfent, G, Van den Berg, E, Friedlander, MP, and Herrmann, F, 2008. New insights into one-norm solvers from the Pareto curve, Geophysics 73 (2008), pp. A23–A26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, YF, and Yang, CC, 2010. Accelerating migration deconvolution using a nonmonotone gradient method, Geophysics 75 (2010), pp. S131–S137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, CH, and Mangasarian, OL, 1996. A class of smoothing functions for non-linear and mixed complementarity problems, Comput. Optim. Appl. 5 (1996), pp. 97–138.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, M, Fung, G, and Rosales, R, 2007. "Fast optimization methods for L1 regularization: A comparative study and two new approaches". In: Proceedings of European Conference on Machine Learning, Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg. 2007. pp. 286–297.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, HL, Banks, S, and McCoy, J, 1979. Deconvolution with the l1 norm, Geophysics 44 (1979), pp. 39–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar