273
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

A new multimodal cortical source imaging algorithm for integrating simultaneously recorded EEG and MEG

, , &
Pages 1074-1089 | Received 02 Apr 2012, Accepted 15 Sep 2012, Published online: 19 Oct 2012

References

  • Hämäläinen, MS, Hari, R, Ilmoniemi, RJ, Knuutila, J, and Lounasmaa, OV, 1993. Magnetoencephalography – Theory, instrumentation, and applications to noninvasive studies of the working human brain, Rev. Modern Phys. 65 (1993), pp. 413–497.
  • Cohen, D, and Halgren, E, 2009. "Magnetoencephalography". In: Squire, LR, ed. Encyclopedia of Neuroscience. Oxford: Academic Press; 2009.
  • Ammari, H, 2008. An Introduction to Mathematics of Emerging Biomedical Imaging. Berlin: Springer; 2008.
  • Ammari, H, Bao, G, and Fleming, JL, 2002. An inverse source problem for Maxwell's equations in magnetoencephalography, SIAM J. Appl. Math. 62 (2002), pp. 1369–1382.
  • Nunez, PL, and Srinivasan, R, 2006. Electric Fields of the Brain: The Neurophysics of EEG. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2006.
  • Knake, S, Halgren, E, Shiraishi, H, Hara, K, Hamer, HM, Grant, PE, Carr, VA, Foxe, D, Camposano, S, and Busa, E, 2006. The value of multichannel MEG and EEG in the presurgical evaluation of 70 epilepsy patients, Epilepsy Res. 69 (2006), pp. 80–86.
  • Yoshinaga, H, Nakahori, T, Ohtsuka, Y, Oka, E, Kitamura, Y, Kiriyama, H, Kinugasa, K, Miyamoto, K, and Hoshida, T, 2002. Benefit of simultaneous recording of EEG and MEG in dipole localization, Epilepsia 43 (2002), pp. 924–928.
  • Bast, T, Ramantani, G, Boppel, T, Metzke, T, Ozkan, O, Stippich, C, Seitz, A, Rupp, A, Rating, D, and Scherg, M, 2005. Source analysis of interictal spikes in polymicrogyria: Loss of relevant cortical fissures requires simultaneous EEG to avoid MEG misinterpretation, Neuroimage 25 (2005), pp. 1232–1241.
  • Cohen, D, and Cuffin, BN, 1983. Demonstration of useful differences between magnetoencephalogram and electroencephalogram, Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 56 (1983), pp. 38–51.
  • Cohen, D, and Cuffin, BN, 1987. Method for combining MEG and EEG to determine the sources, Phys. Med. Biol. 32 (1987), pp. 85–89.
  • Leahy, RM, Mosher, JC, Spencer, ME, Huang, MX, and Lewine, JD, 1998. A study of dipole localization accuracy for MEG and EEG using a human skull phantom, Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 107 (1998), pp. 159–173.
  • Huizenga, HM, Van Zuijen, TL, Heslenfeld, DJ, and Molenaar, PCM, 2001. Simultaneous MEG and EEG source analysis, Phys. Med. Biol. 46 (2001), pp. 1737–1751.
  • Ahlfors, SP, Han, J, Belliveau, JW, and Hämäläinen, MS, 2010. Sensitivity of MEG and EEG to source orientation, Brain Topogr. 23 (2010), pp. 227–232.
  • Dassios, G, 2009. Electric and Magnetic Activity of the Brain in Spherical and Ellipsoidal Geometry in Mathematical Modeling in Biomedical Imaging. Berlin: Springer; 2009.
  • Dassios, G, Fokas, AS, and Hadjiloizi, D, 2007. On the complementarity of electroencephalography and magnetoencephalography, Inverse Prob. 23 (2007), pp. 2541–2549.
  • Sutherling, WW, Crandall, PH, Cahan, LD, and Barth, DS, 1988. The magnetic field of epileptic spikes agrees with intracranial localizations in complex partial epilepsy, Neurology 38 (1988), pp. 778–786.
  • Ebersole, JS, Squires, K, Gamelin, J, Lewine, J, and Scherg, M, 1993. Simultaneous MEG and EEG provide complementary dipole models of temporal lobe spikes, Epilepsia 34 (Suppl 6) (1993), p. 143.
  • Ko, DY, Kufta, C, Scaffidi, D, and Sato, S, 1998. Source localization determined by magnetoencephalography and electroencephalography in temporal lobe epilepsy: Comparison with electrocorticography: Technical case report, Neurosurgery 42 (1998), pp. 414–421.
  • Baumgartner, C, Pataraia, E, Lindinger, G, and Deecke, L, 2000. Neuromagnetic recordings in temporal lobe epilepsy, J. Clin. Neurophysiol. 17 (2000), pp. 175–176.
  • Iwasaki, M, Nakasato, N, Shamoto, H, Nagamatsu, K, Kanno, A, Hatanaka, K, and Yoshimoto, T, 2002. Surgical implications of neuromagnetic spike localization in temporal lobe epilepsy, Epilepsia 43 (2002), pp. 415–424.
  • Nakasato, N, Levesque, MF, Barth, DS, Baumgartner, C, Rogers, RL, and Sutherling, WW, 1994. Comparisons of MEG, EEG, and ECoG source localization in neocortical partial epilepsy in humans, Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 91 (1994), pp. 171–178.
  • Baumgartner, C, 2004. Controversies in clinical neurophysiology. MEG is superior to EEG in the localization of interictal epileptiform activity: Con, Clin. Neurophysiol. 115 (2004), pp. 1010–1020.
  • Phillips, JW, Leahy, RM, Mosher, JC, and Timsari, B, 1997. Imaging neural activity using MEG and EEG, IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Mag. 16 (1997), pp. 34–42.
  • Fuchs, M, Wagner, M, Wischmann, HA, Kohler, T, Theißen, A, Drenckhahn, R, and Buchner, H, 1998. Improving source reconstructions by combining bioelectric and biomagnetic data, Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 107 (1998), pp. 93–111.
  • Babiloni, F, Carducci, F, Cincotti, F, Del Gratta, C, Pizzella, V, Romani, GL, Rossini, PM, Tecchio, F, and Babiloni, C, 2001. Linear inverse source estimate of combined EEG and MEG data related to voluntary movements, Hum. Brain Mapping 14 (2001), pp. 197–209.
  • Babiloni, F, Babiloni, C, Carducci, F, Romani, GL, Rossini, PM, Angelone, LM, and Cincotti, F, 2004. Multimodal integration of EEG and MEG data: A simulation study with variable signal-to-noise ratio and number of sensors, Hum. Brain Mapping 22 (2004), pp. 52–62.
  • Liu, AK, Dale, AM, and Belliveau, JW, 2002. Monte Carlo simulation studies of EEG and MEG localization accuracy, Hum. Brain Mapping 16 (2002), pp. 47–62.
  • Huang, MX, Song, T, Hagler, DJ, Podgorny, I, Jousmaki, V, Cui, L, Gaa, K, Harrington, DL, Dale, AM, and Lee, RR, 2007. A novel integrated MEG and EEG analysis method for dipolar sources, Neuroimage 37 (2007), pp. 731–748.
  • Dossevi, A, Cosmelli, D, Garnero, L, and Ammari, H, 2008. Multivariate reconstruction of functional networks from cortical sources dynamics in MEG/EEG, IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 55 (2008), pp. 2074–2086.
  • Molins, A, Stufflebeam, SM, Brown, EN, and Hämäläinen, MS, 2008. Quantification of the benefit from integrating MEG and EEG data in minimum ℓ2-norm estimation, Neuroimage 42 (2008), pp. 1069–1077.
  • Wood, CC, 1982. Application of dipole localization methods to source identification of human evoked potentials, Ann. New York Acad. Sci. 338 (1982), pp. 139–155.
  • Stok, CJ, Meijs, JWH, and Peters, MJ, 1987. Inverse solutions based on MEG and EEG applied to volume conductor analysis, Phys. Med. Biol. 32 (1987), pp. 99–104.
  • Goncalves, SI, de Munck, JC, Verbunt, JPA, Bijma, F, Heethaar, RM, and Lopes da Silva, F, 2003. In vivo measurement of the brain and skull resistivities using an EIT-based method and realistic models for the head, IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 50 (2003), pp. 754–767.
  • Fuchs, M, Wagner, M, Kohler, T, and Wischmann, HA, 1999. Linear and nonlinear current density reconstructions, J. Clin. Neurophysiol. 16 (1999), pp. 267–295.
  • Dale, AM, and Sereno, MI, 1993. Improved localization of cortical activity by combining EEG and MEG with MRI cortical surface reconstruction: A linear approach, J. Cognitive Neurosci. 5 (1993), pp. 162–176.
  • Baillet, S, Garnero, L, Marin, G, and Hugonin, JP, 1999. Combined MEG and EEG source imaging by minimization of mutual information, IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 46 (1999), pp. 522–534.
  • Kincses, WE, Braun, C, Kaiser, S, and Elbert, T, 1999. Modeling extended sources of event-related potentials using anatomical and physiological constraints, Hum. Brain Mapping 8 (1999), pp. 182–193.
  • Golub, GH, Heath, M, and Wahba, G, 1979. Generalized cross-validation as a method for choosing a good ridge parameter, Technometrics 21 (1979), pp. 215–223.
  • Sekihara, K, Nagarajan, SS, Poeppel, D, Marantz, A, and Miyashita, Y, 2001. Reconstructing spatio-temporal activities of neural sources using an MEG vector beamformer technique, IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 48 (2001), pp. 760–771.
  • Im, CH, Jung, HK, and Fujimaki, N, 2005. fMRI constrained MEG source imaging and consideration of fMRI invisible sources, Hum. Brain Mapping 26 (2005), pp. 110–118.
  • Dale, AM, Liu, AK, Fischl, BR, Buckner, RL, Belliveau, JW, Lewine, JD, and Halgren, E, 2000. Dynamic statistical parametric mapping combining fMRI and MEG for high-resolution imaging of cortical activity, Neuron 26 (2000), pp. 55–67.
  • Babiloni, F, Babiloni, C, Carducci, F, Cincotti, F, Astolfi, L, Basilisco, A, Rossini, PM, Ding, L, Ni, Y, and Cheng, J, 2005. Assessing time-varying cortical functional connectivity with the multimodal integration of high resolution EEG and fMRI data by directed transfer function, Neuroimage 24 (2005), pp. 118–131.
  • Dale, AM, Fischl, B, and Sereno, MI, 1999. Cortical surface-based analysis I. Segmentation and surface reconstruction, Neuroimage 9 (1999), pp. 179–194.
  • Fischl, B, and Dale, AM, 2000. Measuring the thickness of the human cerebral cortex from magnetic resonance images, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97 (2000), pp. 11050–11055.
  • Dhond, RP, Marinkovic, K, Dale, AM, Witzel, T, and Halgren, E, 2003. Spatiotemporal maps of past-tense verb inflection, Neuroimage 19 (2003), pp. 91–100.
  • Jung, YJ, and Im, CH, 2011. An improved technique to consider mismatches between fMRI and EEG/MEG sources for fMRI constrained EEG/MEG source imaging, Biomed. Eng. Lett. 1 (2011), pp. 32–41.
  • Hämäläinen, MS, and Sarvas, J, 1989. Realistic conductivity geometry model of the human head for interpretation of neuromagnetic data, IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 36 (1989), pp. 165–171.
  • Haueisen, J, Ramon, C, Eiselt, M, Brauer, H, and Nowak, H, 1997. Influence of tissue resistivities on neuromagnetic fields and electric potentials studied with a finite element model of the head, IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 44 (1997), pp. 727–735.
  • Oostendorp, TF, Delbeke, J, and Stegeman, DF, 2000. The conductivity of the human skull: Results of in vivo and in vitro measurements, IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 47 (2000), pp. 1487–1492.
  • Im, CH, An, KO, Jung, HK, Kwon, H, and Lee, YH, 2003. Assessment criteria for MEG/EEG cortical patch tests, Phys. Med. Biol. 48 (2003), pp. 2561–2573.
  • de Peralta-Menendez, RG, and Gonzalez-Andino, SL, 1998. A critical analysis of linear inverse solutions to the neuroelectromagnetic inverse problem, IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 45 (1998), pp. 440–448.
  • Sarvas, J, 1987. Basic mathematical and electromagnetic concepts of the biomagnetic inverse problem, Phys. Med. Biol. 32 (1987), pp. 11–22.
  • Cuffin, BN, Cohen, D, Yunokuchi, K, Maniewski, R, Purcell, C, Cosgrove, GR, Ives, J, Kennedy, J, and Schomer, D, 1991. Tests of EEG localization accuracy using implanted sources in the human brain, Ann. Neurol. 29 (1991), pp. 132–138.
  • Baillet, S, Mosher, JC, and Leahy, RM, 2001. Electromagnetic brain mapping, IEEE Signal Process. Mag. 18 (2001), pp. 14–30.
  • Henson, RN, Mouchlianitis, E, and Friston, KJ, 2009. MEG and EEG data fusion: Simultaneous localisation of face-evoked responses, Neuroimage 47 (2009), pp. 581–589.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.