A spectral method for sizing cracks using ultrasonic arrays

References

• Hellier C. Handbook of nondestructive evaluation. New York (NY): McGraw Hill Professional; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Adams R, Cawley P. A review of defect types and non destructive testing techniques for composites and bonded joints. NDT & E Int. 1988;21(4):208–222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng L, Tian G. Pulsed electromagnetic NDE for defect detection and characterisation in composites. In: IEEE I2MTC. Graz, Austria; 2012 May 13--16.
   Google Scholar
• Ettemeyer A. Laser shearography for inspection of pipelines. Nucl Eng Des. 1996;160:237–240.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose J. Ultrasonic waves in solid media. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Schmerr L, Song S. Ultrasonic nondestructive evaluation systems. (NY): Springer; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Safari A, Akdogan E. Piezoelectric and acoustic materials for transducer applications. New York (NY): Springer Science + Business Media; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Drinkwater B, Wilcox P. Ultrasonic arrays for non-destructive evaluation: a review. NDT & E Int. 2006;39(7):525–541.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connolly G, Lowe M, Rokhlin S, et al. Imaging of defects within austenitic steel welds using an ultrasonic array. In: Leger A, Deschamps M, editors. Ultrasonic wave propagation in non homogeneous media. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 2009. p. 25–38.
   Google Scholar
• Velichko A, Wilcox P. An analytical comparison of ultrasonic array imaging algorithms. JASA. 2010;127(4):2378–2384.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmes C, Drinkwater B, Wilcox P. Post processing of the full matrix of ultrasonic transmit receive array data for non destructive evaluation. NDT & E Int. 2005;38(8):701–711.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilcox P, Holmes C, Drinkwater B. Advanced reflector characterization with ultrasonic phased arrays in NDE applications. IEEE TUFFC. 2005;38(8):701–711.
   Google Scholar
• Kirsch A, Grinberg N. The factorization method for inverse problems. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Colton D, Kirsch A. A simple method for solving inverse scattering problems in the resonance region. Inverse Prob. 1996;12(4):383.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kress R, Rundell W. Inverse scattering for shape and impedance. Inverse Prob. 2001;17(4):1075.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Achenbach JD, Viswanathan K, Norris A. An inversion integral for crack-scattering data. Wave Motion. 1979;1(4):299–316.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chapman R. A system model for the ultrasonic inspection of smooth planar cracks. J Nondestructive Eval. 1990;9(2–-3):197–210.
   Google Scholar
• Kitahara M, Nakahata K, Hirose S. Elastodynamic inversion for shape reconstruction and type classification of flaws. Wave Motion. 2002;36(4):443–455.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tant KMM, Mulholland AJ, Gachagan A. A model-based approach to crack sizing with ultrasonic arrays. IEEE TUFFC. 2015;62(5):915–926.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang J, Drinkwater B, Wilcox P. The use of ultrasonic arrays to characterize crack-like defects. J Nondestructive Eval. 2010;29(4):222–232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bai L, Velichko A, Drinkwater B. Ultrasonic characterization of crack-like defects using scattering matrix similarity metrics. IEEE TUFFC. 2015;62(3):545–559.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmerr L. Fundamentals of ultrasonic nondestructive evaluation: a modelling approach. New York (NY): Plenum Press; 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Böttcher A, Grudsky SM. Spectral properties of banded toeplitz matrices. Philadelphia: SIAM; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Böttcher A, Grudsky SM. Toeplitz matrices, asymptotic linear algebra, and functional analysis. Basel: Birkhäuser; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Gray R. On the asymptotic eigenvalue distribution of toeplitz matrices. IEEE Trans Inform Theory. 1972;18(6):725–730.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reichel L, Trefethen LN. Eigenvalues and pseudo-eigenvalues of toeplitz matrices. Linear Algebra Appl. 1992;162:153–185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hertz D. Simple bounds on the extreme eigenvalues of toeplitz matrices. IEEE Trans Inform Theory. 1992;38(1):175–176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abramowitz M, Stegun I. Handbook of mathematical functions with formulas, graphs and mathematical tables. New York (NY): Dover; 1972.
   Google Scholar
• Cunningham L. Mathematical model based methods for characterising defects within ultrasonic non destructive evaluation [dissertation]. Glasgow: The University of Strathclyde; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Arakawa T, Ibukiyama T, Kaneko M, et al. Bernoulli numbers and zeta functions. Tokyo: Springer; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• PZFlex. Thornton Tomasetti Defence Ltd 6th Floor South, 39 St Vincent Place, Glasgow, Scotland, G1 2ER, United Kingdom; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey G, Tweedie A, Carpentier C, et al. Finite element analysis of ultrasonic phased array inspections on anisotropic welds. In: AIP Conference Proceedings, Vol. 1335. San Diego, CA; 2010. p. 827–834.
   Google Scholar