A complex elastographic hyperbolic solver (CEHS) to recover frequency dependent complex shear moduli in viscoelastic models utilizing one or more displacement data-sets

References

• Barbone PE, Bamber JC. Quantitative elasticity imaging: what can and cannot be inferred from strain images. Phys Med Biol. 2002;47:2147–2164.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oberai A, Gokhale N, Doyley M, et al. Evaluation of the adjoint equation based algorithm for elasticity imaging. Phys Med Biol. 2004;49:2955–2974.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Konafagou EE, Harrigan T, Ophir J. Shear strain estimation and lesion mobility assessment in elastography. Ultrasonics. 2000;38:400–404.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thitaikumar A, Ophir J. Effect of lesion boundary conditions on axial strain elastograms: a parametric study. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2007;33(9):1463–1467.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ophir J, Céspedes EI, Ponnekanti H, et al. Elastography: a quantitative method for imaging the elasticity of biological tissue. Ultrason Imaging. 1991;13:111–134.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Donnell M, Skovoroda AR, Shapo BM, et al. Internal displacement and strain imaging using ultrasonic speckle tracking. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelec Freq Control. 1994;41:314–325.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sugimoto T, Ueha S, Itoh K. Tissue hardness measurement using the radiation force of focused ultrasound. Proc IEEE Ultrason Symp. 1990;1:1377–1380.
   Google Scholar
• Parker KJ, Fu D, Gracewski SM, et al. Vibration sonoelastography and the detectability of lesions. Ultrasound Med Biol. 1998;24:1937–1947.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu Z, Taylor LS, Rubens DJ, et al. Sonoelastographic imaging of interference patterns for estimation of the shear velocity of homogeneous biomaterials. Phys Med Biol. 2004;49:911–922.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu Z, Rubens DJ, Parker KJ. Sonoelastographic imaging of interference patterns for estimation of the shear velocity distribution in biomaterials. J Acoust Soc Am. 2006;120:535–545.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maleke C, Luo J, Konofagou EE. 2d simulation of the amplitude-modulated harmonic motion imaging (AM-HMI) with experimental validation. In: IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium. New York, NY; 2007 Oct 28-31. p. 681–706.
   Google Scholar
• Curiel L, Souchon R, Rouviere O, et al. Elastography for the follow-up of high-intensity focused ultrasound prostate cancer treatment: initial comparison with MRI. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2005;31:1461–1468.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fatemi M, Greenleaf JF. Ultrasound-stimulated vibro-acoustic spectrography. Science. 1998;280:82–85.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenleaf J, Fatemi M, Insana M. Selected methods for imaging elastic properties of biological tissues. Annu Rev Biomed Eng. 2003;5:57–58.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manduca A, Lake DS, Ehman RL. Improved inversion of MR elastography images by spatio-temporal directional filtering. Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng. 2003;5032:445–452.
   Google Scholar
• Ehman RL, Manducca A, McLaughlin JR, et al. Variance controlled shear stiffness images for MRE data. In: IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: Macro to Nano. Arlington; 2006. p. 960–963.
   Google Scholar
• Sinkus R, Siegmann K, Xydeas T, et al. MR elastography of breast lesions: understanding the solid/liquid duality can improve the specificity of contrast-enhanced MR mammography. Magn Reson Med. 2007;58:1135–1144.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarvazyan A, Rudenko OV, Swanson SD, et al. Shear wave elasticity imaging a new ultrasonic technology of medical diagnostics. Ultrasound Med Biol. 1998;24:1419–1435.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nightingale KR, McAleavey SA, Trahey GE. Shear wave generation using acoustic radiation force: in vivo and ex vivo results. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2003;29(2):1715–1723.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bercoff J, Tanter M, Fink M. Supersonic shear imaging: a new technique for soft tissue elasticity mapping. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2004;19:396–409.
   Google Scholar
• Sandrin L, Tanter M, Catheline S, et al. Shear modulus imaging with 2-d transient elastography. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2002;49:426–435.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanter M, Bercoff J, Athanasiou A, et al. Quantitative assessment of breast lesion viscoelasticity: initial clinical results using supersonic shear imaging. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2008;34(9):1373–1386.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmeri ML, McAleavey SA, Trahey GE, et al. Ultrasonic tracking of acoustic radiation force-induced displacements in homogeneous media. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2006;53(7):1300–1313.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmeri ML, Wang MH, Dahl JJ, et al. Quantifying hepatic shear modulus in vivo using acoustic radiation force. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2008;34(4):546–558.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmeri ML, Dahl JJ, Macleod DB, et al. On the feasibility of imaging peripheral nerves using acoustic radiation force impulse imaging. Ultrasound Imaging. 2009;31(3):172–182.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen S, Urban MW, Pislaru C, et al. Shearwave dispersion ultrasound vibrometry (SDUV) for measuring tissue elasticity and viscosity. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2009 Jan;56(1):55–62.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker KJ, Doyley MM, Rubens DJ. Imaging the elastic properties of tissue: the 20 year perspective. Phys Med Biol. 2011;56:R1–R29.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang M, Nigwekar P, Castaneda B, et al. Quantitative characterization of viscoelastic properties of human prostate correlated with histology. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2008;34(7):1033–1042.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinkus R, Tanter M, Xydeas T, et al. Viscoelastic shear properties of in vivo breast lesions measured by MR elastography. Magn Reson Imaging. 2005;23(2):159–165.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen S, Urban MW, Greenleaf JF, et al. Quantification of liver stiffness and viscosity with SDUV: in vivo animal study. In: IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium Proceeding. Beijing; 2008. p. 654–657.
   Google Scholar
• Klatt D, Hamhaber U, Asbach P, et al. Noninvasive assessment of the rheological behavior of human organs using multifrequency MR elastography: a study of brain and liver viscoelasticity. Phys Med Biol. 2007;52:7281–7294.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koeller RC. Applications of fractional calculus to theory of viscoelasticity. J Appl Mech Trans ASME. 1984;51:299–307.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suki B, Barabasi AL, Lutchen KR. Lung tissue viscoelasticity: a mathematical framework and its molecular basis. J Appl Physiol. 1994;76:2749–2759.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor LS, Lerner AL, Rubens DJ, et al. A Kelvin-Voigt fractional derivative model for viscoelastic characterization of liver tissue. In: ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition. New Orleans; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Fung Y. Biomechanics: mechanical properties of living tissue. New York (NY): Springer-Verlag; 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Lin K, McLaughlin JR, Renzi D, et al. Shear wave speed recovery in sonoelastography using crawling wave data. J Acoust Soc Am. 2010;128:88–97.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen JA, Svendsen NB. Calculation of pressure fields from arbitrarily shaped, apodized, and excited ultrasound transducers. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelec Freq Control. 1992;39:262–267.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen JA. Field: a program for simulating ultrasound systems, paper presented at the 10th nordic-baltic conference on biomedical imaging. Med Biol Eng Comput. 1996;34(1):351–353.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lin K, McLaughlin JR. An error estimate on the direct inversion model in shear stiffness imaging. Inverse Prob. 2009;25:075003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin K, McLaughlin JR, Zhang N. Log-elastographic and non-marching full inversion schemes for shear modulus recovery from single frequency elastographic data. Inverse Prob. 2009;25:075004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hwang YH. Upwind scheme for non-hyperbolic systems. J Comput Phys. 2003;192:643–676.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLaughlin JR, Zhang N, Manduca A. Calculating tissue shear modulus and pressure by 2d log-elastographic methods. Inverse Prob. 2010;26:085007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang YX, Oberai A, Barbone P, et al. Solution of the time-harmonic viscoelastic inverse problem with interior data in two dimensions. Int J Numer Methods Eng. 2012;92:1100–1116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doyley MM. Model-based elastography: a survey of approaches to the inverse elasticity problem. Phys Med Biol. 2012;57(3):35–73.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas JW. Numerical partial differential equations: finite difference methods. New York (NY): Springer; 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Nyborg WLM. Physical acoustics. New York (NY): Academic Press; 1965.
   Google Scholar
• Collino F, Tsogka C. Application of the perfectly matched absorbing layer model to the linear elastodynamic problem in anisotropic heterogeneous media. Geophysics. 2001;66(1):294–307.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderssen R, Hegland M. For numerical differentiation, dimensionality can be a blessing!. Math Comput. 1999;68(227):1121–1141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin K, McLaughlin JR, Thomas A, et al. Two-dimensional shear wave speed and crawling wave speed recoveries from in vitro prostate data. J Acoust Soc Am. 2010, submitted for publication.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee RH, Szajewski BA, Hah Z, et al. Modeling shear waves through a viscoelastic medium induced by acoustic radiation force. Int J Numer Methods Biomed Eng. 2012;28:678–696.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLaughlin JR, Renzi D. Shear wave speed recovery in transient elastography and supersonic imaging using propagation fronts. Inverse Prob. 2006;22:681–706.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar