Application of the photoacoustic technique for temperature measurements during hyperthermia

References

• Nicandro C-R, Efrén M-M, María Yaneli A-A, et al. Evaluation of the diagnostic power of thermography in breast cancer using Bayesian network classifiers. Comput. Math. Methods Med. 2013;2013: 1–10. doi: 10.1155/2013/264246
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiskova T, Karasova M, Steffekova Z, et al. Thermography use as a predictive tool in early diagnosis of breast cancer. Adv. Tech. Biol. Med. 2017;5:2379–1764. doi: 10.4172/2379-1764.1000217
   Google Scholar
• Pouget J-P, Lozza C, Deshayes E, et al. Introduction to radiobiology of targeted radionuclide therapy. Front. Med. 2015;2:428. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2015.00012
   Google Scholar
• Dewhirst M, Viglianti B, Lora-Michiels M, et al. Thermal dose requirement for tissue effect: experimental and clinical findings. Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng. 2003;4954:37. doi: 10.1117/12.476637
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stoll AM, Greene LC. Relationship between pain and tissue damage due to thermal radiation. J. Appl. Physiol. 1959;14:373–382. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1959.14.3.373
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamien B, Orlande HRB, Eliçabe GE, et al. State estimation problem in hyperthermia treatment of tumors loaded with nanoparticles, in: Proc. 15th Int. Heat Transf. Conf. IHTC 2014, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Mcclay EF. Cancer management in man: chemotherapy, biological therapy, hyperthermia and supporting measures. Cancer Manag. Man Chemother. Biol. Ther. Hyperth. Support. Meas. 2011;13:39–60. doi: 10.1007/978-90-481-9704-0
   Google Scholar
• Field SB, Franconi C. Physics and technology of hyperthermia; 2012. doi: 10.1007/978-94-009-3597-6
   Google Scholar
• Bermeo Varon LA, Barreto Orlande HR, Eliçabe GE. Estimation of state variables in the hyperthermia therapy of cancer with heating imposed by radiofrequency electromagnetic waves. Int. J. Therm. Sci. 2015;98:228–236. doi: 10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2015.06.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foster KR, Cheever EA. Microwave radiometry in biomedicine: a reappraisal. Bioelectromagnetics. 1992;13:567–579. doi: 10.1002/bem.2250130611
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leroy Y, Bocquet B, Mamouni A. Non-invasive microwave radiometry thermometry. Physiol. Meas. 1998;19:127–148. doi: 10.1088/0967-3334/19/2/001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edrich J, Jobe WE, Cacak RK, et al. Imaging Thermograms at centimeter and millimeter wavelengths. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1980;335:456–474. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1980.tb50769.x
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• De Poorter J, De Wagter C, De Deene Y, et al. Noninvasive MRI thermometry with the proton resonance frequency (PRF) method: in vivo results in human muscle. Magn. Reson. Med. 1995;33:74–81. doi: 10.1002/mrm.1910330111
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cady EB, D’Souza PC, Penrice J, et al. The estimation of local brain temperature by in vivo 1H magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Magn. Reson. Med. 1995;33:862–867. doi: 10.1002/mrm.1910330620
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young IR, Hand JW, Oatridge A, et al. Further observations on the measurement of tissue T1 to monitor temperature in vivo by MRI. Magn. Reson. Med. 1994;31:342–345. doi: 10.1002/mrm.1910310317
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bertsch F, Mattner J, Stehling MK, et al. Non-invasive temperature mapping using MRI: comparison of two methods based on chemical shift and T1-relaxation. Magn. Reson. Imaging. 1998;16:393–403. doi: 10.1016/S0730-725X(97)00311-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delannoy J, Chen CN, Turner R, et al. Noninvasive temperature imaging using diffusion MRI. Magn. Reson. Med. 1991;19:333–339. doi: 10.1002/mrm.1910190224
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bleier AR, Jolesz FA, Cohen MS, et al. Real-time magnetic resonance imaging of laser heat deposition in tissue. Magn. Reson. Med. 1991;21:132–137. doi: 10.1002/mrm.1910210116
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Germain D, Chevallier P, Laurent A, et al. MR monitoring of tumour thermal therapy. Magn. Reson. Mater. Physics, Biol. Med. 2001;13:47–59. doi:10.1016/S1352-8661(01)00123-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rieke V, Pauly KB, thermometry MR. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging. 2008;27:376–390. doi: 10.1002/jmri.21265
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seip R, Ebbini ES. Noninvasive estimation of tissue temperature response to heating fields using diagnostic ultrasound. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 1995;42:828–839. doi: 10.1109/10.398644
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maass Moreno R, Damianou CA, Sanghvi NT. Noninvasive temperature estimation in tissue via ultrasound echo-shifts. Part II. In vitro study. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1996;100:2522–2530. doi: 10.1121/1.417360
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pulkkinen A, Cox BT, Arridge SR, et al. Quantitative photoacoustic tomography using illuminations from a single direction. J. Biomed. Opt. 2015;20:36015. doi: 10.1117/1.JBO.20.3.036015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox BT, Laufer JG, Beard PC. Quantitative photoacoustic image reconstruction using fluence dependent chromophores. Biomed. Opt. Express. 2010;1:201–208. doi: 10.1364/BOE.1.000201
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuan Z, Jiang H. Quantitative photoacoustic tomography: recovery of optical absorption coefficient maps of heterogeneous media. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2006;88:231101. doi: 10.1063/1.2209883
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ripoll J, Ntziachristos V. Quantitative point source photoacoustic inversion formulas for scattering and absorbing media. Phys. Rev. E - stat. nonlinear. Soft Matter Phys. 2005;71:2331. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.71.031912
   Google Scholar
• Jetzfellner T, Razansky D, Rosenthal A, et al. Performance of iterative optoacoustic tomography with experimental data. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2009;95:013703. doi: 10.1063/1.3167280
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banerjee B, Bagchi S, Vasu RM, et al. Quantitative photoacoustic tomography from boundary pressure measurements: noniterative recovery of optical absorption coefficient from the reconstructed absorbed energy map. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A. 2008;25:2347–2356. doi: 10.1364/JOSAA.25.002347
   Google Scholar
• Yin L, Wang Q, Zhang Q, et al. Tomographic imaging of absolute optical absorption coefficient in turbid media using combined photoacoustic and diffusing light measurements. Opt. Lett. 2007;32:2556. doi: 10.1364/OL.32.002556
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox BT, Arridge SR, Beard PC. Simultaneous estimation of chromophore concentration and scattering distributions from multiwavelength photoacoustic images. Proc. SPIE 6856, Photons Plus Ultrasound: Imaging and Sensing 2008: The Ninth Conference on Biomedical Thermoacoustics, Optoacoustics, and Acousto-optics, 68560Y; 2008 Feb 28. doi:10.1117/12.762924
   Google Scholar
• Laufer J, Simpson R, Kohl M, et al. Effect of temperature on the optical properties of ex vivo human dermis and subdermis. Phys. Med. Biol. 1998;43:2479–2489. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9755940 doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/43/9/004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ke H, Tai S, Wang LV. Photoacoustic thermography of tissue. J. Biomed. Opt. 2014;19:26003), doi: 10.1117/1.JBO.19.2.026003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nikitin SM, Khokhlova TD, Pelivanov IM. Temperature dependence of the optoacoustic transformation efficiency in ex vivo tissues for application in monitoring thermal therapies. J. Biomed. Opt. 2012;17:61214), doi: 10.1117/1.JBO.17.6.061214
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu X, Sanders JL, Stephens DN, et al. Photoacoustic-imaging-based temperature monitoring for high-intensity focused ultrasound therapy. 38th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society; Orlando, FL. IEEE; 2016. p. 3235–3238.
   Google Scholar
• Petrova EV, Motamedi M, Oraevsky AA, et al. In vivo cryoablation of prostate tissue with temperature monitoring by optoacoustic imaging. Photons Plus Ultrasoun Imaging Sens 2016. 2016;9708:1–8. doi: 10.1117/12.2211190
   Google Scholar
• Yu Liaoa XJ, Dong F, Cui Y. Dual-wavelengths photoacoustic temperature measurement. Proc. SPIE. 2017;10256:102561K–1. doi: 10.1117/12.2256956
   Google Scholar
• Alaeian M, Orlande HRB. Inverse photoacoustic technique for parameter and temperature estimation in tissues. Heat Transf. Eng. 2017;38:1573–1594. doi: 10.1080/01457632.2016.1262721
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaipio J, Somersalo E. Statistical and computational inverse problems; 2005. doi: 10.1007/b138659
   Google Scholar
• Kaipio JP, Fox C. The Bayesian framework for inverse problems in heat transfer. Heat Transf. Eng. 2011;32:718–753. doi: 10.1080/01457632.2011.525137
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox C, Nicholls GK, Tan SM. An introduction To inverse problems An introduction To inverse problems. Stat. Ber. 2010: 1–65. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-32557-1
   Google Scholar
• Metropolis N, Rosenbluth AW, Rosenbluth MN, et al. Equation of state calculations by fast computing machines. J. Chem. Phys. 1953;21:1087–1092. doi: 10.1063/1.1699114
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Welch AJ, Van Gemert MJC. Optical-thermal response of laser-irradiated tissue; 2011. doi: 10.1007/978-90-481-8831-4
   Google Scholar
• Paltauf G, Dyer PE. Photomechanical processes and effects in ablation. Chem. Rev. 2003;103:487–518. doi: 10.1021/cr010436c
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yao D-K, Zhang C, Maslov K, et al. Photoacoustic measurement of the Grüneisen parameter of tissue. J. Biomed. Opt. 2014;19:17007-1–17007–7. doi: 10.1117/1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Treeby BE, Cox BT. k-Wave: MATLAB toolbox for the simulation and reconstruction of photoacoustic wave fields. J. Biomed. Opt. 2010;15:21314. doi: 10.1117/1.3360308
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox BT, Kara S, Arridge SR, et al. k-space propagation models for acoustically heterogeneous media: application to biomedical photoacoustics. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2007;121:3453. doi: 10.1121/1.2717409
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuan X, Borup D, Wiskin J, et al. Simulation of acoustic wave propagation in dispersive media with relaxation losses by using FDTD method with PML absorbing boundary condition. IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control. 1999;46:14–23. doi: 10.1109/58.741419
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamien B, Orlande HRB, Eliçabe GE. Particle filter and approximation error model for state estimation in hyperthermia. J. Heat Transfer. 2017;139:1–12. doi: 10.1115/1.4034064
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamien B, Orlande HRB, Eliçabe GE. Inverse problem in the hyperthermia therapy of cancer with laser heating and plasmonic nanoparticles. Inverse Probl. Sci. Eng. 2017;25:608–631. doi: 10.1080/17415977.2016.1178260
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Star WM. Diffusion theory of light transport, In: Opt. response laser-irradiated tissue; 2011. p. 145–201. doi: 10.1007/978-90-481-8831-4_6
   Google Scholar
• Carp SA, Prahl SA, Venugopalan V. Radiative transport in the delta-P1 approximation: accuracy of fluence rate and optical penetration depth predictions in turbid semi-infinite media. J. Biomed. Opt. 2004;9:632–647. doi: 10.1117/1.1695412
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pennes HH. Analysis of tissue and arterial blood temperatures in the resting human forearm 1948. J. Appl. Physiol. 1998;85:5–34. doi: 9714612
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aykroyd RG. Bayesian estimation for homogeneous and inhomogeneous Gaussian random fields. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 1998;20:533–539. doi: 10.1109/34.682182
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rue H. Gaussian Markov random fields: theory and applications, hand. 104; 2005. 263 p. doi: 10.1007/s00184-007-0162-3
   Google Scholar
• Anderson JD. Computational fluid dynamics, 1995. doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-85056-4
   Google Scholar
• Duck FA. Physical properties of tissues. Phys. Prop. Tissues. 1990;336:73–135. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-222800-1.50008-5
   Google Scholar
• Nilsson AMK, Berg R, Andersson-Engels S. Measurements of the optical properties of tissue in conjunction with photodynamic therapy. Appl. Opt. 1995;34:4609–4619. doi: 10.1364/AO.34.004609
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jain PK, Lee KS, El-Sayed IH, et al. Calculated absorption and scattering properties of gold nanoparticles of different size, shape, and composition: applications in biological imaging and biomedicine. J. Phys. Chem. B. 2006;110:7238–7248. doi: 10.1021/jp057170o
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tabei M, Mast TD, Waag RC. A k-space method for coupled first-order acoustic propagation equations. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2002;111:53–63. doi: 10.1121/1.1421344
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haney WD, O’Brian MJ. Temperature dependency of ultrasonic propagation properties in biological materials. Tissue Charact. with Ultrasound. 1986: 15–55. http://www.brl.uiuc.edu/Publications/1986/Haney-CRCpress-15-1986.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Jarvis HFT. The thermal variation of the density of beef and the determination of its coefficient of cubical expansion. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 1971;6:383–391. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2621.1971.tb01625.x
   Google Scholar
• Varzakas T, Tzia C. Food engineering handbook; 2015. 600. doi: 10.1201/b17843
   Google Scholar