Structural dynamics model updating with interval uncertainty based on response surface model and sensitivity analysis

References

• Mottershead J, Friswell M. Model updating in structural dynamics: a survey. J Sound Vib. 1993;167(2):347–375.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fritzen CP, Jennewein D, Kiefer T. Damage detection based on model updating methods. Mech Syst Signal Process. 1998;11(1):163–186.
   Google Scholar
• Ren R, Beards CF. Identification of ‘effective’ linear joints using coupling and joint identification techniques. ASME J Vib Acoust. 1998;121:331–338.
   Google Scholar
• Li WL. A new method for structural model updating and joint stiffness identification. Mech Syst Signal Process. 2002;16(1):155–167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakir PG, Reynders E, Roeck GD. Sensitivity-based finite element model updating using constrained optimization with a trust region algorithm. J Sound Vib. 2007;305:211–225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mottershead J, Link M, Friswell M. The sensitivity method in finite element model updating: a tutorial. Mech Syst Signal Process. 2011;25:2275–2296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oberkampf WL, Roy CJ. Verification and validation in scientific computing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Simoen E, De Roeck G, Lombaert G. Dealing with uncertainty in model updating for damage assessment: a review. Mech Syst Signal Process. 2015: 56–57: 123–149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friswell M. The adjustment of structural parameters using a minimum variance estimator. Mech Syst Signal Process. 1989;3(2):143–155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck JL, Katafygiotis LS. Updating models and their uncertainties I: Bayesian statistical framework. J Eng Mech. 1998;124(4):455–461.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck JL, Au SK. Bayesian updating of structural models and reliability using Markov chain Monte Carlo simulation. J Eng Mech. 2002;128(4):380–391.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennedy MC, Hagan AO. Bayesian calibration of computer models. J Roy Stat Soc Ser B-Stat Methodol. 2001;63(3):425–464.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wentworth MT, Smith RC, Williams B. Bayesian model calibration and uncertainty quantification for an HIV model using adaptive Metropolis algorithms. Inverse Prob Sci Eng. 2018;26(2):233–256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khodaparast H, Mottershead J, FrisWell M. Perturbation methods for the estimation of parameter variability in stochastic model updating. Mech Syst Signal Process. 2008;22(8):1751–1773.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Husain NA, Khodaparast H, Ouyang HH. Parameter selection and stochastic model updating using perturbation methods with parameter weighting matrix assignment. Mech Syst Signal Process. 2012;32:135–152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hua X G, Ni Y Q, Chen Z Q, et al. An improved perturbation method for stochastic finite element model updating. Int J Numer Methods Eng. 2008;73(13):1845–1864.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hua X G, Wen Q, Ni Y Q, et al. Assessment of stochastically updated finite element models using reliability indicator. Mech Syst Signal Process. 2017;82:217–229.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rao S S, Berke L. Analysis of uncertain structural systems using interval analysis. AIAA J. 1997;35(4):727–735.
   Google Scholar
• Khodaparast H, Mottershead J, Badcock K. Interval model updating with irreducible uncertainty using the Kriging predictor. Mech Syst Signal Process. 2011;25(4):1204–1226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabriele S, Valente C. An interval-based technique for FE model updating. Int J Reliab Saf. 2009;3(1–3):79–103.
   Google Scholar
• Fang SE, Zhang QH, Ren WX. An interval model updating strategy using interval response surface models. Mech Syst Signal Process. 2015: 60–61. : 909–927.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fang SE, Perera R. A response surface methodology based damage identification technique. Smart Mater Struct. 2009;18(6):065009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fang SE, Perera R. Damage identification by response surface model updating using D-optimal design. Mech Syst Signal Process. 2011;25(2):717–733.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang GG. Adaptive response surface method using inherited Latin hypercube design points. J Mech Des. 2003;125(2):210–220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friswell MI, Penny JET, Garvey SD. A combined genetic and eigensensitivity algorithm for the location of damage in structures. Comput Struct. 1998;69(5):547–556.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore RE, Kearfott RB, Cloud MJ. Introduction to interval analysis. Philadelphia: Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• McFarland J, Mahadevan S. Error and variability characterization in structural dynamics modeling. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng. 2008;197(29):2621–2631.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ChenX J, Wang MC, Wu WK, et al. Structural design of beam transport system in SGIII facility target area. Fusion Eng Des. 2014;89(12):3095–3100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar