Lipschitz stability estimate and reconstruction of Lamé parameters in linear elasticity

References

• Ammari H, Bretin E, Garnier J. Mathematical methods in elasticity imaging. Princeton (NJ): Princeton University Press; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Weglein AB, Araújo FV, Carvalho PM, et al. Inverse scattering series and seismic exploration. Inverse Probl. 2003;19:R27–R83.
   Google Scholar
• Barbone E, Gokhale NH. Elastic modulus imaging: on the uniqueness and nonuniqueness of the elastography inverse problem in two dimensions. Inverse Probl. 2004;20:203–96.
   Google Scholar
• Bonnet M, Constantinescu A. Topical review: inverse problems in elasticity. Inverse Probl. 2015;21(2):R1–R50.
   Google Scholar
• Ikehata M. Inversion formulas for the linearized problem for an inverse boundary value problem in elastic prospection. SIAM J Appl Math. 1990;50(6):1635–1644.
   Google Scholar
• Akamatsu M, Nakamura G, Steinberg S. Identification of Lamé coefficients from boundary observations. Inverse Probl. 1991;7(3):335.
   Google Scholar
• Nakamura G, Uhlmann G. Identification of Lamé parameters by boundary measurements. Am J Math. 1993;115:1161–1187.
   Google Scholar
• Imanuvilov OY, Yamamoto M. On reconstruction of Lamé coefficients from partial Cauchy data. J Inverse Ill-Posed Probl. 2011;19(6):881–891.
   Google Scholar
• Lin YH, Nakamura G. Boundary determination of the Lamé moduli for the isotropic elasticity system. Inverse Probl. 2017;33(12):125004.
   Google Scholar
• Imanuvilov OY, Yamamoto M. Global uniqueness in inverse boundary value problems for the Navier-Stokes equations and Lamé system in two dimensions. Inverse Probl. 2015;31(3):46.
   Google Scholar
• Nakamura G, Uhlmann G. Inverse problems at the boundary for an elastic medium. SIAM J Math Anal. 1995;26(2):263–279.
   Google Scholar
• Nakamura G, Uhlmann G. Global uniqueness for an inverse boundary value problem arising in elasticity. Inventiones Math. 2003;152(1):205–207.
   Google Scholar
• Eskin G, Ralston J. On the inverse boundary value problem for linear isotropic elasticity. Inverse Probl. 2002;18(3):907.
   Google Scholar
• Beretta E, Francini E, Morassi A, et al. Lipschitz continuous dependence of piecewise constant Lamé coefficients from boundary data: the case of non-flat interfaces. Inverse Probl. 2014;30(12):125005.
   Google Scholar
• Beretta E, Francini E, Vessella S. Uniqueness and Lipschitz stability for the identification of Lamé parameters from boundary measurements. Inverse Probl Imaging. 2014;8(3):611–644.
   Google Scholar
• Nakamura G, Tanuma K, Uhlmann G. Layer stripping for a transversely isotropic elastic medium. SIAM J Appl Math. 1999;59(5):1879–1891.
   Google Scholar
• Cârstea CI, Honda N, Nakamura G. Uniqueness in the inverse boundary value problem for piecewise homogeneous anisotropic elasticity. SIAM J Math Anal. 2018;50(3):3291–3302.
   Google Scholar
• Isakov V, Wang JN, Yamamoto M. An inverse problem for a dynamical Lamé system with residual stress. SIAM J Math Anal. 2007;39(4):1328–1343.
   Google Scholar
• de Hoop MV, Qiu L, Scherzer O. Local analysis of inverse problems: Hölder stability and iterative reconstruction. Inverse Probl. 2012;28(4):045001.
   Google Scholar
• Harrach B, Pohjola V, Salo M. Monotonicity and local uniqueness for the Helmholtz equation. Anal. PDE 2019; 12 (7), 1741–1771.
   Google Scholar
• Harrach B, Lin YH, Liu H. On localizing and concentrating electromagnetic fields. SIAM J Appl Math. 2018;78(5):2558–2574.
   Google Scholar
• Harrach B. Simultaneous determination of the diffusion and absorption coefficient from boundary data. Inverse Probl Imaging. 2012;6(4):663–679.
   Google Scholar
• Harrach B, Lin YH. Monotonicity-based inversion of the fractional Schrödinger equation I. positive potentials. SIAM J Math Anal. 2019; 51 (4), 3092–3111.
   Google Scholar
• Harrach B, Lin YH. Monotonicity-based inversion of the fractional Schrödinger equation II. general potentials and stability. SIAM J Math Anal. 2020; 52 (1), 402–436.
   Google Scholar
• Gebauer B. Localized potentials in electrical impedance tomography. Inverse Probl Imaging. 2008;2(2):251–269.
   Google Scholar
• Harrach B. On uniqueness in diffuse optical tomography. Inverse Probl. 2009;25(5):055010.
   Google Scholar
• Murea C. The BFGS algorithm for a nonlinear least squares problem arising from blood flow in arteries. Comput Math Appl. 2005;49(2-3):171–186.
   Google Scholar
• Bellassoued M, Imanuvilov O, Yamamoto M. Inverse problem of determining the density and two Lamé coefficients by boundary data. SIAM J Math Anal. 2008;40(1):238–265.
   Google Scholar
• Bellassoued M, Yamamoto M. Lipschitz stability in determining density and two Lamé coefficients.  Mathematical Analysis and Applications J Math Anal Appl. 2007;329(2):1240–1259.
   Google Scholar
• Harrach B. Uniqueness and Lipschitz stability in electrical impedance tomography with finitely many electrodes. Inverse Probl. 2019;35(2):024005.
   Google Scholar
• Harrach B, Meftahi H. Global uniqueness and Lipschitz-stability for the inverse Robin transmission problem. SIAM J Appl Math. 2019;79(2):525–550.
   Google Scholar
• Harrach B. Uniqueness, stability and global convergence for a discrete inverse elliptic Robin transmission problem. arXiv preprint arXiv:1907.02759; 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Seo JK, Kim KC, Jargal A. A learning-based method for solving ill-posed nonlinear inverse problems: a simulation study of lung EIT. SIAM J Imaging Sci. 2019; 12 (3), 1275–1295.
   Google Scholar
• Harrach B, Minh MN. Enhancing residual-based techniques with shape reconstruction features in electrical impedance tomography. Inverse Probl. 2016;32(12):125002.
   Google Scholar
• Harrach B, Ullrich M. Resolution guarantees in electrical impedance tomography.  Transactions on Medical Imaging IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2015;34(7):1513–1521.
   Google Scholar
• Harrach B, Lee E, Ullrich M. Combining frequency-difference and ultrasound modulated electrical impedance tomography. Inverse Probl. 2015;31(9):095003.
   Google Scholar
• Harrach B, Minh MN. Monotonicity-based regularization for phantom experiment data in electrical impedance tomography. In: Hofmann B, Leitão A, Zubelli J (eds): New Trends in Parameter Identification for Mathematical Models, pp 107–120. Trends Math., Birkhäuser, Cham, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Barth A, Harrach B, Hyvönen N, et al. Detecting stochastic inclusions in electrical impedance tomography. Inverse Probl. 2017;33(11):115012.
   Google Scholar
• Harrach B, Seo JK. Exact shape-reconstruction by one-step linearization in electrical impedance tomography. SIAM J Math Anal. 2010;42(4):1505–1518.
   Google Scholar
• Harrach B, Ullrich M. Monotonicity-based shape reconstruction in electrical impedance tomography. SIAM J Math Anal. 2013;45(6):3382–3403.
   Google Scholar
• Harrach B, Ullrich M. Local uniqueness for an inverse boundary value problem with partial data. Proc Am Math Soc. 2017;145(3):1087–1095.
   Google Scholar
• Griesmaier R, Harrach B. Monotonicity in inverse medium scattering on unbounded domains. SIAM J Appl Math. 2018;78(5):2533–2557.
   Google Scholar
• Brander T, Harrach B, Kar M, et al. Monotonicity and enclosure methods for the p-Laplace equation. SIAM J Appl Math. 2018;78(2):742–758. doi: 10.1137/17M1128599.
   Google Scholar
• Ciarlet PG. The finite element method for elliptic problems. Amsterdam: North Holland; 1978.
   Google Scholar
• Lin CL, Nakamura G, Uhlmann G, et al. Quantitative strong unique continuation for the Lamé system with less regular coefficients. Methods Appl Anal. 2011;18(1):85–92.
   Google Scholar
• Gosh A, Gosh T. Unique continuation for a non bi-Laplacian fourth order elliptic operator. arXiv preprint arXiv:1908.05882; 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Ciarlet PG. Mathematical elasticity, volume I: Three-dimensional elasticity. Series “Studies in Mathematics and its Applications”. Amsterdam: North Holland; 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Delfour MC, Zolésio JP. Shapes and geometries. 2nd ed. Philadelphia (PA): Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics (SIAM); 2011. (Advances in Design and Control; Vol. 22). Metrics, analysis, differential calculus, and optimization. doi: 10.1137/1.9780898719826.
   Google Scholar
• Ekeland I, Temam R. Analyse convexe et problèmes variationnels. Dunod: Collection Études Mathématiques; 1974.
   Google Scholar
• Correa R, Seeger A. Directional derivative of a minimax function. Nonlinear Anal. 1985;9(1):13–22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0362-546X(85)90049-5
   Google Scholar
• Lechleiter A, Rieder A. Newton regularizations for impedance tomography: convergence by local injectivity. Inverse Probl. 2008;24(6):065009. 18.
   Google Scholar
• Dai Y-H. Convergence properties of the BFGS algoritm. SIAM J. Optim.. 2002;13(3):693–701.
   Google Scholar
• Eberle S, Harrach B. Shape reconstruction in linear elasticity: standard and linearized monotonicity method. arXiv preprint arXiv:2003.02598; 2020.
   Google Scholar