Combining adaptive dictionary learning with nonlocal similarity for full-waveform inversion

References

• Virieux J, Stéphane O. An overview of full-waveform inversion in exploration geophysics. Geophysics. 2009;74(6):WCC1–WCC26.
   Google Scholar
• Wang YH, Rao Y. Reflection seismic waveform tomography. J Geophys Res Solid Earth. 2009;114(B3):B03304.
   Google Scholar
• Tarantola A. Inversion of seismic reflection data in the acoustic approximation. Geophysics. 1984;49(8):1259–1266.
   Google Scholar
• Bunks C, Saleck FM, Zaleski S, et al. Multiscale seismic waveform inversion. Geophysics. 1995;60(5):1457–1473.
   Google Scholar
• Shipp R, Satish CS. Two-dimensional full wavefield inversion of wide-aperture marine seismic streamer data. Geophysical Journal International. 2002;151(2):325–344.
   Google Scholar
• Han B, Fu HS, Li Z. A homotopy method for the inversion of a two-dimensional acoustic wave equation. Inverse Problems in Science and Engineering. 2005;13(4):411–431.
   Google Scholar
• Pratt RG, Shin C, Hick GJ. Gauss–Newton and full Newton methods in frequency-space seismic waveform inversion. Geophysical Journal International. 1998;133(2):341–362.
   Google Scholar
• Brossier R, Operto S, Virieux J. Seismic imaging of complex onshore structures by 2D elastic frequency-domain full-waveform inversion. Geophysics. 2009;74(6):WCC105–WCC118.
   Google Scholar
• Luo J, Xie X. Frequency-domain full waveform inversion with an angle-domain wavenumber filter. Journal of Applied Geophysics. 2017;141:107–118.
   Google Scholar
• Wang YH, Rao Y. Waveform Modeling and Tomography. In: Gupta H.K. (eds) Encyclopedia of Solid Earth Geophysics. Encyclopedia of Earth Sciences Series. Springer, Dordrecht; 2021. p. 1608–1621.
   Google Scholar
• Wang YH. Seismic inversion: theory and applications. Chichester, West Sussex, UK : John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Aster RC, Borchers B, Thurber CH. Tikhonov regularization. Parameter estimation and inverse problems. 2nd edn; Elsevier Academic Press, New York; 2011. p. 93–127.
   Google Scholar
• Chan TF, Wong CK. Total variation blind deconvolution. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing. 1998;7(3):370–375.
   Google Scholar
• Ritschl L, Bergner F, Fleischmann C, et al. Improved total variation-based CT image reconstruction applied to clinical data. Physics in Medicine and Biology. 2011;56(6):1545–1561.
   Google Scholar
• Esser E, Guasch L, Van Leeuwen T, et al. Total variation regularization strategies in full-waveform inversion. SIAM Journal on Imaging Sciences. 2018;11(1):376–406.
   Google Scholar
• Peng Y, Liao W, Huang J, et al. Total variation regularization for seismic waveform inversion using an adaptive primal dual hybrid gradient method. Inverse Problems. 2018;34(4):045006.
   Google Scholar
• Loris I, Nolet G, Daubechies I, et al. Tomographic inversion using l1-norm regularization of wavelet coefficients. Geophysical Journal International. 2007;170(1):359–370.
   Google Scholar
• Fang H, Zhang H. Wavelet-based double-difference seismic tomography with sparsity regularization. Geophysical Journal International. 2014;199(2):944–955.
   Google Scholar
• Herrmann FJ, Hanlon I, Kumar R, et al. Frugal full-waveform inversion: from theory to a practical algorithm. Geophysics. 2013;32(9):1082–1092.
   Google Scholar
• Chai X, Tang G, Peng R, et al. The linearized Bregman method for frugal full-waveform inversion with compressive sensing and sparsity-promoting. Pure Appl Geophys. 2018;175(3):1085–1101.
   Google Scholar
• Fu HS, Ma MY, Han B. An accelerated proximal gradient algorithm for source-independent waveform inversion. J Appl Geophys. 2020;177:104030.
   Google Scholar
• Xue Z, Zhu H, Fomel S, et al. Full-waveform inversion using Seislet regularization. Geophysics. 2017;82(5):1–40.
   Google Scholar
• Peters B, Smithyman BR, Herrmann FJ. Projection methods and applications for seismic nonlinear inverse problems with multiple constraints. Geophysics. 2019;84(2):R251–R269.
   Google Scholar
• Rubinstein R, Bruckstein AM, Elad M. Dictionaries for sparse representation modeling. Proc IEEE. 2010;98(6):1045–1057.
   Google Scholar
• Bao C, Cai J, Ji H. Fast sparsity-based orthogonal dictionary learning for image restoration.Sydney, NSW, AustraliaProceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV).2013.
   Google Scholar
• Zhu L, Liu E, Mcclellan JH, et al. Sparse-promoting full-waveform inversion based on online orthonormal dictionary learning. Geophysics. 2017;82(2):R87–R107.
   Google Scholar
• Huang X, Liu Y, Wang F, et al. A robust full waveform inversion using dictionary learning. SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts; 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Li D, Harris JM. Full waveform inversion with nonlocal similarity and model-derivative domain adaptive sparsity-promoting regularization. Geophys J Int. 2018;215(3):1841–1864.
   Google Scholar
• Shi Y, Wang YH. Reverse time migration of 3D vertical seismic profile data. Geophysics. 2016;18:S31–S38.
   Google Scholar
• Dong W, Zhang L, Shi G, et al. Image deblurring and super-resolution by adaptive sparse domain selection and adaptive regularization. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing. 2011;20(7):1838–1857.
   Google Scholar
• Nocedal J, Wright SJ. Numerical optimization. 2nd edn. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer Verlag; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Chavent G. Identification of functional parameters in partial differential equations. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control. 1974;12(12):155–156.
   Google Scholar
• Plessix RE. A review of the adjoint-state method for computing the gradient of a functional with geophysical applications. Geophysical Journal International. 2006;167(2):495–503.
   Google Scholar
• Barucq H, Chavent G, Faucher F, et al. A priori estimates of attraction basins for nonlinear least squares, with application to Helmholtz seismic inverse problem. Inverse Problems. 2019;35(11):115004.
   Google Scholar
• Metivier L, Brossier R. The seiscope optimization toolbox: a large-scale nonlinear optimization library based on reverse communication. Geophysics. 2016;81(2):F1–F15.
   Google Scholar
• Reddy SR, Freno BA, Cizmas P, et al. Constrained reduced-order models based on proper orthogonal decomposition. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng. 2017;321:18–34.
   Google Scholar
• Wang N, Shi W, Fan C, et al. An improved nonlocal sparse regularization-based image deblurring via novel similarity criteria. Int J Adv Robot Syst. 2018;15(3):172988141878311.
   Google Scholar
• Liu Q, Zhang C, Guo Q, et al. Adaptive sparse coding on PCA dictionary for image denoising. The Visual Computer. 2016;32(4):535–549.
   Google Scholar
• Xu J, Zhang L, Zuo W. Patch group based nonlocal self-similarity prior learning for image denoising.Santiago, Chile.In International Conference on Computer Vision.2015.
   Google Scholar
• Daubechies I, Defrise M, De Mol C, et al. An iterative thresholding algorithm for linear inverse problems with a sparsity constraint. Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics. 2004;57(11):1413–1457.
   Google Scholar
• Xu L, Yan Q, Xia Y, et al. Structure extraction from texture via relative total variation. ACM Trans Graph. 2012;31(6):139.
   Google Scholar
• Gong C, Zeng L. Adaptive iterative reconstruction based on relative total variation for low-intensity computed tomography. Signal Processing. 2019;165:149–162.
   Google Scholar
• Emmanuel C, Demanet L, Donoho D, et al. Fast discrete curvelet transforms. SIAM J Multiscale Modeling Simul. 2006;5(3):861–899.
   Google Scholar