Appropriate assumption on cross-hauling national input–output table regionalization

REFERENCES

• Bonfiglio, A. (2009). On the parameterization of techniques for representing regional economic structures. Economic Systems Research, 21, 115–127. doi: 10.1080/09535310902995727
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonfiglio, A., & Chelli, F. (2008). Assessing the behaviour of non-survey methods for constructing regional input–output tables through a Monte Carlo simulation. Economic Systems Research, 20, 243–258. doi: 10.1080/09535310802344315
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flegg, A. T., Huang, Y., & Tohmo, T. (2014). Cross-hauling and regional input–output table: The case of the province of Hubei, China. (Economic Working Paper Series 1310). University of the West of England.
   Google Scholar
• Flegg, A. T., Mastronardi, L. J., & Romero, C.A. (2016). Evaluating the FLQ and AFLQ formulae for estimating regional input coefficients: Empirical evidence for the province of Córdoba, Argentina. Economic Systems Research, 28, 21–37. doi: 10.1080/09535314.2015.1103703
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flegg, A. T., & Tohmo, T. (2013a). Regional input–output tables and the FLQ formula: A case study of Finland. Regional Studies, 47, 703–721. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2011.592138
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flegg, A. T., & Tohmo, T. (2013b). A comment on Tobias Kronenberg’s ‘Construction of regional input–output tables using nonsurvey methods: The role of cross-hauling’. International Regional Science Review, 36, 235–257. doi: 10.1177/0160017612446371
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flegg, A. T., & Tohmo, T. (2016). Estimating regional input coefficients and multipliers: The use of the FLQ is not a gamble. Regional Studies, 50, 310–325. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2014.901499
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flegg, A. T., & Webber, C. D. (1997). On the appropriate use of location quotients in generating regional input–output tables: Reply. Regional Studies, 31, 795–805. doi: 10.1080/713693401
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flegg, A. T., & Webber, C. D. (2000). Regional size, regional specialization and the FLQ formula, Regional Studies, 34, 563–569. doi: 10.1080/00343400050085675
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flegg, A. T., Webber, C. D., & Elliott, M. V. (1995). On the appropriate use of location quotients in generating regional input–output tables. Regional Studies, 29, 547–561. doi: 10.1080/00343409512331349173
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fujimoto, T. (2015). Quantitative analysis of the regional income determinant factors in a remote island economy: Generation and application of a regional input–output table. Journal of Rural Economics, 86, 257–272. doi.org/10.11472/nokei.86.257. [in Japanese]
   Google Scholar
• Fujimoto, T. (2017). A quantitative analysis of regional income determinants in remote island economies: Generation and application of the regional input–output table. Japanese Journal of Agricultural Economics, 19, 1–19. doi.org/10.18480/jjae.19.0_1
   Google Scholar
• Grubel, H. G., & Lloyd, P. J. (1971). The empirical measurement of intra-industry trade, Economic Record, 47, 494–517. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-4932.1971.tb00772.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrigan, F., McGilvray, J. W., & McNicoll, I. H. (1981). The estimation of interregional trade flows. Journal of Regional Science, 21, 65–77. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9787.1981.tb00681.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, R. I. D., & LiuA. (1998). Input–output modelling of the urban and regional economy: The importance of external trade. Regional Studies, 32, 851–862. doi: 10.1080/00343409850118004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, R. W. (1998). Regionalizing national commodity-by-industry accounts. Economic Systems Research, 10, 223–238. doi: 10.1080/762947109
   Google Scholar
• Kowalewski, J. (2015). Regionalization of national input–output tables: Empirical evidence on the use of the FLQ formula. Regional Studies, 49(2), 240–250. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2013.766318
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kronenberg, T. (2009). Construction of regional input–output tables using nonsurvey methods: The role of cross-hauling. International Regional Science Review, 32, 40–64. doi: 10.1177/0160017608322555
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kronenberg, T. (2012). Regional input–output models and the treatment of imports in the European System of Accounts (ESA). Jahrbuch für Regionalwissenschaft, 32, 175–191. doi: 10.1007/s10037-012-0065-2
   Google Scholar
• Kronenberg, T., & Többen, J. (2012). On the construction of regional input–output tables with imported products inside the transactions matrix. Forschungszentrum Jülich, Institute of Energy and Climate Research, Systems Analysis and Technology Evaluation.
   Google Scholar
• Lehtonen, O., & Tykkyläinen, M. (2014). Estimating regional input coefficients and multipliers: Is the choice of a non-survey technique a gamble?Regional Studies, 48, 382–399. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2012.657619
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leigh, R. (1970). The use of location quotients in urban economic base studies. Land Economics, 46, 202–205. doi: 10.2307/3145181
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, R. E., & Blair, P. D. (2009). Input–output analysis: Foundations and extensions. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry (METI). (2010). 2005 Inter-regional input–output table: A debrief report. Tokyo: Research and Statistics Department Economic and Industrial Policy Bureau, METI. Retrieved from http://www.meti.go.jp/english/statistics/tyo/tiikiio/pdf/2005report.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications. (2009). 2005 Input–output tables for Japan. Tokyo: Statistics Bureau, Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications. Retrieved from http://www.soumu.go.jp/english/dgpp_ss/data/io/io05.htm
   Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2000). The OECD input–output database: Sources and methods. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/industry/ind/2673344.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Richardson, H. W. (1985). Input–output and economic base multipliers: Looking backward and forward. Journal of Regional Science, 25, 607–661. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9787.1985.tb00325.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sasaki, K., & Shibata, H. (1984). Nonsurvey methods for projecting the input–output system at a small-region level: Two alternative approaches. Journal of Regional Science, 24, 35–50. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9787.1984.tb01017.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaffer, W. A., & Chu, K. (1969). Nonsurvey techniques for constructing regional interindustry models. Papers of the Regional Science Association, 23, 83–101. doi: 10.1007/BF01941876
   Google Scholar
• Többen, J., & Kronenberg, T. (2015). Construction of multi-regional input–output tables using the Charm method. Economic Systems Research, 27, 487–507. doi: 10.1080/09535314.2015.1091765
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tohmo, T. (2004). New developments in the use of location quotients to estimate regional input–output coefficients and multipliers. Regional Studies, 38, 43–54. doi: 10.1080/00343400310001632262
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar