Market potential, spatial theories and spatial trends

REFERENCES

• Anselin, L. (2010). Thirty years of spatial econometrics. Papers in Regional Science, 89(1), 3–25. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1435-5957.2010.00279.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arbia, G., Bee, M., & Espa, G. (2013). Testing isotropy in spatial econometric models. Spatial Economic Analysis, 8(3), 228–240. https://doi.org/10.1080/17421772.2013.804629
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baltagi, B. H., & Griffin, J. M. (1984). Short and long run effects in pooled models. International Economic Review, 25(3), 631–645. https://doi.org/10.2307/2526223
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basile, R., De Benedictis, L., Durban, M., Faggian, A., & Mínguez, R. (2021). The impact of immigration on the internal mobility of natives and foreign-born residents: Evidence from Italy. Spatial Economic Analysis, 16(1), 9–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/17421772.2020.1729997
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basile, R., Girardi, A., Mantuano, M., & Pastore, F. (2012). Sectoral shifts, diversification and regional unemployment: Evidence from local labour systems in Italy. Empirica, 39(4), 525–544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10663-012-9198-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beenstock, M., Feldman, D., & Felsenstein, D. (2012). Testing for unit roots and cointegration in spatial cross-section data. Spatial Economic Analysis, 7(2), 203–222. https://doi.org/10.1080/17421772.2012.669491
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bivand, R., Pebesma, E. J., & Rubio, V. G. (2008). Applied spatial data analysis with R (1st edition). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Borchert, I., Larch, M., Shikher, S., & Yotov, Y. V. (2022). Disaggregated gravity: Benchmark estimates and stylized facts from a new database. Review of International Economics, 30(1), 113–136. https://doi.org/10.1111/roie.12555
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boulhol, H., de Serres, A., & Molnár, M. (2008). The contribution of economic geography to GDP per capita. OECD Journal: Economic Studies, 2008(1), 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1787/eco_studies-v2008-art9-en
   Google Scholar
• Brakman, S., Garretsen, H., & van Marrewijk, C. (2009). Economic Geography within and between European nations: The role of Market Potential and density across space and time. Journal of Regional Science, 49(4), 777–800. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9787.2009.00633.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breinlich, H. (2006). The spatial income structure in the European Union—what role for economic geography? Journal of Economic Geography, 6(5), 593–617. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbl018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Briant, A., Combes, P.-P., & Lafourcade, M. (2010). Dots to boxes: Do the size and shape of spatial units jeopardize economic geography estimations? Journal of Urban Economics, 67(3), 287–302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jue.2009.09.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brülhart, M., & Koenig, P. (2006). New economic geography meets Comecon. The Economics of Transition, 14(2), 245–267. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0351.2006.00256.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruna, F. (2015). A generalized NEG wage-type equation. In C. Díaz-Roldán, & J. Perote (Eds.), Advances on International Economics (pp. 63–82). Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Bruna, F. (2024a). Market Potential: The Measurement of Domestic Market Size (SSRN Scholarly Paper 4745973). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4745973
   Google Scholar
• Bruna, F. (2024b). Spatial trends in regional science. In P. Nijkamp, K. Kourtit, K. Haynes, & Z. Elburz (Eds.), Encyclopedia the world of regional science. Edward Elgar (forthcoming).
   Google Scholar
• Bruna, F., Lopez-Rodriguez, J., & Faíña, A. (2016). Market potential, spatial dependences and spillovers in European Regions. Regional Studies, 50(9), 1551–1563. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2015.1048796
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carruthers, J., & Mulligan, G. F. (2012). The plane of living and the precrisis evolution of housing values in the USA. Journal of Economic Geography, 12(4), 739–773. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbr045
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chasco, C., & Le Gallo, J. (2015). Heterogeneity in perceptions of noise and air pollution: A spatial quantile approach on the city of Madrid. Spatial Economic Analysis, 10(3), 317–343. https://doi.org/10.1080/17421772.2015.1062127
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chasco, C., Lopez, A., & Guillain, R. (2012). The influence of geography on the spatial agglomeration of production in the European Union. Spatial Economic Analysis, 7(2), 247–263. https://doi.org/10.1080/17421772.2012.669490
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christaller, W. (1933). Die zentralen Orte in Süddeutschland. In C. W. Baskin (Trans.), (1966) Central places in Southern Germany. N.J. Fischer.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, C., Wilson, F., & Bradley, J. (1969). Industrial location and economic potential in Western Europe. Regional Studies, 3(2), 197–212. https://doi.org/10.1080/09595236900185201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clemente, J., Pueyo, F., & Sanz, F. (2009). Market potential, European Union and growth. Journal of Policy Modeling, 31(5), 719–730. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpolmod.2009.04.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Combes, P.-P., Mayer, T., & Thisse, J.-F. (2008). Economic geography: The integration of regions and nations. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cressie, N., & Chan, N. H. (1989). Spatial modeling of regional variables. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 84(406), 393–401. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1989.10478783
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Díaz-Lanchas, J., Zofío, J. L., & Llano, C. (2022). A trade hierarchy of cities based on transport cost thresholds. Regional Studies, 56(8), 1359–1376. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2021.1967922
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diggle, P., & Ribeiro, P. J. (2007). Model-based Geostatistics. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Dijkstra, L., Annoni, P., & Kozovska, K. (2011). A new regional competitiveness index: Theory, methods and findings. European Union Regional Policy Working Papers, 2. https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/JRC67630.
   Google Scholar
• Donaldson, D., & Hornbeck, R. (2016). Railroads and American economic growth: A “market access” approach. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 131(2), 799–858. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjw002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duranton, G., & Puga, D. (2004). Micro-foundations of urban agglomeration economies. In J. V. Henderson, & J.-F. Thisse (Eds.), Handbook of regional and urban economics 4 (pp. 2063–2117). North Holland. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1574008004800051.
   Google Scholar
• Elhorst, P., Zandberg, E., & De Haan, J. (2013). The impact of interaction effects among neighbouring countries on financial liberalization and reform: A dynamic spatial panel data approach. Spatial Economic Analysis, 8(3), 293–313. https://doi.org/10.1080/17421772.2012.760136
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fallah, B. N., Partridge, M. D., & Olfert, M. R. (2011). New economic geography and US metropolitan wage inequality. Journal of Economic Geography, 11(5), 865–895. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbq016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fichet de Clairfontaine, A., & Hammer, C. (2018). Is the wage equation spatial enough? Evidence from a novel regional trade dataset. Review of International Economics, 26(3), 610–633. https://doi.org/10.1111/roie.12315
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fingleton, B. (1999). Spurious spatial regression: Some Monte Carlo results with a spatial unit root and spatial cointegration. Journal of Regional Science, 39(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9787.00121
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fingleton, B. (2006). The new economic geography versus urban economics: An evaluation using local wage rates in Great Britain. Oxford Economic Papers, 58(3), 501–530. https://doi.org/10.1093/oep/gpl006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fingleton, B., & Fischer, M. M. (2010). Neoclassical theory versus new economic geography: Competing explanations of cross-regional variation in economic development. The Annals of Regional Science, 44(3), 467–491. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-008-0278-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fotheringham, A. S., & Sachdeva, M. (2022). Scale and local modeling: New perspectives on the modifiable areal unit problem and Simpson’s paradox. Journal of Geographical Systems, 24(3), 475–499. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10109-021-00371-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gambuli, G. (2023). Navigating the geography of regional disparities: Market access and the core-periphery divide. THEMA Working Papers, Article 2023–05. https://ideas.repec.org//p/ema/worpap/2023-05.html.
   Google Scholar
• García-Córdoba, J. A., Matilla-García, M., & Ruiz Marín, M. (2019). A test for deterministic dynamics in spatial processes. Spatial Economic Analysis, 14(3), 361–377. https://doi.org/10.1080/17421772.2019.1559348
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granger, C. W. J., & Newbold, P. (1974). Spurious regressions in econometrics. Journal of Econometrics, 2(2), 111–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(74)90034-7
   Google Scholar
• Greenhut, M. L. (1960). Size of markets versus transport costs in industrial location surveys and theory. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 8(2), 172–184. https://doi.org/10.2307/2097363
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guastella, G., & van Oort, F. G. (2015). Regional Heterogeneity and Interregional Research Spillovers in European Innovation: Modelling and Policy Implications. Regional Studies, 49(11), 1772–1787. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2015.1034668
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanson, G. H. (2005). Market potential, increasing returns and geographic concentration. Journal of International Economics, 67(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2004.09.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, C. D. (1954). The market as a factor in the localization of industry in the United States. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 44, 315–348. https://doi.org/10.1080/00045605409352140
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Head, K., & Mayer, T. (2004). The empirics of agglomeration and trade. In J. V. Henderson, & J.-F. Thisse (Eds.), Handbook of regional and urban economics 4 (pp. 2609–2669). North Holland. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1574-0080(04)80016-6
   Google Scholar
• Head, K., & Mayer, T. (2006). Regional wage and employment responses to market potential in the EU. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 36(5), 573–594. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2006.06.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Head, K., & Mayer, T. (2014). Gravity equations: Workhorse, toolkit, and cookbook. In G. Gopinath, E. Helpman, & K. Rogoff (Eds.), Handbook of international economics 4 (pp. 131–195). Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Helpman, E. (1998). The size of regions. In D. Pines, E. Sadka, & I. Zilcha (Eds.), Topics in public economics. Theoretical and applied analysis (pp. 33–54). Cambridge Univ. Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hsu, W.-T. (2012). Central place theory and city size distribution. The Economic Journal, 122(563), 903–932. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0297.2012.02518.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isard, W. (1954). Location theory and trade theory: Short-run analysis. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 68(2), 305–320. https://doi.org/10.2307/1884452
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karahasan, B. C., & López-Bazo, E. (2013). The spatial distribution of human capital: Can it really be explained by regional differences in market access? International Regional Science Review, 36(4), 451–480. https://doi.org/10.1177/0160017613491492
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keeble, D., Owens, P. L., & Thompson, C. (1982). Regional accessibility and economic potential in the European Community. Regional Studies, 16(6), 419–432. https://doi.org/10.1080/09595238200185421
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klaesson, J., Larsson, J. P., & Norman, T. (2015). Accessibility and market potential analysis. In C. Karlsson, M. Andersson, & T. Norman (Eds.), Handbook of research methods and applications in economic geography (pp. 412–435). Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Krugman, P. (1991). Increasing returns and economic geography. Journal of Political Economy, 99(3), 483–499. https://doi.org/10.1086/261763
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krugman, P. (1992). A Dynamic Spatial Model. NBER Working Paper, 4219. https://doi.org/10.3386/w4219
   Google Scholar
• Lauridsen, J., & Kosfeld, R. (2006). A test strategy for spurious spatial regression, spatial nonstationarity, and spatial cointegration. Papers in Regional Science, 85(3), 363–377. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1435-5957.2006.00087.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lauridsen, J., & Kosfeld, R. (2007). Spatial cointegration and heteroscedasticity. Journal of Geographical Systems, 9(3), 253–265. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10109-007-0048-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lauridsen, J., & Kosfeld, R. (2011). Spurious spatial regression and heteroscedasticity. Journal of Spatial Science, 56(1), 59–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/14498596.2011.567411
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LeSage, J. P. (2014). What regional scientists need to know about spatial econometrics. The Review of Regional Studies, 44(1), 13–32. https://doi.org/10.52324/001c.8081
   Google Scholar
• LeSage, J. P., & Pace, R. K. (2014). The biggest myth in spatial econometrics. Econometrics, 2(4), 217–249. https://doi.org/10.3390/econometrics2040217
   Google Scholar
• Makeienko, M. (2020). Symbolic analysis applied to the specification of spatial trends and spatial dependence. Entropy, 22(4), 466. https://doi.org/10.3390/e22040466
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMillen, D. P. (2012). Perspectives on spatial econometrics: Linear smoothing with structured models. Journal of Regional Science, 52(2), 192–209. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9787.2011.00746.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller, U. K., & Watson, M. W. (2023). Spatial Unit Roots. Department of Economics, Princeton University. https://www.princeton.edu/~umueller/.
   Google Scholar
• Mulligan, G., Partridge, M., & Carruthers, J. (2012). Central place theory and its reemergence in regional science. The Annals of Regional Science, 48(2), 405–431. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-011-0496-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mur, J., & Trívez, F. J. (2003). Unit roots and deterministic trends in spatial econometric models. International Regional Science Review, 26(3), 289–312. https://doi.org/10.1177/0160017603253790
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niebuhr, A. (2006). Market access and regional disparities. The Annals of Regional Science, 40(2), 313–334. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-005-0047-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Openshaw, S. (1984). The modifiable areal unit problem. Geo Books.
   Google Scholar
• Pace, R. K., & LeSage, J. P. (2008). A spatial Hausman test. Economics Letters, 101(3), 282–284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2008.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parr, J. B. (2017). Central place theory: An evaluation. Review of Urban & Regional Development Studies, 29(3), 151–164. https://doi.org/10.1111/rurd.12066
   Google Scholar
• Partridge, M. D. (2010). The duelling models: NEG vs amenity migration in explaining US engines of growth. Papers in Regional Science, 89(3), 513–536. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1435-5957.2010.00315.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Partridge, M. D., Rickman, D. S., Ali, K., & Olfert, M. R. (2009). Agglomeration spillovers and wage and housing cost gradients across the urban hierarchy. Journal of International Economics, 78(1), 126–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2009.02.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pebesma, E., & Bivand, R. (2023). Spatial data science: With applications in R. Chapman and Hall/CRC. https://r-spatial.org/book/#printed-version-of-this-book.
   Google Scholar
• Pesaran, M. H., Shin, Y., & Smith, R. P. (1999). Pooled mean group estimation of dynamic heterogeneous panels. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 94(446), 621–634. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1999.10474156
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Redding, S. J. (2011). Economic Geography: A Review of the Theoretical and Empirical Literature. In D. Bernhofen, R. Falvey, D. Greenaway, & U. Kreickemeier (Eds.), Palgrave Handbook of International Trade (pp. 497–531). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Redding, S. J., & Venables, A. J. (2004). Economic geography and international inequality. Journal of International Economics, 62(1), 53–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2003.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rokicki, B., & Cieślik, A. (2023). Rethinking regional wage determinants: Regional market potential versus trade partners’ potential. Spatial Economic Analysis, 18(1), 126–142. https://doi.org/10.1080/17421772.2022.2070657
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart, J. Q. (1941). An inverse distance variation for certain social influences. Science, 93(2404), 89–90. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.93.2404.89
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stewart, J. Q. (1947). Empirical mathematical rules concerning the distribution and equilibrium of population. Geographical Review, 37(3), 461–485. https://doi.org/10.2307/211132
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tabuchi, T., & Thisse, J.-F. (2011). A new economic geography model of central places. Journal of Urban Economics, 69(2), 240–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jue.2010.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, P. J., & Hoyler, M. (2021). Lost in plain sight: Revealing central flow process in Christaller’s original central place systems. Regional Studies, 55(2), 345–353. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2020.1772965
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, J., de Jong, R., & Lee, L. (2012). Estimation for spatial dynamic panel data with fixed effects: The case of spatial cointegration. Journal of Econometrics, 167(1), 16–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2011.05.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar