The progressive role of acoustic cavitation for non-invasive therapies, contrast imaging and blood-tumor permeability enhancement

References

• Nejad SM, Hosseini SHR, Akiyama H, et al. Optical observation of cell sonoporation with low intensity ultrasound. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2011;413:218–223.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kooiman K, Vos HJ, Versluis M, et al., Acoustic behavior of microbubbles and implications for drug delivery. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2014;72:28–48.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Javadi M, Pitt WG, Tracy CM, et al. Ultrasonic gene and drug delivery using eLiposomes. J Control Release. 2013;167:92–100.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kadam SU, Tiwari BK, Alvarez C, et al. Ultrasound applications for the extraction, identification and delivery of food proteins and bioactive peptides. Trends Food Sci Technol. 2015;46:60–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sirsi SR, Borden MA, State-of-the-art materials for ultrasound-triggered drug delivery. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2014;72:3–14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu S-Y, Chen CC, Tung Y-S, et al. Effects of the microbubble shell physicochemical properties on ultrasound-mediated drug delivery to the brain. J Control Release. 2015;212:30–40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lentacker I, De Cock I, Deckers R, et al. Understanding ultrasound induced sonoporation: definitions and underlying mechanisms. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2014;72:49–64.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker ML. Biological effects of diagnostic ultrasound: a review. Radiology. 1978;126:479–483.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ibsen S, Benchimol M, Esener S. Fluorescent microscope system to monitor real-time interactions between focused ultrasound, echogenic drug delivery vehicles, and live cell membranes. Ultrasonics. 2013;53:178–184.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang T-Y, Choe JW, Pu K, et al. Ultrasound-guided delivery of microRNA loaded nanoparticles into cancer. J Control Release. 2015;203:99–108.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mo S, Carlisle R, Laga R, et al. Increasing the density of nanomedicines improves their ultrasound-mediated delivery to tumours. J Control Release. 2015;210:10–18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Cock I, Zagato E, Braeckmans K, et al. Ultrasound and microbubble mediated drug delivery: acoustic pressure as determinant for uptake via membrane pores or endocytosis. J Control Release. 2015;197:20–28.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Unga J, Hashida M, Ultrasound induced cancer immunotherapy. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2014;72:144–153.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiessling F, Fokong S, Bzyl J, et al. Recent advances in molecular, multimodal and theranostic ultrasound imaging. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2014;72:15–27.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cochran MC, Eisenbrey JR, Soulen MC, et al. Disposition of ultrasound sensitive polymeric drug carrier in a rat hepatocellular carcinoma model. Acad Radiol. 2011;18:1341–1348.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Husseini GA, Velluto D, Kherbeck L, et al. Investigating the acoustic release of doxorubicin from targeted micelles. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 2013;101:153–155.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geers B, Lentacker I, Sanders NN, et al. Self-assembled liposome-loaded microbubbles: the missing link for safe and efficient ultrasound triggered drug-delivery. J Control Release. 2011;152:249–256.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chai W-Y, Chu P-C, Tsai M-Y, et al. Magnetic-resonance imaging for kinetic analysis of permeability changes during focused ultrasound-induced blood-brain barrier opening and brain drug delivery. J Control Release. 2014;192:1–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomita Y, Matsuura T, Kodama T. Temporal effect of inertial cavitation with and without microbubbles on surface deformation of agarose S gel in the presence of 1-MHz focused ultrasound. Ultrasonics. 2015;55:1–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis GK Jr, Guarino S, Gandhi G, et al. Time-reversal techniques in ultrasound-assisted convection-enhanced drug delivery. Proc Meet Acoust. 2011;11:020005.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Geis NA, Katus HA, Bekeredjian R. Microbubbles as a vehicle for gene and drug delivery: current clinical implications and future perspectives. Curr Pharm Des. 2012;18:2166–2183.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips LC, Dhanaliwala AH, Klibanov AL, et al. Focused ultrasound-mediated drug delivery from microbubbles reduces drug dose necessary for therapeutic effect on neointima formation—brief report. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2011;31:2853–2855.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yudina A, Lepetit-Coiffé M, Moonen CTW. Evaluation of the temporal window for drug delivery following ultrasound-mediated membrane permeability enhancement. Mol Imaging Biol. 2011;13:239–249.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cool SK, Geers B, Roels S, et al. Coupling of drug containing liposomes to microbubbles improves ultrasound triggered drug delivery in mice. J Control Release. 2013;172:885–893.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ibsen S, Benchimol M, Simberg D, et al. A novel nested liposome drug delivery vehicle capable of ultrasound triggered release of its payload. J Control Release. 2011;155:358–366.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Husseini GA, Kherbeck L, Pitt WG, et al. Kinetics of ultrasonic drug delivery from targeted micelles. J Nanosci Nanotechnol. 2015;15:2099–2104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan F, Li L, Deng Z, et al. Paclitaxel-liposome–microbubble complexes as ultrasound-triggered therapeutic drug delivery carriers. J Control Release. 2013;166:246–255.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang P, Li D, Jin S, et al. Stimuli-responsive biodegradable poly(methacrylic acid) based nanocapsules for ultrasound traced and triggered drug delivery system. Biomater. 2014;35:2079–2088.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de la Rosa MAD, Husseini GA, Pitt WG. Comparing microbubble cavitation at 500 kHz and 70 kHz related to micellar drug delivery using ultrasound. Ultrasonics. 2013;53:377–386.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Unger E, Porter T, Lindner J, et al., Cardiovascular drug delivery with ultrasound and microbubbles. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2014;72:110–126.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Figueiredo M, Esenaliev RO. PLGA nanoparticles for ultrasound-mediated gene delivery to solid tumors. J Drug Deliv. 2012;2012:1–20.
   Google Scholar
• An L, Hua H, Du J, et al. Paramagnetic hollow silica nanospheres for in vivo targeted ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging. Biomater. 2014;35:5381–5392.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doane TL, Burda C. The unique role of nanoparticles in nanomedicine: imaging, drug delivery and therapy. Chem Soc Rev. 2012;41:2885–2911.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geers B, Dewitte H, De Smedt SC, et al. Crucial factors and emerging concepts in ultrasound-triggered drug delivery. J Control Release. 2012;164:248–255.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hijnen N, Langereis S, Grüll H, Magnetic resonance guided high-intensity focused ultrasound for image-guided temperature-induced drug delivery. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2014;72:65–81.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cochran MC, Eisenbrey J, Ouma RO, et al. Doxorubicin and paclitaxel loaded microbubbles for ultrasound triggered drug delivery. Int J Pharm. 2011;414:161–170.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kost J, Langer R. Responsive polymeric delivery systems. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2012;64:327–341.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ranjan A, Jacobs GC, Woods DL, et al. Image-guided drug delivery with magnetic resonance guided high intensity focused ultrasound and temperature sensitive liposomes in a rabbit VX2 tumor model. J Control Release. 2012;158:487–494.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aryal M, Vykhodtseva N, Zhang Y-Z, et al. Multiple sessions of liposomal doxorubicin delivery via focused ultrasound mediated blood–brain barrier disruption: a safety study. J Control Release. 2015;204:60–69.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staruch RM, Ganguly M, Tannock IF, et al. Enhanced drug delivery in rabbit VX2 tumours using thermosensitive liposomes and MRI-controlled focused ultrasound hyperthermia. Int J Hyperther. 2012;28:776–787.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ebbini ES, Haar GT. Ultrasound-guided therapeutic focused ultrasound: current status and future directions. Int J Hyperther. 2015;31:77–89.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burgess A, Shah K, Hough O, et al. Focused ultrasound-mediated drug delivery through the blood–brain barrier. Exp Rev Neurother. 2015;15:477–491.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meairs S. Drug delivery across the blood-brain barrier with focused ultrasound and microbubbles. Top Med Chem. 2014;10:143–158.
   Google Scholar
• Azagury A, Khoury L, Enden G, et al., Ultrasound mediated transdermal drug delivery. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2014;72:127–143.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polat BE, Hart D, Langer R, et al. Ultrasound-mediated transdermal drug delivery: mechanisms, scope, and emerging trends. J Control Release. 2011;152:330–348.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schoellhammer CM, Srinivasan S, Barman R, et al. Applicability and safety of dual-frequency ultrasonic treatment for the transdermal delivery of drugs. J Control Release. 2015;202:93–100.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herwadkar A, Sachdeva V, Taylor LF, et al. Low frequency sonophoresis mediated transdermal and intradermal delivery of ketoprofen. Int J Pharm. 2012;423:289–296.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polat BE, Deen WM, Langer R, et al., A physical mechanism to explain the delivery of chemical penetration enhancers into skin during transdermal sonophoresis — Insight into the observed synergism. J Control Release. 2012;158:250–260.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langer M, Lewis S, Fleshman S, et al. “SonoBandage” a transdermal ultrasound drug delivery system for peripheral neuropathy. J Acoust Soc Am. 2013;133:3497.
   Google Scholar
• Han T, Bhusan Das D. Potential of combined ultrasound and microneedles for enhanced transdermal drug permeation: a review. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2015;89:312–328.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zorec B, Jelenc J, Miklavčič D, et al. Ultrasound and electric pulses for transdermal drug delivery enhancement: ex vivo assessment of methods with in vivo oriented experimental protocols. Int J Pharm. 2015;490:65–73.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park D, Park H, Seo J, Lee S. Sonophoresis in transdermal drug deliverys. Ultrasonics. 2014;54:56–65.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lopez RFV, Seto JE, Blankschtein D, et al. Enhancing the transdermal delivery of rigid nanoparticles using the simultaneous application of ultrasound and sodium lauryl sulfate. Biomater. 2011;32:933–941.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park J, Zhang Y, Vykhodtseva N, et al. The kinetics of blood brain barrier permeability and targeted doxorubicin delivery into brain induced by focused ultrasound. J Control Release. 2012;162:134–142.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brudno Y, Mooney DJ. On-demand drug delivery from local depots. J Control Release. 2015;219:8–17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodriguez A, Nabili M, Mahesh S, et al. Ultrasound-enhanced drug delivery for treatment of parasitic diseases in the eye. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2015;41:S62–S63.
   Google Scholar
• Eisenbrey JR, Albala L, Kramer MR, et al. Development of an ultrasound sensitive oxygen carrier for oxygen delivery to hypoxic tissue. Int J Pharm. 2015;478:361–367.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kawata H, Uesugi Y, Soeda T, et al. A new drug delivery system for intravenous coronary thrombolysis with thrombus targeting and stealth activity recoverable by ultrasound. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;60:2550–2557.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pacella JJ, Brands J, Schnatz FG, et al. Treatment of microvascular micro-embolization using microbubbles and long-tone-burst ultrasound: an in vivo study. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2015;41:456–464.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fokong S, Theek B, Wu Z, et al. Image-guided, targeted and triggered drug delivery to tumors using polymer-based microbubbles. J Control Release. 2012;163:75–81.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rix A, Palmowski M, Gremse F, et al. Influence of repetitive contrast agent injections on functional and molecular ultrasound measurements. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2014;40:2468–2475.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myers R, Graham S, Kwan J, et al. Evaluation of sub-micron, ultrasound-responsive particles as a drug delivery strategy. J Acoust Soc Am. 2014;135:2370.
   Google Scholar
• Paefgen V, Doleschel D, Kiessling F. Evolution of contrast agents for ultrasound imaging and ultrasound-mediated drug delivery. Front Pharmaco. 2015;6:1–16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kilroy JP, Klibanov AL, Wamhoff BR, et al. Localized in vivo model drug delivery with intravascular ultrasound and microbubbles. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2014;40:2458–2467.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu H, Shi H, Zhang H, et al. Prostate stem cell antigen antibody-conjugated multiwalled carbon nanotubes for targeted ultrasound imaging and drug delivery. Biomater. 2014;35:5369–5380.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong AW, Fite BZ, Liu Y, et al. Ultrasound ablation enhances drug accumulation and survival in mammary carcinoma models. J Clin Invest. 2015;126:99–111. Epub 2015 Dec 12. doi:10.1172/JCI83312.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fry FJ, Johnson LK. Tumor irradiation with intense ultrasound. Ultrasound Med Biol. 1978;4:337–341.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sorace AG, Korb M, Warram JM, et al. Ultrasound-stimulated drug delivery for treatment of residual disease after incomplete resection of head and neck cancer. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2014;40:755–764.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwan JJ, Myers R, Coviello CM, et al. Ultrasound-propelled nanocups for drug delivery. Small. 2015;11:5305–5314.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dudau C, Hameed S, Gibson D, et al. Can contrast-enhanced ultrasound distinguish malignant from reactive lymph nodes in patients with head and neck cancers? Ultrasound Med Biol. 2014;40:747–754.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ninomiya K, Kawabata S, Tashita H, et al. Ultrasound-mediated drug delivery using liposomes modified with a thermosensitive polymer. Ultrason Sonochem. 2014;21:310–316.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin C-Y, Javadi M, Belnap DM, et al. Ultrasound sensitive eLiposomes containing doxorubicin for drug targeting therapy. Nanomed: Nanotechnol, Biol Med. 2014;10:67–76.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mo S, Coussios -C-C, Seymour L, et al. Ultrasound-enhanced drug delivery for cancer. Exp Opin Drug Deliv. 2012;9:1525–1538.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan C-H, Ting C-Y, Liu H-L, et al. Antiangiogenic-targeting drug-loaded microbubbles combined with focused ultrasound for glioma treatment. Biomater. 2013;34:2142–2155.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tabatabaei SN, Girouard H, Carret A-S, et al. Remote control of the permeability of the blood–brain barrier by magnetic heating of nanoparticles: a proof of concept for brain drug delivery. J Control Release. 2015;206:49–57.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alonso A, Hennerici MG, Meairs S. Ultrasound-induced blood-brain barrier opening for drug delivery. Translational neurosonology. Front Neurol Neurosci, Basel, Karger. 2015;36:106–115.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Aryal M, Arvanitis CD, Alexander PM, et al., Ultrasound-mediated blood–brain barrier disruption for targeted drug delivery in the central nervous system. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2014;72:94–109.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arvanitis CD, Livingstone MS, McDannold N. Combined ultrasound and MR imaging to guide focused ultrasound therapies in the brain. Phys Med Biol. 2013;58:4749–4761.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu D, Wang L, Cochran S, et al. Targeted drug delivery with modified gamma-Cyclodextrin nanocarriers and MR-guided focused ultrasound triggering. J Ther Ultrasound. 2015;3:79.
   Google Scholar
• Alkins RD, Brodersen PM, Sodhi RNS, et al. Enhancing drug delivery for boron neutron capture therapy of brain tumors with focused ultrasound. Neuro Oncol. 2013;15:1225–1235.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Downs M, Buch AM, Karakatsani MEM, et al. Behavioral effects of targeted drug delivery via non-invasive microbubble enhanced focused ultrasound blood brain barrier opening in non-human primates. J Ther Ultrasound. 2015;3:16.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kiessling F, Fokong S, Koczera P, et al. Ultrasound microbubbles for molecular diagnosis, therapy, and theranostics. J Nucl Med. 2012;53:345–348.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang C, Huang P, Zhang Y, et al. Anti-tumor efficacy of ultrasonic cavitation is potentiated by concurrent delivery of anti-angiogenic drug in colon cancer. Cancer Lett. 2014;347:105–113.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suarez MW, Dever DD, Gu X, et al. Transcranial vibro-acoustography can detect traumatic brain injury, in-vivo: preliminary studies. Ultrasonics. 2015;61:151–156.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haworth KJ, Raymond JL, Radhakrishnan K, et al. Trans-stent B-mode ultrasound and passive cavitation imaging. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2016;42:518–527.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patil AV, Rychak JJ, Klibanov AL, et al. A real-time technique for improving molecular imaging and guiding drug delivery in large blood vessels: in vitro and ex vivo results. Mol Imaging. 2011;10:238–247.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan C-H, Ting C-Y, Chang Y-C, et al. Drug-loaded bubbles with matched focused ultrasound excitation for concurrent blood–brain barrier opening and brain-tumor drug delivery. Acta Biomater. 2015;15:89–101.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kempen PJ, Greasley S, Parker KA, et al. Theranostic mesoporous silica nanoparticles biodegrade after pro-survival drug delivery and ultrasound/magnetic resonance imaging of stem cells. Theranostics. 2015;5:631–642.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen X, Wang J, Pacella JJ, et al. Dynamic behavior of microbubbles during long ultrasound tone-burst excitation: mechanistic insights into ultrasound-microbubble mediated therapeutics using high-speed imaging and cavitation detection. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2016;42:528–538.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ding T, Hu H, Bai C, et al. Spatial-temporal three-dimensional ultrasound plane-by-plane active cavitation mapping for high-intensity focused ultrasound in free field and pulsatile flow. Ultrasonics. 2016;69:166–181.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolloch L, Azagury A, Goldbart R, et al. Fetal membrane transport enhancement using ultrasound for drug delivery and noninvasive detection. Pharm Res. 2015;32:403–413.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen CC, Sheeran PS, Wu S-Y, et al. Targeted drug delivery with focused ultrasound-induced blood-brain barrier opening using acoustically-activated nanodroplets. J Control Release. 2013;172:795–804.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alkilany AM, Thompson LB, Boulos SP, et al. Gold nanorods: their potential for photothermal therapeutics and drug delivery, tempered by the complexity of their biological interactions. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2012;64:190–199.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Chan HF, Leong KW. Advanced materials and processing for drug delivery: the past and the future. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2013;65:104–120.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Liu L, Modern methods for delivery of drugs across the blood–brain barrier. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2012;64:640–665.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nhan T, Burgess A, Cho EE, et al. Drug delivery to the brain by focused ultrasound induced blood–brain barrier disruption: quantitative evaluation of enhanced permeability of cerebral vasculature using two-photon microscopy. J Control Release. 2013;172:274–280.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDannold N, Zhang Y, Vykhodtseva N. Nonthermal ablation in the rat brain using focused ultrasound and an ultrasound contrast agent: long-term effects. J Neurosurgery. 2016:1–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun T, Samiotaki G, Wang S, et al. Acoustic cavitation-based monitoring of the reversibility and permeability of ultrasound-induced blood-brain barrier opening. Phys Med Bio. 2015;60:9079.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gourevich D, Dogadkin O, Volovick A, et al. Ultrasound-mediated targeted drug delivery with a novel cyclodextrin-based drug carrier by mechanical and thermal mechanisms. J Control Release. 2013;170:316–324.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burgess A, Nhan T, Moffatt C, et al. Analysis of focused ultrasound-induced blood–brain barrier permeability in a mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease using two-photon microscopy. J Control Release. 2014;192:243–248.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar