Stimuli-responsive graphene-incorporated multifunctional chitosan for drug delivery applications: a review

References

• Mainardes RM, Silva LP. Drug delivery systems: past, present, and future. Curr Drug Targets. 2004;5:449–455.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reddy PD, Swarnalatha D. Recent advances in novel drug delivery systems. Int J Pharmtech Res. 2010;2:2025–2027.
   Google Scholar
• Arora S, Ali J, Ahuja A, et al. Floating drug delivery systems: a review. Aaps PharmSciTech. 2005;6:E372–E90.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bae YH, Park K. Targeted drug delivery to tumors: myths, reality and possibility. J Control Release. 2011;153:198.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruschi M L. Development of drug delivery systems and quality by design. Recent Pat Drug Deliv Formul. 2015;9:105.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Dikshit R, et al. Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012. Int J Cancer. 2015;136:E359–E386.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marcucci F, Lefoulon F. Active targeting with particulate drug carriers in tumor therapy: fundamentals and recent progress. Drug Discov Today. 2004;9:219–228.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh R, Lillard JW Jr. Nanoparticle-based targeted drug delivery. Exp Mol Pathol. 2009;86:215–223.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maderuelo C, Zarzuelo A, Lanao JM. Critical factors in the release of drugs from sustained release hydrophilic matrices. J Control Release. 2011;154:2–19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saks SR, Gardner LB. The pharmacoeconomic value of controlled-release dosage forms. J Control Release. 1997;48:237–242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langer R. Polymer-controlled drug delivery systems. Acc Chem Res. 1993;26:537–542.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samad A, Sultana Y, Aqil M. Liposomal drug delivery systems: an update review. Curr Drug Deliv. 2007;4:297–305.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nanjwade BK, Bechra HM, Derkar GK, et al. Dendrimers: emerging polymers for drug-delivery systems. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2009;38:185–196.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dobson J. Magnetic nanoparticles for drug delivery. Drug Dev Res. 2006;67:55–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu Z, Robinson JT, Tabakman SM, et al. Carbon materials for drug delivery & cancer therapy. Mater Today. 2011;14:316–323.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernkop-Schnürch A, Dünnhaupt S. Chitosan-based drug delivery systems. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2012;81:463–469.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saneja A, Nehate C, Alam N, et al. Recent advances in chitosan-based nanomedicines for cancer chemotherapy. In: Dutta PK, editor. Chitin and chitosan for regenerative medicine. Springer Series on Polymer and Composite Materials. New Delhi: Springer; 2016. p. 229–259.
   Google Scholar
• Zhu Y, Murali S, Cai W, et al. Graphene and graphene oxide: synthesis, properties, and applications. Adv Mater. 2010;22:3906–3924.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu J, Cui L, Losic D. Graphene and graphene oxide as new nanocarriers for drug delivery applications. Acta Biomater. 2013;9:9243–9257.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dutta PK, Dutta J, Tripathi V Chitin and chitosan: Chemistry, properties and applications. J Sci Ind Res. 2004;63:20–31.
   Google Scholar
• Rinaudo M. Chitin and chitosan: properties and applications. Prog Polym Sci. 2006;31:603–632.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dash M, Chiellini F, Ottenbrite R, et al. Chitosan—A versatile semi-synthetic polymer in biomedical applications. Prog Polym Sci. 2011;36:981–1014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar MR, Muzzarelli RA, Muzzarelli C, et al. Chitosan chemistry and pharmaceutical perspectives. Chem Rev. 2004;104:6017–6084.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prabaharan M. Chitosan derivatives as promising materials for controlled drug delivery. J Biomater Appl. 2008;23:5–36.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elgadir MA, Uddin MS, Ferdosh S, et al. Impact of chitosan composites and chitosan nanoparticle composites on various drug delivery systems: A review. J Food Drug Anal. 2015;23:619–629.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dutta PK, Dutta J, editors. Multifaceted development and application of biopolymers for biology, biomedicine and nanotechnology. Heidelberg: Springer; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Semwal A, Singh R, Dutta P. Chitosan: a promising substrate for pharmaceuticals. J Chitin Chitosan Sci. 2013;1:87–102.
   Google Scholar
• Kean T, Thanou M. Biodegradation, biodistribution and toxicity of chitosan. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2010;62:3–11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baldrick P. The safety of chitosan as a pharmaceutical excipient. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2010;56:290–299.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kashyap M, Archana D, Semwal A, et al. Chitosan: a promising substrate for regenerative medicine in drug formulation. In: Dutta PK, editor. Chitin and chitosan for regenerative medicine. Springer Series on Polymer and Composite Materials. New Delhi: Springer; 2016. p. 261–277.
   Google Scholar
• Shu X, Zhu K, Song W. Novel pH-sensitive citrate cross-linked chitosan film for drug controlled release. Int J Pharm. 2001;212:19–28.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puttipipatkhachorn S, Nunthanid J, Yamamoto K, et al. Drug physical state and drug–polymer interaction on drug release from chitosan matrix films. J Control Release. 2001;75:143–153.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kistriyani L, Sulistyawan W, Kesuma SH. Characteristic of ascorbic acid in crosslinked chitosan edible film as drug delivery system membrane. MATEC Web of Conferences: EDP Sciences. 2018;01027.
   Google Scholar
• Mi FL, Her NL, Kuan CY, et al. Chitosan tablets for controlled release of theophylline: effect of polymer—drug wet or dry blending and anionic—cationic interpolymer complex. J Appl Polym Sci. 1997;66:2495–2505.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sogias IA, Williams AC, Khutoryanskiy VV. Chitosan-based mucoadhesive tablets for oral delivery of ibuprofen. Int J Pharm. 2012;436:602–610.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sahasathian T, Kerdcholpetch T, Chanweroch A, et al. Sustained release of amoxicillin from chitosan tablets. Arch Pharm Res. 2007;30:526–531.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Millotti G, Laffleur F, Perera G, et al. In vivo evaluation of thiolated chitosan tablets for oral insulin delivery. J Pharm Sci. 2014;103:3165–3170.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tozaki H, Odoriba T, Okada N, et al. Chitosan capsules for colon-specific drug delivery: enhanced localization of 5-aminosalicylic acid in the large intestine accelerates healing of TNBS-induced colitis in rats. J Control Release. 2002;82:51–61.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tozaki H, Komoike J, Tada C, et al. Chitosan capsules for colon‐specific drug delivery: improvement of insulin absorption from the rat colon. J Pharm Sci. 1997;86:1016–1021.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tozaki H, Fujita T, Odoriba T, et al. Colon-specific delivery of R68070, a new thromboxane synthase inhibitor, using chitosan capsules: therapeutic effects against 2, 4, 6-trinitrobenzene sulfonic acid-induced ulcerative colitis in rats. Life Sci. 1999;64:1155–1162.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitra S, Gaur U, Ghosh P, et al. Tumour targeted delivery of encapsulated dextran–doxorubicin conjugate using chitosan nanoparticles as carrier. J Control Release. 2001;74:317–323.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Campos AM, Sánchez A, Alonso M. Chitosan nanoparticles: a new vehicle for the improvement of the delivery of drugs to the ocular surface. Application to cyclosporin A. Int J Pharm. 2001;224:159–168.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janes KA, Fresneau MP, Marazuela A, et al. Chitosan nanoparticles as delivery systems for doxorubicin. J Control Release. 2001;73:255–267.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin L, Ding J, He C, et al. Drug permeability and mucoadhesion properties of thiolated trimethyl chitosan nanoparticles in oral insulin delivery. Biomaterials. 2009;30:5691–5700.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aydin R, Pulat M. 5-Fluorouracil encapsulated chitosan nanoparticles for pH-stimulated drug delivery: evaluation of controlled release kinetics. J Nanomater. 2012;2012:42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bugamelli F, Raggi MA, Orienti I, et al. Controlled insulin release from chitosan microparticles. Arch Pharm. 1998;331:133–138.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang C-H, Huang K-S, Chang J-Y. Manufacturing monodisperse chitosan microparticles containing ampicillin using a microchannel chip. Biomed Microdevices. 2007;9:253–259.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Novoselov KS, Geim AK, Morozov SV, et al. Electric field effect in atomically thin carbon films. Science. 2004;306:666–669.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar A, Husale S, Srivastava A, et al. Cu–ni nanoparticle-decorated graphene based photodetector. Nanoscale. 2014;6:8192–8198.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markovic ZM, Harhaji-Trajkovic LM, Todorovic-Markovic BM, et al. In vitro comparison of the photothermal anticancer activity of graphene nanoparticles and carbon nanotubes. Biomaterials. 2011;32:1121–1129.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hummers WS Jr, Offeman RE. Preparation of graphitic oxide. J Am Chem Soc. 1958;80:1339.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang L, Xia J, Zhao Q, et al. Functional graphene oxide as a nanocarrier for controlled loading and targeted delivery of mixed anticancer drugs. Small. 2010;6:537–544.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gui D, Liu C, Chen F, et al. Preparation of polyaniline/graphene oxide nanocomposite for the application of supercapacitor. Appl Surf Sci. 2014;307:172–177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cong H-P, Ren X-C, Wang P, et al. Flexible graphene–polyaniline composite paper for high-performance supercapacitor. Energy Environ Sci. 2013;6:1185–1191.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu Q, Xu Y, Yao Z, et al. Supercapacitors based on flexible graphene/polyaniline nanofiber composite films. ACS Nano. 2010;4:1963–1970.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Q, Li Y, Feng Y, et al. Electropolymerization of graphene oxide/polyaniline composite for high-performance supercapacitor. Electrochim Acta. 2013;90:95–100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Mashat L, Shin K, Kalantar-Zadeh K, et al. Graphene/polyaniline nanocomposite for hydrogen sensing. J Phys Chem C. 2010;114:16168–16173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu Z, Chen X, Zhu S, et al. Enhanced sensitivity of ammonia sensor using graphene/polyaniline nanocomposite. Sens Actuators B Chem. 2013;178:485–493.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang X, Hu N, Gao R, et al. Reduced graphene oxide–polyaniline hybrid: preparation, characterization and its applications for ammonia gas sensing. J Mater Chem. 2012;22:22488–22495.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruecha N, Rodthongkum N, Cate DM, et al. Sensitive electrochemical sensor using a graphene–polyaniline nanocomposite for simultaneous detection of Zn (II), Cd (II), and Pb (II). Anal Chim Acta. 2015;874:40–48.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Konwer S, Guha AK, Dolui SK. Graphene oxide-filled conducting polyaniline composites as methanol-sensing materials. J Mater Sci. 2013;48:1729–1739.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bo Y, Yang H, Hu Y, et al. A novel electrochemical DNA biosensor based on graphene and polyaniline nanowires. Electrochim Acta. 2011;56:2676–2681.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng Q, Wu H, Shen Z, et al. An electrochemical DNA sensor based on polyaniline/graphene: high sensitivity to DNA sequences in a wide range. Analyst. 2015;140:6660–6670.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li R, Liu L, Yang F. Preparation of polyaniline/reduced graphene oxide nanocomposite and its application in adsorption of aqueous Hg (II). Chem Eng J. 2013;229:460–468.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim M-Y, Shin H, Shin DM, et al. Poly (vinyl alcohol) nanocomposites containing reduced graphene oxide coated with tannic acid for humidity sensor. Polymer. 2016;84:89–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baruah U, Chowdhury D. Functionalized graphene oxide quantum dot–PVA hydrogel: a colorimetric sensor for Fe2+, Co2+ and Cu2+ ions. Nanotechnology. 2016;27:145501.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu H, Du M, Zhang M, et al. Facile and green fabrication of small, mono-disperse and size-controlled noble metal nanoparticles embedded in water-stable polyvinyl alcohol nanofibers: high sensitive, flexible and reliable materials for biosensors. Sens Actuators B Chem. 2013;185:608–619.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qi Y, Tai Z, Sun D, et al. Fabrication and characterization of poly (vinyl alcohol)/graphene oxide nanofibrous biocomposite scaffolds. J Appl Polym Sci. 2013;127:1885–1894.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li J, Guo S, Zhai Y, et al. High-sensitivity determination of lead and cadmium based on the Nafion-graphene composite film. Anal Chim Acta. 2009;649:196–201.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jia L-P, Wang H-S. Preparation and application of a highly sensitive nonenzymatic ethanol sensor based on nickel nanoparticles/Nafion/graphene composite film. Sens Actuators B Chem. 2013;177:1035–1042.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li J, Guo S, Zhai Y, et al. Nafion–graphene nanocomposite film as enhanced sensing platform for ultrasensitive determination of cadmium. Electrochem Commun. 2009;11:1085–1088.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu L-M, Li H-B, Qu F, et al. In situ synthesis of palladium nanoparticle–graphene nanohybrids and their application in nonenzymatic glucose biosensors. Biosens Bioelectron. 2011;26:3500–3504.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu P, Shao Q, Hu Y, et al. Direct electrochemistry of glucose oxidase assembled on graphene and application to glucose detection. Electrochim Acta. 2010;55:8606–8614.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang W, Guo Z, Huang D, et al. Synergistic effect of chemo-photothermal therapy using PEGylated graphene oxide. Biomaterials. 2011;32:8555–8561.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wen H, Dong C, Dong H, et al. Engineered redox‐responsive PEG detachment mechanism in PEGylated nano‐graphene oxide for intracellular drug delivery. Small. 2012;8:760–769.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen H, Liu M, He H, et al. PEGylated graphene oxide-mediated protein delivery for cell function regulation. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2012;4:6317–6323.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu H, Fan M, Elhissi AM, et al. PEGylated graphene oxide for tumor-targeted delivery of paclitaxel. Nanomedicine. 2015;10:1247–1262.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang C, Feng L, Yang H, et al. Graphene oxide stabilized polyethylene glycol for heat storage. Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2012;14:13233–13238.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qi G-Q, Liang C-L, Bao R-Y, et al. Polyethylene glycol based shape-stabilized phase change material for thermal energy storage with ultra-low content of graphene oxide. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells. 2014;123:171–177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qi G-Q, Yang J, Bao R-Y, et al. Enhanced comprehensive performance of polyethylene glycol based phase change material with hybrid graphene nanomaterials for thermal energy storage. Carbon. 2015;88:196–205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu Y, Zhou J, Tang J, et al. Three-dimensional, chemically bonded polypyrrole/bacterial cellulose/graphene composites for high-performance supercapacitors. Chem Mater. 2015;27:7034–7041.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weng Z, Su Y, Wang DW, et al. Graphene–cellulose paper flexible supercapacitors. Adv Energy Mater. 2011;1:917–922.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kafy A, Akther A, Zhai L, et al. Porous cellulose/graphene oxide nanocomposite as flexible and renewable electrode material for supercapacitor. Synth Met. 2017;223:94–100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kafy A, Sadasivuni KK, Akther A, et al. Cellulose/graphene nanocomposite as multifunctional electronic and solvent sensor material. Mater Lett. 2015;159:20–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadasivuni KK, Kafy A, Zhai L, et al. Transparent and flexible cellulose nanocrystal/reduced graphene oxide film for proximity sensing. Small. 2015;11:994–1002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadasivuni KK, Kafy A, Kim H-C, et al. Reduced graphene oxide filled cellulose films for flexible temperature sensor application. Synth Met. 2015;206:154–161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang J, Zhang E, Li X, et al. Cellulose/graphene aerogel supported phase change composites with high thermal conductivity and good shape stability for thermal energy storage. Carbon. 2016;98:50–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang Y-R, Li Y-L, Hou F, et al. Fabrication of electric papers of graphene nanosheet shelled cellulose fibres by dispersion and infiltration as flexible electrodes for energy storage. Nanoscale. 2012;4:3248–3253.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasoulzadeh M, Namazi H. Carboxymethyl cellulose/graphene oxide bio-nanocomposite hydrogel beads as anticancer drug carrier agent. Carbohydr Polym. 2017;168:320–326.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luo H, Ao H, Li G, et al. Bacterial cellulose/graphene oxide nanocomposite as a novel drug delivery system. Curr Appl Phys. 2017;17:249–254.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu H, Wang J, Kang X, et al. Glucose biosensor based on immobilization of glucose oxidase in platinum nanoparticles/graphene/chitosan nanocomposite film. Talanta. 2009;80:403–406.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang J, Yu J-H, Strickler JR, et al. Nickel nanoparticle–chitosan-reduced graphene oxide-modified screen-printed electrodes for enzyme-free glucose sensing in portable microfluidic devices. Biosens Bioelectron. 2013;47:530–538.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan L, Luo C, Sun M, et al. Synthesis of magnetic β-cyclodextrin–chitosan/graphene oxide as nanoadsorbent and its application in dye adsorption and removal. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 2013;103:601–607.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li L, Luo C, Li X, et al. Preparation of magnetic ionic liquid/chitosan/graphene oxide composite and application for water treatment. Int J Biol Macromol. 2014;66:172–178.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang C, Chen B, Zou M, et al. Cyclic RGD-modified chitosan/graphene oxide polymers for drug delivery and cellular imaging. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 2014;122:332–340.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pan Q, Lv Y, Williams GR, et al. Lactobionic acid and carboxymethyl chitosan functionalized graphene oxide nanocomposites as targeted anticancer drug delivery systems. Carbohydr Polym. 2016;151:812–820.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang Y, Yang S-T, Liu J-H, et al. In vitro toxicity evaluation of graphene oxide on A549 cells. Toxicol Lett. 2011;200:201–210.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang X, Yin J, Peng C, et al. Distribution and biocompatibility studies of graphene oxide in mice after intravenous administration. Carbon. 2011;49:986–995.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liao K-H, Lin Y-S, Macosko CW, et al. Cytotoxicity of graphene oxide and graphene in human erythrocytes and skin fibroblasts. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2011;3:2607–2615.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu M, Zhu J, Wang F, et al. Improved in vitro and in vivo biocompatibility of graphene oxide through surface modification: poly (acrylic acid)-functionalization is superior to PEGylation. ACS Nano. 2016;10:3267–3281.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang K, Wan J, Zhang S, et al. In vivo pharmacokinetics, long-term biodistribution, and toxicology of PEGylated graphene in mice. ACS Nano. 2010;5:516–522.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhi X, Fang H, Bao C, et al. The immunotoxicity of graphene oxides and the effect of PVP-coating. Biomaterials. 2013;34:5254–5261.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Qi Y, Tai Z, et al. Preparation, mechanical properties and biocompatibility of graphene oxide/ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene composites. Eur Polym J. 2012;48:1026–1033.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu Z, Robinson JT, Sun X, et al. PEGylated nanographene oxide for delivery of water-insoluble cancer drugs. J Am Chem Soc. 2008;130:10876–10877.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang R, Shou D, Lv O, et al. pH-Controlled drug delivery with hybrid aerogel of chitosan, carboxymethyl cellulose and graphene oxide as the carrier. Int J Biol Macromol. 2017;103:248–253.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stankovich S, Dikin DA, Dommett GH, et al. Graphene-based composite materials. Nature. 2006;442:282.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pan Y, Wu T, Bao H, et al. Green fabrication of chitosan films reinforced with parallel aligned graphene oxide. Carbohydr Polym. 2011;83:1908–1915.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Depan D, Girase B, Shah J, et al. Structure–process–property relationship of the polar graphene oxide-mediated cellular response and stimulated growth of osteoblasts on hybrid chitosan network structure nanocomposite scaffolds. Acta Biomater. 2011;7:3432–3445.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Justin R, Chen B. Characterisation and drug release performance of biodegradable chitosan–graphene oxide nanocomposites. Carbohydr Polym. 2014;103:70–80.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denet A-R, Vanbever R, Préat V. Skin electroporation for transdermal and topical delivery. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2004;56:659–674.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown MB, Traynor MJ, Martin GP, et al. Transdermal drug delivery systems: skin perturbation devices. In: Jain KK, editor. Drug delivery systems. New York: Humana Press; 2008. p. 119–139.
   Google Scholar
• Justin R, Chen B. Strong and conductive chitosan–reduced graphene oxide nanocomposites for transdermal drug delivery. J Mat Chem B. 2014;2:3759–3770.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore TL, Rodriguez-Lorenzo L, Hirsch V, et al. Nanoparticle colloidal stability in cell culture media and impact on cellular interactions. Chem Soc Rev. 2015;44:6287–6305.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zuo H, Gu Z, Cooper H, et al. Crosslinking to enhance colloidal stability and redispersity of layered double hydroxide nanoparticles. J Colloid Interface Sci. 2015;459:10–16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee SH, Dreyer DR, An J, et al. Polymer brushes via controlled, surface‐initiated atom transfer radical polymerization (ATRP) from graphene oxide. Macromol Rapid Commun. 2010;31:281–288.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang K, Li Y, Tan X, et al. Behavior and toxicity of graphene and its functionalized derivatives in biological systems. Small. 2013;9:1492–1503.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fang M, Long J, Zhao W, et al. pH-responsive chitosan-mediated graphene dispersions. Langmuir. 2010;26:16771–16774.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang H, Bremner DH, Tao L, et al. Carboxymethyl chitosan-mediated synthesis of hyaluronic acid-targeted graphene oxide for cancer drug delivery. Carbohydr Polym. 2016;135:72–78.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bao H, Pan Y, Ping Y, et al. Chitosan‐functionalized graphene oxide as a nanocarrier for drug and gene delivery. Small. 2011;7:1569–1578.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang X, Hu W, Li J, et al. A comparative study of cellular uptake and cytotoxicity of multi-walled carbon nanotubes, graphene oxide, and nanodiamond. Toxicol Res (Camb). 2012;1:62–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• An W, Zhang Y, Zhang X, et al. Ocular toxicity of reduced graphene oxide or graphene oxide exposure in mouse eyes. Experimental Eye Research. 2018;174:59–69.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang H, Yan T, Xu S, et al. Graphene oxide-chitosan nanocomposites for intracellular delivery of immunostimulatory CpG oligodeoxynucleotides. Mater Sci Eng C. 2017;73:144–151.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu H, Tang C, Yin C. Folate conjugated trimethyl chitosan/graphene oxide nanocomplexes as potential carriers for drug and gene delivery. Mater Lett. 2014;125:82–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rana VK, Choi MC, Kong JY, et al. Synthesis and drug‐delivery behavior of chitosan‐functionalized graphene oxide hybrid nanosheets. Macromol Mater Eng. 2011;296:131–140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan H, Wang L, Zhao K, et al. Fabrication, mechanical properties, and biocompatibility of graphene-reinforced chitosan composites. Biomacromolecules. 2010;11:2345–2351.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaharwar AK, Peppas NA, Khademhosseini A. Nanocomposite hydrogels for biomedical applications. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2014;111:441–453.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffman AS. Hydrogels for biomedical applications. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2012;64:18–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamidi M, Azadi A, Rafiei P. Hydrogel nanoparticles in drug delivery. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2008;60:1638–1649.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wichterle O, Lim D. Hydrophilic gels for biological use. Nature. 1960;185:117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mamaghani KR, Naghib SM, Zahedi A, et al. Synthesis and microstructural characterization of GelMa/PEGDA hybrid hydrogel containing graphene oxide for biomedical purposes. Mater Today Proc. 2018;5:15635–15644.
   Google Scholar
• Kalkhoran AHZ, Vahidi O, Naghib SM. A new mathematical approach to predict the actual drug release from hydrogels. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2018;111:303–310.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalkhoran AHZ, Naghib SM, Vahidi O, et al. Synthesis and characterization of graphene-grafted gelatin nanocomposite hydrogels as emerging drug delivery systems. Biomed Phys Eng Express. 2018;4:055017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhattarai N, Gunn J, Zhang M. Chitosan-based hydrogels for controlled, localized drug delivery. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2010;62:83–99.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen K, Ling Y, Cao C, et al. Chitosan derivatives/reduced graphene oxide/alginate beads for small-molecule drug delivery. Mater Sci Eng C. 2016;69:1222–1228.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bag DS, Saxena AK Smart gels. Kirk-Othmer Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons; 2014
   Google Scholar
• Yu L, Ding J. Injectable hydrogels as unique biomedical materials. Chem Soc Rev. 2008;37:1473–1481.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saeednia L, Yao L, Berndt M, et al. Structural and biological properties of thermosensitive chitosan–graphene hybrid hydrogels for sustained drug delivery applications. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2017;105:2381–2390.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulker Z, Erkey C. An emerging platform for drug delivery: aerogel based systems. J Control Release. 2014;177:51–63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Qi Y, Yan X, et al. Green fabrication of porous chitosan/graphene oxide composite xerogels for drug delivery. J Appl Polym Sci. 2014;131:1–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin T, Zhang L, Davis J, et al. Combination of TRAIL gene therapy and chemotherapy enhances antitumor and antimetastasis effects in chemosensitive and chemoresistant breast cancers. Mol Ther. 2003;8:441–448.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yadav S, van Vlerken LE, Little SR, et al. Evaluations of combination MDR-1 gene silencing and paclitaxel administration in biodegradable polymeric nanoparticle formulations to overcome multidrug resistance in cancer cells. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2009;63:711–722.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao X, Kim K-S, Liu D. Nonviral gene delivery: what we know and what is next. Aaps J. 2007;9:E92–E104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saad M, Garbuzenko OB, Minko T Co-delivery of siRNA and an anticancer drug for treatment of multidrug-resistant cancer. Nanomedicine. 2008;3:761–776.
   Google Scholar
• Chen AM, Zhang M, Wei D, et al. Co‐delivery of doxorubicin and Bcl‐2 siRNA by mesoporous silica nanoparticles enhances the efficacy of chemotherapy in multidrug‐resistant cancer cells. Small. 2009;5:2673–2677.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang C, Ravi S, Garapati US, et al. Multifunctional chitosan magnetic-graphene (CMG) nanoparticles: a theranostic platform for tumor-targeted co-delivery of drugs, genes and MRI contrast agents. J Mat Chem B. 2013;1:4396–4405.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang C, Zhang Z, Chen B, et al. Design and evaluation of galactosylated chitosan/graphene oxide nanoparticles as a drug delivery system. J Colloid Interface Sci. 2018;516:332–341.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salehi R, Irani M, Rashidi M-R, et al. Stimuli-responsive nanofibers prepared from poly (N-isopropylacrylamide-acrylamide-vinylpyrrolidone) by electrospinning as an anticancer drug delivery. Des Monomers Polym. 2013;16:515–527.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salehi R, Irani M, Eskandani M, et al. Interaction, controlled release, and antitumor activity of doxorubicin hydrochloride from pH-sensitive P (NIPAAm-MAA-VP) nanofibrous scaffolds prepared by green electrospinning. Int J Polym Mater Polym Biomater. 2014;63:609–619.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anaraki NA, Rad LR, Irani M, et al. Fabrication of PLA/PEG/MWCNT electrospun nanofibrous scaffolds for anticancer drug delivery. J Appl Polym Sci. 2014;3:n/a–n/a.
   Google Scholar
• Shalumon K, Anulekha K, Girish C, et al. Single step electrospinning of chitosan/poly (caprolactone) nanofibers using formic acid/acetone solvent mixture. Carbohydr Polym. 2010;80:413–419.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ardeshirzadeh B, Anaraki NA, Irani M, et al. Controlled release of doxorubicin from electrospun PEO/chitosan/graphene oxide nanocomposite nanofibrous scaffolds. Mater Sci Eng C. 2015;48:384–390.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siddiqui MN, Garg G, Sharma PK. A short review on “A novel approach in oral fast dissolving drug delivery system and their patents”. Adv Biol Res. 2011;5:291–303.
   Google Scholar
• Moroz E, Matoori S, Leroux J-C. Oral delivery of macromolecular drugs: where we are after almost 100years of attempts. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2016;101:108–121.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Des Rieux A, Fievez V, Garinot M, et al. Nanoparticles as potential oral delivery systems of proteins and vaccines: a mechanistic approach. J Control Release. 2006;116:1–27.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whiting DR, Guariguata L, Weil C, et al. IDF diabetes atlas: global estimates of the prevalence of diabetes for 2011 and 2030. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2011;94:311–321.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verma A, Kumar N, Malviya R, et al. Emerging trends in noninvasive insulin delivery. J Pharm (Cairo). 2014;2014.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Najafzadeh H, Kooshapur H, Kianidehkordi F. Evaluation of an oral insulin formulation in normal and diabetic rats. Indian J Pharmacol. 2012;44:103.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mei L, Zhang Z, Zhao L, et al. Pharmaceutical nanotechnology for oral delivery of anticancer drugs. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2013;65:880–890.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thanki K, Gangwal RP, Sangamwar AT, et al. Oral delivery of anticancer drugs: challenges and opportunities. J Control Release. 2013;170:15–40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banna GL, Collovà E, Gebbia V, et al. Anticancer oral therapy: emerging related issues. Cancer Treat Rev. 2010;36:595–605.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park K, Kwon IC, Park K. Oral protein delivery: current status and future prospect. React Funct Polym. 2011;71:280–287.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renukuntla J, Vadlapudi AD, Patel A, et al. Approaches for enhancing oral bioavailability of peptides and proteins. Int J Pharm. 2013;447:75–93.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mansuri S, Kesharwani P, Jain K, et al. Mucoadhesion: a promising approach in drug delivery system. React Funct Polym. 2016;100:151–172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dodane V, Khan MA, Merwin JR. Effect of chitosan on epithelial permeability and structure. Int J Pharm. 1999;182:21–32.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sonaje K, Chuang E-Y, Lin K-J, et al. Opening of epithelial tight junctions and enhancement of paracellular permeation by chitosan: microscopic, ultrastructural, and computed-tomographic observations. Mol Pharm. 2012;9:1271–1279.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeh T-H, Hsu L-W, Tseng MT, et al. Mechanism and consequence of chitosan-mediated reversible epithelial tight junction opening. Biomaterials. 2011;32:6164–6173.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li L, Jiang G, Yu W, et al. Preparation of chitosan-based multifunctional nanocarriers overcoming multiple barriers for oral delivery of insulin. Mater Sci Eng C. 2017;70:278–286.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith J, Wood E, Dornish M. Effect of chitosan on epithelial cell tight junctions. Pharm Res. 2004;21:43–49.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen M-C, Mi F-L, Liao Z-X, et al. Recent advances in chitosan-based nanoparticles for oral delivery of macromolecules. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2013;65:865–879.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al Rubeaan K, Rafiullah M, Jayavanth S. Oral insulin delivery systems using chitosan-based formulation: A review. Expert Opin Drug Deliv. 2016;13:223–237.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abbad S, Zhang Z, Waddad AY, et al. Chitosan-modified cationic amino acid nanoparticles as a novel oral delivery system for insulin. J Biomed Nanotechnol. 2015;11:486–499.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He Z, Santos JL, Tian H, et al. Scalable fabrication of size-controlled chitosan nanoparticles for oral delivery of insulin. Biomaterials. 2017;130:28–41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li J, Jiang C, Lang X, et al. Multilayer sodium alginate beads with porous core containing chitosan based nanoparticles for oral delivery of anticancer drug. Int J Biol Macromol. 2016;85:1–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farhadian A, Dounighi NM, Avadi M. Enteric trimethyl chitosan nanoparticles containing hepatitis B surface antigen for oral delivery. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2015;11:2811–2818.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahmanian N, Hamishehkar H, Dolatabadi JEN, et al. Nano graphene oxide: a novel carrier for oral delivery of flavonoids. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 2014;123:331–338.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hou L, Shi Y, Jiang G, et al. Smart nanocomposite hydrogels based on azo crosslinked graphene oxide for oral colon-specific drug delivery. Nanotechnology. 2016;27:315105.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peng J-M, Lin J-C, Chen Z-Y, et al. Enhanced antimicrobial activities of silver-nanoparticle-decorated reduced graphene nanocomposites against oral pathogens. Mater Sci Eng C. 2017;71:10–16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang K, Gong H, Shi X, et al. In vivo biodistribution and toxicology of functionalized nano-graphene oxide in mice after oral and intraperitoneal administration. Biomaterials. 2013;34:2787–2795.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Sousa IP, Buttenhauser K, Suchaoin W, et al. Thiolated graphene oxide as promising mucoadhesive carrier for hydrophobic drugs. Int J Pharm. 2016;509:360–367.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Javanabkht S, Shaabani A. Encapsulation of graphene quantum dot-crosslinked chitosan by carboxymethylcellulose hydrogel beads as a pH-responsive bio-nanocomposite for the oral delivery agent. Int J Biol Macromol. 2018;123:389–397.
   Google Scholar
• Sangeetha S, Venkatesh DN, Krishan P, et al. Mucosa as a route for systemic drug delivery. Res J Pharm Biol Chem Sci. 2010;1:178–187.
   Google Scholar
• Agnihotri SA, Mallikarjuna NN, Aminabhavi TM. Recent advances on chitosan-based micro-and nanoparticles in drug delivery. J Control Release. 2004;100:5–28.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Du Toit LC, Pillay V, Choonara YE, et al. Ocular drug delivery–a look towards nanobioadhesives. Expert Opin Drug Deliv. 2011;8:71–94.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang H, Oh M, Allen C, et al. Monodisperse chitosan nanoparticles for mucosal drug delivery. Biomacromolecules. 2004;5:2461–2468.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Issa MM, Köping-Höggård M, Artursson P. Chitosan and the mucosal delivery of biotechnology drugs. Drug Discov Today. 2005;2:1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Gaudana R, Ananthula HK, Parenky A, et al. Ocular drug delivery. Aaps J. 2010;12:348–360.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sahoo SK, Dilnawaz F, Krishnakumar S. Nanotechnology in ocular drug delivery. Drug Discov Today. 2008;13:144–151.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Başaran E, Yazan Y. Ocular application of chitosan. Expert Opin Drug Deliv. 2012;9:701–712.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alonso MJ, Sánchez A. The potential of chitosan in ocular drug delivery. J Pharm Pharmacol. 2003;55:1451–1463.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Da Silva SB, Ferreira D, Pintado M, et al. Chitosan-based nanoparticles for rosmarinic acid ocular delivery—in vitro tests. Int J Biol Macromol. 2016;84:112–120.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Illum L. Nasal drug delivery—recent developments and future prospects. J Control Release. 2012;161:254–263.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Türker S, Onur E, Ózer Y. Nasal route and drug delivery systems. Pharm World Sci. 2004;26:137–142.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozsoy Y, Güngör S. Nasal route: an alternative approach for antiemetic drug delivery. Expert Opin Drug Deliv. 2011;8:1439–1453.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luppi B, Bigucci F, Cerchiara T, et al. Chitosan-based hydrogels for nasal drug delivery: from inserts to nanoparticles. Expert Opin Drug Deliv. 2010;7:811–828.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casettari L, Illum L. Chitosan in nasal delivery systems for therapeutic drugs. J Control Release. 2014;190:189–200.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amidi M, Romeijn SG, Borchard G, et al. Preparation and characterization of protein-loaded N-trimethyl chitosan nanoparticles as nasal delivery system. J Control Release. 2006;111:107–116.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Werle M, Bernkop‐Schnürch A. Thiolated chitosans: useful excipients for oral drug delivery. J Pharm Pharmacol. 2008;60:273–281.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu W, Yan L, Wu Q, et al. Evaluation of the toxicity of graphene oxide exposure to the eye. Nanotoxicology. 2016;10:1329–1340.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu W, Yan L, Chen S, et al. Investigating oxidation state-induced toxicity of PEGylated graphene oxide in ocular tissue using gene expression profiles. Nanotoxicology. 2018;1–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanner T, Marks R. Delivering drugs by the transdermal route: review and comment. Skin Res Technol. 2008;14:249–260.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amjadi M, Sheykhansari S, Nelson BJ, et al. Recent advances in wearable transdermal delivery systems. Adv Mater. 2018;30:1704530.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prausnitz MR, Langer R. Transdermal drug delivery. Nat Biotechnol. 2008;26:1261.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He W, Guo X, Xiao L, et al. Study on the mechanisms of chitosan and its derivatives used as transdermal penetration enhancers. Int J Pharm. 2009;382:234–243.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thein‐Han WW, Stevens WF. Transdermal delivery controlled by a chitosan membrane. Drug Dev Ind Pharm. 2004;30:397–404.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thacharodi D, Rao KP. Development and in vitro evaluation of chitosan-based transdermal drug delivery systems for the controlled delivery of propranolol hydrochloride. Biomaterials. 1995;16:145–148.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teodorescu F, Queniat G, Foulon C, et al. Transdermal skin patch based on reduced graphene oxide: A new approach for photothermal triggered permeation of ondansetron across porcine skin. J Control Release. 2017;245:137–146.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Justin R, Román S, Chen D, et al. Biodegradable and conductive chitosan–graphene quantum dot nanocomposite microneedles for delivery of both small and large molecular weight therapeutics. RSC Adv. 2015;5:51934–51946.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi Y, Li L. Current advances in sustained-release systems for parenteral drug delivery. Expert Opin Drug Deliv. 2005;2:1039–1058.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Larsen C, Larsen SW, Jensen H, et al. Role of in vitro release models in formulation development and quality control of parenteral depots. Expert Opin Drug Deliv. 2009;6:1283–1295.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mao S, Guo C, Shi Y, et al. Recent advances in polymeric microspheres for parenteral drug delivery–part 1. Expert Opin Drug Deliv. 2012;9:1161–1176.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang C, Qu G, Sun Y, et al. Biological evaluation of N-octyl-O-sulfate chitosan as a new nano-carrier of intravenous drugs. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2008;33:415–423.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lv O, Tao Y, Qin Y, et al. Highly fluorescent and morphology-controllable graphene quantum dots-chitosan hybrid xerogels for in vivo imaging and pH-sensitive drug carrier. Mater Sci Eng C. 2016;67:478–485.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anand P, Kunnumakara AB, Sundaram C, et al. Cancer is a preventable disease that requires major lifestyle changes. Pharm Res. 2008;25:2097–2116.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iwamoto T. Clinical application of drug delivery systems in cancer chemotherapy: review of the efficacy and side effects of approved drugs. Biol Pharm Bull. 2013;36:715–718.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ta HT, Dass CR, Dunstan DE. Injectable chitosan hydrogels for localised cancer therapy. J Control Release. 2008;126:205–216.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2016. CA Cancer J Clin. 2016;66:7–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu D, Auguste DT. Cancer targeted therapeutics: from molecules to drug delivery vehicles. J Control Release. 2015;219:632–643.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peer D, Karp JM, Hong S, et al. Nanocarriers as an emerging platform for cancer therapy. Nat Nanotechnol. 2007;2:751.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwon IK, Lee SC, Han B, et al. Analysis on the current status of targeted drug delivery to tumors. J Control Release. 2012;164:108–114.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Babu A, Ramesh R. Multifaceted applications of chitosan in cancer drug delivery and therapy. Mar Drugs. 2017;15:96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prusty K, Swain SK. Nanostructured chitosan composites for cancer therapy: A review. Int J Polym Mater Polym Biomater. 2017;67:879–888.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suarato G, Li W, Meng Y. Role of pH-responsiveness in the design of chitosan-based cancer nanotherapeutics: a review. Biointerphases. 2016;11:04B201.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arias JL, Reddy LH, Couvreur P. Fe 3 O 4/chitosan nanocomposite for magnetic drug targeting to cancer. J Mater Chem. 2012;22:7622–7632.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cross D, Burmester JK. Gene therapy for cancer treatment: past, present and future. Clin Med Res. 2006;4:218–227.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nayerossadat N, Maedeh T, Ali PA. Viral and nonviral delivery systems for gene delivery. Adv Biomed Res. 2012;1:27–43.
   Google Scholar
• Mao S, Sun W, Kissel T. Chitosan-based formulations for delivery of DNA and siRNA. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2010;62:12–27.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaharoff DA, Hoffman BS, Hooper HB, et al. Intravesical immunotherapy of superficial bladder cancer with chitosan/interleukin-12. Cancer Res. 2009;69:6192–6199.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petrovsky N, Cooper PD. Carbohydrate-based immune adjuvants. Expert Rev Vaccines. 2011;10:523–537.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaharoff DA, Rogers CJ, Hance KW, et al. Chitosan solution enhances both humoral and cell-mediated immune responses to subcutaneous vaccination. Vaccine. 2007;25:2085–2094.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang K, Feng L, Liu Z. Stimuli responsive drug delivery systems based on nano-graphene for cancer therapy. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2016;105:228–241.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma N, Liu J, He W, et al. Folic acid-grafted bovine serum albumin decorated graphene oxide: an efficient drug carrier for targeted cancer therapy. J Colloid Interface Sci. 2017;490:598–607.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lv Y, Tao L, Bligh SA, et al. Targeted delivery and controlled release of doxorubicin into cancer cells using a multifunctional graphene oxide. Mater Sci Eng C. 2016;59:652–660.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bai -Y-Y, Zheng S, Zhang L, et al. Non-invasively evaluating therapeutic response of nanorod-mediated photothermal therapy on tumor angiogenesis. J Biomed Nanotechnol. 2014;10:3351–3360.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li M, Yang X, Ren J, et al. Using graphene oxide high near‐infrared absorbance for photothermal treatment of Alzheimer’s disease. Adv Mater. 2012;24:1722–1728.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dolmans DE, Fukumura D, Jain RK. Photodynamic therapy for cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2003;3:380.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Y, Dong H, Li Y, et al. Graphene-based nanovehicles for photodynamic medical therapy. Int J Nanomedicine. 2015;10:2451.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sahu A, Choi WI, Lee JH, et al. Graphene oxide mediated delivery of methylene blue for combined photodynamic and photothermal therapy. Biomaterials. 2013;34:6239–6248.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yi L, Zhang Y, Shi X, et al. Recent progress of functionalised graphene oxide in cancer therapy. J Drug Target. 2018;1–20.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nurunnabi M, Khatun Z, Reeck GR, et al. Photoluminescent graphene nanoparticles for cancer phototherapy and imaging. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2014;6:12413–12421.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li J-L, Tang B, Yuan B, et al. A review of optical imaging and therapy using nanosized graphene and graphene oxide. Biomaterials. 2013;34:9519–9534.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan T, Zhang H, Huang D, et al. Chitosan-functionalized graphene oxide as a potential immunoadjuvant. Nanomaterials. 2017;7:59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu Y, Dong X, Chen P. Biological and chemical sensors based on graphene materials. Chem Soc Rev. 2012;41:2283–2307.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He Q, Wu S, Yin Z, et al. Graphene-based electronic sensors. Chem Sci. 2012;3:1764–1772.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shan C, Yang H, Han D, et al. Graphene/AuNPs/chitosan nanocomposites film for glucose biosensing. Biosens Bioelectron. 2010;25:1070–1074.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ren J, Shi W, Li K, et al. Ultrasensitive platinum nanocubes enhanced amperometric glucose biosensor based on chitosan and nafion film. Sens Actuators B Chem. 2012;163:115–120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khun K, Ibupoto ZH, Lu J, et al. Potentiometric glucose sensor based on the glucose oxidase immobilized iron ferrite magnetic particle/chitosan composite modified gold coated glass electrode. Sens Actuators B Chem. 2012;173:698–703.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh A, Sinsinbar G, Choudhary M, et al. Graphene oxide-chitosan nanocomposite based electrochemical DNA biosensor for detection of typhoid. Sens Actuators B Chem. 2013;185:675–684.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang L, Zheng Y, Lu X, et al. Dendritic copper-cobalt nanostructures/reduced graphene oxide-chitosan modified glassy carbon electrode for glucose sensing. Sens Actuators B Chem. 2014;195:1–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei L, Fan Y-J, Wang -H-H, et al. Electrochemically shape-controlled synthesis in deep eutectic solvents of Pt nanoflowers with enhanced activity for ethanol oxidation. Electrochim Acta. 2012;76:468–474.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu A, Ren Q, Xu T, et al. Morphology-controllable gold nanostructures on phosphorus doped diamond-like carbon surfaces and their electrocatalysis for glucose oxidation. Sens Actuators B Chem. 2012;162:135–142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang L, Fu J, Hou H, et al. A facile strategy to prepare Cu2O/Cu electrode as a sensitive enzyme-free glucose sensor. Int J Electrochem Sci. 2012;7:12587–12600.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang J, Dong Z, Li Y, et al. High performance non-enzymatic glucose biosensor based on copper nanowires–carbon nanotubes hybrid for intracellular glucose study. Sens Actuators B Chem. 2013;182:618–624.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng JY, Quan ZL, Song G, et al. Vertical cobalt dendrite array films: electrochemical deposition and characterization, glucose oxidation and magnetic properties. J Mater Chem. 2012;22:12296–12304.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu Z, Huang L, Zhang L, et al. Electrocatalytic oxidation of d-glucose at nanoporous Au and Au–ag alloy electrodes in alkaline aqueous solutions. Electrochim Acta. 2009;54:7286–7293.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu D, Luo Q, Zhou F. Nonenzymatic glucose sensor based on gold–copper alloy nanoparticles on defect sites of carbon nanotubes by spontaneous reduction. Synth Met. 2010;160:1745–1748.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahshid SS, Mahshid S, Dolati A, et al. Template-based electrodeposition of Pt/Ni nanowires and its catalytic activity towards glucose oxidation. Electrochim Acta. 2011;58:551–555.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang P, Jin SY, Xu QZ, et al. Decorating PtCo bimetallic alloy nanoparticles on graphene as sensors for glucose detection by catalyzing luminol chemiluminescence. Small. 2013;9:199–204.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li C, Wang H, Yamauchi Y. Electrochemical deposition of mesoporous Pt–Au alloy films in aqueous surfactant solutions: towards a highly sensitive amperometric glucose sensor. Chemistry. 2013;19:2242–2246.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bertoncello P, Forster RJ. Nanostructured materials for electrochemiluminescence (ECL)-based detection methods: recent advances and future perspectives. Biosens Bioelectron. 2009;24:3191–3200.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miao W. Electrogenerated chemiluminescence and its biorelated applications. Chem Rev. 2008;108:2506–2553.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jie G-F, Liu P, Zhang -S-S. Highly enhanced electrochemiluminescence of novel gold/silica/CdSe-CdS nanostructures for ultrasensitive immunoassay of protein tumor marker. Chem Comm. 2010;46:1323–1325.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu X, Ju H. Coreactant enhanced anodic electrochemiluminescence of CdTe quantum dots at low potential for sensitive biosensing amplified by enzymatic cycle. Anal Chem. 2008;80:5377–5382.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shan Y, Xu -J-J, Chen H-Y. Electrochemiluminescence quenching by CdTe quantum dots through energy scavenging for ultrasensitive detection of antigen. Chem Comm. 2010;46:5079–5081.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jie G, Li L, Chen C, et al. Enhanced electrochemiluminescence of CdSe quantum dots composited with CNTs and PDDA for sensitive immunoassay. Biosens Bioelectron. 2009;24:3352–3358.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li LL, Liu KP, Yang GH, et al. Fabrication of graphene–quantum dots composites for sensitive electrogenerated chemiluminescence immunosensing. Adv Funct Mater. 2011;21:869–878.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deng S, Lei J, Cheng L, et al. Amplified electrochemiluminescence of quantum dots by electrochemically reduced graphene oxide for nanobiosensing of acetylcholine. Biosens Bioelectron. 2011;26:4552–4558.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Lu J, Tang L, et al. Graphene oxide amplified electrogenerated chemiluminescence of quantum dots and its selective sensing for glutathione from thiol-containing compounds. Anal Chem. 2009;81:9710–9715.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang T, Zhang S, Mao C, et al. Enhanced electrochemiluminescence of CdSe quantum dots composited with graphene oxide and chitosan for sensitive sensor. Biosens Bioelectron. 2012;31:369–375.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winter M, Brodd RJ. What are batteries, fuel cells, and supercapacitors? ACS Publications; 2004;104:4245–4269.
   Google Scholar
• Zhu Y, Murali S, Stoller MD, et al. Carbon-based supercapacitors produced by activation of graphene. Science. 2011;332:1537–1541.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dubal DP, Holze R. Synthesis, properties, and performance of nanostructured metal oxides for supercapacitors. Pure Appl Chem. 2014;86:611–632.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mastragostino M, Arbizzani C, Soavi F. Conducting polymers as electrode materials in supercapacitors. Solid State Ion. 2002;148:493–498.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi H-J, Jung S-M, Seo J-M, et al. Graphene for energy conversion and storage in fuel cells and supercapacitors. Nano Energy. 2012;1:534–551.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• An C, Wang Y, Li L, et al. Effects of highly crumpled graphene nanosheets on the electrochemical performances of pseudocapacitor electrode materials. Electrochim Acta. 2014;133:180–187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen P, Yang -J-J, Li -S-S, et al. Hydrothermal synthesis of macroscopic nitrogen-doped graphene hydrogels for ultrafast supercapacitor. Nano Energy. 2013;2:249–256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee JW, Ko JM, Kim J-D. Hydrothermal preparation of nitrogen-doped graphene sheets via hexamethylenetetramine for application as supercapacitor electrodes. Electrochim Acta. 2012;85:459–466.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olejniczak A, Lezanska M, Wloch J, et al. Novel nitrogen-containing mesoporous carbons prepared from chitosan. ?J Mater Chem A. 2013;1:8961–8967.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Primo A, Atienzar P, Sanchez E, et al. From biomass wastes to large-area, high-quality, N-doped graphene: catalyst-free carbonization of chitosan coatings on arbitrary substrates. Chem Comm. 2012;48:9254–9256.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun G, Li B, Ran J, et al. Three-dimensional hierarchical porous carbon/graphene composites derived from graphene oxide-chitosan hydrogels for high performance supercapacitors. Electrochim Acta. 2015;171:13–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hao P, Zhao Z, Leng Y, et al. Graphene-based nitrogen self-doped hierarchical porous carbon aerogels derived from chitosan for high performance supercapacitors. Nano Energy. 2015;15:9–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shannon MA, Bohn PW, Elimelech M, et al. Science and technology for water purification in the coming decades. Nature. 2008;452:301.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenlee LF, Lawler DF, Freeman BD, et al. Reverse osmosis desalination: water sources, technology, and today’s challenges. Water Res. 2009;43:2317–2348.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Babel S, Kurniawan TA. Low-cost adsorbents for heavy metals uptake from contaminated water: a review. J Hazard Mater. 2003;97:219–243.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crini G. Non-conventional low-cost adsorbents for dye removal: a review. Bioresour Technol. 2006;97:1061–1085.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soylak M, Unsal YE, Kizil N, et al. Utilization of membrane filtration for preconcentration and determination of Cu (II) and Pb (II) in food, water and geological samples by atomic absorption spectrometry. Food Chem Toxicol. 2010;48:517–521.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karbassi A, Nadjafpour S. Flocculation of dissolved Pb, Cu, Zn and Mn during estuarine mixing of river water with the Caspian Sea. Environ Pollut. 1996;93:257–260.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parida SK, Dash S, Patel S, et al. Adsorption of organic molecules on silica surface. Adv Colloid Interface Sci. 2006;121:77–110.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin T-F, Wu J-K. Adsorption of arsenite and arsenate within activated alumina grains: equilibrium and kinetics. Water Res. 2001;35:2049–2057.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hua M, Zhang S, Pan B, et al. Heavy metal removal from water/wastewater by nanosized metal oxides: a review. J Hazard Mater. 2012;211:317–331.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ren X, Chen C, Nagatsu M, et al. Carbon nanotubes as adsorbents in environmental pollution management: a review. Chem eng j. 2011;170:395–410.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang S, Sun H, Ang H-M, et al. Adsorptive remediation of environmental pollutants using novel graphene-based nanomaterials. Chem eng j. 2013;226:336–347.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mauter MS, Elimelech M. Environmental applications of carbon-based nanomaterials. Environ Sci Technol. 2008;42:5843–5859.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramesha G, Kumara AV, Muralidhara H, et al. Graphene and graphene oxide as effective adsorbents toward anionic and cationic dyes. J Colloid Interface Sci. 2011;361:270–277.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crini G. Recent developments in polysaccharide-based materials used as adsorbents in wastewater treatment. Prog Polym Sci. 2005;30:38–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crini G, Badot P-M. Application of chitosan, a natural aminopolysaccharide, for dye removal from aqueous solutions by adsorption processes using batch studies: A review of recent literature. Prog Polym Sci. 2008;33:399–447.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guibal E. Interactions of metal ions with chitosan-based sorbents: a review. Sep Purif Technol. 2004;38:43–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiou M, Li H. Adsorption behavior of reactive dye in aqueous solution on chemical cross-linked chitosan beads. Chemosphere. 2003;50:1095–1105.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Chen L, Bai H, et al. Graphene oxide–chitosan composite hydrogels as broad-spectrum adsorbents for water purification? J Mater Chem A. 2013;1:1992–2001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan L, Luo C, Sun M, et al. Highly selective adsorption of lead ions by water-dispersible magnetic chitosan/graphene oxide composites. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 2013;103:523–529.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar