Vascular and extracellular matrix remodeling by physical approaches to improve drug delivery at the tumor site

References

• Li Y, Wang J, Wientjes MG, et al. Delivery of nanomedicines to extracellular and intracellular compartments of a solid tumor. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2012;64:29–39.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marcucci F, Corti A. How to improve exposure of tumor cells to drugs — promoter drugs increase tumor uptake and penetration of effector drugs. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2012;64:53–68.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carmeliet P, Jain RK. Angiogenesis in cancer and other diseases. nature. 2000;407:249.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matsumura Y, Maeda H, New A. Concept for macromolecular therapeutics in cancer chemotherapy: mechanism of tumoritropic accumulation of proteins and the antitumor agent smancs. Cancer Res. 1986;46:6387–6392.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nichols JW, Bae YHEPR. Evidence and fallacy. J Control Release. 2014;190:451–464.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heldin C-H, Rubin K, Pietras K, et al. High interstitial fluid pressure - an obstacle in cancer therapy. Nat Rev Cancer. 2004;4:806–813.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ariffin AB, Forde PF, Jahangeer S, et al. Releasing pressure in tumors: what do we know so far and where do we go from here? A review. Cancer Res. 2014;74:2655–2662.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ojha T, Pathak V, Shi Y, et al. Pharmacological and physical vessel modulation strategies to improve EPR-mediated drug targeting to tumors. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2017;119:44–60.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dhaliwal A, Zheng G. Improving accessibility of EPR-insensitive tumor phenotypes using EPR-adaptive strategies: designing a new perspective in nanomedicine delivery. Theranostics. 2019;9:8091.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang S, Gao H. Nanoparticles for modulating tumor microenvironment to improve drug delivery and tumor therapy. Pharmacol Res. 2017;126:97–108.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou Y, Chen X, Cao J, et al. Overcoming the biological barriers in the tumor microenvironment for improving drug delivery and efficacy. J Mater Chem B. 2020;8:6765–6781.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henke E, Nandigama R, Ergün S. Extracellular Matrix in the tumor microenvironment and its impact on cancer therapy. Front Mol Biosci. 2020;6:160.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paszek MJ, Zahir N, Johnson KR, et al. Tensional homeostasis and the malignant phenotype. Cancer Cell. 2005;8:241–254.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kauppila S, Stenbäck F, Risteli J, et al. Aberrant type I and type III collagen gene expression in human breast cancer in vivo. J Pathol J Pathol Soc G B Irel. 1998;186:262–268.
   Google Scholar
• Theocharis AD, Skandalis SS, Gialeli C, et al. Extracellular matrix structure. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2016;97:4–27.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu P, Weaver VM, Werb Z. The extracellular matrix: A dynamic niche in cancer progression. J Cell Biol. 2012;196:395–406.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Netti PA, Berk DA, Swartz MA, et al. Role of extracellular matrix assembly in interstitial transport in solid tumors. Cancer Res. 2000;60:2497–2503.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jain RK. Normalizing Tumor microenvironment to treat cancer: bench to bedside to biomarkers. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31:2205–2218.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burgstaller G, Oehrle B, Gerckens M, et al. The instructive extracellular matrix of the lung: basic composition and alterations in chronic lung disease. Eur Respir J. 2017;50:1601805.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minchinton AI, Tannock IF. Drug penetration in solid tumours. Nat Rev Cancer. 2006;6:583–592.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown E, McKee T, di.Tomaso E, et al. Dynamic imaging of collagen and its modulation in tumors in vivo using second-harmonic generation. Nat Med. 2003;9:796–800.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dolor A, Szoka FC. Digesting a path forward: the utility of collagenase tumor treatment for improved drug delivery. Mol Pharm. 2018;15:2069–2083.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chauhan VP, Martin JD, Liu H, et al. Angiotensin inhibition enhances drug delivery and potentiates chemotherapy by decompressing tumour blood vessels. Nat Commun. 2013;4:1–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barry-Hamilton V, Spangler R, Marshall D, et al. Allosteric inhibition of lysyl oxidase–like-2 impedes the development of a pathologic microenvironment. Nat Med. 2010;16:1009.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coussens LM, Fingleton B, Matrisian LM. Matrix metalloproteinase inhibitors and cancer—trials and tribulations. Science. 2002;295:2387–2392.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diop-Frimpong B, Chauhan VP, Krane S, et al. Losartan inhibits collagen I synthesis and improves the distribution and efficacy of nanotherapeutics in tumors. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2011;108:2909–2914.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khawar IA, Kim JH, Kuh H-J. Improving drug delivery to solid tumors: priming the tumor microenvironment. J Control Release. 2015;201:78–89.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakamura Y, Mochida A, Choyke PL, et al. Nanodrug delivery: is the enhanced permeability and retention effect sufficient for curing cancer? Bioconjug Chem. 2016;27:2225–2238.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Gan G, Wang B, et al. Cancer-associated Fibroblasts promote irradiated cancer cell recovery through autophagy. EBioMedicine. 2017;17:45–56.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanahan D, Weinberg RA. Hallmarks of Cancer: the next generation. Cell. 2011;144:646–674.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuks Z, Kolesnick R. Engaging the vascular component of the tumor response. Cancer Cell. 2005;8:89–91.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potiron VA, Abderrahmani R, Clément-Colmou K, et al. Improved functionality of the vasculature during conventionally fractionated radiation therapy of prostate cancer. PloS One. 2013;8:e84076.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia-Barros M, Paris F, Cordon-Cardo C, et al. Tumor response to radiotherapy regulated by endothelial cell apoptosis. Science. 2003;300:1155–1159.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DuRoss AN, Neufeld MJ, Rana S, et al. Integrating nanomedicine into clinical radiotherapy regimens. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2019;144:35–56.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwickert HC, Stiskal M, Roberts TP, et al. Contrast-enhanced MR imaging assessment of tumor capillary permeability: effect of irradiation on delivery of chemotherapy. Radiology. 1996;198:893–898.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moding EJ, Kastan MB, Kirsch DG. Strategies for optimizing the response of cancer and normal tissues to radiation. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2013;12:526–542.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stapleton S, Jaffray D, Milosevic M. Radiation effects on the tumor microenvironment: implications for nanomedicine delivery. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2017;109:119–130.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi J, Kantoff PW, Wooster R, et al. Cancer nanomedicine: progress, challenges and opportunities. Nat Rev Cancer. 2017;17:20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roh HD, Boucher Y, Kalnicki S, et al. Interstitial hypertension in carcinoma of uterine cervix in patients: possible correlation with tumor oxygenation and radiation response. Cancer Res. 1991;51:6695–6698.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Znati CA, Rosenstein M, Boucher Y, et al. Effect of radiation on interstitial fluid pressure and oxygenation in a human tumor xenograft. Cancer Res. 1996;56:964–968.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giustini AJ, Petryk AA, Hoopes PJ. Ionizing radiation increases systemic nanoparticle tumor accumulation. Nanomed Nanotechnol Biol Med. 2012;8:818–821.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moeller BJ, Cao Y, Li CY, et al. Radiation activates HIF-1 to regulate vascular radiosensitivity in tumors: role of reoxygenation, free radicals, and stress granules. Cancer Cell. 2004;5:429–441.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dewhirst MW, Cao Y, Moeller B. Cycling hypoxia and free radicals regulate angiogenesis and radiotherapy response. Nat Rev Cancer. 2008;8:425–437.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee C-G, Heijn M, Di Tomaso E, et al. Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor treatment augments tumor radiation response under normoxic or hypoxic conditions. Cancer Res. 2000;60:5565–5570.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tachiiri S, Katagiri T, Tsunoda T, et al. Analysis of gene-expression profiles after gamma irradiation of normal human fibroblasts. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2006;64:272–279.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qian L-W, Mizumoto K, Urashima T, et al. Radiation-induced increase in invasive potential of human pancreatic cancer cells and its blockade by a matrix metalloproteinase inhibitor, CGS27023. Clin Cancer Res. 2002;8:1223–1227.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar A, Collins HM, Scholefield JH, et al. Increased type-IV collagenase (MMP-2 and MMP-9) activity following preoperative radiotherapy in rectal cancer. Br J Cancer. 2000;82:960–965.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Angenete E, Öresland T, Falk P, et al. Preoperative radiotherapy and extracellular matrix remodeling in rectal mucosa and tumour matrix metalloproteinases and plasminogen components. Acta Oncol. 2009;48:1144–1151.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chetty C, Bhoopathi P, Rao JS, et al. Inhibition of matrix metalloproteinase‐2 enhances radiosensitivity by abrogating radiation‐induced FoxM1‐mediated G2/M arrest in A549 lung cancer cells. Int J Cancer. 2009;124:2468–2477.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paquette B, Baptiste C, Therriault H, et al. In vitro irradiation of basement membrane enhances the invasiveness of breast cancer cells. Br J Cancer. 2007;97:1505–1512.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Speake WJ, Dean RA, Kumar A, et al. Radiation induced MMP expression from rectal cancer is short lived but contributes to in vitro invasion. Eur J Surg Oncol EJSO. 2005;31:869–874.
   Google Scholar
• Shankar A, Kumar S, Iskander A, et al. Subcurative radiation significantly increases cell proliferation, invasion, and migration of primary glioblastoma multiforme in vivo. Chin J Cancer. 2014;33:148.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ager EI, Kozin SV, Kirkpatrick ND, et al. Blockade of MMP14 activity in murine breast carcinomas: implications for macrophages, vessels, and radiotherapy. JNCI J Natl Cancer Inst. 2015;4:107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strup-Perrot C, M-C V-B, Vandamme M, et al. Expression and activation of MMP −2, −3, −9, −14 are induced in rat colon after abdominal X-irradiation. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2006;41:60–70.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Angenete E, Langenskiöld M, Falk P, et al. Matrix metalloproteinases in rectal mucosa, tumour and plasma: response after preoperative irradiation. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2007;22:667–674.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Angenete E, Langenskiöld M, Palmgren I, et al. uPA and PAI-1 in rectal cancer—relationship to radiotherapy and clinical outcome. J Surg Res. 2009;153:46–53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kagan HM, Li W. Lysyl oxidase: properties, specificity, and biological roles inside and outside of the cell. J Cell Biochem. 2003;88:660–672.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erler JT, Giaccia AJ. Lysyl oxidase mediates hypoxic control of metastasis. Cancer Res. 2006;66:10238–10241.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egeblad M, Rasch MG, Weaver VM. Dynamic interplay between the collagen scaffold and tumor evolution. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2010;22:697–706.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen CJ, Sharma A, Vuong D-V, et al. Ionizing radiation induces tumor cell lysyl oxidase secretion. BMC Cancer. 2014;14:532.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie P, Yu H, Wang F, et al. Inhibition of LOXL2 enhances the radiosensitivity of castration-resistant prostate cancer cells associated with the reversal of the emt process. Catalá A, editor. BioMed Res Int. 2019;2019:4012590.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen HH, Kuo MT. Improving radiotherapy in cancer treatment: promises and challenges. Oncotarget. 2017;8:62742.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Li J, Shang W, Li Y, et al. Advanced nanomaterials targeting hypoxia to enhance radiotherapy. Int J Nanomedicine. 2018;13:5925.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lammers T, Peschke P, Kühnlein R, et al. Effect of radiotherapy and hyperthermia on the tumor accumulation of HPMA copolymer-based drug delivery systems. J Control Release. 2007;117:333–341.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lammers T, Subr V, Peschke P, et al. Image-guided and passively tumour-targeted polymeric nanomedicines for radiochemotherapy. Br J Cancer. 2008;99:900–910.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies CDL, Lundstrøm LM, Frengen J, et al. Radiation improves the distribution and uptake of liposomal doxorubicin (caelyx) in human osteosarcoma xenografts. Cancer Res. 2004;64:547–553.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stapleton S, Dunne M, Milosevic M, et al. Radiation and heat improve the delivery and efficacy of Nanotherapeutics by modulating Intratumoral fluid dynamics. ACS Nano. 2018;12:7583–7600.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller MA, Chandra R, Cuccarese MF, et al. Radiation therapy primes tumors for nanotherapeutic delivery via macrophage-mediated vascular bursts. Sci Transl Med. 2017;9:392.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koukourakis MI, Koukouraki S, Giatromanolaki A, et al. Liposomal doxorubicin and conventionally fractionated radiotherapy in the treatment of locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer and head and neck cancer. J Clin Oncol. 1999;17:3512–3521.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenthal DI, Yom SS, Liu L, et al. A phase I study of SPI-077 (Stealth® liposomal cisplatin) concurrent with radiation therapy for locally advanced head and neck cancer. Invest New Drugs. 2002;20:343–349.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dipetrillo T, Milas L, Evans D, et al. Paclitaxel poliglumex (PPX-Xyotax) and concurrent radiation for esophageal and gastric cancer: a phase I study. Am J Clin Oncol. 2006;29:376–379.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zee J, van D, Vujaskovic Z, et al. The Kadota Fund International Forum 2004–Clinical group consensus*. Int J Hyperthermia. 2008;24:111–122.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koning GA, Eggermont AMM, Lindner LH, et al. Hyperthermia and thermosensitive liposomes for improved delivery of chemotherapeutic drugs to solid tumors. Pharm Res. 2010;27:1750–1754.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu Q, Huang Z, Duan Y, et al. Reprogramming tumor microenvironment with photothermal therapy. Bioconjug Chem. 2020;31:1268–1278.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Datta NR, Kok HP, Crezee H, et al. Integrating Loco-regional hyperthermia into the current oncology practice: SWOT and TOWS analyses. Front Oncol. 2020;10:819.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaupel PW, Kelleher DK. Pathophysiological and vascular characteristics of tumours and their importance for hyperthermia: heterogeneity is the key issue. Int J Hyperthermia. 2010;26:211–223.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirui DK, Koay EJ, Guo X, et al. Tumor vascular permeabilization using localized mild hyperthermia to improve macromolecule transport. Nanomed Nanotechnol Biol Med. 2014;10:1487–1496.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melancon MP, Elliott AM, Shetty A, et al. Near-infrared light modulated photothermal effect increases vascular perfusion and enhances polymeric drug delivery. J Control Release. 2011;156:265–272.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lapin NA, Krzykawska-Serda M, Dilliard S, et al. The effects of non-invasive radiofrequency electric field hyperthermia on biotransport and biodistribution of fluorescent [60]fullerene derivative in a murine orthotopic model of breast adenocarcinoma. J Control Release. 2017;260:92–99.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li L, TLM TH, Bolkestein M, et al. Improved intratumoral nanoparticle extravasation and penetration by mild hyperthermia. J Control Release. 2013;167:130–137.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao H, Bi Y, Chen J, et al. Near-infrared light-triggered switchable nanoparticles for targeted chemo/photothermal cancer therapy. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2016;8:15103–15112.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baronzio GF, Galante F, Gramaglia A, et al. Tumor microcirculation and its significance in therapy: possible role of omega-3 fatty acids as rheological modifiers. Med Hypotheses. 1998;50:175–182.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fite BZ, Kheirolomoom A, Foiret JL, et al. Dynamic contrast enhanced MRI detects changes in vascular transport rate constants following treatment with thermally-sensitive liposomal doxorubicin. J Control Release. 2017;256:203–213.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song CW, Park HJ, Lee CK, et al. Implications of increased tumor blood flow and oxygenation caused by mild temperature hyperthermia in tumor treatment. Int J Hyperthermia. 2005;21:761–767.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corr SJ, Shamsudeen S, Vergara LA, et al. A new imaging platform for visualizing biological effects of non-invasive radiofrequency electric-field cancer hyperthermia. Muñoz-Barrutia A, editor. Plos One. 2015;10:e0136382.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marangon I, Silva AAK, Guilbert T, et al. Tumor Stiffening, a Key Determinant of Tumor Progression, is Reversed by Nanomaterial-Induced Photothermal Therapy. Theranostics. 2017;7:329–343.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolosnjaj-Tabi J, Marangon I, Nicolas-Boluda A, et al. Nanoparticle-based hyperthermia, a local treatment modulating the tumor extracellular matrix. Pharmacol Res. 2017;126:123–137.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yudina A, Moonen C. Ultrasound-induced cell permeabilisation and hyperthermia: strategies for local delivery of compounds with intracellular mode of action. Int J Hyperthermia. 2012;28:311–319.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryu JS, Raucher D. Elastin-like polypeptides: the influence of its molecular weight on local hyperthermia-induced tumor accumulation. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2014;88:382–389.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolosnjaj-Tabi J, Di Corato R, Lartigue L, et al. Heat-generating iron oxide nanocubes: subtle “destructurators” of the tumoral microenvironment. ACS Nano. 2014;8:4268–4283.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thakkar S, Sharma D, Kalia K, et al. Tumor microenvironment targeted nanotherapeutics for cancer therapy and diagnosis: a review. Acta Biomater. 2020;101:43–68.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lokerse WJM, Bolkestein M, Dalm SU, et al. Comparing the therapeutic potential of thermosensitive liposomes and hyperthermia in two distinct subtypes of breast cancer. J Control Release. 2017;258:34–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raeesi V, Chan WCW. Improving nanoparticle diffusion through tumor collagen matrix by photo-thermal gold nanorods. Nanoscale. 2016;8:12524–12530.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piehler S, Wucherpfennig L, Tansi FL, et al. Hyperthermia affects collagen fiber architecture and induces apoptosis in pancreatic and fibroblast tumor hetero-spheroids in vitro. Nanomed Nanotechnol Biol Med. 2020;28:102183.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolosnjaj-Tabi J, Kralj S, Griseti E, et al. Magnetic silica-coated iron oxide nanochains as photothermal agents, disrupting the extracellular matrix, and eradicating cancer cells. Cancers (Basel). 2019;11:2040.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ta T, Bartolak-Suki E, Park E-J, et al. Localized delivery of doxorubicin in vivo from polymer-modified thermosensitive liposomes with MR-guided focused ultrasound-mediated heating. J Control Release. 2014;194:71–81.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beola L, Asín L, Fratila RM, et al. Dual role of magnetic nanoparticles as intracellular hotspots and extracellular matrix disruptors triggered by magnetic hyperthermia in 3D cell culture models. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2018;10:44301–44313.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li J, Xie C, Huang J, et al. Semiconducting polymer nanoenzymes with photothermic activity for enhanced cancer therapy. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2018;57:3995–3998.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramos-Docampo MA, Fernández-Medina M, Taipaleenmäki E, et al. Microswimmers with heat delivery capacity for 3D Cell spheroid penetration. ACS Nano. 2019;13:12192–12205.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sebeke L, Deenen DA, Maljaars E, et al. Model predictive control for MR-HIFU-mediated, uniform hyperthermia. Int J Hyperthermia. 2019;36:1039–1049.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hancock HA, Smith LH, Cuesta J, et al. Investigations into Pulsed high-intensity focused ultrasound–enhanced delivery: preliminary evidence for a novel mechanism. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2009;35:1722–1736.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee S, Han H, Koo H, et al. Extracellular matrix remodeling in vivo for enhancing tumor-targeting efficiency of nanoparticle drug carriers using the pulsed high intensity focused ultrasound. J Control Release. 2017;263:68–78.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang T, Zhang B, Shen S, et al. Tumor microenvironment modulation by cyclopamine improved photothermal therapy of biomimetic gold nanorods for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2017;9:31497–31508.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan T, Hu H, Wang H, et al. Bioinspired lipoproteins-mediated photothermia remodels tumor stroma to improve cancer cell accessibility of second nanoparticles. Nat Commun. 2019;10:3322.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sorrin AJ, Ruhi MK, Ferlic NA, et al. Photodynamic therapy and the biophysics of the tumor microenvironment. Photochem Photobiol. 2020;96:232–259.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krammer B. Vascular effects of photodynamic therapy. Anticancer Res. 2001;21:4271–4277.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen B, Pogue BW, Hoopes PJ, et al. Vascular and cellular targeting for photodynamic therapy. Crit Rev Eukaryot Gene Expr. 2006;16:279–305.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fingar VH, Wieman TJ, Wiehle SA, et al. The role of microvascular damage in photodynamic therapy: the effect of treatment on vessel constriction, permeability, and leukocyte adhesion. Cancer Res. 1992;52:4914–4921.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fingar VH, Wieman TJ, Doak KW. Changes in tumor interstitial pressure induced by photodynamic therapy. Photochem Photobiol. 1991;53:763–768.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malik Z, Faraggi A, Savion N. Ultrastructural damage in photosensitized endothelial cells: dependence on hematoporphyrin delivery pathways. J Photochem Photobiol B. 1992;14:359–368.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leunig A, Staub F, Plesnila N, et al. Effect of photodynamic treatment of human endothelial cells on cell volume and cell viability. Int J Oncol. 1996;8:1217–1221.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sporn LA, Foster TH. Photofrin and Light induces microtubule depolymerization in cultured human endothelial cells. Cancer Res. 1992;52:3443–3448.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gil M, Bieniasz M, Seshadri M, et al. Photodynamic therapy augments the efficacy of oncolytic vaccinia virus against primary and metastatic tumours in mice. Br J Cancer. 2011;105:1512–1521.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snyder JW, Greco WR, Bellnier DA, et al. Photodynamic therapy: a means to enhanced drug delivery to tumors. Cancer Res. 2003;63:8126–8131.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng C, Debefve E, Haouala A, et al. Photodynamic therapy selectively enhances liposomal doxorubicin uptake in sarcoma tumors to rodent lungs. Lasers Surg Med. 2010;42:391–399.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perentes JY, Wang Y, Wang X, et al. Low-dose vascular photodynamic therapy decreases tumor interstitial fluid pressure, which promotes liposomal doxorubicin distribution in a murine sarcoma metastasis model. Transl Oncol. 2014;7:393–399.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sano K, Nakajima T, Choyke PL, et al. The effect of photoimmunotherapy followed by liposomal daunorubicin in a mixed tumor model: a demonstration of the super-enhanced permeability and retention effect after photoimmunotherapy. Mol Cancer Ther. 2014;13:426–432.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luo D, Carter KA, Miranda D, et al. Chemophototherapy: an emerging treatment option for solid tumors. Adv Sci. 2017;4:1600106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lv T, Huang Z-F, Wang H-W, et al. Evaluation of collagen alteration after topical photodynamic therapy (PDT) using second harmonic generation (SHG) microscopy – in vivo study in a mouse model. Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther. 2012;9:164–169.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mills SJ, Farrar MD, Ashcroft GS, et al. Topical photodynamic therapy following excisional wounding of human skin increases production of transforming growth factor-β3 and matrix metalloproteinases 1 and 9, with associated improvement in dermal matrix organization. Br J Dermatol. 2014;171:55–62.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryu A-R, Lee M-Y. Chlorin e6-mediated photodynamic therapy promotes collagen production and suppresses MMPs expression via modulating AP-1 signaling in P. acnes-stimulated HaCaT cells. Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther. 2017;20:71–77.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yova DM, Hovhannisyan VA, Theodossiou T. Photochemical effects and hypericin photosensitized processes in collagen. J Biomed Opt. 2001;6:52–58.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hovhannisyan V, Guo HW, Hovhannisyan A, et al. Photo-induced processes in collagen-hypericin system revealed by fluorescence spectroscopy and multiphoton microscopy. Biomed Opt Express. 2014;5:1355–1362.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hovhannisyan V, Hovhannisyan A, Ghukasyan V, et al. Hypericin-mediated selective photomodification of connective tissues. Appl Phys Lett. 2014;105:263701.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferrario A, Chantrain CF, von Tiehl K, et al. The matrix metalloproteinase inhibitor prinomastat enhances photodynamic therapy responsiveness in a mouse tumor model. Cancer Res. 2004;64:2328–2332.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karrer S, Bosserhoff AK, Weiderer P, et al. Influence of 5-aminolevulinic acid and red light on collagen metabolism of human dermal fibroblasts. J Invest Dermatol. 2003;120:325–331.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang C, Wang J, Chou A, et al. Photodynamic therapy induces antifibrotic alterations in primary human vocal fold fibroblasts. Laryngoscope. 2018;128:E323–E331.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biel MA. Photodynamic therapy treatment of early oral and laryngeal cancers. Photochem Photobiol. 2007;83:1063–1068.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ihsanullah KM, Kumar BN, Zhao Y, et al. Stepwise-activatable hypoxia triggered nanocarrier-based photodynamic therapy for effective synergistic bioreductive chemotherapy. Biomaterials. 2020;245:119982.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tachibana K, Uchida T, Ogawa K, et al. Induction of cell-membrane porosity by ultrasound. Lancet. 1999;353:1409.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frenkel V. Ultrasound mediated delivery of drugs and genes to solid tumors. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2008;60:1193–1208.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferrara K, Pollard R, Borden M. Ultrasound microbubble contrast agents: fundamentals and application to gene and drug delivery. Annu Rev Biomed Eng. 2007;9:415–447.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hernot S, Klibanov AL. Microbubbles in ultrasound-triggered drug and gene delivery. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2008;60:1153–1166.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lentacker I, De Cock I, Deckers R, et al. Understanding ultrasound induced sonoporation: definitions and underlying mechanisms. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2014;72:49–64.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tharkar P, Varanasi R, Wong WSF, et al. Nano-enhanced drug delivery and therapeutic ultrasound for cancer treatment and beyond. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2019;7:324.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skyba DM, Price RJ, Linka AZ, et al. Direct in vivo visualization of intravascular destruction of microbubbles by ultrasound and its local effects on tissue. Circulation. 1998;98:290–293.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen H, Kreider W, Brayman AA, et al. Blood vessel deformations on microsecond time scales by ultrasonic cavitation. Phys Rev Lett. 2011;106:034301.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen H, Brayman AA, Evan AP, et al. Preliminary observations on the spatial correlation between short-burst microbubble oscillations and vascular bioeffects. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2012;38:2151–2162.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wamel AV, Kooiman K, Emmer M, et al. Ultrasound microbubble induced endothelial cell permeability. J Control Release. 2006;116:e100–e102.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patil AV, Rychak JJ, Klibanov AL, et al. Real-time technique for improving molecular imaging and guiding drug delivery in large blood vessels: in vitro and ex vivo results. Mol Imaging. 2011;10:7290. 2011.00002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meijering BDM, Henning RH, Gilst WHV, et al. Optimization of ultrasound and microbubbles targeted gene delivery to cultured primary endothelial cells. J Drug Target. 2007;15:664–671.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juffermans LJM, Meijering BDM, Henning RH, et al. Ultrasound and microbubble-targeted delivery of small interfering RNA into primary endothelial cells is more effective than delivery of plasmid DNA. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2014;40:532–540.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meijering BDM, Juffermans LJM, van Wamel A, et al. Ultrasound and microbubble-targeted delivery of macromolecules is regulated by induction of endocytosis and pore formation. Circ Res. 2009;104:679–687.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juffermans LJM, van Dijk A, Jongenelen CAM, et al. Ultrasound and microbubble-induced intra- and intercellular bioeffects in primary endothelial cells. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2009;35:1917–1927.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bekeredjian R, Kroll RD, Fein E, et al. Ultrasound targeted microbubble destruction increases capillary permeability in hepatomas. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2007;33:1592–1598.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mukherjee D, Wong J, Griffin B, et al. Ten-fold augmentation of endothelial uptake of vascular endothelial growth factor with ultrasound after systemic administration. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000;35:1678–1686.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cochran MC, Eisenbrey JR, Soulen MC, et al. Disposition of ultrasound sensitive polymeric drug carrier in a rat hepatocellular carcinoma model. Acad Radiol. 2011;18:1341–1348.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan F, Li L, Deng Z, et al. Paclitaxel-liposome–microbubble complexes as ultrasound-triggered therapeutic drug delivery carriers. J Control Release. 2013;166:246–255.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qin J, Wang T-Y, Willmann JK. Sonoporation: applications for cancer therapy. Ther Ultrasound. 2016;880:263–291. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Chowdhury SM, Wang T-Y, Bachawal S, et al. Ultrasound-guided therapeutic modulation of hepatocellular carcinoma using complementary microRNAs. J Control Release. 2016;238:272–280.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devulapally R, Sekar NM, Sekar TV, et al. Polymer nanoparticles mediated codelivery of antimiR-10b and antimiR-21 for achieving triple negative breast cancer therapy. ACS Nano. 2015;9:2290–2302.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han H, Kim D, Jang Y, et al. Focused ultrasound-triggered chemo-gene therapy with multifunctional nanocomplex for enhancing therapeutic efficacy. J Control Release. 2020;322:346–356.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolosnjaj-Tabi J, Gibot L, Fourquaux I, et al. Electric field-responsive nanoparticles and electric fields: physical, chemical, biological mechanisms and therapeutic prospects. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2019;138:56–67.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yarmush ML, Golberg A, Serša G, et al. Electroporation-based technologies for medicine: principles, applications, and challenges. Annu Rev Biomed Eng. 2014;16:295–320.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gehl J, Sersa G, Matthiessen LW, et al. Updated standard operating procedures for electrochemotherapy of cutaneous tumours and skin metastases. Acta Oncol. 2018;57:874–882.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramirez L, Orlowski S, An D, et al. Electrochemotherapy on liver tumours in rabbits. Br J Cancer. 1998;77:2104–2111.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sersa G, Beravs K, Cemazar M, et al. Contrast enhanced MRI assessment of tumor blood volume after application of electric pulses. Electro- Magnetobiology. 1998;17:299–306.
   Google Scholar
• Gehl J, Skovsgaard T, Mir LM. Vascular reactions to in vivo electroporation: characterization and consequences for drug and gene delivery. Biochim Biophys Acta BBA - Gen Subj. 2002;1569:51–58.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sersa G, Jarm T, Kotnik T, et al. Vascular disrupting action of electroporation and electrochemotherapy with bleomycin in murine sarcoma. Br J Cancer. 2008;98:388–398.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gehl J, Geertsen PF. Efficient palliation of haemorrhaging malignant melanoma skin metastases by electrochemotherapy. Melanoma Res. 2000;10:585–589.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markelc B, Bellard E, Sersa G, et al. In vivo molecular imaging and histological analysis of changes induced by electric pulses used for plasmid DNA electrotransfer to the skin: a study in a dorsal window chamber in mice. J Membr Biol. 2012;245:545–554.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markelc B, Bellard E, Sersa G, et al. Increased permeability of blood vessels after reversible electroporation is facilitated by alterations in endothelial cell-to-cell junctions. J Control Release. 2018;276:30–41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sersa G, Cemazar M, Miklavcic D, et al. Tumor blood flow modifying effect of electrochemotherapy with bleomycin. Anticancer Res. 1999;19:4017–4022.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sersa G, Cemazar M, Parkins CS, et al. Tumour blood flow changes induced by application of electric pulses. Eur J Cancer. 1999;35:672–677.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sersa G, Krzic M, Sentjurc M, et al. Reduced blood flow and oxygenation in SA-1 tumours after electrochemotherapy with cisplatin. Br J Cancer. 2002;87:1047–1054.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanthou C, Kranjc S, Sersa G, et al. The endothelial cytoskeleton as a target of electroporation-based therapies. Mol Cancer Ther. 2006;5:3145–3152.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meulenberg CJW, Todorovic V, Cemazar M. Differential cellular effects of electroporation and electrochemotherapy in monolayers of human microvascular endothelial cells. PloS One. 2012;7:e52713.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kodama H, Shamay Y, Kimura Y, et al. Electroporation-induced changes in tumor vasculature and microenvironment can promote the delivery and increase the efficacy of sorafenib nanoparticles. Bioelectrochemistry Amst Neth. 2019;130:107328.
   Google Scholar
• Kis E, Baltás E, Á K, et al. Successful treatment of multiple basaliomas with bleomycin-based electrochemotherapy: a case series of three patients with Gorlin-Goltz Syndrome. Acta Derm Venereol. 2012;92:648–651.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campana LG, Mocellin S, Basso M, et al. Bleomycin-based electrochemotherapy: clinical outcome from a single institution’s experience with 52 patients. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009;16:191–199.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maor E, Ivorra A, Leor J, et al. The effect of irreversible electroporation on blood vessels. Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2007;6:307–312.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golberg A, Villiger M, Broelsch GF, et al. Skin regeneration with all accessory organs following ablation with irreversible electroporation. J Tissue Eng Regen Med. 2018;12:98–113.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weltmann KD, Von Woedtke T. Plasma medicine—current state of research and medical application. Plasma Phys Control Fusion. 2016;59:014031.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Privat-Maldonado A, Bengtson C, Razzokov J, et al. Modifying the tumour microenvironment: challenges and future perspectives for anticancer plasma treatments. Cancers (Basel). 2019;11:1920.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arndt S, Unger P, Berneburg M, et al. Cold atmospheric plasma (CAP) activates angiogenesis-related molecules in skin keratinocytes, fibroblasts and endothelial cells and improves wound angiogenesis in an autocrine and paracrine mode. J Dermatol Sci. 2018;89:181–190.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duchesne C, Banzet S, Lataillade -J-J, et al. Cold atmospheric plasma modulates endothelial nitric oxide synthase signalling and enhances burn wound neovascularisation. J Pathol. 2019;249:368–380.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nikitovic D, Corsini E, Kouretas D, et al. ROS-major mediators of extracellular matrix remodeling during tumor progression. Food Chem Toxicol. 2013;61:178–186.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keyvani A, Atyabi SM, Sardari S, et al. Effects of cold atmospheric plasma jet on collagen structure in different treatment times. Basic Res J Med Clin Sci. 2017;6:84–90.
   Google Scholar
• Dong X, Chen M, Wang Y, et al. A mechanistic study of plasma treatment effects on demineralized dentin surfaces for improved adhesive/dentin interface bonding. Clin Plasma Med. 2014;2:11–16.
   Google Scholar
• Samouillan V, Merbahi N, Yousfi M, et al. Effect of low-temperature plasma jet on thermal stability and physical structure of type I Collagen. IEEE Trans Plasma Sci. 2012;40:1688–1695.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiegand C, Fink S, Beier O, et al. Dose- and time-dependent cellular effects of cold atmospheric pressure plasma evaluated in 3D skin models. Skin Pharmacol Physiol. 2016;29:257–265.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arndt S, Unger P, Wacker E, et al. Cold atmospheric plasma (CAP) changes gene expression of key molecules of the wound healing machinery and improves wound healing in vitro and in vivo. PloS One. 2013;8:e79325–e79325.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi X, Cai J, Xu G, et al. Effect of cold plasma on cell viability and collagen synthesis in cultured murine fibroblasts. Plasma Sci Technol. 2016;18:353–359.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vijayarangan V, Delalande A, Dozias S, et al. Cold atmospheric plasma parameters investigation for efficient drug delivery in hela cells. IEEE Trans Radiat Plasma Med Sci. 2018;2:109–115.
   Google Scholar
• Jinno M, Tachibana K, Motomura H, et al. Improvement of efficiency and viability in plasma gene transfection by plasma minimization and optimization electrode configuration. Jpn J Appl Phys. 2016;55:07LG09.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu W, Lee S-J, Castro NJ, et al. Synergistic effect of cold atmospheric plasma and drug loaded core-shell nanoparticles on inhibiting breast cancer cell growth. Sci Rep. 2016;6:21974.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim GC, Kim GJ, Park SR, et al. Air plasma coupled with antibody-conjugated nanoparticles: a new weapon against cancer. J Phys Appl Phys. 2008;42:032005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang M, Geilich BM, Keidar M, et al. Killing malignant melanoma cells with protoporphyrin IX-loaded polymersome-mediated photodynamic therapy and cold atmospheric plasma. Int J Nanomedicine. 2017;12:4117–4127.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raavé R, van Kuppevelt TH, Daamen WF. Chemotherapeutic drug delivery by tumoral extracellular matrix targeting. J Control Release. 2018;274:1–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo J, Zeng H, Chen Y. Emerging Nano drug delivery systems targeting cancer-associated fibroblasts for improved antitumor effect and tumor drug penetration. Mol Pharm. 2020;17:1028–1048.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Steen SC, Raavé R, Langerak S, et al. Targeting the extracellular matrix of ovarian cancer using functionalized, drug loaded lyophilisomes. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2017;113:229–239.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li L, Zhou S, Lv N, et al. Photosensitizer-encapsulated ferritins mediate photodynamic therapy against cancer-associated fibroblasts and improve tumor accumulation of nanoparticles. Mol Pharm. 2018;15:3595–3599.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vail DM, Amantea MA, Colbern GT, et al. Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin: proof of principle using preclinical animal models and pharmacokinetic studies. Semin Oncol. 2004;31(6 Suppl 13):16–35. Elsevier.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dreher MR, Liu W, Michelich CR, et al. Tumor vascular permeability, accumulation, and penetration of macromolecular drug carriers. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2006;98:335–344.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang H, Lin Y, Nienhaus K, et al. The protein corona on nanoparticles as viewed from a nanoparticle-sizing perspective. WIREs Nanomedicine Nanobiotechnology. 2018;10:e1500.
   Google Scholar
• Cai R, Chen C. The Crown and the Scepter: roles of the protein corona in nanomedicine. Adv Mater Deerfield Beach Fla. 2019;31:e1805740.
   Google Scholar
• Appelboom G, Detappe A, LoPresti M, et al. Stereotactic modulation of blood-brain barrier permeability to enhance drug delivery. Neuro-Oncol. 2016;18:1601–1609.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hynynen K. Focused ultrasound for blood–brain disruption and delivery of therapeutic molecules into the brain. Expert Opin Drug Deliv. 2007;4:27–35.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorenzo MF, Thomas SC, Kani Y, et al. Temporal characterization of blood-brain barrier disruption with high-frequency electroporation. Cancers (Basel). 2019;11:1850.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar